Kazlarda Selüloz ve Selüloz Fraksiyonlarının Sindirimi

Kanatlı hayvanların sindirim sistemi kısa olduğundan yemlerin sindirim sisteminde kalış süresi kısadır. Buna ilave olarak, kanatlı hayvan türlerinin birçoğunun selüloz, selüloz fraksiyonları (ADF ve NDF) ile nişasta tabiatında olmayan polisakkaritleri sindirebilme ve bunlardan yararlanma yetenekleri düşüktür. Bundan dolayı kanatlı hayvanların beslenmesinde besin madde içeriği yüksek olan daha pahalı yemlerin kullanılması zorunlu hale gelmektedir. Bu durum ise beyaz et ve yumurta gibi hayvansal ürünlerin fiyatlarını yükseltmektedir. Kanatlı hayvan beslemedeki bu dezavantajı avantaja çevirmek için sindirim sistemi daha güçlü, selülozca zengin ucuz yem kaynaklarını daha iyi sindirebilen, kaba yemlerden daha iyi yararlanabilen alternatif kanatlı hayvanlara ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Sahip olduğu özellikler açısından değerlendirildiğinde, ucuz yem kaynaklarından daha iyi yararlanabilecek kanatlı hayvanlardan birisinin de kaz olduğu görülecektir. Kazların selülozca zengin kaba yemlerden etkin bir şekilde yararlanabilmesi, yem giderlerini azaltmak suretiyle hayvansal ürünlerin daha ekonomik olması için uygun bir fırsat sunmaktadır. Diğer kanatlı hayvanlara göre kaba yemlerden daha iyi yararlanmasından dolayı beyaz et ve yumurta üretimi için kaz yetiştiriciliğinin yaygınlaştırılması özellikle kırsaldaki nüfus için önemli bir gelir ve geçim kaynağı olabilir. Bu derlemede, kazların mikrobiyal sindirim özellikleri, selüloz başta olmak üzere selüloz fraksiyonlarından ve nişasta tabiatında olmayan yem unsurlarından yararlanabilme yetenekleri incelenmiştir

Digestion of Cellulose and Cellulose Fractions in Geese

Since the digestive system of poultry is quite short, the residence time of the feeds in the digestive system is also short. In addition, many poultry species have a low ability to digest and utilize cellulose, cellulose fractions (ADF and NDF) and non-starch polysaccharides. Therefore, it becomes necessary to use more expensive feeds with high nutrient content in poultry nutrition. This situation raises the prices of animal products such as white meat and eggs. In order to turn this disadvantage in poultry feeding into an advantage, alternative poultry with a stronger digestive system, better digestibility of cellulose-rich cheap feed sources and better utilization of roughage are needed. When evaluated in terms of its characteristics, it will be seen that one of the poultry that can better benefit from cheap feed sources is goose. The efficient use of cellulose-rich feeds, such as goose, reduces feed costs and provides a suitable opportunity to produce cheaper poultry products. Encouraging goose production can be an important source of income and livelihood, especially for the rural population. It is thought that goose breeding can be an important alternative for white meat and egg production because it benefits from cellulose-rich feeds better than other poultry. In this review, the microbial digestion properties of geese, their ability to benefit from cellulose fractions, especially cellulose, and nonstarch feed elements were examined.

PDF

___

Aidy SE, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. 2014. Immune modulation of the brain-gut-microbe axis. Front Microbiology, 5:146.
Amat JA, Garcia-Criado B, Garcia-Ciudad A. 1991. Food, feeding behaviour and nutritional ecology of wintering Greylag Geese Anser anser. Ardea, 79(2): 271-282.
Apj T, Davies DR, Gull K, Lawrence MI, Nielson BB, Rickers A, Theodorou MK. 1994. Anaerobic fungi in herbivorous animals. Mycological Research, 98(2): 129-152.
Arslan C, İnal F. 2002. Farklı Kaba Yem Kaynaklarının Yerli Kazlarda Büyüme Performansı ve Karkas Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 26: 91-96.
