Levene, Bartlett, Neyman-Pearson ve Bartlett 2 Testlerinin 1.Tip Hata Olasılıkları Bakımından Karşılaştırılması

Bu çal ışmada, Levene, Bartlett, Neyman-Pearson ve Bartlett 2 testlerinin de ğ iş ik deneme koş ulları nda gerçekleşen 1.Tip hata olas ı l ı kları bak ı mı ndan karşı laştı nlmalan yap ı lm ışt ı r. Yap ı lan 50000 simülasyon denemesi sonunda ele al ı nan bütün testlerin dağı l ı m şekli ve örnek hacminden oldukça etkilendikleri görülmü ştür.

The Comparisons of Levene, Bartlett, Neyman-Pearson and Bartlett 2 Tests in Terms of Actual Type I Error Rates

In this study, Levene, Bartlett, Neyman-Pearson and Bartlett 2 tests were compared in terms of actual Type I error rates under various experimental conditions. At the end of 50000 simülation experiment it was seen that all of these tests were effected distribution shapes and sample size.

___

  • Anonymous, 1994. FORTRAN Subroutines for Mathematical Applications. IMSL MATH/LIBRARY. Voll -2. Visual Numerics, Inc., Houston, USA.
  • Bradley, J. C. 1978. Robustness. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 144-152.
  • Brown, M. B. and A. B. Forsythe, 1974. The small sample behaviour of some statistics which test the equality of several means. Technometrics, 16, 129-132.
  • Canover, W. J., M. E. Johnson and M. M. Johnson, 1981. A comparative study of tests for homogneity of variances, with applications to outer continental shelf bidding data. Technometrics, 23, 351-361.
  • Cochran, W. G. 1954. Some methods for strengthening the common x2 -tests.Biometrics, 10, 417-451.
  • Ghost, M. and Y. H. Kim, 2001.The Behrens-Fisher problem revisited: A Bayes-frequentist synthesis. The Canadian Journal of Statistics, 29, No:1
  • Krutchkoff, R. G 1988. One-way fixed effects analysis of variance when the error variances may be unequal. J. Statist. Comput. Simul., 30, 259-71
  • Ott, L. 1998. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. Third Edition. PWS-Kent Publishing Company. USA, 835 s.
  • Piepho., H. P. 1996. A Monte Carlo test for variance homogeneity in linear models. Biometrical Journal, 38,461-473.
  • Sokal, R. R. and F. J. Rohlf, 1995. Biometry.The Prenciples and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research.Third Ed.W.H.Freeman and Co. New York, 887 s.
  • Tomarken, A. J. and R. C. Serlin, 1986. Comparison of ANOVA alternatives under variance heterogeneity and specific noncentrality structures. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 90-99
  • Winer, B. J., D. R. Brown and K. M. Michels, 1991.Statistical Princeples in Experimental Design.Third Ed., McGraw-Hill, Inc. USA, 1057 s.
  • Wludyka, P. S. and P. R. Nelson, 1997. An analysis of means type test for variances from normal populations. Technometrics, 39, 274-286.
  • Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis.Fourth Ed.,Prentice-Hall, inc. USA, 683 s.
  • Zimmerman, D. W. 1998. Invalidation of parametric and nonparametric statistical tests by concurrent violation of two assumptions. J. of Experimental Education, 67, 55-69.