___

• Alaniz, M. L., Cartmill, R. S., ve Parker, R. N. (1998). Immigrants and violence: The importance of neighborhood context. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20(2), 155-174.
• Anderson, A. L. (2002). Individual and contextual influences on delinquency: The role of the single parent family. Journal of Criminal Justice, 30, 575-587.
• Andresen, M. A. (2006). Crime measures and the spatial analysis of criminal activity. British Journal of Criminology, 46, 258285.
• Bachman, R. (1991). An analysifs of American Indian homicide: A test of social disorganization and economic deprivation at the reservation county level. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 28(4), 456-471.
• Barnett, C.,ve Mencken, F. C. (2002).Social disorganization theory and the contextual nature of crime in nonmetropolitan counties. Rural Sociology, 67(3), 372-393.
• Basibuyuk, O. (2008). Social (Dis)organization and Terror Related Crimes in Turkey. University of North Texas.
• Blalock, H. M. (1960). Social statistics (Vol. 1221). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Bellair, P. E. (1997). Social interaction and community crime: Examining the importance of neighbor networks. Criminology, 35(4), 677-704.
• Bernasco, W.,ve Block, R. (2009). Where offenders choose to attack: A discrete choice model of robberies in Chicago. Criminology, 47(1), 93-130.
• Bernasco, W.,ve Luykx, F. (2003).Effects of attractiveness, opportunity and accessibility to burglars on residential burglary rates of urban neighborhoods. Criminology, 41(3), 981-1002.
• Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., ve Farrington, D. P. (1988). Criminal career research: Its value for criminology. Criminology, 26(1), 1-35.
• Brantingham, P. L., ve Brantingham, P. J. (1993). Nodes, paths and edges: Considerations on the complexity of crime and the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 13(1), 328.
• Brantingham, P. L., ve Brantingham, P. J. (1995). Criminality of place: Crime generators and crime attractors. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 3(3), 1-26.
• Brantingham, P. L., ve Brantingham, P. J. (1999). A theoretical model of crime hot spot generation. Studies on Crime and Crime Prevention, 8(1), 7-26.
• Brantingham, P. L., ve Brantingham, P. J. (2003).Anticipating the displacement of crime using the principles of environmental criminology. Crime Prevention Studies, 16, 119-148.
• Bursik, R. J. (1988). Social disorganization and theories of crime and delinquency: Problems and prospects. Criminology, 26(4), 519-551.
• Bursik, R. J., ve Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and Crime: The Dimensions of Effective Community Control. New York: Macmillan.
• Cohen, L. E., ve Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588-608.
• Cohen, L. E., Felson, M., ve Land, K. C. (1980). Property crime rates in the United States: A macrodynamic analysis, 19471977; with ex ante forecasts for the mid-1980s. American Sociological Review, 86(1), 90-118.
• Cohen, L. E., Kluegel, J. R., ve Land, K. D. (1981). Social inequality and predatory criminal victimization: An exposition and test of a formal theory. American Sociological Review, 46(5), 505524.
• Cömerter, N., ve Kar, M. (2007). Economic and social determinants of the crime rate in Turkey: Cross- section analysis. Ankara Universitesi, Siyasal Bilimler Fakultesi Dergisi, 62(2), 37-57.
• DeFronzo, J. (1996). Welfare and burglary. Crime & Delinquency, 42(2), 223-230.
• DeFronzo, J. (1997). Welfare and homicide. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(3), 395-406.
• Demren, C. (2007). Coffee House Masculinity: A Case of a Gecekondu District in Ankara. Hacettepe University, Ankara.
• Dobson, J. E., Bright, E. A., Coleman, P. R., ve Bhaduri, B. L. (2003). Landscan: A global population database for estimating population at risk. V. Mesev (Ed.), Remotely Sensed Cities (pp. 267279). London and New York: Taylor and Francis içinde.
• Dobson, J. E., Bright, E. A., Coleman, P. R., Durfee, R. C., ve Worley, B. A. (2000). Landscan: A global population database for estimating populations at risk. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66, 849-857.
• Duru, H. (2010). Crime on Turkish Streetblocks: An Examination of the Effects of High-Schools, On- Premise Alcohol Outlets, and Coffeehouses, Cincinnati Üniversitesi, yayınlanmamış doktora tezi.
• Duru H. ve Yiğit.M. (2014).Terör ve terörle mücadeleden doğan zararların karşılanması hakkında kanun, uygulanması ve etkileri, Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi IIBF Dergisi, 9(2), 123149.
