Cristian Mihai ENESCU, Alexandru Lucian CURTU, Neculae SOFLETEA

Is Quercus virgiliana a distinct morphological and genetic entity among European white oaks?

The existence of Quercus virgiliana Ten. is a subject of debate among botanists and silviculturists. It was considered a distinct species, sometimes as an intraspecific taxonomic unit of Q. pubescens L., or was not even recognized as a taxon or infrataxon. This disagreement with regard to the taxonomic classification is explained by the morphological similarities between Q. virgiliana and Q. pubescens, with a small overlap between particular leaf and fruit traits. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the macromorphological fruit and leaf descriptors in Romanian populations of pubescent oaks. We wanted to find which traits discriminate between the 2 taxa. By using 7 microsatellite markers, we checked whether the 2 taxa have different genetic structures. A total of 918 individuals were sampled for morphological analyses from 20 stands across Romania. The length of cupula peduncle showed the highest discriminating power, but also leaf characters such as abaxial laminar pubescence, lamina length, sinus width, and length of lamina at largest width helped to discriminate between the 2 taxa. The analysis performed at 7 microsatellite loci revealed very little genetic differentiation between Q. pubescens and Q. virgiliana. Different genetic assignment tests provided no support for 2 genetic entities in our sample. This could be explained by the restricted number of loci used. However, the morphological differences found in this study suggest that Q. virgiliana is an intraspecific taxonomic unit of Q. pubescens rather than a distinct species.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Key words: Fruit morphology, leaf morphology, microsatellites, Quercus pubescens, Quercus virgiliana

Is Quercus virgiliana a distinct morphological and genetic entity among European white oaks?

Keywords:

Key words: Fruit morphology, leaf morphology, microsatellites, Quercus pubescens, Quercus virgiliana,

