MUSA KILIÇ, GONCA BALCI KILIÇ, AYŞE OKUR

Eğirme sisteminin iplik özelliklerine etkisi

Bu çalışmada, farklı eğirme sistemlerinde üretilen ipliklerin özellikleri, ilgili literatürün ışığında karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiştir. Çalışma kapsamında, günümüzde yaygın olarak kullanılan ring, kompakt, rotor, air-jet, vortex ve friksiyon eğirme sistemleri üzerinde durulmuştur. Son yıllarda geliştirilen kompakt, rotor, air-jet, vortex ve friksiyon eğirme sistemleri, gerek üretilen ipliklerin özelliklerindeki çeşitli avantajlar ve gerekse de üretim hızları sayesinde öne çıkmış ve kısa zamanda ticarileşmiştir. Bununla birlikte, ring iplikçiliği günümüzde hâlâ en yaygın kullanılan sistemdir ve referans yöntem olarak kabul edilmektedir. Literatür genel olarak değerlendirildiğinde, en az tüylü ipliklerin vortex, en düşük düzgünsüzlük ve en yüksek mukavemet değerlerine sahip ipliklerin kompakt ve en çok uzama yeteneğine sahip ipliklerin de friksiyon eğirme sistemlerinde üretildiği söylenebilir. Ayrıca, kompakt iplikler en düşük sürtünme katsayısı değerlerine sahiptir.

Effects of spinning system on yarn properties

In this study, the properties of yarns spun in different spinning systems were compared in the light of the literature. Ring, compact, rotor, air-jet, vortex and friction spinning systems were evaluated within the scope of the work. Compact, rotor, air-jet, vortex and friction systems, developed in recent years, have become important through some advantages in yarn properties and production speeds. However, ring spinning is still the most widely used system and it is also accepted as the reference method. A general evaluation of the literature may conclude that vortex yarns are the least hairy, compact yarns are the most even and the strongest and friction yarns have the best elongation. Furthermore, compact yarns also have the least friction coefficient values.