• Eck, J. (1994). Drug Markets and Drug Places: A CaseControl Study of the Spatial Structure of Illicit Drug Dealing. University of Maryland, College Park.
• Erman, T. (2001). The politics of squatter (Gecekondu) studies in Turkey: The changing representations of rural migrants in the academic discourse. Urban Studies, 38(7), 983-1002. Farrington, D. P. (1986).Age and crime. Crime and Justice, 7, 189-250.
• Felson, M., ve Clarke, R. V. (1998). Opportunity Makes the Thief: Practical Theory for Crime Prevention. London: Crown. Gottfretson, M. ve Hirschi T. (1990). A General Theory of Crime, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
• Gök, O. (2009). Structural Disadvantage, Terrorism, and Non-Terrorist Violent Crime in Turkey.University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.
• Greenberg, S. W., Rohe, W. M., ve Williams, J. R. (1982). Safety in urban neighborhoods: A comparison of physical characteristics and informal territorial control in high and low crime neighborhoods. Population and Environment, 5(3), 141-165.
• Hindelang, M. J., Gottfredson, M. R., ve Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of Personal Crime. Cambridge, Mass: Ballinger. Horney, Julie (2006). An alternative psychology of criminal behavior, Criminology, 44(1): 1-16.
• Kornhauser, R. R. (1978). Social Sources of Delinquency: An Appraisal of Analytic Models. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
• Kurbin, C. E., ve Weitzer, R. (2003). Retailatory homicide: Concentrated disadvantage and neighborhood culture. Social Problems, 50(2), 157-180.
• Krivo, L. J., ve Peterson, R. D.(1996). Extremely disadvantaged neighborhoods and urban crime. Social Forces, 75(2), 619-648.
• Köseli, M. (2006). Poverty, Inequality & Terrorism Relationship in Turkey.Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
• LaGrange, T. C. (1999). The impact of neighborhoods, schools, and malls on the spatial distribution of property damage. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(4), 393-422.
• LandScan TM Global Population Database (http://www.ornl.gov/ landscan/ adresinden erişilebilir)(Cartographer). (2008).
• Lockwood, D. (2007). Mapping crime in Savannah: Social disadvantage, land use, and violent crimes reported to the police. Social Science Computer Review, 25(2), 194-209.
• Loftin, C. ve McDowall, D. (2010). The use of official records to measure crime and delinquency, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26: 527-532.
• Long, A. D. (2005). Residential community identification and psychological well-being: The predictive utility of self-identity as situated in the street block as social group and physical place. Society for Community Research Action. Champaign, Illinois.
• Lowenkamp, C. T., Cullen, F. T., ve Pratt, T. C. (2003). Replicating Sampson and Groves's test of social disorganization theory: Revisiting a criminological classic. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 40(4), 351-373.
• McCord, E. S., ve Ratcliffe, J. H. (2007). A micro-spatial analysis of the demographic and criminogenic environment of drug markets in Philadelphia. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 40(1), 43-63.
• Merton, R. K. (1938). Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672-682.
• Messner, S. F., ve Blau, J. R. (1987). Routine leisure activities and rates of crime: A macro-level analysis. Social Forces, 65(4), 1035-1052.
• Miethe, T. D., ve McDowall, D. (1993). Contextual effects in models of criminal victimization. Social Forces, 71(3), 741-759. Miethe, T. D., Stafford, M. C., ve Long, J. S. (1987). Social differentiation in criminal victimization: A test of routine activities/lifestyle theories. American Sociological Review, 52(2), 184-194.
• Miller, W. B. (1958). Lower class culture as a generating milieu of gang delinquency. Journal of Social Issues, 14(3), 5-19.
• Moneroff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., ve Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39(3), 517-559.
• Muş, E. (2010). Examining Violent and Property Crimes in the Provinces of Turkey for the years of 2000 and 2007.Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
• Osgood, D. W. (2000). Poisson-based regression analysis of aggregate crime rates. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(1), 2143.
• Osgood, D. W., ve Anderson, A. L. (2004). Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology, 42(3), 519-549.
• Osgood, D. W., ve Chambers, J. M. (2000). Social disorganization outside the metropolis: An analysis of rural youth violence. Criminology, 38(1), 81-116.
• Perkins, D. D ve Taylor, R. B. (1996). Ecological assessments of community disorder: Their relationship to fear of crime and theoretical implications. American Journal of Community Psychology, 24(1), 63-107.
• Raudenbush, S. W., ve Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, Second Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Ltd.
