___

• [1] The USGS Water Science School, https://water.usgs.gov/edu/gallery/watercyclekids/earth-water-distribution.html, 2020.
• [2] Duan Z., Bastiaanssen W. G. M., Estimating water volume variations in lakes and reservoirs from four operational satellite altimetry databases and satellite imagery data. Remote Sensing of Environment 134:403-416.DOI:10.1016/j.rse.2013.03.10, 2013
• [3] Zhang, G., Xie H., Duan S., Tian, M., and Yi, D., Water level variation of Lake Qinghai from satellite and in situ measurements under climate change, J of Applied Remote Sensing, 2011
• [4] Jiang L., Andersen O. B., Nielsen K., Zhang G., Bauer-Gottwein P., Influence of local geoid variation on water surface elevation estimates derived from multi-mission altimetry for Lake Namco, Remote Sensing of Environment, Volume 221, 2019, Pages 65-79 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.004.
• [5] ICESat. https://icesat.gsfc.nasa.gov/icesat/index.php (Son ulaşım 16 Eylül 2019)
• [6] Rao, B . S., Kumar, G., A. N., Krishna P., V., S., S., N., Srinivasulu, P., Venkataraman V., R., Evaluation of EGM 2008 with EGM96 and its utilization in Topographical Mapping Projects., J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens., 40(2):335-340, doi:10.1007/s12524-011-0131-1, 2012
• [7] Kılıçoğlu, A., Direnç, A., Simav, M., Lenk, O., Aktug, B., Yildiz, H. Evaluation of The Earth Gravitational Model 2008 in Turkey. 2019, https://www.harita.gov.tr/yuksismod/images/egitim/beb3eda36d64806.pdf
• [8] Yilmaz., N. ve Karaali,. C., Comparison of global and local gravetric models in Turkey. Scientific and Research Essays., 5(14), 1829-1839, 2010
• [9] Tekeli, A. E. Augmenting in situ lake level measurements with Earth observation satellites. Teknik Dergi, 29 (6), 0-0. DOI: 10.18400/tekderg.341316, 2018
• [10] Ramsar Sites Information Service, Lake Burdur, https://rsis.ramsar.org/ris/658, 2019.
• [11] Google Earth Pro V.7.3.2, 2019.
• [12] Yiğitbaşıoğlu, H., Uğur, A., Burdur Gölü Havzasında Arazi Kullanım Özelliklerinden Kaynaklanan Çevre Sorunları, Ankara Üniversitesi Çevrebilimleri Dergisi, Cilt 2, Sayı 2, 129-143, 2010.
• [13] DMİ 2019 , https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?k=A&m=BURDUR
• [14] Kaya, L., G., Yücedağ, C., Duruşkan, Ö., Burdur Gölü Havzasının Çevresel Açıdan İrdelenmesi, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 6(1): 6-10 (2015).
• [15] Keskin, M., E., Taylan, E., D., Eğirdir ve Burdur Gölleri Su Seviyelerinde Olasi Azalma Eğilimleri, 4. Su Yapıları Sempozyumu, sayfalar: 489-499, 2015.
• [16] Ataol, M. Burdur Gölü’nde Seviye Değişimleri, Coğrafi Bilimler Dergisi, 8 (1), 77-92, 2010.
• [17] Yiğitbaşoğlu, H., Uğur, A., Burdur Gölü’nün Jeoekolojik Özellikleri ve Sorunları, TURQUA Türkiye Kuvaterner Sempozyumu V, sayfalar: 100-103, 2005.
• [18] Yıldırım, Ü., Uysal, M. (2011). Changes in the Coastline of the Burdur Lake Between 1975 and 2010. International Symposium on Environmental Protection and Planning: Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Remote Sen-sing (RS) Applications (ISEPP) 28-29 June 2011, Izmir-Turkey.
• [19] Şener, E., Morova, N., Bulanık Mantık ve Doğrusal Regresyon Analizleri ile Burdur Gölü Su Seviyesi Değişimlerinin Modellenmesi, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15-1( 2011),60-66
• [20] Zwally, H. J., Schutz, B., Abdalati, W., Abshire, J., Bentley, C., Brenner, A., et al., ICESat's laser measurements of polar ice, atmosphere, ocean, and land, Journal of Geodynamics, 34(3–4), 405−445, 2002.
• [21] Spinhirne, J. D., S. P. Palm, W. D. Hart, D. L. Hlavka, and E. J. Welton, Cloud and aerosol measurements from GLAS: Overview and initial results, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L22S03, 2005, doi:10.1029/2005GL023507.
