Critical Period of Weed Control in Three Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars

Field experiments were carried out at the Agricultural Research Station, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, in 2004-2005 and 2005-2006. Three winter oilseed rape cultivars (Okapi, Licord, and SLM046) with 12 weed interference durations were evaluated in a factorial experiment based on a randomized complete block design with 3 replications. The experiments consisted of 2 sets of treatments. In the first set, the crop was kept weed-free until the growth stages of 4-leaf, 8-leaf, stem elongation, flowering, and podding. In the second set, weeds were permitted to grow within the crop until the above-mentioned growth stages. Weedy and weed-free checks were also included in the study. Different weed interference durations and interaction of cultivar * year affected significantly the grain, oil, and biological yield, but not the percentage of oil. Minimum values of these traits were observed under the full weed-infestation condition. Maximum values for grain yield, oil and biological yield belonged to the weed free control and SLM046 cultivar in both years. Regression models showed that in order to prevent >10% grain and oil yield loss, canola must be kept weed free between the 6-leaf stage and initial flowering (47-110 DAE) and for biological yield between the 7-leaf stage and stem elongation (52-94 DAE).

Critical Period of Weed Control in Three Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars

Field experiments were carried out at the Agricultural Research Station, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Tabriz, in 2004-2005 and 2005-2006. Three winter oilseed rape cultivars (Okapi, Licord, and SLM046) with 12 weed interference durations were evaluated in a factorial experiment based on a randomized complete block design with 3 replications. The experiments consisted of 2 sets of treatments. In the first set, the crop was kept weed-free until the growth stages of 4-leaf, 8-leaf, stem elongation, flowering, and podding. In the second set, weeds were permitted to grow within the crop until the above-mentioned growth stages. Weedy and weed-free checks were also included in the study. Different weed interference durations and interaction of cultivar * year affected significantly the grain, oil, and biological yield, but not the percentage of oil. Minimum values of these traits were observed under the full weed-infestation condition. Maximum values for grain yield, oil and biological yield belonged to the weed free control and SLM046 cultivar in both years. Regression models showed that in order to prevent >10% grain and oil yield loss, canola must be kept weed free between the 6-leaf stage and initial flowering (47-110 DAE) and for biological yield between the 7-leaf stage and stem elongation (52-94 DAE).

___

  • Ahmad Khan, I., H. Gul and M. Azim Khan, 2003. Efficacy of post- emergence herbicide for controlling weeds in canola. Asian J. Plant Sci. 3: 294-296.
  • Baldwin, F.L. and P.W. Santelmann. 1980. Weed science in integrated weed management. Bioscience. 30: 675-678.
  • Blackshaw, R.E., D. Lemerle, R. Mailer and K.R. Young, 2002.
  • Influence of wild radish on yield and quality of canola. Weed Sci. 50: 344-349.
  • Cruse, D., N. Ampony, R. Labrada and A. Merago, 1995. Weed management in legume crops: bean, soybean and cowpea. In: "Weed management for development countries". FAO Plant Production and Protection. pp:283-287.
  • CPA. 2002. http://www.baa.org.uk/knowledgebase/6_prod_peswor. asp.
  • Eyherabide, J.J. and M.G. Cendoya, 2002. Critical period of weed control in soybean for full field and in-furrow interference. Weed Sci. 50: 162- 166.
  • Gibson, L. and M. Liebman, 2003. A laboratory exercise for teaching critical period for weed control concepts. Weed Tech. 17: 403- 411.
  • Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez, 1984. Statistical procedures for agricultural research (2nd ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
  • Hager, G.A., M.L. Wax and A.G. Bollero, 2002. Common water hemp (Amaranthus rudis) interference in soybean. Weed Sci. 50: 607- 610.
  • Knezevic, S.Z., S.P. Evans, E.E. Blankenship, R.C. Van Acker and J.L. Lindquist, 2002. Critical period for weed control: the concept and data analysis. Weed Sci. 50: 773-786.
  • Knezevic, S.Z., S.P. Evans and M. Mainz, 2003. Row spacing influence the critical timing for weed removal in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Tech. 17: 666-673.
  • Martin, S.G., R.C. Van Acker and L.F. Friesen, 2001. Critical period of weed control in spring canola. Weed Sci. 49: 326-333.
  • McMullan, P.M., J.K. Daun and D.R. DeClercq, 1994. Effect of wild mustard (Brassica kaber) competition on yield and quality of triazine-tolerant and triazine-susceptible canola (Brassica napus andBrassica rapa), Can. J. Plant Sci. 74: 369-374.
  • Ratkowsky, D.A., 1990. Handbook of Nonlinear Regression Models. New York: Marcel Dekker. Pp:123-147.
  • SAS Institute, 1988. SAS / STAT. Guide for personal computer. Release 6.04. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
  • Seem, J.E., N.G. Cramer and D.V. Monks, 2003. Critical weed-free period for ‘Beauregard’ sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). Weed Tech. 17: 686-695.
  • Singh, M., M.C. Saxena and N.I. Haddad, 1996. Estimation of critical period of weed control. Weed Sci. 44: 273-283.
  • Swanton, C. J. and S. F. Weise, 1991. Integrated weed management: the rational approach. Weed Tech. 5: 657-663.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Determination of Pollen Production and Quality of Some Local and Foreign Walnut Genotypes in Turkey

Mehmet SÜTYEMEZ

Effect of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) population and nitrogen levels on some aagronomic traits of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Meher GUL, Gul HASSAN, Imtiaz KHAN, Muhammad Ishfaq KHAN

Partial Purification of Hen Egg White Lysozyme by Ethanol Precipitation Method and Determination of the Thermal Stability of Its Lyophilized Form

Seyhun GEMİLİ, Emin Selahattin UMDU, Nilgün YAPRAK, Fatma Işık ÜSTOK, Fatih Yalçın Güneş YENER

Selection of Chestnuts (Castanea sativa Mill.) Grown in Nazilli District, Turkey

Engin ERTAN, Güner SEFEROĞLU, Gonca Günver DALKILIÇ, F. Ekmel TEKİNTAŞ

Integrated Management of Stem Rot Disease (Sclerotium rolfsii) of Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Using Rhizobium and Trichoderma harzianum (ITCC - 4572)

S. GANESAN, R. GANESH KUPPUSAMY, R. SEKAR

Critical Period of Weed Control in Three Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica napus L.) Cultivars

Javad HAMZEI, Adel Dabbagh Mohammady NASAB, Farrokh Rahimzadeh KHOIE, Aziz JAVANSHIR

Effect of Wild Oat (Avena fatua L.) Population and Nitrogen Levels on Some Agronomic Traits of Spring Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Imtiaz KHAN, Gul HASSAN, Muhammad Ishfaq KHAN, Meher GUL

Relationships between Remotely Sensed Data and Biomass Components in a Big Sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) Dominated Area in Yellowstone National Park

Mustafa MİRİK, Jack E. NORLAND, Mario E. BIONDINI, Robert L. CRABTREE, Gerald J. MICHELS