Okul ortamı ve sanal ortamda meydana gelen akran zorbalığı ne ölçüde örtüşüyor?

Araştırmada, ergenliğin ilk ve orta dönemini temsil eden yaş grubunda okulda ve sanal ortamda gerçekleşen zorbalık türleri arasındaki ilişkiler ve bu iki tür zorbalığın ne ölçüde örtüştüğü incelenmiştir. Araştırma, ilköğretim ikinci kademe ve liseye devam eden yaşları 12 ile 18 arasında değişen 868 ergenle yürütülmüştür. Ergenlere cep telefonu, bilgisayar ve internet kullanım olanakları ve bu araçları kullanım özelliklerini belirlemeye yönelik sorular sorulmuş, ergenlerin ne sıklıkla geleneksel ve sanal zorbalık tanımı içinde yer alan davranışlar uyguladıkları ve maruz kaldıklarını incelemek için Geleneksel Akran Zorbalığı Ölçeği ve Sanal Zorbalık Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Ergenlerin % 31.9'unun okulda, % 21.7'sinin sanal ortamda zorba, kurban ve zorba/kurban olarak akran zorbalığına dâhil olduğu, erkeklerin sanal ortamda zorbalık davranışlarını kızlara göre daha fazla sergiledikleri, erken ergenlik dönemindeki-lerin elektronik ortamda zorbalığa maruz kalma açısından daha fazla risk altında oldukları görülmektedir. Geleneksel zorba, kurban ve zorba/kurban statülerinde yer almanın sanal zorbalıkta aynı statülerde yer almayı anlamlı olarak yordadığı bulunmuştur. Geleneksel ve sanal zorbalık arasında % 63 'lük bir örtüşme olduğu, ilişkisel zorbalığa maruz kalma ile sanal ortamda zorbalığa maruz kalma ve sosyal dışlama yoluyla zorbalık yapma ile sanal ortamda zorbalık uygulama arasında bir ilişki olduğu görülmektedir.

How much overlap between traditional and cyberbullying in Turkish adolescents?

In this study, the relation between involvement in traditional and cyberbullying and the potential overlap in traditional and cyberbullying among early and middle adolescents were examined. A total of 868 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 completed a self-report questionnaire designed to assess; adolescents' usage pattern of information and communication technologies, their experiences for being a bully and a victim both in school and cyber environments on a 4-point Likert type scale (Traditional and Cyberbullying Inventory). Results show that 31.9% of the adolescents have involved in traditional bullying and 21.7 % of them have involved in cyberbullying. While males are more likely to be cyberbullies than females, gender is not significant for being cyberbullied. Secondary school adolescents are more likely to report being cyberbullied in general. Adolescents' roles in traditional bullying predicted the same role in cyberbullying. It is found that 63 % overlap between bullying in school grounds and cyber environments. There is a significant relationship between the behavior damaging social relations in school grounds and being involved in cyberbullying.

