Comparative Response of Two Olive (Olea europaea L.) Cultivars to Salinity

Two olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars, Leccino and Barnea, were exposed to increasing concentrations of NaCl (control, 2560, 5120 and 7680 mg l-1 of NaCl, which is equal to 4.0 dS m-1, 8.0 dS m-1 and 12.0 dS m-1 salinity) in a sand culture. Plants were harvested and separated into different organs. Thin root, thick root, shoot and leaves were analysed for Na+, Cl-, K+, Ca+2 and Mg+2 contents. Dry weights of the plants were determined. Shoot elongation was also measured. Increasing NaCl inhibited growth of the plants. However, this effect was only statistically significant in Barnea. The growth of Leccino was not statistically affected by the salinity. Cultivars took up similar amounts of NaCl by thin roots but translocated to leaves in different quantities. Salinity negatively affected the K+, Ca+2 and Mg+2 contents of plant tissues. On the whole, the major effect of the NaCl treatment was observed in the K+ content, followed by Ca+2 and Mg+2. The Na+/K+ ratio of the plants increased with increasing salt treatments. The results clearly show that Olea europaea L. cultivars may possess an effective salt exclusion mechanism operating in the root system.

Comparative Response of Two Olive (Olea europaea L.) Cultivars to Salinity

Two olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars, Leccino and Barnea, were exposed to increasing concentrations of NaCl (control, 2560, 5120 and 7680 mg l-1 of NaCl, which is equal to 4.0 dS m-1, 8.0 dS m-1 and 12.0 dS m-1 salinity) in a sand culture. Plants were harvested and separated into different organs. Thin root, thick root, shoot and leaves were analysed for Na+, Cl-, K+, Ca+2 and Mg+2 contents. Dry weights of the plants were determined. Shoot elongation was also measured. Increasing NaCl inhibited growth of the plants. However, this effect was only statistically significant in Barnea. The growth of Leccino was not statistically affected by the salinity. Cultivars took up similar amounts of NaCl by thin roots but translocated to leaves in different quantities. Salinity negatively affected the K+, Ca+2 and Mg+2 contents of plant tissues. On the whole, the major effect of the NaCl treatment was observed in the K+ content, followed by Ca+2 and Mg+2. The Na+/K+ ratio of the plants increased with increasing salt treatments. The results clearly show that Olea europaea L. cultivars may possess an effective salt exclusion mechanism operating in the root system.

