Impact of irrigation water quality, irrigation systems, irrigation rates and soil amendments on tomato production in sandy calcareous soil

Low quality water for irrigation can impose a major environmental constraint to crop productivity. Effects of water quality, irrigation system, irrigation rates, and type of amendment on the yield and quality of tomato plants were investigated during the 2 growing seasons of 2005/2006 and 2006/2007. Two water quality treatments (fresh water with electrical conductivity (EC) of 0.86 dS m-1, and saline water with EC of 3.6 dS m-1), 2 drip irrigation systems (surface and subsurface), 3 irrigation rates (2, 4, and 6 L h-1) and 3 amendment types (clay deposit, and organic matter and without amendment) were applied. The results revealed that the water quality significantly affected both the yield and water use efficiency (WUE). The decreases in yields due to using low quality water were 39.2% and 17.6% for the first and second season, respectively. At a high irrigation rate (6 L h-1), tomato yields were higher and decreased significantly at a low irrigation rate (2 L h-1) in both seasons. When fresh water was used, the amendment type affected both the yield and WUE in both seasons. Clay deposit increased the yield by 11.7% and 15% in the control treatments in the first and second season, respectively. Low quality of irrigation water significantly increased fruit pH, and significantly decreased the other 3 traits (average fruit weight, total soluble solid, and fruit thickness). The influence of salinity was more obvious on average fruit weight than the other 2 traits. Application of clay deposits on sandy soils modifies the distribution of soil water content in the root zone area where water could be retained by clay deposits applied in the subsurface layer. Using saline water increased the salt accumulation in the surface to about 15 dS m-1 compared with 5 dS m-1 for fresh water treatments. The clay deposit amendments for subsurface sandy soils using good irrigation water show quite valuable effects in storing irrigation water and then enhance the root growth and the yield.

Impact of irrigation water quality, irrigation systems, irrigation rates and soil amendments on tomato production in sandy calcareous soil

Low quality water for irrigation can impose a major environmental constraint to crop productivity. Effects of water quality, irrigation system, irrigation rates, and type of amendment on the yield and quality of tomato plants were investigated during the 2 growing seasons of 2005/2006 and 2006/2007. Two water quality treatments (fresh water with electrical conductivity (EC) of 0.86 dS m-1, and saline water with EC of 3.6 dS m-1), 2 drip irrigation systems (surface and subsurface), 3 irrigation rates (2, 4, and 6 L h-1) and 3 amendment types (clay deposit, and organic matter and without amendment) were applied. The results revealed that the water quality significantly affected both the yield and water use efficiency (WUE). The decreases in yields due to using low quality water were 39.2% and 17.6% for the first and second season, respectively. At a high irrigation rate (6 L h-1), tomato yields were higher and decreased significantly at a low irrigation rate (2 L h-1) in both seasons. When fresh water was used, the amendment type affected both the yield and WUE in both seasons. Clay deposit increased the yield by 11.7% and 15% in the control treatments in the first and second season, respectively. Low quality of irrigation water significantly increased fruit pH, and significantly decreased the other 3 traits (average fruit weight, total soluble solid, and fruit thickness). The influence of salinity was more obvious on average fruit weight than the other 2 traits. Application of clay deposits on sandy soils modifies the distribution of soil water content in the root zone area where water could be retained by clay deposits applied in the subsurface layer. Using saline water increased the salt accumulation in the surface to about 15 dS m-1 compared with 5 dS m-1 for fresh water treatments. The clay deposit amendments for subsurface sandy soils using good irrigation water show quite valuable effects in storing irrigation water and then enhance the root growth and the yield.