Awati A, Konstantinov SR, Williams BA, Akkermans ADL, Bosch MW, Smidt H, Verstegen MWA. 2005. Effect of substrate adaptation on the microbial fermentation and microbial composition of faecal microbiota of weaning piglets studied in vitro. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 85(10): 1765-1772.
Backhed F, Ding H, Wang T, Hooper LV, Koh GY, Nagy A, Semenkovich CF, Gordon JI. 2004. The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 101(44): 15718-15723.
Björnhag G, Sperber I. 1977. Transport of various food components through the digestive tract of turkeys, geese and guinea fowl. Swedish Journal of Agricultural Research, 7(1): 57-66.
Bruinzeel LW, van Eerden MR, Drent RH, Vu link JT. 1998. Scaling metabolisable energy intake and daily energy expenditure in relation to the size of herbivorous waterfowl: limits set by available foraging time and digestive perform ance. In: Patchwork: Patch use, habitat exploitation and carrying capacity for water birds in Dutch freshwater wetlands, (M. van Eerden). Published PhD thesis, University of Groningen (pp.448).
Buchsbaum R, Wilson J, Valiela I. 1986. Digestibility of plant constitutents by Canada Geese and Atlantic Brant. Ecological Society of America, 67(2): 386-393.
Chen YH, Hsu JC, Yu B. 1992. Effects of dietary fiber levels on growth performance, intestinal fermentation and cellulase activity of goslings. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 21(2): 15-28. (in Chinese).
Chen WH. 2006. Utilization and digestion of different sources dietary fiber in Yangzhou Goose. Master thesis, Yangzhou University, China.
Clemens ET, Stevens CE, Southworth M. 1975. Sites of organic production and pattern of digesta movement in the gastrointestinal tract of geese. Journal of Nutrition, 105(10): 1341-1350.
Cryan JF, Dinan, TG. 2012. Mind-altering microorganisms:the impact of the gut microbiota on brain and behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(10): 701-712.
Cui XY, Wang CW, Liu M. 2008. Study on the law of colonization of main normal flora in geese’s digestive tract. China Poultry, 30: 17-24.
Dawson TJ, Whitehead, PJ, McLean A, Fanning FD, Dawson, WR. 2000. Digestive function in Australian Magpie Geese Anseranas semipalmata. Australian Journal of Zoology. 48(3): 265-279.
Desvaux M, Guedon E, Petitdemange H. 2000. Cellulose catabolism by Clostridium cellulolyticum growing in batch culture on defined medium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66(6): 2461-2470.
Durant D. 2003. The digestion of fibre in herbivorous Anatidae - A review. Wildfowl, 54: 7-24. Eswaran S, Muir J, Chey WD. 2013. Fiber and functional gastrointestinal disorders. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 108(3): 718-727.
FAO, 2018. Agriculture data. Agricultural production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QL-. Erişim 22 Eylül 2018. Feed Science, 1:37–50.
Franklin MA, Mathew AG, Vickers JR, Clift RA. 2002. Characterization of microbial populations and volatile fatty acid concentrations in the jejunum, ileum, and cecum of pigs weaned at 17 vs 24 days of age. The Journal of Animal Science, 80(11): 2904-2910.
Garcia DM. 2006. The role of the giant Canada goose (Branta Canadensis maxima) cecum in nutrition [master's thesis]. Columbia, MO, USA: University of Missouri-Columbia (pp.110).
Gensollen T, Iyer SS, Kasper DL, Blumberg RS. 2016. How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Science, 352(6285): 539-544.
Guo P, Mochidzuki K, Cheng W, Zhou M, Gao H, Zheng D, Wang XF, Cui ZJ. 2011. Effects of different pretreatment strategies on corn stalk acidogenic fermentation using a microbial consortium. Bioresource Technology, 102(16): 7526-7531.
Guy G, Rousselot-Pailley D, Rosinsky A, Rouvier R. 1996. Comparison of meat geese performances fed with or without grass. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde, 60(5): 217-221.
He LW, Meng QX, Li DY, Zhang YW, Ren LP. 2015. Influence of feeding alternative fiber sources on the gastrointestinal fermentation, digestive enzyme activities and mucosa morphology of growing Greylag geese. Poultry Science, 94(10): 2464-2471.
Herd RM, Dawson TJ. 1984. Fiber digestion in the Emu, Dromaius novaebollandiae, a large bird with a simple gut and high rates of passage. Physiological Zoology, 57(1): 70-84.
Hsu JC, Lu TW, Chiou PWS, Yu B. 1996. Effects of different sources of dietary fibre on growth performance and apparent digestibility in geese. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 60(1-2): 93-102.
Hsu JC, Chen Li, Yu B. 2000. Effects of levels of crude fibre on growth performances and intestinal carbohydrases of domestic goslings. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, (13(10): 1450-1454.
Huang M, Cao LJ, Li W, Li HX. 2010. Segmental comparison of cellulase activities in goose intestinal tract. Contemporary Animal Husbandry, (pp. 27-28).
Jamroz D, Wiliczkiewicz A, Sharupinska J. 1992. The effect of diets containing different levels of structural substances on morpholigical changes in the intestinal walls and the digestibility of the crude fiber fractions in geese (part III.). Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 1(1): 37-50.
Jamroz D, Wiliczkiewicz A, Orda J, Skorupıńska J. 1994. Ileale und postileale Fermentation von Getreidekohlenhydraten bei Jungmastgeflügel, Wiener Tierärztliche Monatsschrift, 81: 80-84.
Jamroz D, Orda J, Wiliczkiewicz A, Skorupinska J. 1996. Die scheinbare Verdaulichkeit der Gerüstkohlen-hydrate und Darmfermentation verschiedener Getreidearten bei drei Geflügelspezies. [In Germ a with English summary: The apparent digestibility of structural carbohydrates and the intestine fermentation of different kinds of grains in three poultry species.]. Wiener Tierarztliche Monatsschrift, 83: 210-218.
Jamroz D, Jakobsen K, Orda J, Skorupinska J, Wiliczkiewicz A. 2001. Development of the gastrointestinal tract and digestibility of dietary fibre and amino acids in young chickens, ducks and geese fed diets with high amounts of barley. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part A: Molecular and Integrative Physiology, 130(4): 643-652.
Jamroz D, Jakobsen K, Bach Knudsen KE, Wilczkiewicz A, Orda J. 2002. Digestibility and energy value of the non-starch polysaccharides in young chickens, ducks and geese, fed diets containing high amounts of barley. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Pt. A 131: 657-668.
Jamroz D, Wertelecki T, Wiliczkiewicz A, Orda J, Skorupińsk J. 2004. Dynamics of yolk sac resorption and post-hatching development of the gastrointestinal tract in chickens, ducks and geese. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 88(5-6): 239-250.
Jamroz D. 2005. Comparative characteristic of gastrointestinal tract development and digestibility of nutrients in young chickens, ducks and geese. In: Proc. 15th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Balatonfüred, Hungary, 74–85.
Kau AL, Ahern PP, Griffin NW, Goodman AL, Gordon JI. 2011. Human nutrition, the gut microbiome and the immune system. Nature, 474(7351): 327-336.
Li Y, Yang H, Xu L, Wang Z, Zhao Y, Chen X. 2018. Effects of dietary fiber levels on cecal microbiota composition in geese. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 31(8): 1285- 1290.
Liu BY, Wang ZY, Wang HR, Hu P, Xu D, Wang Q. 2011. Molecular profiling of bacterial species in the caecum of geese. Czech Journal of Animal Science, 56(4): 192-203.
Liu G, Luo X, Zhao X, Zhang A, Jiang N, Yang L, Huang M, Xu L, Ding L, Li M, Guo Z, Li X, Sun J, Zhou J, Feng Y, He H, Wu H, Fu X, Meng H. 2018. Gut microbiota correlates with fiber and apparent nutrients digestion in goose. Poultry Science, 97:3899-3909.
