___

• Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W., Traver, H. ve Shotland, A.(1997). A meta analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel Psychology, 50, 341-358.
• Antonioni, D. (1995). Problems associated with implementation of an effective upward appraisal feedback process: An experimental field study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6(2), 175-171.
• Antonioni, D. (1996). Designing an effective 360-degree appraisal feedback process. Organizational Dynamics, 25, 24-38.
• Atwater, L., Roush, P. ve Fischthal, A. (1995). The influence of upward feedback on self- and follower ratings of leadership. Personnel Psychology, 48, 35-59.
• Atwater, L. E., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, D. ve Carrier, P. (2000). An upward feedback field experiment: Supervisors' cynicism, reactions, and commitment to subordinates. Personnel Psychology, 53, 275-297.
• Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R. N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Stahl, G. ve Kurshid, A. (200Ö). Impact of culture on human resource management practices: A 10-country comparison. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49 (1), 192-221.
• Bono, J. E. ve Colbert, A.E. (2005). Understanding responses to multi-source feedback: The role of core selfevaluations. Personnel Psychology, 58, 171-203.
• Borman, W. C. (1997). 360° ratings: An analysis of assumptions and a research agenda for evaluating their validity. Human Resource Management Review, 7 (3), 299-315.
• Borman W. C. ve Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. N. Schmitt ve W. Borman, (Ed.), Personnel selection in organizations içinde (71-98). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Brett, J. F. ve Atwater, L.E. (2001). 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (5), 930-942.
• Campbell, J. P., McCloy, R. A., Oppler, S. H. ve Sager, C. E. (1993). A theory of performance. N. Schmitt ve W. C. Borman, (Ed.), Personnel selection in organizations içinde (35-70). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• DeGregorio, M. ve Fisher C. D. (1988). Providing performance feedback: Reactions to alternate methods. Journal of Management, 14 (4), 605-616.
• DeNisi, A. S. ve Kluger, A. N. (2000). Feedback effectiveness- Can 360-degree appraisals be improved? Academy of Management Executive, 14(1), 129-139.
• De Luque, M. F. S. ve Sommer, S. (2000). The impact of culture on feedback-seeking behavior: An integrated model and propositions. Academy of Management Review, 25 (4), 829-849.
• Fandray, D. (2001). The new thinking in performance appraisals. Workforce, 80 (5), 36-39.
• Fletcher, C. ve Perry, E. L. (2001). Performance appraisal and feedback: A consideration of national culture and a review of contemporary research and future trends. N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. K.Sinangil ve C. Viswesvaran, (Ed.), Handbook of industrial, work and organizational psychology (Vol. 1) içinde (126- 144). London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
• Giles W. F. ve Mossholder, K. V. (1990). Employee reactions to contextual and session components of performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75 (4), 371-377.
• Hauenstein, N. M. A. (1992). An information-processing approach to leniency in performance judgments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77 (4), 485-493.
• Hofstede, G. ve Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Hough, L. M. ve Oswald, F. L. (2000). Personnel selection: Looking toward the future - Remembering the past. Annual Review Psychology, 51, 631-664.
• Jawahar, I. M. (2006). Correlates of satisfaction with performance appraisal feedback. Journal of Labor Research, 27 (2), 213-236.
• Kluger, A.N. ve DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 254-284.
• Le Pine, J. A., Colquitt, J. A. ve Erez, A. (2000). Adaptability to changing task contexts: Effects of general cognitive ability, conscientiousness, and openness to experience. Personnel Psychology, 53,563-593.
• London, M. (2003). Job feedback: Giving, seeking, and using feedback for performance improvement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• London, M. ve Smither, J. W. (2002). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review, 12 (1), 81-100.
• Mohrman, A. M. Jr., Resnick-West, S. M. ve Lawler, III E. E. (1989). Designing performance appraisal systems: Aligning appraisals and organizational realities. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Murphy, K. R. ve Cleveland, J. N. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal systems: Aligning appraisals and organizational realities. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
• Nemeroff, W. F. ve Cosentino, J. (1979). Utilizing feedback and goal setting to increase performance appraisal interviewer skills of managers. Academy of Management Journal, 22 (3), 566-576.
• Nemeroff, W. F. ve Wexley, K. N. (1979). An exploration of the relationships between performance interview characteristics and interview outcomes as perceived by managers and subordinates. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 25-34.
• Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. ve Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (4), 679-703.
• Phoel, C. M. (2006). Feedback that works. Harvard Management Update, 11 (9), 3-4.
• Raj, J. D., Nelson, J. A. ve Rao, K. S. P. (2006). A study on the effects of some reinforcers to improve performance of employees in a retail industry. Behavior Modification, 30 (6), 848-866.
• Reilly, R. R., Smither, J. W. ve Vasilopoulos, N. L. (1996). A longitudinal study of upward feedback. Personnel Psychology, 49, 599-612.
• Robertson, M. M. ve Huang, Y-H. (2006). Effect of a workplace design and training intervention on individual performance, group effectiveness and collaboration: The role of environmental control. Work: Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 27 (1), 3- 12.
• Seifert, C. F., Yukl, G. ve McDonald, R. A. (2003). Effects of multi-source feedback and a feedback facilitator on the influence behavior of managers toward subordinates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (3), 561-569.
• Shipper, F., Hoffman, R. C. ve Rotondo, D. M. (2004). Does the 360-degree feedback process create actionable knowledge equally across cultures? Academy of Management Best Conference Paper, 6 pages.
• Smither, J. W., London, M. ve Reilly, R. R. (2005). Does performance improve following multi-source feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 55,33-66.
• Sözer, S. (2004). An evaluation of current human resource management practices in the Turkish private sector. Yayınlanmamaış doktora tezi, Orta doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
• Steelman, L. A. ve Rutkowski, K. A. (2004). Moderators of employee reactions to negative feedback. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19 (1), 6-18.
• Sümer, H. C. (2007). Çok kaynaklı geribildirim ve kültür: Kritik bir bakış. R. Erdem ve C. Ş. Çukur, (Ed.), Kültürel bağlamda yönetsel örgütsel davranış içinde (347-385). Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınlan.
• Taylor, M. S., Tracy, K. B., Renard, M. K., Harrison, J. K. ve Carroll, S. J. (1995). Due process in performance appraisal: A quasi experiment in procedural justice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 495-523.
• Viswesvaran, C, Schmidt, F. L. ve Ones, D. S. (2005). Is there a general factor in ratings of job performance? A metaanalytic framework for disentangling substantive and error influences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (1), 108-131
• Walker, A. G. ve Smither, J. W. (1999). A five-year study of upward feedback: What managers do with their results matters. Personnel Psychology, 52, 393-423.