___

• Alptekin, C. (2006). Cultural familiarity in inferential and literal comprehension in L2 reading. System, 34, 494‐508.
• Arıkan, A. (2008). Topics of reading passages in ELT coursebooks: What do our students   really read?   The Reading Matrix, 8 (2), 70‐85
• Bernhardt, E. & Kamil M. (1995). Interpreting the relationship between L1 and L2 reading: Consolidating the linguistic threshold and the linguistic interdependence hypothesis. Applied Linguistics, 16, 15‐34.
• Brisbois, J. E. (1995). Connections between first‐ and second‐language reading. Journal of Reading Behavior,   27, 4,  565‐584.
• Brown, C. M. (1998). L2 reading: An update on relevant L1 research. Foreign Language Annals, 31 (2), 191‐201.
• Carrell, P. (1984). The effects of rhetorical organization on ESL readers. TESOL Quarterly, 18 (3), 441‐469.
• Carrell, P. (1991). Second language reading: Reading ability or language proficiency. Applied Linguistics, 12, (2),   159‐179.
• Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. & Liberto, J.  (1989). Metacognitive Strategy training for ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 23, (4), 647‐678.
• Carrell, P. L. (1998). Introduction: Interactive approaches to second language reading. In  P. L. Carrell, J.
• Devine  & D.E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading (pp.1‐5). New York:   Cambridge University Press.
• Carrell, P.L. ,  Devine, J.,  &  Eskey, D.E. (1998). Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. New York:   Cambridge University Press.
• Carrell, P. L, Eisterhold, J. C. (1998). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine & D.E. Eskey (Ed.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp.1‐5). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Cekic, H. (2007).Separate and simultaneous cumulative effects of content and formal schemata on Turkish   EFL learners’ reading. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 447‐465.
• Cohen, A.D. (1986). Mentalistic Measures in Reading Strategy Research: Some Recent Findings. English for Specific Purposes 5 (2), 131‐145.
• Clarke, M. A. (1998). The shortcircuit hypothesis of ESL reading‐ or when language competence interferes   with reading performance. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine & D.E. Eskey (Ed.), Interactive approaches to   second language reading (pp.1‐5). New York : Cambridge University Press.
• Cubukcu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Educational Research, 18 (1), 1‐11.
• Denzin, N. (1970). The Research Act in Sociology. London: Butterworth.
• Erten, I.H., & Karakas, M. (2007). Understanding the divergent influences of reading activities on the comprehension of short stories. The Reading Matrix, 7(3), 113‐133.
• Erten, I.H., & Razı, S. (2009). The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21 (1), 66‐77.
• Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices Thousand Oaks: Sage Inc.
• Hammadou, J. (2000). The impact of analogy and content knowledge on reading comprehension: What   helps, what hurts. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 38‐50.
• Hudson, T. (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the short circuit in L2 reading: Nondecoding   factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32, 1‐31.
• Johnson, P. (1981). Effects of reading comprehension on building bacground knowledge. TESOL Quarterly,   16, 503‐516.
• Kern, R. G. (1989). Second language reading strategy instruction: Its effects on comprehension and word inference ability. Modern Language Journal, 73, 135‐149.
• Kol, S., & Schcolnik, M. (2000). Enhancing screen reading strategies. CALICO Journal, 18(1), 67‐80.
• MacIntyre, P. D. (1995). How does anxiety affect second language learning? A reply to Sparks and Ganschow.   The Modern Lnaguage Journal, 79, 90‐99
• MacIntyre, P. D, Noels, K. A. & Clement, R. (1997). Biases in self‐ratings of second language proficiency:   The role of language anxiety. Language Learning, 47, 265‐287.
• Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. San Francisco: Jossey‐Bass.
• Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2006). A reevaluation of the role of anxiety: Self‐  efficacy, anxiety and their relation to reading and listening proficiency. Foreign Language Annals,   39, 2, 276‐295.
• Ozek, Y., & Civelek, M. (2006). A study on the use of cognitive reading strategies by ELT students.   The Asian EFL Journal, Professional Teachers Articles,1‐26.
• Saito, Y., Horwitz, E. & Garza, T. (1999). Foreign language reading anxiety. The ModernLanguage Journal,  83 (2), 202‐218.
• Schoonen, R., Hulstijn, J., & Bossers, B. (1998). Metacognitive and language‐specific knowledge in native   and foreign language reading comprehension: An Empirical study among Dutch students in grades   6, 8 and 10. Language Learning, 48, (1), 71‐106.
• Sellers, V.D. (2000). Anxiety and reading comprehension in Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign  Language Annals, 33,(5), 512‐ 520.
• Tobias, S. (1986) Anxiety and cognitive processing of instruction. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self‐related cognitions   in anxiety and motivation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Taillefer, G. F. (1996). L2 reading ability: Further insight into the short‐circuit hypothesis. The Modern Language Journal, 80, 461‐477.
• Yayli, D. (2010). A think‐aloud study: Cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies of ELT department   students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 38, 234‐251.