Lin CH, Young CP. 1976. Utilization of fibrous feedstuffs by domestic gosling. III. Nutritive value of dehydrated alfalfa meal. Journal of the Chinese Society of Animal Science, 5(3- 4): 29-34 (in Chinese).
Looft T, Allen HK, Cantarel BL, Levine UY, Bayles DO, Alt DP, Henrissat B, Stanton TB. 2014. Bacteria, phages and pigs: the effects of in-feed antibiotics on the microbiome atdifferent gut locations. ISME J, 8(8): 1566-1576.
Lou YJ, Liu HL, Wang J, Sun ZJ. 2010. Determination and comparison of digestion kinetics of two fibre sources in geese (Anseris). South African Journal of Animal Science, 40(1): 70-77.
Lu J, Kong XL, Wang ZY, Yang HM, Zhang KN, Zou JM. 2011. Influence of whole corn feeding on the performance, digestive tract development, and nutrient retention of geese. Poultry Science, 90(3): 587-594.
Manco M. 2012. Gut microbiota and developmental programming of the brain: from evidence in behavioral endopheno types to novel perspective in obesity. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 2:109.
Matsui H, Kato Y, Chikaraishi T, Moritani, M, Tokuda TB, Wakita M. 2010. Microbial diversity in ostrich ceca as revealed by 16S ribosomal RNA gene clone library and detection of novel Fibrobacter species. Anaerobe, 16(2): 83- 93.
Mattocks JGM. 1971. Some aspects of the problem of cellulose digestion and caecal function in the domestic goose. Unpublished M.Sc. thesis, University of Bath. (pp.107-113).
Mcnab JM. 1973.The avian caeca: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal, 29(3): 251-263.
McWilliams, SR. 1999. Digestive strategies of avian herbivores. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Ornithological Congress, Durban, [eds. N.J. Adams and R.H. Slotow). Bird Life South Africa, Johannesburg; pp. 2198-2207.
NRC (National Research Council), 1994. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry: Ninth Revised Edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
O’Mahony SM, Clarke G, Borre YE, Dinan TG, Cryan JF. 2015. Serotonin, tryptophan metabolism and the brain gutmicrobiome axis. Behavioural Brain Research, 277: 32-48.
Pourabedin M, Zhao X. 2015. Prebiotics and gut microbiota in chickens. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 362(15): fnv122.
Prop J, Vulink T. 1992. Digestion by Barnacle Geese in the annual cycle: the interplay between retention time and food quality. Functional Ecology, 6(2): 180-189.
Saatcı M, Tilki M, Sarı M, Yapıcıer ÖŞ. 2021. Her yönüyle kaz yetiştiriciliği (Fizibiliteli Örnek Kaz Yetiştiriciliği Projesi, Yatırım Desteklemeleri ve Detaylı Kaz Hastalıkları İlaveli II.Baskı. Kutlu and Avcı Ofset Ltd. Şti.). ISBN 978-605- 9447-83-6. Sayfa 58.
Scheppach W, Luehrs H, Menzel T. 2001. Beneficial health effects of low-digestible carbohydrate consumption. British Journal of Nutrition, 85(1): 23-30.
Sears, CL. 2005. A dynamic partnership: celebrating our gut flora. Anaerobe, 11(5): 247-251.
Sedinger JS, White, RG, Hupp J. 1995. Metabolizability and partitioning of energy and protein in green plants by yearling Lesser Snow Geese. Condor, 97(1): 116-122.
Shao CM, Han ZK. 1992. Study of fiber components of goose cecal digestion. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 15: 86-89.
Shehan NA. 2012. Anatomical and histological study of esophagus in geese (Anser anser domesticus). Basrah Journal of Veterinary Research, 11(1): 14-22.
Shih BL, Yu B, Hsu JC. 2005. The Development of gastrointestinal tract and pancreatic enzymes in White Roman Geese. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 18(6): 841-847.
Slavin J. 2013. Fiber and prebiotics: mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients, 5(4): 1417-1435.
