İÇİŞLERİ BAKANLIĞININ YÖNETİM GELENEĞİ

Bürokrasinin kapasitesinin genel yetersizliği ile ilgili algılar Kamu yönetimi reformların sürekli tetiklemiştir. Türk yönetim geleneği yüksek standartlı kamu hizmetlerinin gelişmesinde baş engel olarak görülmüştür. Bu algıların aksine, bu makale yönetim geleneğini, özellikle İçişleri Bakanlığının, şu andaki ve gelecekteki muhtemel sorunlarda yol gösterici olan değerli tecrübe ve mücadelenin deposu olarak önermektedir. Ayrıca bu makale sürekli reformlara rağmen İçişleri Bakanlığının yönetim geleneğin sürekliğine dair güçlü sebepler sunmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, politikacı ve yönetici elitlerinin dünyalarını onların gözünden tasvir ettiği için etnografik methodu seçtim.

THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRADITION OF THE TURKISH MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR

Perceptions of general incapacity of the bureaucracy has triggeredpersistent public administration reforms. The administrative tradition of theTurkey was seen a major barrier to develop high standard public services.Instead, this article try to understand and describe the administrative traditionof Turkey, especially Turkish Ministry of Interior (MoI). In addition, it suggeststhe administrative tradition as valuable repository of experience and challengethat highlight how to tackle current and future possible issues. Furthermore, thisarticle provides robust reasons for how the tradition of the MoI has persisted inspite of these reforms. I chose the ethnographic qualitative research design thatdescribes the political-administrator elites’ world from their own standpoints.

PDF

___

Balci, O., (2015). The changing roles of governors and district governors in Turkey, 2000-2014 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton).
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A., (2012). Interpretivism and the analysis of traditions and practices. Critical policy studies, 6(2), pp.201-208. Available: Google scholar
Boll, K. and Rhodes, R.A., (2015). Excursions in administrative ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 4(2). Available: https://doi.org/10.1108/ JOE-05-2015-0013 (Retrieved 03/03/2017)
Çiner, C.U., (2014). Reconsidering the Role of the Prefects in Turkey: Public Policies and Metropolization, International Journal of Public Administration, 37(8), 445-455. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2014.903277
Crawley, J. and Kutlu, O., (2009). UNDP Institutional Review of the Ministry of the Interior for Effective Civilian Oversight. (Retrieved from its author via mail)
Dinçer, Ö. and Yılmaz, C., (2003). Kamu yönetiminde yeniden yapılanma 1: Değişimin yönetimi için yönetimde değişim. [Change in Management for the Management of Change] TC Başbakanlık.
Eryılmaz, B., (2013). Bürokrasi ve Siyaset: Bürokratik Devletten Etkin Yönetime. [Bureucracy and Politics: From bureaucratic state to effective administration/management.] 5th ed. Alfa Basım Yayım Dağıtım Limited Şti.
Feslihan, M., (2016). Exploring How Decentralisation Works in the Territorial Administration of Turkey 2004-2014: The Case of the Kocaeli Province (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton).
Hood, C. and Lodge, M., (2007). End piece: Civil Service Reform Syndrome– Are We Heading for a Cure? Transformation, pp.58-59. Available: Google scholar
Lindquist, E. and Tiernan, A., (2011). The Australian public service and policy advising: Meeting the challenges of 21st century governance. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 70(4), 437-450. Available: http://onlinelibrary. wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2011.00748.x/epdf Retrieved 26/05/2015)
Painter, M. and Peters, B.G., (2010). The Analysis of Administrative Traditions. In: Painter M., Peters B.G. (Eds) Tradition and Public Administration (pp. 3-16). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Peters, B.G., (2008). The Napoleonic tradition. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21(2), 118-132. Available: Google scholar
Rhodes, R.A., (1999). Traditions and public sector reform: Comparing Britain and Denmark. Scandinavian Political Studies, 22(4), 341-370. Available: Google scholar
Rhodes, R.A.W., (2011a). Everyday life in British government. Oxford University Press.
Rhodes, R.A., (2015). Ethnography. In Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (eds.), 2015The Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science, pp.171-185. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge: forthcoming.
Rhodes, R.A., (2016). Recovering the Craft of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 4(76), pp.638-647. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley. com/doi/10.1111/puar.12504/pdf
Tiernan, A., (2015a). Craft and capacity in the public service. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(1), pp.53-62. Available: Google scholar
Yesilkagit K., (2010). The Future of Administrative Tradition: Tradition as Ideas and Structure. In: Painter M., Peters B.G. (Eds) Tradition and Public Administration (pp.145-156). Palgrave Macmillan, London
Varol, O., (2015). Public management reform experience of Turkey: effective factors on the administrative reform process of Turkey in the period of 1980-2010 (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton).
Icisleri Bakanligi (MoI 2008). Ic-islev Raporu (Internal Audit Report), Available : http://www.arem.gov.tr/icisleri-bakanligi-ic-islev-arastirmaraporu- 2008 (Retrieved 05/06/2015)
Icisleri Bakanligi (MoI, 2009a;2015a). İçişleri Bakanlığı Stratejik Planı 2010-2014 [the MoI’s 2010 and 2014 Strategic Plan]. Available: http://www.strateji. gov.tr/ (Retrieved 10/06/2015)
Icisleri Bakanligi (MoI, 2010b-2017b). Faaliyet Raporlari 2009-2016 [Activity Reports]. Available: http://www.strateji.gov.tr/ (several access between 10/06/2015-05/04/2017)
Icisleri Bakanligi (MoI, 2010c-2017c). Performans Programı 2009-2016 [Performance Programmes]. Ankara: Ministry of Interior. Available: http://www. strateji.gov.tr/ (several access between 10/06/2015-05/04/2017)
Icisleri Bakanligi Egitim Plani, 2016 [report of Education Plan of MoI, 2016d] Available: http://egitim.icisleri.gov.tr/kurumlar/egitim.icisleri.gov.tr/ Genel/Belgeler.pdf (Retrieved on 26/09/2016)
TIAV, 2013. Toplumda İçişleri Bakanlığı ve Mülki idare Amirleri Algısı: Vatandaş Algısı [The Perception of the Ministry of Interior Affairs and the CAs in the Society: Perception of citizens.] Ankara.
TIAV, 2014a. Toplumda İçişleri Bakanlığı ve Mülki idare Amirleri Algısı: Toplumun Farklı Kesimlerinin Algısı. [The Perception of the Ministry of Interior Affairs and the CAs in the Society: Perception of several society groups. Ankara.
TIAV, 2014c. Toplumda İçişleri Bakanlığı ve Mülki idare Amirleri Algısı: Mülki idare Amirleri’nin Algısı. [The Perception of the Ministry of Interior Affairs and the CAs in the Society: Perception of Prefecturals -CAs]. Ankara.
http://www.icisleri.gov.tr [official web sites of MoI] (several access between 10/06/2015- 21/09/2018)