___

  • Abdelgawad G, Arslan A, Gaihbe A and Kadouri F (2005) The effect of saline irrigation water management and salt tolerant tomato varieties on sustainable production of tomato in Syria (1999- 2002). Agric Water Manage 73: 39-53.
  • Adams P and Ho LC (1989) Effects of constant and fluctuating salin- ity on the yield quality and calcium status of tomatoes. J Hort Sci 64: 725-732.
  • Al-Omran AM, El-Damry S, Nadeem M and Al-Eter A (2008) Im- pact of irrigation regime and emitter depth on tomato growth and yield. King Saud J Agric Science (accepted).
  • Al-Omran AM, Choudahry MI, Shalaby AA and Mursi MM (2002) Impact of nature clay deposits on water movement in calcareous sandy soil. Arid Land Res Manage 16: 185-193.
  • Al-Omran AM, Falatah AM, Sheta AS and Al-Harbi AR (2004) Clay deposits for water management of sandy soils. Arid Land Res. Manage 18: 171-183.
  • Al-Omran AM, Sheta AS, Falatah AM and Al-Harbi AR (2005) Effect of drip irrigation on squash (Cucurbita pepo) yield and water- use efficiency in sandy calcareous soils amended with clay de- posits. Agric Water Manage 73: 43-55.
  • Al-Rashed MF and Sherif MM (2000) Water resources in the GCC countries: overview. Water Resources Manage 14: 59-75.
  • Ayars JE, Phene CJ, Hutmacher RB, Davis KR, Schoneman RA, Vail SS and Mead RM (1999) Subsurface drip irrigation of row crops: a review of 15 years of research at the Water Management Re- search Laboratory. Agric Water Manage 42: 1-27.
  • Bar-Yosef B, Stammers C and Sagiv B (1980) Growth of trickle-irri- gated tomato as related to rooting volume and uptake of N and water. Agron J 72: 815-822.
  • Bauder TA, Cardon GE, Waskam RM and Davis JG (2004) Irrigation water quality. Calorado State University. Cooperative Extension Agriculture 506.
  • Cuartero J and Fernandez-Munoz R (1999) Tomato and salinity. Sci- entia Horticulturae 78: 83-125.
  • Ertek A, Sensoy S, Ildis M and Kabay T (2002) Estimation of the most suitable irrigation frequencies and quantities in eggplant grown in greenhouse condition by using pan evaporation coefficient. KS Univ Life Sci Eng J 5: 57-67 (in Turkish).
  • Golden Software. 2000. Contouring and 3D surface mapping for sci- entists and engineers version 7. Golden Software, Inc. www.goldensoftware.com
  • Keutgen A and Pawelizik E (2007) Modifications of taste-relevant compounds in strawberry fruit under NaCl salinity. Food Chemistry 105: 1487-1494.
  • Kirda C, Cetin M, Dasgan Y, Topcu S, Kaman H, Ekici B, Derici MR and Ozguven AI (2004) Yield response of greenhouse-grown tomato to partial root drying and conventional deficit irriga- tion. Agric Water Manage 69: 191-201.
  • Kulte A (1986) Methods of soil analysis. Part 1. Physical and miner- alogical methods. 2nd ed. Agronomy No. 9 American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
  • Lamm FR and Trooien TP (2003) Subsurface drip irrigation for corn productivity: a review of 10 years of research in Kansas. Irrig Sci 22: 195-200.
  • Machado RMA, Rosario M, Oliveira G and Portas CAM (2003) Tomato root distribution, yield and fruit quality under subsur- face drip irrigation. Plant and Soil 255: 333-341.
  • Machado RMA and Oliveira G (2003) Comparison of tomato root distributions by minirhizotron and destructive sampling. Plant and Soil 255: 375-385.
  • Maas EV (1986) Salt tolerance of plants. Applied Agriculture Research 1: 12-26.
  • Malash NM, Flowers TJ and Ragab R (2005) Effect of irrigation sys- tem and water management practices using saline and non- saline water on tomato production. Agric Water Manage 78: 25-38.
  • Malash NM, Flowers TJ and Ragab R (2008) Effect of irrigation meth- ods, management and salinity of irrigation water on tomato yield, soil moisture and salinity distribution. Irrig Sci 26: 313- 323.
  • Oliveira MRG, Calado AM and Portas CAM (1996) Tomato root dis- tribution under drip irrigation. J Am Soc Hort Sci 121: 644-648.
  • Olympios CM, Karapanos IC, Lionoudakis K and Apidianakis I (2003) The growth, yield and quality of greenhouse tomato in relation to salinity applied at different stages of plant growth. Acta Hort 609.
  • Onest A, Demir K, Cakmak B and Kendirili B (1995) Drip Irrigation Scheduling in Head Lettuce Grown in Greenhouse Condition (In Turkish). 5. Ulusal Kulturteknik Kongresi Bildirileri, Kemer- Antalya, p.208
  • Phene CJ, Davis KR, Hutmacher RB and McCormick RL (1987) Ad- vantages of subsurface drip irrigation for processing tomatoes. Acta Hort 200: 101-113.
  • Reina-Sanchez A, Romero-Aranda R and Cuartero J (2005) Plant water uptake and water use efficiency of greenhouse tomato cul- tivars irrigated with saline water. Agric Water Manage 78: 54-66.
  • Sanders DC, Howell TA, Hile MMS, Hodges L, Meek D and Phene CJ (1989) Yield and quality of processing tomatoes in response to irrigation rate and schedule. J Am Soc Hort Sci 114: 904-908.
  • Shalhevet J (1994) Using water of marginal quality for crop produc- tion: major issues. Agric Water Manage 25: 233-269.
  • Sheta AS, Al-Omran AM, Falatah AM and Al-Harbi AR (2006) Effect of clay deposit, physiochemical and intermittent evaporation characteristics of Torripsamment. Arid Land Research and Manage 20: 295-307.
  • Subbarao GV and Johansen C (1994) Strategies and scope for im- proving salinity tolerance in crop plants. In: Pessarakli, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Plant Crop Stress. Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp 559-579.
  • Van-Ieperen W (1996) Effects of different day and night salinity lev- els on vegetative growth, yield and quality of tomato. J Hort Sci 71: 99-111.
  • Wan S, Kang Y, Wang D, Liu SH and Feng L (2007) Effect of drip ir- rigation with saline water on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) yield and water use in semi-humid area. Agric Water Manage 90: 63-74.
  • Yurtseven E, Kesmez GD and Unlukara A (2005) The effects of water salinity and potassium levels on yield, fruit quality and water consumption of native center anatolian tomato species (Lyco- persicon esculentum). Agric Water Manage 78: 128-135.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Changes in hay yield and quality of bulbous barley at different phenological stages