PDF

___

1.Lawrence, C.A. (2003). Fundamentals of Spun Yarn Technology. CRC Press. New York.
2.Bange, M.P., Constable, G.A., Gordon, S.G., Long, R.L., Naylor, G.R.S. and van der Sluijs, M.H.J. (2009). FIBREpakfrom seeds to good shirts. The Cotton Catchment Communities CRC. Australia.
3.Muratec, Murata Machinery LTD. Textile Machinery., www.muratec.net/tm/index.html, Haziran 2010.
4.Rieter, Rotor Spinning, http://www.rieter.com/en/textile/shortk. [47] tarafından yapılan araştırmalardaki ılmıştır.staple-yarn/rotor-spinning/, Mayıs 2010.
5.Beltran, R., Wang, L. and Wang, X. (2007). A Controlled Experiment on Yarn Hairiness and Fabric Pilling. Textile Research Journal, 77(3), 179-183.
6.Beceren, Y. and Nergis, B.U. (2008). Comparison of the Effects of Cotton Yarns Produced by New, Modified and Conventional Spinning Systems on Yarn and Knitted Fabric Performance. Textile Research Journal, 78(4), 297-303.
7.Erdumlu, N., Ozipek, B., Oztuna, A.S. and Cetinkaya, S. (2009). Investigation of Vortex Spun Yarn Properties in Comparison with Conventional Ring and Open-end Rotor Spun Yarns. Textile Research Journal, 7P(7); 585-595.
8.Canoglu, S. and Tanır, S.K. (2009). Studies on Yarn Hairiness of Polyester/Cotton Blended Ring-Spun Yarns Made from Different Blend Ratios. Textile Research Journal. 79(3), 235-242.
9.Chattopadhyay, R. and Sinha, S.K., (2007). A Study on Spinning Limits and Yarn Properties with Progressive Change in Yarn Count in Friction Spinning. A UTEXResearch Journal, vol.1, no. 1,1 -8.
10.Wiget, T. (2000). The New Method for Spinning High Quality Ring Yarns, Cotton Incorporated's 13th AnnualEFSSystem Conference.
11.Cheng, K.P.S. and Yu, C. (2003). A Study of Compact Spun Yarns. Textile Research Journal, 73(4), 345-349.
12.Kılıç, M. (2004). îplik Çapı ve Değişimi ile Mukavemet Arasındaki ilişkiler Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, DEÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, îzmir.
13.Basal, G. and Oxenham, W. (2006). Comparison of Properties and Structures of Compact and Conventional Spun Yarns. Textile Research Journal. 76(1), 567-575.
14.Xia,Z.,Wang,H.,Wang,X.,Ye, W. andXu,W. (2010). AStudy on the Relationship between Irregularity and Hairiness of Spun Yarns. Textile Research Journal, published online.
15.Yılmaz D. and Usal Mustafa R. (2010). Comparison of Compact-Jet, Compact, and Conventional Ring-Spun Yarns. Textile Research Journal, published online.
16.Carissoni, E., Dotti, S., Fleiss, F., Petaccia, L. and Pieri, L. (2002). Reference Books of Textile Technologies, Spinning, Cotton and Wool Spinning. ACIMIT, Italy.
17.Mohamed, M.H., Lord, P.R. and Saleh, H.A. (1975). A Comparison of the Hairiness and Diameter of Ring and Open-End Yarns. Textile Research Journal, 45(5), 389-395.
18.Sirang, Y., Dinfon, G. and Behery, H.M. (1982). A Study of Hairiness and Diameter of Open-End Yarn Processed Through Single- and Double-Cylinder Carding Machines and Its Comparison with Ring Yarn. Textile Research Journal, 52(4), 274-279.
19.Barella, A., Manich, A.M., Castro, L. and Hunter, L. (1984). Diameter and Hairiness of Ring and Rotor Polyester-Cotton Blended Spun Yarns. Textile Research Journal, 54(12), 840-844.
20.Wang, X. and Chang, L., (1999). An Experimental Study of the Effect of Test Speed on Yarn Hairiness. Textile Research Journal, 69(1). 25-29.
21.Dönmez, S. and Marmaralı, A:, (2004). A Model for Predicting a rn's Knittability. Textile Research Journal, 74(12), 1049-1054.
22.Baykal, P.D., Babaarslan, O. and Rızvan, E. (2006). Prediction of :ength and Elongation Properties of Cotton/Polyester-Blended OE >tor Yarns. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, vol.14,1(55), 18-21.
23.Baykal, P.D., Babaarslan, O. and Rızvan, E. (2007). A Statistical odel for the Hairiness of Cotton/Polyester Blended OE Rotor irns. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, vol.15, 4(63), 46-49.
24.Jackowska-Strumillo, L., Cyniak, D., Czekalski, J. and ckowski, T. (2007). Quality of Cotton Yarns Spun Using Ring-, )mpact-, and Rotor-Spinning Machines as a Function of Selected »inning Process Parameters. Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 1.15,1(60), 24-30.