Stanley D, Hughes RJ, Moore RJ. 2014. Microbiota of the chicken gastrointestinal tract: influence on health, productivity and disease. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 98(10): 4301-4310.
Stappenbeck TS, Hooper LV, Gordon JI. 2002. Developmental regulation of intestinal angiogenesis by indigenous microbes via paneth cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (USA), 99(24):15451-15455.
Stevenson MH. 1985. Effects of diets varying enegy concentrations on the growth and carcase composition of geese. British Poultry Science, 26: 493-504.
Svihus B. 2014. Function of the digestive system. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 23: 306-314.
Timmler R. 1994. Investigation into the digestibility of high fiber feedstuffs for geese. Proceeding’s 8th International Symposium of Young Poultry Scientist. Poland.
Turnbaugh PJ, Bäckhed F, Fulton L, Gordon JI. 2008. Dietinduced obesity is linked to marked but reversible alterations in the mouse distal gut microbiome. Cell Host Microbe, 3(4): 213-223.
TÜİK, 2020. Kümes hayvan sayıları. https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/ medas/?kn =101&locale=tr. Ubeda C, Djukovic A, Isaac S. 2017. Roles of the intestinal microbiota in pathogen protection. Clinical and Translational Immunology, 6(2): e128.
Van Soest PJ. 1982. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant: Ruminant metabolism, Nutritional Strategies, the Cellulotic Fermentation and the Chemistry of Forages and Plant Fibres. O and B Books, Corvallis, Oreg., (pp.374).
Von Rosenvinge EC, Song Y, White JR, Maddox C, Blanchard T, Fricke WF. 2013. Immune status, antibiotic medication and pH are associated with changes in the stomach fluid microbiota. The ISME Journal, 7(7): 1354-1366.
Waite DW, Taylor MW. 2014. Characterizing the avian gut microbiota:membership, driving influences, and potential function. Front Microbiology, 5(223): 1-12.
Wang ZY, Wang J, Zhao WL. 2004. Comparison of fibre metabolic rate of different fodder diets in caecectomized and intact geese. Chinese J. Anim. Sci., 40(1): 16-18.
Wang BW, Jing LZ, Zhang Q, Wang QL, Fang YC, Yue B, Sun P, Jiang XX, Wang N. 2008. Digestibility of goose fed with different levels of corn straw silage. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 20: 176-182.
Wang ZY, Shi SR, Xu MJ, Yang HM. 2009. 16S rRNA-based analysis of bacterial diversity in the microbial flora of thegoose intestinal tract. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 18(3): 531-540.
Woyengo TA, Kiarie E, Nyachoti CM. 2010. Metabolizable energy and standardized ileal digestible amino acid contents of expeller extracted canola meal fed to broiler chicks. Poultry Science, 89(6): 1182-1189.
Yang HM, Wang ZY, Wang, J, Shi SR, Zhu XH. 2009. Effects of caecectomy on digestibility of crude protein, calcium, phosphorus, neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre in geese. Archiv fur Geflugelkunde, 73(3): 189-192.
Yatsunenko T, Rey FE, Manary MJ, Trehan I, Dominguez-Bello MG, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Baldassano RN, Anokhin AP, Heath AC, Warner B, Reeder J, Kuczynski J, Caporaso JG, Lozupone CA, Lauber C, Clemente JC, Knights D, Knight R, Gordon JI. 2012. Human gut microbiome viewed across age and geography. Nature, 486(7402): 222- 227. Yu B, Tsai CC, Hsu JC, Chiou PW. 1998. Effect of different
sources of dietary fibre on growth performance, intestinal morphology and caecal carbohydrases of domestic geese. British Poultry Science, 39(4): 560-567.
Zhou XL. 2004. Study on effect of lucerne, ryegrass and wheat middlings contents in dietary on digestive physiology and performance in goslings. Master thesis, Yangzhou University, China.
Zhou H, Guo W, Zhang T, Xu B, Zhang D, Teng Z, Tao D, Lou Y, Gao Y. 2018. Response of goose intestinal microflora to the source and level of dietary fiber. Poultry Science, 97(6): 2086-2094.