Ferat UZUN

Evaluation of fertilizing schemes for direct-seeding rice fields in Taihu Lake Basin, China

Yong LI, Lin Zhang YANG, Chao WANG

Determining the levels of genetic variation using SSR markers in three Turkish barley materials known as Tokak

Nejdet KANDEMİR, Ahmet YILDIRIM, Rahime GÜNDÜZ

Antepfıstığında azotlu ve fosforlu gübrelemenin verim, bazı meyve özellikleri, hormon konsantrasyonları ve periyodiste üzerine etkisi

Nurdan Tuna GÜNEŞ, Yeşim OKAY, A. İlhami KÖKSAL, Mehmet KÖROĞLU

Allelopathic potential of Euphorbia helioscopia L. against wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.)

Asif TANVEER, Aqeel REHMAN, Muhammad Mansoor JAVAID, Rana Nadeem ABBAS

The effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization on yield, some fruit characteristics, hormone concentrations, and alternate bearing in pistachio

Mehmet KÖROĞLU, Yeşim OKAY, Nurdan Tuna GÜNEŞ, A. İlhami KÖKSAL

The effects of biogas slurry on the production and quality of maize fodder

Md. Rafiqul ISLAM, Syed Mohammad Ehsanur RAHMAN, Md. Mukhlesur RAHMAN, Deog Hwan OH, Chang Six RA

Impact of irrigation water quality, irrigation systems, irrigation rates and soil amendments on tomato production in sandy calcareous soil

Abdulrasoul M. AL-OMRAN, A. R. AL-HARBI, Mahmoud A. WAHB-ALLAH

Neutral sulfite semi-chemical pulping of rapeseed residues

Mohammad AHMADI, Ahmad Jahan LATIBARI, Mehdi FAEZIPOUR, Sahab HEDJAZI

Linear-like discrete-time fuzzy control in the regulation of irrigation canals

Ömer Faruk DURDU