PDF

___

Abrudan IV, Marinescu V, Ionescu O, Ioras F, Horodnic SA, Sestras R (2009) Developments in the Romanian Forestry and its linkages with other sectors. Not Bot Hort Agrobot Cluj 37: 14–
Bartha D (2001) Quercus virgiliana Ten. In: Schutt P, Weisgerber H, Schuck HJ, Lang UM, Roloff A (Hrsg.): Enzyklopädie der Holzgewächse. Handbuch und Atlas der DendrologieECOMED Verlagsgesellschaft, Landsberg, Band III/2/25, pp. 1–
Borazan A, Babaç MT (2003) Morphometric leaf variation in oaks (Quercus) of Bolu, Turkey. Ann Bot Fennici 40: 233–242.
Bruschi P, Vendramin GG, Bussotti F, Grossoni P (2000) Morphological and molecular differentiations between Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl and Quercus pubescens Willd (Fagaceae) in Northern and Central Italy. Ann Bot 85: 325–333.
Bussotti F, Grossini P (1997) European and Mediterranean oaks (Quercus L.; Fagaceae): SEM characterization of the micromorphology of the abaxial leaf surface. Bot J Linn Soc 124: 183–199.
Camus A (1936–1954) Les Chênes. Monographie du genre Quercus. Paul Lechevalier, Paris.
Curtu AL, Moldovan IC, Enescu CM, Crăciunesc I, Șofletea N (2011a) Genetic differentiation between Quercus frainetto Ten and Q. pubescens Willd in Romania. Not Bot Hort Agrobot Cluj 39: 275–282.
Curtu AL, Șofletea N, Toader AV, Enescu CM (2011b) Leaf morphological and genetic differentiation between Quercus robur L. and its closest relative, the drought tolerant Q. pedunculiflora K Koch. Ann For Sci 68: 1163–1172.
Doniță N (2008) Quercus virgiliana Ten un arbore de interes pentru silvicultura din zonele aride. Rev Pădur 4: 18–19.
Drake D, Muller-Bombois D (1993) Population development of rain forest trees on chronosequence of Hawaiian lava flows. Ecology 74: 1012–1019.
Dupouey JL, Badeau V (1993) Morphological variability of oaks (Quercus robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl, Quercus pubescens Willd) in northeastern France: preliminary results. Ann For Sci 50: 35s–40s.
Earl DA, Von Holdt BM (2011) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4: 359–361.
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14: 2611–2620.
Fortini P, Viscosi V, Maiuro L, Fineschi S, Vendramin GG (2009) Comparative leaf surface morphology and molecular data of five oaks of the subgenus Quercus Oerst (Fagaceae). Plant Biosyst 143: 543–554.
Franjić J, Liber Z, Škvorc Ž, Idzojtic M, Sostrac R, Strancic Z (2006) Morphological and molecular differentiation of the Croatian populations of Quercus pubescens Willd (Fagaceae). Acta Soc Bot Pol 75: 123–130.
Goudet J (2002) FSTAT: a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices. Version 2.9.3.2. Available at http://unil.ch/izea/softwares/fstat.html and accessed on 26 May 2012.
Gugerli F, Walser J-C, Dounavi K, Holderengger R, Finkeldey R (2007) Coincidence of small-scale spatial discontinuities in leaf morphology and nuclear microsatellite variation of Quercus petraea and Q. robur in a mixed forest. Ann Bot 99: 713–722.
He HS, Hao Z, Mladenoff DJ, Shao G, Hu Y, Chang Y (2005) Simulating forest ecosystem response to climate warming incorporating spatial effects in northeastern China. J Biogeogr 32: 2043–2056.
Jedináková-Schmidtová J, Paule L, Magic D, Gomory D (2004) Morphological and genetic differentiation among the Central European White Oaks. For Genet 11: 263–271.
Jerše M, Batič M (2007) Morphological analysis of pubescent oak (Quercus pubescens Willd) in Slovenia. Zborik gazdarstva in lesarstva 83: 35–45.
Kardol P, Todd DE, Hanson PJ, Mullholand PJ (2010) Longterm successional forest dynamics: species and community responses to climatic variability. J Veg Sci 21: 627–642.
Kissling P (1977) Les poils des quatre espéces de chênes du Jura (Quercus pubescens, Q. petraea, Q. robur et Q. cerris). Ber Schweiz Bot Ges 87: 1–18.
Kleinschmit J (1993) Intraspecific variation of growth and adaptive traits in European oak species. Ann For Sci 50: 166–185.
Kremer A, Dupouey JL, Deans JD, Cottrel J, Csaikl UM, Finkeldey R, Espinel S, Jensen JS, Kleinschmit J, Van Dam B, Ducousso A, Forrest I, De Heredia UL, Lowe J, Tutkova M, Minro RC, Badeau V (2002) Leaf morphological differentiation between Quercus robur and Quercus petraea is stable across western European mixed stand. Ann For Sci 59: 777–787.
Lepais O, Leger V, Gerber S (2006) Short Note: High throughput microsatellite genotyping in oak species. Silvae Genet 55: 238–240.
Menitsky Yu L (2005) Oaks of Asia. Science Publishers, Enfield, NH, USA: 44–108.
Neophytou C, Aravanopoulos FA, Fink S, Dounavi A (2010) Detecting interspecific and geographic differentiation patterns in two interfertile oak species (Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. robur L.) using small sets of microsatellite markers. For Ecol Manage 259: 2026–2035.
Nixon KC (1993) Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names. Ann For Sci 50: 25s–34s.
Paetkau D, Calvert W, Stirling I, Strobeck C (1995) Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol 4: 347–354.
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GenALEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 288–295.
Petit JR, El Mousadik A, Pons O (1998) Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conserv Biol 12: 844–855.
Petit JR, Excoffier L (2009) Gene flow and species delimitation. Trends Ecol Evol 24: 386–393.
Ponton S, Dupouey J-L, Dreyer E (2004) Leaf morphology as species indicator in seedlings of Quercus robur L. and Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl: modulation by irradiance and growth flush. Ann For Sci 61: 73–80.
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155: 945– 9
Rousset F (2008) Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour 8: 103–106.
Sanda V, Barabaş N, Ştefănuţ S (2004) Atlas Florae Romanie III. Genul Quercus. Ion Borcea, Bacău.
Schwarz O (1993) Quercus L. In: Tutin TG, Burges NA, Chater AO (Eds.) Flora Europaea. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge pp. 72–76.
Škvorc Ž, Franjić J, Idžojtić M (2005) Population structure of Quercus pubescens Willd (Fagaceae) in Croatia according to morphology of leaves. Acta Bot Hung 47: 183–196.
Stănescu V, Şofletea N, Popescu O (1997) Flora forestieră lemnoasă a României. Ceres, București.
StatSoft (2008) STATISTICA for Windows [Software-System For Data Analysis].
Şofletea N, Curtu L (2007) Dendrologie. Editura Universităţii Transilvania, Brașov.
Toader VA, Moldovan IC, Şofletea N, Abrudan IV, Curtu AL (2009) DNA isolation and amplification in oak species (Quercus spp.). Bulletin of Transilvania University of Braşov, Series II: Forestry • Wood Engineering • Agriculture and Food Engineering 2: 45–
Trinajstić I (2007) About the problem of differentiation between the oaks Quercus pubescens Willd and Quercus virgiliana (Ten.) Pregledni Članci – Rewievs UDK 630 * 164. Šumarski list br. 1– CXXXI: 57–60.
Van Oosterhout C, Hutchinson WF, Wills DPM, Shipley P (2004) MICRO-CHECKER: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Mol Ecol Notes 4: 535–538.
Viscosi V, Fortini P, Slice DE, Loy A, Blasi C (2009) Geometric morphometric analyses of leaf variation in four oak species of the subgenus Quercus (Fagaceae). Plant Biosyst 143: 575–587.
Viscosi V, Fortini P, D’Imperio M (2011) A statistical approach to species identification on morphological traits of European white oaks: evidence of morphological structure in Italian populations of Quercus pubescens sensu lato. Acta Bot Gallica 158: 175–188.
Zeng Y-F, Liao W-J, Petit RJ, Zhang D-Y (2010) Exploring species limits in two closely related Chinese oaks. PloS ONE 5(11): e155