• [22] NSIDC, https://nsidc.org/sites/nsidc.org/files/technical-references/GLAS_ATBD_Range_and_Range_Distribution_v7_08_2012.pdf, (Son ulaşım 16 Eylül 2019)
• [23] Kwok, R., Zwally, H. J., Yi, D., ICESat observations of Arctic sea ice: a first look. Geophysical Research Letters, 31, L16401, 2004
• [24] Srivastava, P., Bhambri, R., Kawishwar, P., Dobhal, D. P., Water level changes of high altitude lakes in Himalaya–Karakoram from ICESat altimetry, J. Earth Syst. Sci.122, 1533–1543, 2013.
• [25] Khvorostovsky, K., Rampal, P., On retrieving sea ice freeboard from ICESat laser altimeter, The Cryosphere, 10, 2329–2346, 2016.
• [26] Song, C., Huang, B., Ke, L., Heterogeneous change patterns of water level for inland lakes in High Mountain Asia derived from multi-mission satellite altimetry, Hydrological Processes, 29, 2769-2781, 2015, doi:10.1002/hyp.10399
• [27] Zhang, G. ,Xie, H., Kang, S. ,Yi, D. and Ackley, S. F., Monitoring lake level changes on the Tibetan Plateau using ICESat altimetry data (2003-2009), Remote Sens. Environ, 115(7), 1733–1742, 2011.
• [28] Song C, Huang B, Ke L. 2013. Modeling and analysis of lake water storage changes on the Tibetan Plateau using multi-mission satellite data. Remote Sensing of Environment 135: 25–35. DOI: 10.1016/j. rse.2013.03.013.
• [29] MODIS. http://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/dataprod/mod10.php (Son ulaşım 16 Eylül 2019)
• [30] Hall, D. K., Riggs, G. A., Salomonson, V. V., Development of methods for mapping global snow cover using moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer data, Remote Sens Environ, 54:127–14, 1995.
• [31] Pu, Z., Xu, L., Salomonson, V. V., MODIS/Terra observed seasonal variations of snow cover over the Tibetan Plateau, Geopyhs Res Lett, 34:L06706., 2007 doi:10,1029/2007GL029262
• [32] Gafuorov A., Vorogushyn S., Farinotti D., Duethmann D., Merkushkin A., Merz B., Snow-cover reconstruction methodology for mountainous regions based on historic in situ observations and recent remote sensing data, The Cryosphere, 9, 451-463, 2015.
• [33] Xu W., Ma H., Wu D., Yuan W., Assessment of the Daily Cloud-Free MODIS Snow-Cover Product for Monitoring the Snow-Cover Phenology over the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Remote Sens, 9(6),585, 2017
• [34] Tekeli, A. E., Akyürek, Z, Şorman, A. A., Şensoy, A., Şorman, A. U., Using MODIS snow cover maps in modeling snowmelt runoff process in the eastern part of Turkey, Remote Sens Environ, 97, 216–230, 2005.
• [35] Tekeli, A. E., Sensoy, A., Sorman, A. A., Akyurek, Z., Sorman, A. U., Accuracy assessment of MODIS daily snow albedo retrievals with in situ measurements in Karasu Basin, Turkiye, Hydrological Processes, 20, 705-721, 2006.
• [36] Uysal G., Şorman A. A., Şensoy A., 2016. Streamflow Forecasting Using Different Neural Network Models with Satellite Data for a Snow Dominated Region in Turkey, Procedial Engineering 154, 1185-1192, 12th International Conference on Hydroinformatics, HIC 2016, 21-26 August 2016
• [37] Uysal G., Şensoy A., Şorman A. A., 2016. Improving daily streamflow forecasts in mountainous Upper Euphrates basin by multi-layer percoptron model with satellite snow products . J. Hydrol.534,630-650, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.10.037
• [38] Sorman A. A., Uysal G., Sensoy A., Probabilistic Snow Cover and Ensemble Streamflow Estimations in the Upper Euphrates Basin, Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 67,1,82-92, https://doi.org/10.2478/johh-2018-0025
• [39] Hall, D. K., V. V. Salomonson, and G. A. Riggs. 2006. MODIS/Terra Snow Cover Daily L3 Global 500m Grid, Version 5. Boulder, Colorado USA. NASA National Snow and Ice Data Center Distributed Active Archive Center. doi: https://doi.org/10.5067/63NQASRDPDB0.
• [40] Koçıbay O. Burdur tarihi, https://www.academia.edu/32247710/Burdur_Gölü (Last accessed 06 Eylul 2019).
• [41] ICESat2. http://icesat.gsfc.nasa.gov/icesat2/science_objs.php (Last accessed 20 February 2017).