Comparison of Sea Buckthorn Genotypes (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Based on RAPD and FAME Data

FAME and RAPD profiles were used to examine biochemical and genetic relationships between 10 selected sea buckthorn genotypes found in the same area of Eastern Anatolia. Fatty acid composition of sea buckthorn berries was determined using gas chromatography. Fatty acid results showed that there were differences between genotypes in both the percent and presence of fatty acids in the berries. Myristic acid was detected only in berries of the ESB8 and ESB9 genotypes. Nervonic acid was detected only in the ESB5 genotype and linoleic acid was detected only in the ESB4 genotype. RAPD data also showed that the ESB4 genotype was in a group distinct from the others. According to these results, it can be concluded that both the absence of linoleic acid and the use of RAPD data could be useful indicators for the characterization and grouping of sea buckthorn genotypes.

Comparison of Sea Buckthorn Genotypes (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Based on RAPD and FAME Data

FAME and RAPD profiles were used to examine biochemical and genetic relationships between 10 selected sea buckthorn genotypes found in the same area of Eastern Anatolia. Fatty acid composition of sea buckthorn berries was determined using gas chromatography. Fatty acid results showed that there were differences between genotypes in both the percent and presence of fatty acids in the berries. Myristic acid was detected only in berries of the ESB8 and ESB9 genotypes. Nervonic acid was detected only in the ESB5 genotype and linoleic acid was detected only in the ESB4 genotype. RAPD data also showed that the ESB4 genotype was in a group distinct from the others. According to these results, it can be concluded that both the absence of linoleic acid and the use of RAPD data could be useful indicators for the characterization and grouping of sea buckthorn genotypes.

___

  • Ağar, G., A. Adıguzel, O. Barış, M. Şengül, M. Güllüce, F. Şahin and O.F. Bayrak. 2006. RAPD and FAME analyses of Vicia species growing in eastern Anatolia region of Turkey. Ann. Bot. Fennici. 43: 241- 249.
  • Aitzetmuller, K. 1993. Capillary GLC fatty acid fingerprints of seed lipids-a tool in plant chemotaxonomy? J. High Resol. Chromatogr. 16: 488-490.
  • Baytop, T. 1999. Therapy with medicinal plants in Turkey (Past and Present). Nobel Press, İstanbul (in Turkish).
  • Bekker, N.P. and A.I. Glushenkova. 2001. Components of certain species of the Elaeagnaceae family. Chem. Nat. Compds. 37: 97- 116.
  • Chen G., Y. Wang, C. Zhao, H. Korpelainen and C. Li. 2008. Genetic diversity of Hippophae rhamnoides populations at varying altitudes in the wolong natural reserve of China as revealed by ISSR markers. Silvae Gen. 57: 29-36.
  • Çakır, A. 2004. Essential oil and fatty acid composition of the fruits of Hippophae rhamnoides L. (Sea Buckthorn) and Myrtus communis L. from Turkey. Biochem Syst Ecol. 32: 809-816.
  • Ercişli S., E. Orhan, Ö. Özdemir and M. Şengül. 2007a. The genotypic effects on the chemical composition and antioxidant activity of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) berries grown in Turkey. Scientia Hort. 115: 27-33.
  • Ercişli, S., G. Ağar, E. Orhan, N. Yıldırım and Y. Hızarcı. 2007b. Interspecific variability of RAPD and fatty acid composition of some pomegranate cultivars (Punica granatum L.) growing in Southern Anatolia Region in Turkey. Biochem Syst Ecol. 35: 764- 769.
  • Kawecki, Z., M. Szalkiewicz and A. Bieniek. 2004. The common sea buckthorn-a valuable fruit. J. Fruit Ornam. Plant Res. 12: 183- 193.
  • Lin R.C., Z.S. Ding, L.B. Li and T.Y. Kuang. 2001. A rapid and efficient DNA minipreparation suitable for screening transgenic plants. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 19: 379a-379e.
  • Liu R., J. Yang and L. Gao. 2007. ISSR analysis of Chinese seabuckthorn and Russian seabuckthorn. Acta Bot. Boreali-Occid. Sin. 27: 671- 677.
  • Özen, H.C., M. Başhan, Z. Toker and C. Keskin. 2004. 3-Hydroxy fatty acids from the flowers of Hypericum lysimachioides. Turk. J. Chem. 28: 223-226.
  • Ranjith, A., K.S. Kumar, V.V. Venugopalan, C. Arumughan, R.C. Sawhney and V. Singh. 2006. Fatty acids, tocols, and carotenoids in pulp oil of three sea buckthorn species (H. rhamnoides, H. salicifolia, and H. tibetana) grown in the Indian Himalayas. JAOCS. 88: 359-364.
  • Ruan, C. and D.Q. Li. 2002. Analysis on the community characteristics of Hippophae rhamnoides L. plantation and water and nutrition of woodland in Loess Hilly Region. J. Appl. Ecol. 13: 1061-1064.
  • Ruan, C., P. Qin, J. Zheng and Z. He. 2004. Genetic relationships among some cultivars of sea buckthorn from China, Russia and Mongolia based on RAPD analysis. Sci. Hortic. 101: 417-426.
  • Sabir, S.M., S.D. Ahmed and N. Lodhi. 2003. Morphological and biochemical variation in Hippophae rhammnoides ssp. turketanica, a multipurpose plant for fragile mountains of Pakistan. S. Afr. J. Bot. 69: 587-592.
  • Sabir, S.M., H. Maqsood, S.D. Ahmed, A.H. Shah and M.Q. Khan. 2005. Chemical and nutritional constituents of sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides ssp. turkestanica) berries from Pakistan. Ital. J. Food Sci. 17: 455-462.
  • Sheng, H.M., L.Z. An, T. Chen, S.J. Xu, G.X. Liu, X.L. Zheng, L.L. Pu, Y.J. Liu and Y.S. Lian. 2006. Analysis of genetic diversity and relationships among and within species of Hippophae (Elaeagnaceae) based on RAPD markers. Plant Syst. and Evol. 260: 25-37.
  • Singh, R., S.N. Mishra, S.K. Dwivedi and Z. Ahmed. 2006. Genetic variation in seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) population of cold arid Ladakh (India) using RAPD markers. Curr. Sci. 91: 1321-1322.
  • Tiitinen, K.M., B. Yang, G.G. Haraldsson, S. Jonsdottir and H.P. Kallio. 2006. Fast analysis of sugars, fruit acids, and vitamin C in sea buckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides) varieties. J. Agr. Food Chem. 54: 2508-2513.
  • Vijayan K., C.V. Nair and S.N. Chatterjee. 2005. Molecular characterization of mulberry genetic resources indigenous to India. Genet. Resour. Crop Ev. 52: 77-86.
  • Williams, J.G.K., M.K. Hanafey, J.A. Rafalski and S.V. Tingey. 1993. Genetic analysis using random amplified polymorphic DNA markers. Methods Enzymol. 218: 704-740.
  • Wolff, K. and M. Morgan-Richards. 1999. The use of RAPD data in the analysis of population genetic structure: case studies of Alkanna (Boraginaceae) and Plantago (Plantaginaceae). In: Molecular Systematics and Plant Evolution. (Eds. P. Hollingsworth, R. Bateman and R. Gornall), Taylor & Francis, London, pp. 51-73.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-011X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Feeding and foraging behaviour in two coccinellid predators: Scymnus Ievaillanti muls. and Cycloneda sanguinea L.