___

  • Ashraf, M. 2002. Salt tolerance of cotton: Some new advances. Critical Review in Plant Sciences, 21: 1-30.
  • Ashraf, M. and S. Ahmad. 2000. Influence of sodium chloride on ion accumulation, yield components, and fiber characteristics in salt- tolerant and salt-sensitive lines of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Field Crops Res. 66: 115-127.
  • Ben-Hayin, G., U. Kafkafi. and R. Ganmore-Neumann. 1987. Role of internal potassium in maintaining growth of cultured citrus cells on increasing NaCl and CaCl2concentration. Plant Physiol. 85: 434.
  • Benlloch, M., F. Arboleda, D. Barranco and R. Fernandez-Escobar. 1991. Response of young olive trees to sodium and boron excess in irrigation water. Hort Science. 26: 867-870.
  • Chartzoulakis, K., M. Loupassaki, M. Bertaki and I. Androulakis. 2002. Effects of NaCl salinity on growth, ion content and CO2 assimilation rate of six olive cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae. 96: 235-247.
  • Flowers, T.J., P.F. Troke and A.R. Yeo. 1977. The mechanism of salt tolerance in halophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 28: 89-121.
  • Gorham, L. 1990. Salt tolerance in the triticale: Ion discrimination in rye and triticale. J. Exp. Botany 4: 601-614.
  • Gratten, S.R. and C.M. Grieve. 1999. Mineral nutrient acquisition and response by plants grown in saline environments. In: Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. 2ndedition. (Ed. M. Pessarakli). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, pp. 203-229
  • Greenway, H. and R. Munns. 1980. Mechanism of salt tolerance in non- halophytes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31: 149-190.
  • Hale, M.G. and D.M. Orcutt. 1987. The Physiology of Plants under Stress. John Wiley and Sons Inc. NY, USA.
  • Hartmann, H.T., K. Uriu and O. Lillehand. 1966. Olive Nutrition. (Ed. N.F. Childers). Temperate to Tropical Fruit Nutrition. Hort. Publications, Rutgers State University. pp. 252-261
  • Hoagland, D.R. and D.I. Arnon. 1950. The Water Culture Method for Growing Plants Without Soil. Circular 347, College of Agriculture, University of California, Berkeley.
  • Jacoby, B. 1979. Sodium recirculation and loss from Phaseolus vulgaris L. Ann. Bot. 43: 741-744.
  • Jacoby, B. 1999. Mechanisms involved in salt tolerance of plants. In: Handbook of Plant and Crop Stress. 2nd Edition. (Ed. M. Pessarakli). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York. pp. 97-123
  • Jeschke, W.D. 1984. K+-Na
  • exchange at cellular membranes,
  • intracellular compartmentation of cations, and salt tolerance. In:
  • Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Strategies for Crop Improvement.
  • (Eds. R.C. Staples and G.H. Toenniessen). John Wiley and Sons
  • Inc., New York. pp:37-66.
  • Jeschke, W.D. and O. Wolf. 1988. Effect of NaCl salinity on growth, development, ion distribution, and ion translocation in Castor bean (Ricinus communis L.). J. Plant Physiol. 132: 45.
  • Kacar, B. 1972. Bitki ve Toprağın Kimyasal Analizleri, II. Bitki analizleri. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, No. 453, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Lahaye, P.A. and E. Epstein. 1971. Calcium and salt toleration by bean plants. Physiol. Plant 25: 213.
  • Lewitt, J. 1980. Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses. Vol. II. Water, radiation, salt, and other stresses. Academic Press Inc., New York.
  • Little, T.M. and F.J. Hills. 1978. Agricultural Experimentation: design and analysis. John Wiley and Sons Inc., NY, USA.
  • Matsushita, N. and T. Matoh. 1991. Characterization of Na+exclusion mechanism of salt-tolerant reed plants in comparison with salt- sensitive rice plants. Physiol Plant. 83: 170.
  • Niu, X., M.L. Narasimhan, R.A. Salzman, R.A. Bressan and P.M. Hasegawa. 1993. NaCl regulation of plasma membrane H+- ATPase gene expression in a glycophyte and a halophyte. Plant Physiol. 103: 713-718.
  • Rugini, E. and E. Fedeli. 1990. Olive as an oilseed crop. In: Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry. Legumes and Oilseed Crops (Ed. Y.P.S. Bajaj). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. 593- 641.
  • Samra, J.S. 1985. Sodicity tolerance of grapes with reference to the uptake of nutrients. Indian J. Hortic. 43: 60-65.
  • Staples, R.C. and G.A. Toenniessen. 1984. Salinity Tolerance in Plants. Strategies for Crop Improvement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. NY, USA.
  • Storey, R. and G.R. Wyn Jones. 1977. Quaternary ammonium compounds in plants in relation to salt resistance. Phyto chemistry 16: 447-453.
  • Tattini, M. 1994. Ionic relations of aeroponically-grown olive genotypes, during salt stress. Plant and Soil 161: 251-256.
  • Tattini, M., P. Bertoni and S. Caselli. 1992. Genotypic responses of olive plants to sodium chloride. J. Plant Nutr. 15: 1467-1485.
  • Tattini, M., C. Ponzio, M.A. Coradeschi, R. Tafani and M.L. Traversi. 1994. Mechanism of salt tolerance in olive plants. Acta Hort. 356: 181-184.
  • Tester, M. and R. Davenport. 2003. Na+tolerance and Na+transport in higher plants. Annals of Botany 91: 503-527.
  • Therios, I.N. and N.D. Misopolinos. 1988. Genotypic response to sodium chloride salinity of four major olive cultivars (Olea europea. L.). Plant and Soil 106: 105-111.
  • Walker, R.R. 1986. Sodium exclusion and potassium-sodium selectivity in salt-treated trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata) and Cleopatra mandarin (Citrus reticulata) plants. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13: 293.
  • Wieneke, J. and A. Lauchli. 1980. Effects of salt stress on distribution of Na+and some other cations in two soybean varieties differing in salt tolerance. Z. Pflanzenernahr Bodenk. 143: 55.
  • Winter, E. 1982. Salt tolerance of Trifolium alexandrinum L. II. Ion balance in relation to its salt tolerance. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 9: 221.
  • Wyn Jones, R.G. 1981. Salt tolerance. In: Physiological Processes Limiting Plant Productivity. (Ed. C.B. Johnson). Butterworths, London. pp. 271-292
  • Wyn Jones, R.G., G.J. Brady and J. Speirs. 1979. Ionic and osmotic relations in plant cells. (Eds. D.L. Laidman and R.G. Wyn Jones). Recent Advances in the Biochemistry of Cereals. Academic Press, Inc., New York, pp. 63-104.
  • Yeo, A.R. and T.J. Flowers. 1984. Mechanisms of salinity resistance in rice and their role as physiological criteria in plant breeding. In: Salinity Tolerance in Plants: Strategies for Crop Improvement. (Eds. R.C. Staples and G.H. Toeniessen). John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York. pp. 151-170.
  • Zidan, I., B. Jacoby, I. Ravina and P.M. Neumann. 1991. Sodium does not compete with calcium in saturating plasma membrane sites regulating 22Na influx in salinized maize roots. Plant Physiol. 96: