___

• Akay AE (2004). A new method of designing forest roads. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 28: 273-279.
• Akay AE, Oğuz H, Karas IR, Aruga K (2009). Using LiDAR technology in forestry activities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 151: 117-125.
• Akay AE, Wing MG, Sessions J (2012). Estimating structural properties of riparian forests with airborne lidar data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 33 (22): 7010-7023.
• Akgül M, Yurtseven H, Akburak S, Çoban S (2016). Determination of some tree parameters using terrestrial laser scanner in urban green areas. Journal of the Faculty of Forestry Istanbul University 66 (2): 445-458 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
• Anton H, Rorres C (2010). Elementary linear algebra − Applications version. New Jersey, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Apostol B, Chivulescu Ş, Ciceu A, Petrila M, Pascu I-S et al. (2018).
• Data collection methods for forest inventory: a comparison between an integrated conventional equipment and terrestrial laser scanning. Annals of Forest Research 61 (2): 189-202.
• Arslan AE, Erten E, İnan M (2016). Application of geodetic projections to terrestrial laser scanning in leaf area index calculation. In: 24th Signal Processing and Communication Application Conference; Zonguldak, Turkey. pp. 957-960 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
• Asan Ü (2017). Orman Amenajmanı (Planlama Sistemleri). İstanbul, Turkey: İstanbul University Publishing (in Turkish).
• Başkent EZ, Köse S, Keleş S (2005). The forest management planning system of Turkey: Constructive criticism towards the sustainable management of forest ecosystems. International Forestry Review 7 (3): 208-217.
• Bauwens S, Bartholomeus H, Calders K, Lejeune P (2016). Forest inventory with terrestrial LiDAR: A comparison of static and hand-held mobile laser scanning. Forests 7 (6): 127-144.
• Besl PJ, McKay ND (1992). A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 14 (2): 239-256.
• Bettinger P, Boston K, Siry JP, Grebner DL (2009). Forest Management and Planning. Burlington, MA, USA: Academic Press.
• Bulut S, Günlü A, Keleş S (2016). Estimation of some stand parameters using Göktürk-2 satellite image. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium of Forest Engineering and Technologies; Bursa, Turkey. pp. 118-124.
• Büyüksalih I, Bayburt S, Schardt M, Büyüksalih G (2017). Forest stem volume calculation using airborne lidar data. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XLII-1/W1, 2017 ISPRS Hannover Workshop: HRIGI 17 – CMRT 17 – ISA 17 – EuroCOW 17, 6–9 June 2017, Hannover, Germany.
• Cabo C, Del Pozo S, Rodriguez-Gonzalvez P, Ordonez C, GonzalezAguilera D (2018). Comparing terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and wearable laser scanning (WLS) for individual tree modeling at plot level. Remote Sensing 10: 540-556.
• CEPF (2003). Caucasus Biodiversity Hotspot (Ecosystem profile final version). Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund, 31 July 2003 (updated: September 2014) https://www.cepf.net/sites/default/ files/final.caucasus.ep_.pdf. Accessed 22 December 2018.
• Chernov N, Lesort C (2005). Least squares fitting of circles. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 23: 239-252.
• Çil B, Karahalil U, Karslı F (2015). Uzaktan algılama verileri yardımıyla bazı meşcere parametrelerinin tahmin edilmesi: Kütahya/Tetik planlama birimi örneği. In: Proceedings of the VIII TUFUAB Symposium; Konya, Turkey. pp. 170-177 (in Turkish).
• Del Perugia B, Giannetti F, Chirici G, Travaglini D (2019). Influence of scan density on the estimation of single-tree attributes by hand-held mobile laser scanning. Forests 10: 277.
• Demirel T, Özkan UY (2018). Estimation of some stand parameters using digital aerial photographs for conservation and service oriented forests. Siberian Journal of Forest Science 5: 85-91.
• Eler Ü (2001). Orman Amenajmanı. Isparta, Turkey: Suleyman Demirel University Press (in Turkish).
• Ercanlı İ, Yavuz H (2006). The construction of variable density yield table for oriental spruce (Picea orientalis (L.) LINK.) stands in Artvin Central State Forest Enterprise. Turkish Journal o Forestry 1: 11-25 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
• Forsman M, Börlin N, Holmgren J (2016). Estimation of tree stem attributes using terrestrial photogrammetry with a camera rig. Forests 7 (3): 61.
• Gadow K, Zhang CY, Wehenkel C, Pommerening A, Corral-Rivas J et al. (2012). Forest Structure and Diversity. In: Pukkala T, von Gadow K (editors). Continuous Cover Forestry. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 29-83.
• Ganivet E, Bloomberg M (2019). Towards rapid assessments of tree species diversity and structure in fragmented tropical forests: A review of perspectives offered by remotely sensed and fieldbased data. Forest Ecology and Management 432: 40-53.
• GDF (2006a). Artvin-Central forest management plan. General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara (in Turkish).
• GDF (2006b). Saçınka forest management plan. General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara (in Turkish).
• GDF (2008). The current forest management regulation of Turkey. General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara (in Turkish).
• GDF (2017). Ecosystem-based multifunctional forest planning guideline (Code: 299). General Directorate of Forestry, Ankara (in Turkish).
• Genç L, Dewitt B, Smith S (2004). Determination of wetland vegetation height with LIDAR. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 28: 63-71.
• Geoslam (2018). Geoslam Zeb-Revo specification_v.1.0.1. Geoslam Limited, Nottingham, UK. https://geoslam.com (Accessed 16 February 2019).
• Giannetti F, Puletti N, Quatrini V, Travaglini D, Francesca B et al. (2018). Integrating terrestrial and airborne laser scanning for the assessment of single-tree attributes in Mediterranean forest stands. European Journal of Remote Sensing 51 (1): 795-807.
• Günlü A, Kadıoğulları Aİ (2018). Modeling forest stand attributes using Landsat ETM+ and QuickBird satellite images in western Turkey. Bosque 39 (1): 49-60.
• Heurich M (2008). Automatic recognition and measurement of single trees based on data from airborne laser scanning over the richly structured natural forests of the Bavarian Forest National Park. Forest Ecology and Management 255 (7): 2416- 2433.
• Holopainen M, Kalliovirta J (2006). Chapter 21: Modern data acquisition for forest inventory. In: Kangas A, Maltamo M (editors). Forest Inventory: Methodology and Applications. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 343-362.
• Hyyppä J, Inkinen M (1999). Detecting and estimating attributes for single trees using laser scanner. The Photogrammetric Journal of Finland 16: 27-42.
• Hyyppä J, Hyyppä H, Leckie D, Gougeon F, Yu X et al. (2008). Review of methods of small-footprint airborne laser scanning for extracting forest inventory data in boreal forests. International Journal of Remote Sensing 29 (5): 1339-1366.
• Kangas A, Jeffrey HG, Scott CT (2006). Chapter 1: Introduction. In: Kangas A, Maltamo M (editors). Forest Inventory: Methodology and Applications. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer, pp. 3-13.
• Kangas A, Maltamo M (2006). Forest Inventory (Methodology and Applications). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
• Kanja K (2016). Modelling timber volume and other forest parameters using LIDAR and field data: A case study in Bergama State Forest Enterprise. MSc, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
• Kanja K, Karahalil U, Çil B (2019). Modeling stand parameters for Pinus brutia (Ten.) using airborne LiDAR data: a case study in Bergama. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 14 (2): 022205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.14.022205
• Kayacan B, Zengin H, Kadiogullari AI (2016). Chapter 44: Turkey. In: Vidal C, Alberdi I, Hernandez L, Redmond J (editors). National Forest Inventories: Assessment of Wood Availability and Use. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 807-827.
• Kırış R (2013). History of forest management planning in Turkey and its future. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium for the 50th Anniversary of the Forestry Sector Planning in Turkey, Antalya, Turkey, pp. 18-29 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
• Laar AV, Akça A (2007). Forest Mensuration. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
• Leeuwen MV, Nieuwenhuis M (2010). Retrieval of forest structural parameters using LiDAR remote sensing. European Journal of Forest Research 129 (4): 749-770.
• Manvelidze Z, Eminağaoğlu Ö, Memiadze N, Kharazishvili D (2009). Species diversity and conservation priorities for endemic plants of Georgian-Turkish transboundary zone in the west lesser Caucasus corridor. In: Zazanashvili N, Mallon D (editors). Status and protection of globally threatened species in the Caucasus.
• Tbilisi: CEPF, WWF. Contour Ltd., pp. 199-205.
• Moskal LM, Zheng G (2012). Retrieving forest inventory variables with terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) in urban heterogeneous forest. Remote Sensing 4 (1): 1-20.
• Ozdemir I, Donoghue DNM (2013). Modelling tree size diversity from airborne laser scanning using canopy height models with image texture measures. Forest Ecology and Management 295: 28-37.
• Ozdemir I, Karnieli A (2011). Predicting forest structural parameters using the image texture derived from WorldView-2 multispectral imagery in a dryland forest, Israel. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation 13: 701-710.
• Ozkal MK (2017). Models of forest inventory for Istanbul Forest using airborne Lidar and spaceborne imagery. MSc, Michigan Technological University, Michigan, USA.
• Ozkan UY, Demirel T (2018). Estimation of forest stand parameters by using the spectral and textural features derived from digital aerial images. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 16 (3): 3043-3060.
• Oveland I, Hauglin M, Giannetti F, Kjorsvik NS, Gobakken T (2018). Comparing three different ground based laser scanning methods for tree stem detection. Remote Sensing 10: 538-555.
• Özdemir İ (2013a). Yersel lazer tarama ile tek ağaç özelliklerinin belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Forestry 14: 40-47 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
• Özdemir İ (2013b). Havasal LIDAR verileri kullanılarak meşcere parametrelerinin tahmin edilmesi. Turkish Journal of Forestry 14: 31-39 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
• Pazhouhan I, Najafi A, Rouhani AK, Vahidi J (2017). Extraction of individual tree parameters by using terrestrial laser scanner data in Hyricanian Forest. Ecopersia 5 (3): 1837-1847.
• Penman J, Gytarsky M, Hiraishi T, Krug T, Kruger D et al. (2003). Good practice guidance for land use, land-use change and forestry. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Kanagawa, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) for the IPCC.
• R Core Team (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienne, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/ Ryding J, Williams E, Smith MJ, Eichhorn MP (2015). Assessing handheld mobile laser scanners for forest surveys. Remote Sensing 7: 1095-1111.
• Sakici OE, Günlü A (2018). Artificial intelligence applications for predicting some stand attributes using Landsat 8 OLI satellite data: A case study from Turkey. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 16 (4): 5269-5285.
• Sariyildiz T (2008). Effects of gap-size classes on long-term litter decomposition rate of beech, oak and chestnut species at high elevations in Northeast Turkey. Ecosystems 11 (6): 841-853.
• Sefercik UG, Atesoglu A (2017). Three-dimensional forest stand height map production utilizing airborne laser scanning dense point clouds and precise quality evaluation. iForest 10: 491- 497.
• SMS (2018). Temperate and precipitation records of the Artvin Weather Station. Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry State Meteorological Service, Ankara, Turkey. Srinivasan S, Popescu S, Eriksson M, Sheridan R, Ku NW (2015).
• Terrestrial laser scanning as an effective tool to retrieve tree level height, crown width, and stem diameter. Remote Sensing 7: 1877-1896.
• Surovy P, Yoshimoto A, Panagiotidis D (2016). Accuracy of reconstruction of the tree stem surface using terrestrial closerange photogrammetry. Remote Sensing 8 (2): 123.
• Şahin B, Güzel C, Baş S, Türker M (2018). 3DETECTOR – Developing automatic tree detection software from 3D Lidar point cloud. In: VII UZAL-CBS Symposium; Eskisehir, Turkey. pp. 116-123 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
• Teremit A, Çalışkan T, Kip HS (2005). Present status of forest inventory at General Directorate of Forestry in need of gathering and updating information. In: Symposium Nationale Waldinventur für die Türkei Proceedings; İstanbul, Turkey. pp. 51-63 (in Turkish with an abstract in English).
• Trotter CM, Dymond JR, Goulding CJ (1997). Estimation of timber volume in a coniferous plantation forest using Landsat TM. International Journal of Remote Sensing 18 (10): 2209-2223.
• Ucar Z, Bettinger P, Merry K, Akbulut R, Siry J (2018). Estimation of urban woody vegetation cover using multispectral imagery and LiDAR. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 29: 248-260.
• Vidal C, Sallnas O, Redmond J, Alberdi I, Barreiro S et al. (2016). Chapter 1: Introduction. In: Vidal C, Alberdi I, Hernandez L, Redmond J (editors). National Forest Inventories: Assessment of Wood Availability and Use. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 1-25.
• Wulder MA, Bater CW, Coops NC, Hilker T, White JC (2008). The role of LiDAR in sustainable forest management. The Forestry Chronicle 84: 807-826.
• Yilmaz V, Güngör O (2019). Estimating crown diameters in urban forests with unmanned aerial system-based photogrammetric point clouds. International Journal of Remote Sensing 40 (2): 468-505.
• Yurtseven H, Çoban S, Akgül M, Akay AO (2019). Individual tree measurements in a planted woodland with terrestrial laser scanner. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 43: 192- 208. doi: https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1805-5
• Zhang WM, Qi JB, Wan P, Wang HT, Xie DH et al. (2016). An easy-to-use airborne LiDAR data filtering method based on cloth simulation. Remote Sensing 8 (6): 501. doi: https://doi. org/10.3390/rs8060501