EUROPOL: TÜRKİYE’NİN OPERASYONEL İŞBİRLİĞİ TARTIŞMASI

Suçun, yirminci yüzyılda, uluslararası bir boyut kazanması, Avrupa'yı, suçla uluslararası etkin bir mücadelede sürekli bir arayış içerisine itmiştir. Bu yüzyılın başında, Avrupa menşeli olarak kurulan Uluslararası Kriminal Polis Teşkilatı-İnterpol ile istenen başarıyı yakalayamayan Avrupa, yüzyılın sonunda, terörizm ve organize suçlar ile mücadele etmek için Europol isminde bölgesel bir güvenlik teşkilatı kurmuştur. Europol, suçla mücadelede etkin bir rol oynayabilmek için ülkeler ile operasyonel ve stratejik olmak üzere iki farklı işbirliği yapmaktadır. Türkiye, suçla uluslararası mücadelede, İnterpol'ün yanında, bölgesel anlamda Europol'ü de kullanmak istemektedir. Bunun için Europol ile olan stratejik işbirliğini, operasyonel işbirliğine yükseltme çabası içerisindedir. Bu makale, Türkiye'nin Europol ile operasyonel işbirliği kurma ihtimali ve daha çok Europol'ün uluslararası suçla etkin bir mücadele aracı olup, olmadığını irdelemek amacıyla kaleme alınmıştır

EUROPOL: THE DISCUSSION ABOUT OPERATIONAL COOPERATION OF TURKEY

Having crime gained international dimension in the 20th century, it pushed Europe into a continuous quest for international struggle. On the outset of the century, Interpol, which was established as European organization, has not accomplished its mission as Europeans have expected. This failure urged Europe to search for a new organization. At the end of the century, a security organization by the name of Europol was established to fight against terrorism and organized crime in Europe. Europol maintains strategic and operational co-operation with other countries to play an essential role in crime fighting. In addition to Interpol, Turkey wants to use Europol in fighting crime at regional basis. To do this, Turkey wishes to elevate its strategic co-opeartion status to operational status. This article is written about the possibility of this cooperation and whether Europol is effective organization in fighting crime regionally

