Gilaburu Tohumunun Bazı Fiziksel Özellikleri

Bu çalışmada gilaburu Viburnum opulus L. tohumunun fiziksel özellikleri araştırılmıştır. % 54 nem içeriğindeki gilaburu tohumunun, uzunluk, genişlik, kalınlık ve geometrik ortalama çap değerlerinin sırasıyla 6.56 ile 8.44 mm, 6.24 ile 8.57 mm, 1.62 ile 2.52 mm ve 4.19 ile 5.31 mm arasında olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Küresellik, yüzey alanı, 1000 tane ağırlığı ve kritik hız değerlerinin sırasıyla, 0.59’ dan 0.68’ e kadar 55.22 mm2’ den 88.65 mm2’ye, 75.00 kg’dan 78.30 kg ‘a kadar ve 4.52 m/s ‘den 5.15 m/s ‘ye kadar değiştiği, hacim ağırlığı, kütlesel yoğunluk, porozite ve doğal yığılma açısı değerlerinin sırasıyla, 524.82 kg/m3’ den 546.81 kg/m3’ e, 981.45 kg/m3 ‘den 1046.15 kg/m3 ‘e,% 45.46 ‘dan % 50.14 ‘e ve 22.60o ‘den 26.78o ‘ye değiştiği belirlenmiştir. Gilaburu tahumunun fiziksel özellikleri gilaburu tohumunun ekim, hasat, ayırma, taşıma, depolama ve diğer işlemler için gerekli olan ekipmanların dizayn edilmesine yardımcı olmaktadır

Some Physical Properties of Gilaburu Seed

In this study, the physical properties of gilaburu Viburnum opulus L. seed have been investigated. The average length, width, thickness and geometric mean diameter values in 54% of moisture content of gilaburu seed were between 6.56 and 8.44 mm, 6.24 and 8.57 mm, 1.62 and 2.52 mm, 4.19 and 5.31 mm, respectively. Sphericity, surface area, thousand seed mass and terminal velocity values in the same moisture content increased from 0.59 to 0.68, from 55.22 to 88.65 mm2, from 75.00 to 78.30 kg, from 4.52 to 5.15 m s-1; the bulk density, true density, porosity and angle of repose values changed betweeen 524.82 and 546.81 kg m-3, 981.45 and 1046.15 kg m-3, % 45.46 and 50.14%, 22.60o and 26.78o, respectively. The physical properties of gilaburu seed are necessary for the design of equipments for planting, harvesting, seperating,transporting, storage and other processing

___

  • Altuntaş, E., E. Özgöz and O. F. Taşer. 2005. Some physical properties of fenugreek (Trigonella foenum-graceum L.) seeds. Journal of Food Engineering, 71(1), 37-43.
  • Aviara, N. A.,M. I. Gwandzang and M. A. Haque. 1999. Physical properties of guna seeds. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 73(2), 105-111.
  • Aydin, C. and M. Özcan. 2002. Some physico-mechanic properties of terebinth (Pistacia terebinthus L.) fruits. Journal of food engineering, 53(1), 97-101.
  • Brusewitz, G. H. 1975. Density of Rewetted High Mistur Grains. Transactions of the ASAE. 18(5), 935-938.
  • Coşkun, M. B., I. Yalçın and C. Özarslan. 2005. Physical Properties of sweet corn seed (Zea mays saccharata Strut). Journal of Food Engineering. 74, 523-528.
  • Çetin, M. 2006. Physical properties of barbunia bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L. Cv. ‘Barbunia’) seed. Journal of Food Engineering. 80. 353-358.
  • Davis, P. H. 1972. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Volume.4. Edinburg University Press, 544.
  • Ekici, L. and S. Velioglu. 2003. Gilaburu ve sağlık. www.cine- tarim.com.tr/dergi/arsiv46/ arastirma02.htm. Accesed 25 January 2005.
  • Gezer, İ., H. Hacıseferoğulları and F. Demir. 2002. Some Physical Properties of Hacıhaliloğlu Apricot pit and Kernel. Journal of Agriculture Engineering Research. 56(1):49-57.
  • Gupta, R. K., and S. K. Das. 1997. Physical properties of sunflower seeds. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 66 (1), 1-8.
  • Kabaş, Ö. and A. Özmerzi. 2006. Characteristic of washington orange in water that grown in Antalya Region. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Science. Vol:1, Number:1, 37-42.
  • Kaleemullah, S. and J. J. Gunasekar. 2002. Moisture- dependent physicial properties of Arecanut Kernels. Biosystems Engineering. 82(3). 331-338.
  • Karababa, E. 2006. Physical properties of popcorn kernels. Journal of Food Engineering. 72. 100-107.
  • Konak, M., K. Çarman and C. Aydın. 2002. Physical properties of chick pea seeds. Biosystems Engineering. 82(1). 73-78.
  • Mohsenin, N. N. 1970. Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York
  • Nimkar, P. M. and P. K. Chattopadhyay. 2001. Some physical properties of green gram. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 80 (2). 183-189.
  • Özarslan, C. 2002. Some physical properties of cotton seed. Biosystems Engineering, 83(2), 169-174.
  • Sacilik, K., R. Ozturk, R and R. Keskin. 2003. Some physical properties of hemp seed. Biosystems Engineering. 86(2). 191-198.
  • Soylak, M., L. Elci, S. Saraçoğlu and U. Divrikli. 2002. Chemical Analysis of Fruit Juice of European Cranberrybush (Viburnum opulus L.) from Kayseri- Turkey. Asian Journal of Chemistry. 14(1): 135-138.
  • Sirisomboon, P., P. Pornchaloempong and T. Romphophak. 2006. Physical properties of green soybean: Criteria for sorting. Journal of Food Engineering.79, 18-22.
  • Tunde–Akintunde, T. Y. and B. O. Akintunde. 2004. Some physical properties of sesame seed. Biosystems Engineering. 88(1). 127-129.
  • Viswanathan, P.T., L. Palanisamy and E. Sreenarayanan. 1996. Physical properties of neem nut. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research. 63, 19-26.