25.Erbil, Y., Babaarslan, O. and Baykal, P.D. (2008). Influence of ivel Type on the Hairiness Properties of Rotor-Spun Blend Yarns. bres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, vol. 16,2(67), 31 -34.
26.US Patent 4497167, Nakahara, T. and Morihashi, K.T. (1985). ethod for Producing Spun Yarns. Patent Genius. tp://www.patentgenius.com/patent/4497167.html, 0cak2009.
27.Chasmawala, R.J., Hansen, S.M. and Jayaraman, S. (1990). ructure and Properties of Air-Jet Spun Yarns. Textile Research mrnal. 60(2), 61-69.
28.Ghosh, A, PatanaikA., Anandjiwala, R.D. andRengasamy, R.S. 008). A Study on Dynamic Friction of Different Spun Yarns. mrnal of Applied Polymer Science, 108, 3233-3238.
29.US Patent 5528895, Koji Deno, O. (1996). Spinning Apparatus ith Twisting Guide Surface, Patent Genius. :tp://www.patentgenius.com/subpage.php?page=patent& itent=5528895,0cak2009.
30.Oxenham, W. (2001). Fasciated Yarns - A Revolutionary evelopment?. Journal of Textile and Apparel, Technology and Management, 1(2), 1-7.
31.Basal, G. and Oxenham, W. (2003). Vortex Spun Yarn vs. Air-Jet pun Yarn .AUTEXResearch Journal, 3(3), 96-101.
32.Soe, A.K., Takahashi, M., Nakajima, M., Matsuo, T. and latsumoto, T. (2004). Structure and Properties of MVS Yarns in omparison with Ring Yarns and Open-End Rotor Spun Yarns. ?xtileResearch Journal, 74(9), 819-826.
33.Örtlek, H.G. and Ülkü, S. (2005). Effect of Some Variables on roperties of 100% Cotton Vortex Spun Yarn. Textile Research yurnal, 75(6), 458-461.
34.Rameshkumar, C., Anandkumar, P., Senthilnathan P., Jeevitha .. and Anbumani, N. (2008). Comparitive Studies on Ring, Rotor tid Vortex Yarn Knitted Fabrics, A UTEXResearch Journal, vol. 8,106-105.
35.Örtlek, H. G., Tutak, M. and Yolaçan, G., (2010). Assessing Colour Differences of Viscose Fabrics Knitted from Vortex-, Ring-tid Open-End Rotor-Spun Yarns After Abrasion. Journal of the extile Institute, 101(A), 310-314.
36.Balcı, G. (2010). İplik Sürtünme Özelliklerini Etkileyen ' aktörler. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, DEÜ Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir.
37.Kilic, M. and Okur, A. (2011). The Properties of Cotton-Tencel nd Cotton-Promodal Blended Yarns Spun in Different Spinning ystems, Textile Research Journal, 81 (2), 15 6-172
38.OerlikonNeumag. BCF Carpet Yarn, Synthetic Staple Fibre and lonw ovens, http://www.fehrerag.com, Şubat 2010.
39.Konda, F., Okamura, M. and Merati, A.A. (1996). Effect of luction Air Pressure inFrictiön Spinning on Yarn Properties. Textile lesearch Journal, 66(7), 446-452.
40. Hüh, Y., Kim, Y.R. and Oxenham, W. (2002). Analyzing Structural and Physical Properties of Ring, Rotor, and Friction Spun farns. Textile Research Journal, 72(2); 156-163.
41.Rankumar, S.S., Shastri, L., Tock, R.W., Shelly, D.C., Smith, M. L. and Padmanabhan, S. (2003). Experimental Study of the Frictional Properties of Friction Spun Yarns. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol: 88,2450-2454.
42.Rengasamy, R.S, Ishtiaque S. M., Das, B.R. and Ghosh A. (2008). Fabric Assistance in Woven Structures Made from Different Spun Yarns. Indiân Journal ofFibre & Textile Research, vol.33,377-382.
43.Das A. and Mal, R. D. (2009). Studies on Cotton-Acrylic Bulked Yarns Produced from Different Spinning Technologies. Part I: Yarn Characteristics. Journal of the Textile Institute, 100(1), 44-50.
44.Hong, J., Jayaraman, S. (2003). Friction in Textiles, Textile Progress, vol. 34, no. 1/2, Oxford, UK: The Textile Institute.
45.Chattopadhyay, R., Banerjee S. (1996). The Frictional Behaviour of Ring-, Rotor-, and Friction-spun Yarn. Journal of Textile Institute, 87(1), 59-67.
46.Rubenstein, C. (1959). Review on the Factors Influencing the Friction of Fibres, Yarns and Fabrics. Wear, 2(4), 296-310.
47.Kanat, E., Süpüren, G., Özdil, N., Özçelik Kayseri, G. (2010) Comparasion of Friction Characteristics of the Yarns Spun from Different Spinning Systems, International Conference of Applied Research in Textile, CIRAT-4, Monastir, Tunisia.
48.Ajayi, J.O., Elder, H.M. (1994). Comparative Studies ofYarn and Fabric Friction. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 22(5),463-467