Liderlik Stillerinin Duygusal Bağlılık ve İşten Ayrılma Niyetiyle İlişkilerinde Örgütsel Destek Algısının Aracılık Rolü

Bu araştırmada babacan, katılımcı ve yetkeci liderlik stilleri ile örgütsel bağlılığın bir bileşeni olan duygusal bağlılık ve işten ayrılma niyeti örgütsel değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkiler örgütsel destek algısının aracılık etkisi bağlamında incelenmektir. Araştırmaya 143 kadın ve 198 erkek olmak üzere toplam 341 beyaz yakalı çalışan katılmıştır. Araştır- manın bulgularına göre örgütsel destek algısının babacan ve katılımcı liderlik ile duygusal bağlılık ilişkisinde kısmi aracılık rolüne ve yetkeci liderlik ve duygusal bağlılık ilişkisinde ise tam aracılık rolüne sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca babacan liderlik ile işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisinde örgütsel destek algısının tam aracılık; katılımcı ve yetkeci liderlik ile işten ayrılma niyeti ilişkisinde ise örgütsel destek algısının kısmi aracılık rolüne sahip olduğu bulunmuştur.

Perceived Organizational Support as a Mediator of the Relationship between Leadership Styles and Organizational Outcomes

The present study investigates the mediating role of perceived organizational support on the relationship between leadership styles (paternalistic, participative and authoritarian leadership) and organizational variables (affective commitment and intention to leave). Participants are 341 (143 women and 198 men) white-collar employees. Analy- sis of data indicated that perceived organizational support fully mediates the relationship between authoritarian lead- ership and affective commitment. But perceived organizational support partially mediates the relationship between paternalistic, participative leadership and affective commitment. Moreover the relationship between paternalistic leadership and intention to leave is fully mediated by perceived organizational support. But perceived organizational support partially mediates the relationship between authoritarian, participative leadership and intention to leave.

___

  • Allen, N. J. ve Meyer, J. P.(1990). The measurement and an- tecedents of affective, continuance and normative com- mitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18.
  • Allen, D. G., Shore, L. M. ve Griffeth, R. W. (2003). The role perceived organizational support and supportive human resource practices in the turnover process. Journal of Management, 29, 99-118.
  • Aube, C., Rousseau, V. ve Morin, E. M. (2007). Perceived orga- nizational support and organizational commitment. Jour- nal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 479-495.
  • Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism: Towards conceptual refine- ment and operationalization. U. Kim, K. S. Yang ve K. K. Hwang, (Ed.), Indigenous and cultural psychology: Understanding people in context içinde (445-466). New York, NY: Springer Science Business Media Inc.
  • Aycan, Z. ve Fikret-Paşa, S. (2003). Career choices, job selec- tion criteria, and leadership preferences in a transitional nation: The case of Turkey. Journal of Career Develop- ment, 30(2), 129-144.
  • Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R. N., Mendonca, M., Yu, K., Deller, J., Stahl, G. ve Kurshid, A. (2000). Impact of culture on hu- man resource management practices: A 10-country com- parison. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(1), 192-221.
  • Baron, R. M. ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Jour- nal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
  • Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stodgill’s handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (3. baskı). New York, NY: The Free Press.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P. ve Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate respons- es: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organiza- tions. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7, 89-117.
  • Chew, Y. T. ve Wong, S. K. (2008). Effects of career mentor- ing experience and perceived organizational support on employee commitment and ıntentions to leave: A study among hotel workers in Malaysia. International Journal of Management, 25, 692-700.
  • Cole, M. S. ve Bruch, H. (2006). Organizational identity strength, identification, and commitment and their rela- tionships to turnover intention: Does organizational hi- erarchy matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 585-605.
  • Dawley, D. D., Andrews, M. C. ve Bucklew, N. S. (2008). Men- toring, supervisor support, and perceived organizational support: What matters most? Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 29, 235-247.
  • Djurkovich, N., McCormack, D. ve Casimir, G. (2008). Work bullying and intention to leave: The moderating effect of perceived organisational support. Human Resource Man- agement, 18, 405-422.
  • Dorfman, P. W., Howell, J. P., Hibino, S., Lee, J. K. Tate, U. ve Bautista, A. (1997). Leadership in western and Asian countries: Commonalities and differences in effective leadership processes across cultures. Leadership Quar- terly, 8, 233-274.
  • Eder, P. ve Eisenberger, R. (2008). Perceived organizational support: reducing the negative influence of coworker withdrawal behavior. Journal of Management, 34, 55-68.
  • Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D. ve Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organiza- tional support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 42-51.
  • Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P. ve Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Per- ceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psy- chology, 75, 51-59.
  • Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S. ve Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Ap- plied Psychology, 71, 500-507.
  • Eisenberger, R. ve Stinglhamber, F. (2011). Perceived organi- zational support: Fostering enthusiastic and productive employees. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L. ve Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor sup- port: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 565-573.
  • Erben, G. S. ve Güneşer, A. B. (2008). The relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment: Investigating the role of climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 955-968.
  • Ergin, C. ve Kozan, M. K. (2004). Çalışanların temel değerleri, dönüşümsel ve etkileşimsel liderlerin çekiciliği. Türk Psi- koloji Dergisi, 19, 37-51.
  • Farh, J. L., Hackett, R. D. ve Liang, J. (2007). Individual-level cultural values as moderators of perceived organizational support–employee outcome relationships in China: Com- paring the effects of power distance and traditionality. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 715-729.
  • Fikret-Paşa, S. (2000). Türkiye ortamında liderlik özellikleri. Z. Aycan, (Ed.), Türkiye’de yönetim, liderlik ve insan kaynak- ları uygulamaları içinde (225-241). Ankara: Türk Psiko- loglar Derneği.
  • Fuller, J. B., Hester, K., Barnett, T., Frey, L. ve Relyea, C. (2006). Perceived organizational support and perceived external prestige: Predicting organizational attachment for university faculty, staff, and administrators. The Jour- nal of Social Psychology, 146, 327-347.
  • Gagnon, M. A. ve Michael, J. H. (2004). Outcomes of perceived supervisor support for wood production employees. For- est Products Journal, 54, 172-177.
  • Giray, M. D. (2010). İş yerinde destek algılarının liderlik stilleri ve örgütsel sonuç değişkenleri ile ilişkisi. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Giray, M. D. ve Şahin D. (2012). Algılanan örgütsel destek, yönetici ve çalışma arkadaşları desteği ölçekleri: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 15(30), 1-9.
  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
  • Göncü, A. (2006). Motivational processes involved in the rela- tionship between leadership and organizational citizen- ship behaviors. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Koç Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • Harris, G. E. ve Cameron, J. E. (2005). Multiple dimensions of organizational identification and commitment as predic- tors of turnover intentions and psychological well-being. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 37, 159-169.
  • Hazar, S. E. (2002). The effects of leadership prototypes and perceived leadership styles on leadership outcomes and the effects of self-construals on leadership prototypes. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
  • Hui, C., Wong, A. ve Tjosvold, D. (2007). Turnover intentions and performance in China: The role of positive affectiv- ity. Chinese values, perceived organizational support and constructive controversy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80, 735-751.