Ali Arda IŞIKBER

Genotypic differences for reproductive growth, yield, and yield components in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)

Mehmet ARSLAN, Mehmet Emin ÇALIŞKAN, Sevgi ÇALIŞKAN

Performance Analysis of Collective Set-Move Lateral Sprinkler Irrigation Systems used in Central Anatolia

İdris BAHÇECİ, Ali Fuat TARI, Nazmi DİNÇ, Pınar BAHÇECİ

Comparison of Sea Buckthorn Genotypes (Hippophae rhamnoides L.) Based on RAPD and FAME Data

Sezai ERCİŞLİ, Emine ORHAN, Nalan YILDIRIM, Güleray AĞAR

Development of a Precision Seed Drill for Oilseed Rape

Ebrahim AHMADI, Hamid Reza GHASSEMZADEH, Mohammad MOGHADDAM, Kyeong Uk KIM

Feeding and Foraging Behaviour in Two Coccinellid Predators: Scymnus levaillanti Muls. and Cycloneda sanguinea L.

Ali Arda IŞIKBER

Biological, serological, and molecular characterization of citrus tristeza virus ısolates from different citrus cultivation regions of Turkey

Bayram ÇEVİK, Savaş KORKMAZ, Serkan ÖNDER, N. Kemal KOÇ

Effects of Loaf Weight and Storage Time on the Qualitative Properties of White and Traditional Vakfıkebir Breads

H. Gürbüz KOTANCILAR, K. Emre GERÇEKASLAN, M. Murat KARAOĞLU

Pilot Study for an Assessment of Vegetation Structure for Steppe Rangelands of Central Anatolia

Hüseyin Kansur FIRINCIOĞLU, Bilal ŞAHİN, Steven SEEFELDT, Fehmi MERT, Basri Hakan HAKYEMEZ, Mecit VURAL

Yerfıstığında (Arachis hypogaea L.) Generatif Büyüme, Verim ve Verim Unsurları Yönünden Genotipik Farklılıklar

Sevgi ÇALIŞKAN, Mehmet Emin ÇALIŞKAN, Mehmet ARSLAN