PDF

___

Akalın, Mehmet, (2014a), “Uluslararası Kriminal Polis Teşkilatı-İnterpol’ün Terörle Mücadeleye Tarihsel Yaklaşımı” Uluslararası Güvenlik ve Terörizm Dergisi, 5 (1), ss.103-117.
Akalın, Mehmet, (2014b), “Uluslararası Kriminal Polis Teşkilatı-İnterpol”, Kripto Yayınları, ss. 1-175.
Alexander, Y. and Dennis A. Pluchinsky (1992). European Terrorism: Today&Tomorrow. Virginia: Brassey’S Inc.
Benyon, John (1994). “Policing the European Union: The Changing Basis of Cooperation on Law Enforcement”. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs), Vol. 70, Issue 3. Jul. pp. 497–517.
Birleşmiş Milletler, (2010), The Globalization of Crime- A Transnational Organized Crime Threat Assessment, Viyana: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, pp. 1-314.
Busuioc, Madalina and Groenleer, Martijn, (2013), “Beyond Design: The Evolution of Europol and Eurojust”, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, Vol. 14 (3), pp. 285-304.
Chalk, Peter (1996). West European Terrorism and Counter Terrorism. New York: ST. Martin’s Press Inc.
Council of the European Union. (2005). Extraordinary Council meeting, Justice and Home Affairs. Brussels. Retrieved July 13, 2005, from http://ue.eu.int/ ueDocs/cmsData/docs/pressdata/en/jha/85703.pdf
Deflem, Mathieu, (2002), Policing world society: Historical foundations of international police cooperation. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.
Deflem, Mathieu, (2006), Europol and the Policing of International Terrorism: Counter Terrorism in a Global Perspective, Justice Quarterly, Vol. 23 (3), pp. 336- 359.
Den, B., Monica; Hillebrand, Claudia and Nolke, Andreas, (2008), “Legitimacy Under Pressure: The European Web of Counterterrorism Networks”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(1), pp. 101–124.
De Moor, Alexander and Vermeulen, Gert, (2010), “The Europol Council Decision: A New Legal Basis for Europol”, New Journal of European Criminal Law, Vol.1 (2), pp. 1-125.
Emniyet Genel Müdürlüğü, (2015a), “Türkiye-Europol İlişkileri”, İnterpol-Europol Dairesi Başkanlığı resmi internet sitesinden ulaşılabilir.
Emniyet Genel Müdürlüğü, (2015b), Avrupa Uyuşturucu ve Uyuşturucu Bağımlılığı İzleme Merkezi 2013 Ulusal Raporu, 2012 Verileri, Reitox Ulusal Temas Noktası, ss. 1-192.
Europol Convention, (1995), “Convention Based on Article K.3 of the Treaty on European Union, On the Establishment of a European Police Office. Europol, (2011), Europol Review- General Report on Europol Activities, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, European Police Office, pp. 1-64.
Europol, (2013), Serious and Organised Crime Threat Assessment (SOCTA), European Police Office, Netherlands, pp. 1-52.
Europol, (2014), European Union Terrorism Situation and Trend Report (TESAT), European Police Office, pp. 1-60.
Europol, (2015), www.europol.europol.eu adresinden ulaşılabilir. Financial Times, (2004), “Big Five to take lead in beefing up EU security measures”, March 20, , p. 7 [on-line]. Available via LexisNexis.
Groenleer, L. P. Marinus, (2009), “The Autonomy of European Union Agencies: A comparative study of institutional development”, Delft: Eburon. Hayes, Ben, (2006), “Future of Europol”, Polis Birimleri Dergisi, Vol. 8 (3-4), ss. 131-142.
House of Lords, (2008), “Europol: Co-ordinating the fight against serious and organised crime”, Select Committee on the European Union, Session 2007–2008, 29th Report.
Inquiry Report (1987), Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Committee of Enquiry Into the Drug Problem in the Member States of the Community 12.
Kaya, Sezgin, (2009), “Uluslararası Alanda Polisiye İşbirliğinin Gelişimi: Avrupa Örneği”, Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), ss. 49-69.
Khosrokhavar, Farhad (2008), “Terrorism in Europe and the Middle East”, This article is a resume of his speech at the Centre for Studies in Islamism and Radicalisation at the Department of Political Science, University of Aarhus, Denmark. ss. 1-11.
Kupchinsky, Roman, (2004), “Intelligence and police coordination in the EU”, RFE/ RL Organized Crime and Terrorism Watch, 4 (11). Retrieved October 26, 2004, from http://www.rferl.org/reports/corruptionwatch/2004/04/11-210404.asp Monaco, R., Francis, (1995). EuropoL: The culmination of the European Union’s international police cooperation efforts. Fordham International Law Journal, 19 (1), 247-307.
Monar, Jorg, (2010), Experimentalist governance in justice and home affairs, in: C. Sabel & J. Zeitlin, Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a new architecture, pp. 237–260 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Nadelmann A., Ethan, (1990), The Role of the United States in the International Enforcement of Criminal Law, 31 HARV. INT’L L.J. 37, 44 (1990).
Occhipinti, D. John, (2003) The Politics of EU Police Cooperation (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers).
Peek, J. (1994). International police cooperation within justified political and judicial frameworks: Five theses on TREVI. In J. Monar F&R . Morgan (Eds.),
The third pillar of the European Union (pp. 201-207). Brussels: European Interuniversity Press.
Türkiye Ekonomi Politikaları Araştırma Vakfı, (2014), “Türkiye’de Kişisel Verilerin Korunmasının Hukuki ve Ekonomik Analizi”, İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi, ss. 1-97.
The New York Times, (2004), “As Europe Hunts for Terrorists”, The Hunted Press Advantages, 22 Mart, 2004.
Wikipedia, (2015), “Schengen Agreement” http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ SchengenAgreement” adresinden ulaşılabilir.