PDF

___

Ancak, O. T. (2009). Psychiatric symptomatology as a predictor of cyberbullying among university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 34, 167-184.
Bayraktar, F. (2001). Internet kullanımının ergen gelişimindeki rolü. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir.
Beran, T. ve Li, Q. (2005). Cyber-harassment: A study of a new method for an old behavior. Journal of Educational Commuting Research, 32(3), 265-277.
Berger, K. S. (2007). Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27, 90-126.
Bjorkqvist, K. (1994). Sex differences in physical, verbal, and indirect aggression: A review of recent research. Sex Roles, 30(3-4), 177-188.
Bjorkqvist K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J. ve Kaukiainen, A. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Developmental trends regarding direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18, 117-127.
Blair, J. (2003). New breed of bullies torment their peers on the Internet. Education Week, 22(21), 6-9.
Boulton, M. J. ve Underwood, K. (1992). Bully/victim problems among middle school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 73-87.
Burnukara, P. (2009). İlk ve orta ergenlikte geleneksel ve sanal akran zorbalığına ilişkin betimsel bir inceleme. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Campbell, M. A. (2005). Cyber bullying: An old problem in a new guise? Australian Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 15, 68-76.
Caspi, A. ve Gorsky, P. (2006). Online deception: Prevalence, motivation and emotion. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 9( 1), 54-59.
Crick, N. R. ve Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710-722.
Dehue F., Bolman, C. ve Völlink, T. (2008). Cyberbullying: Youngsters' experiences and parental perception. Cy-berPsychology & Behavior, 11(2), 217-223.
Dölek, N. (2002). Öğrencilerde zorbaca davranışların araştırılması ve bir önleyici program modeli. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2009). Cyberbullying and its correlation to traditional bullying, gender and frequent and risky usage of internet-mediated communication tools. New Media and Society, 11(8), 1-19.
Erdur-Baker, Ö. ve Kavşut F. (2007). Akran zorbalığının yeni yüzü: Siber zorbalık. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 27, 31-42.
Finkelhor, D., Mitchell, K. J. ve Wolak, J. (2000). Online victimization: A report on the nation's youth. Alexandria, VA: National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
Gültekin, Z. ve Sayıl, M. (2005). Akran Zorbalığını Belirleme Ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 15, 47-61.
Hawker, D. S. J. ve Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(4), 441-455.
Hinduja, S. ve Patchin, J. (2007). Offline consequences of online victimization. Journal of School Violence, 6(3), 89-112.
Juvonen, J. ve Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? - Bullying experiences in cyber space. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496-505.
Katzer, C., Fetchenhauer, D. ve Belschak, F. (2009). Cyberbullying: Who are the victims? A comparison of victimization in internet chatrooms and victimization in school. Journal of Media Psychology, 21(1), 25-36.
Keith, S. ve Martin, M. E. (2005). Cyber-bullying: Creating a culture of respect in a cyber world. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 13(4), 224-228.
Kowalski, R. M. ve Limber, S. P. (2007). Electronic bullying among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 4, 22-30.
Kristensen, S. M. ve Smith, P. K. (2003). The use of coping strategies by Danish children classed as bullies, victims, bully/victims, and not involved, in response to different (hypothetical) types of bullying. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 44, 479-488.
Li, Q. (2006). Cyberbullying in schools: A research of gender differences. School Psychology International, 27, 157-170.
Li, Q. (2007). Bullying in the new playground: Research into cyberbullying and cyber victimization. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 23(4), 435-454.
Monks, C. P., Smith, P. K., Naylor, P., Barter, C., Ireland, J. L. ve Coyne, I. (2009). Bullying in different contexts: Commonalities, differences and the role of theory. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 146-156.
Mynard, H. ve Joseph, S. (2000). Development of the multidimensional peer-victimization scale. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 169-178.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell.
Pekel-Uludağlı, N. ve Uçanok, Z. (2005). Akran zorbalığı gruplarında yalnızlık ve akademik başarı ile sosyometrik statüye göre zorba/ kurban davranış türleri. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 20(56), 77-92.
Raskauskas, J. ve Stoltz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43, 564-573.
Slonje, R.ve Smith, P. K. (2008). Cyberbullying: Another main type of bullying? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 147-154.
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S. ve Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying, its forms and impact in secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385.
Smith, P. K., Morita, Y., Junger-Tas, J., Olweus, D., Catalano, R., ve Slee, P. (1999). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. London, New York: Rout-ledge.
Şirvanlı-Özen, D. (2006). Ergenlerde akran zorbalığına maruz kalmanın yaş, çocuk yetiştirme stilleri ile benlik imgesi ile ilişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 21, 77-94.
Topçu, Ç. (2008). The relationship of cyberbullying to empathy, gender, traditional bullying, internet use and adult monitoring. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Topçu, Ç. ve Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2007). Geleneksel akran zorbalığının, siber zorbalığın ve bu iki tip zorbalık türü arasındaki ilişkinin toplumsal cinsiyet açısından incelenmesi. 16. Ulusal Eğitim Bilimleri Kongresi, Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi, Tokat.
Tosun, L. P. ve Ataca, B. (2004). Yüz-yüze ortamda ve internet ortamında kültürün ve cinsiyetin arkadaşlık ve kişilerara-sı yakınlık üzerine etkisi. 13. Ulusal Psikoloji Kongresi Bilimsel Çalışmaları, İstanbul, 272-273.
Vandebosch, H. ve Van Cleemput, K. (2008). Defining cyberbullying: A qualitative research into the perceptions of youngsters. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 11(4), 499-503.
Varjas, K., Henrich, C. ve Meyers, J. (2009). Urban middle school students' perceptions of bullying, cyberbullying, and school safety. Journal of School Violence, 8, 159-176.
Willard, N. (2005). An educator's guide to cyberbullying and cyberthreats. Washington County Public Schools. 6 Mart 2010, http://cyberbully.org/docs/cbcteducator.pdf.
Williams, K. R. ve Guerra, G. N. (2007). Prevalence and predictors of internet bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 14-21.
Whitney, I. ve Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior, middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3-25.
Wolak, J., Mitchell, K. J. ve Finkelhor, D. (2007). Does online harassment constitute bullying? An exploration of online harassment by known peers and online-only contacts. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), 51-58.
Ybarra, M. L. (2004). Linkages between depressive symptomatology and Internet harassment among young regular internet users. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 247-257.
Ybarra, M. L., Diener-West, M. ve Leaf, P. J. (2007). Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), 42-50.
Ybarra, M. L. ve Mitchell, K. J. (2004a). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: A comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 1308-1316.
Ybarra, M. L. ve Mitchell, K. J. (2004b). Youth engaging in online harassment: Associations with caregiver-child relationships, internet use, and personal characteristics. Journal of Adolescence, 27(3), 319-336.
Ybarra, M. L. ve Mitchell, K. J. (2007). Prevalence and frequency of internet harassment instigation: Implications for adolescent health. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, 189-195.
Ybarra, M. L., Mitchell, K. J., Wolak, J. ve Finkelhor, D. (2006). Examining characteristics and associated distress related to Internet harassment: Findings from the Second Youth Internet Safety Survey. Pediatrics, 118(4), 1169-1177.