  • Hutchison, S. (1997). A path model of perceived organizational support. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 159-174.
  • Kabasakal, H. ve Bodur, M. (2002). Arabic cluster: A bridge between east and west. Journal of World Business, 105, 1-25.
  • Kabasakal, H. ve Dastmalchian, A. (2001). Introduction to the special issue on leadership and culture in the middle east. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 479-
  • LaMastro, V. (2000). Commitment and perceived organiza- tional support. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal.
  • Lewin, K. ve Lippitt, R. (1938). An experimental approach to the study of autocracy and democracy: A preliminary note. Sociometry, 1, 292-300.
  • Liddell, W. W. (2005). Project GLOBE: A large scale cross- cultural study of leadership. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 3, 5-9.
  • Loi, R., Hang-yue, N. ve Foley, S. (2006). Linking employees’ justice perceptions to organizational commitment and intention to leave: The mediating role of perceived orga- nizational support. Journal of Occupational and Organi- zational Psychology, 79, 101-120.
  • Luthar, H. K. (1996). Gender differences in evaluation of per- formance and leadership ability: Autocratic vs. democrat- ic managers. Sex Rloes, 35, 337-361.
  • Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M. ve Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The dif- fering effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 738- 748.
  • Meyer, J. P. ve Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component concep- tualization of organizational commitment. Human Re- source Management Review, 1, 61-89.
  • Meyer, J. P. ve Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the work- place: Theory, research and application. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
  • Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J. ve Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 538-551.
  • Moideenkutty, U., Blau, G., Kumar, R. ve Nalakath, A. (2001). Perceived organisational support as a mediator of the relationship of perceived situational factors to affective organisational commitment. Applied Psychology: An In- ternational Review, 50, 615-634.
  • Naumann, S. E., Bennett, N., Bies, R. J. ve Martin, C. L. (1998). Laid off, but still loyal: The influence of perceived justice and organizational support. International Journal of Con- flict Management, 9, 356-368.
  • Naumann, S. E., Bies, R. J. ve Martin, C. L. (1995). The roles of organizational support and justice during a layoff. Acad- emy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 89-93.
  • O’Driscoll, M. P. ve Randall, D. M. (1999). Perceived organisa- tional support, satisfaction with rewards, and employee job involvement and organisational commitment. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48, 197-209.
  • Ok, A. B. (2007). Correlates of Organizational Commitment: A special emphasis on organizational communication. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Ankara.
  • Paşa, S. F., Kabasakal, H. ve Bodur, M. (2001). Society, organ- isations, and leadership in Turkey. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 50, 559-589.
  • Pellegrini, E. K. ve Scandura, T. A. (2006). Leader-member ex- change (LMX), paternalism, and delegation in the Turk- ish business culture: An empirical investigation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37, 264-279.
  • Perryer, C. ve Jordan, C. (2005). The influence of leader be- haviors on organizational commitment: A study in the Australian Public Sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 379-396.
  • Rhoades, L. ve Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organization- al support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714.
  • Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R. ve Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of per- ceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psy- chology, 86, 825-836.
  • Shore, L. M. ve Shore, T. H. ( 1995). Perceived organizational support and organizational justice. R. S. Cropanzano ve K. M. Kacmar, (Ed.), Organizational politics, justice, and support: Managing the social climate of the workplace içinde (149-164). Westport, CT: Quorum.
  • Shore, L. M. ve Tetrick, L. E. (1991). A construct validity study of the survey of perceived organizational support. Jour- nal of Applied Psychology, 76, 637-643.
  • Sinha, J. B. P. (1995). The cultural context of leadership and power. New Delhi: Sage.
  • Slattery, J. P. ve Selvarajan, T. T. R. (2005). Antecedents to tem- porary employee’s turnover intention. Journal of Leader- ship and Organizational Studies, 12, 53-66.
  • Steyrer, J., Schiffinger, M. ve Lang, R. (2008). Organizational commitment-A missing link between leadership behavior and organizational performance? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24, 364-374.
  • Tett, R. P. ve Meyer, J. P. (1993). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, and turnover: Path anal- yses based on meta-analytic findings. Personnel Psychol- ogy, 46, 259-293.
  • Thomas, J. L., Bliese, P. D. ve Jex, S. M. (2005). Interpersonal conflict and organizational commitment: Examining two levels of supervisory support as multilevel moderators. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2375-2398.
  • Walsh, J. P., Ashford, S. J. ve Hill, T. E. (1985). Feedback ob- struction: The influence of the information environment on employee turnover intentions. Human Relations, 38, 23-46.
  • Wasti, S. A. (2003). Organizational commitment, turnover in- tentions and the influence of cultural values. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76, 303-321
  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H. ve Tetrick, L. E. (2002). The role of fair treatment and rewards in percep- tions of organizational support and leader–member ex- change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 590-598.
  • Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M. ve Liden, R. C. (1997). Perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange: A social exchange perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82-111.
  • Van Dick, R., Christ, O., Stellmacher, J, Wagner, U., Ahlswede, O., Gruba, C., Hauptmeier, M., Höhfeld, C., Moltzen, K. ve Tissington, P. A. (2004). Should I stay or should I go? Explaining turnover intentions with organizational iden- tification and job satisfaction. British Journal of Manage- ment, 15, 351-360.
  • Yokuş, İ. (2006). Erkek egemen işlerde çalışanların örgütsel des- tek algıları ile örgütsel bağlılıkları arasındaki ilişki. Ya- yınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, 321.Ankara.