• Rice, K. J., ve Smith, W. R. (2002). Socioecological models of automotive theft: Integrating routine activity and social disorganization approaches. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 39(3), 304-336.
• Roncek, D. W., ve Faggiani, D. (1985). High schools and crime: A replication. The Sociological Quarterly, 26(4), 491-505.
• Roncek, D. W., ve LoBosco, A. (1983). The effect of high schools on crime in their neighborhoods. Social Science Quarterly, 64(3), 598-613.
• Roncek, D. W., ve Maier, P. A. (1991). Bars, blocks, and crime revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of "Hot Spots". Criminology, 29(4), 725-754.
• Rountree, P. W., ve Warner, B. D. (1999). Social ties and crime: Is the relationship gendered? Criminology, 37(4), 789-814.
• Sampson, R. J. (1988). Local friendship ties and community attachment in mass society: A multilevel systemic model. American Sociological Review, 53(5), 766-779.
• Sampson, R. J., ve Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. The American Journal of Sociology, 94(4), 774-802.
• Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., ve Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A mutlilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277(5328), 918-924.
• Sampson, R. J., ve Wooldredge, J. D. (1987). Linking the micro- and macro- level dimensions of lifestyle- routine activity and opportunity models of predatory victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 3(4), 371-393.
• Shaw, C. R., ve McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
• Sherman, L. W., Gartin, P. R., ve Buerger, M. E. (1989). Hot spots of predatory crime: Routine activities and the criminology of place. Criminology, 27(1), 27-55.
• Smith, W. R., Frazee, S. G., ve Davidson, E. L. (2000). Furthering the integration of routine activity and social disorganization theories: Small units of analysis and the study of street robbery as a diffusion process. Criminology, 38(2), 489-524.
• Snijders, T. A. ve Bosker, R. J. (1994). Modeled variance in two-level models. Sociological Methods & Research, 22(3), 342-363.
• Stewart, E. A., ve Simons, R. L. (2006). Structure and culture in African American adolescent violence: A partial test of the "Code of the Street" thesis. Justice Quarterly, 23(1), 1-33.
• Taylor, R. B. (1997). Social order and disorder of street blocks and neighborhoods: Ecology, microecology, and the systemic model of social disorganization. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(1), 113-155.
• Taylor, R. B., ve Harrell, A. V. (1996). Physical Environment and Crime. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Justiceo. Document Number)
• Taylor, R. B., Koons, B. A., Kurtz, E. M., Greene, J. R., ve Perkins, D. D. (1995). Street blocks with more nonresidential land use have more physical deterioration: Evidence from Baltimore and Philadelphia. Urban Affairs Review, 31(1), 120-136.
• Topçuoğlu, T (2013). Türkiye’de polise kayıtlı suçların rutin aktiviteler teorisi açısından bölgesel dağılımı, Polis Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(13), 125-147.
• Veysey, B. M., ve Messner, S. F. (1999). Further testing of social disorganization theory: An elaboration of Sampson and Groves's "Community Structure and Crime". Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 36(2), 156-174.
• Warner, B. D. (2007). Directly intervene or call the authorities? A study of forms of neighborhood social control within a social disorganization framework. Criminology, 45(1), 99-129.
• Warner, B. D., ve Pierce, G. L. (1993). Reexamining social disorganization theory using calls to the police as a measure of crime. Criminology, 31(4), 493-517.
• Warner, B. D., ve Rountree, P. W. (1997). Local social ties in a community and crime model: Questioning the systemic nature of informal social control. Social Problems, 44(4), 520-536.
• Weisburd, D., Bushway, S., Lum, C., ve Yang, S.-M. (2004). Trajectories of crime at places: A longitudinal study of street segments in the city of Seattle. Criminology, 42(2), 283-321.
• Wilcox, P., Quisenberry, N., Cabrera, D. T., ve Jones, S. (2004). Busy places and broken windows?Toward defining the role of physical structure and process in community crime models. The Sociological Quarterly, 45(2), 185-207.
• Wilkinson, D. L. (2007). Local social ties and willingness to intervene: Textured views among violent urban youth of neighborhood social control dynamics and situations. Justice Quarterly, 24(2), 185-220.
• Wolfgang, M. E., ve Ferracuti, F. (1982). The Subculture of Violence: Toward an Integrated Theory in Criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Wooldredge, John (2002). The (ir)relevance of aggregation bias for multilevel studies of neighborhoods and crime with an example comparing census tracts to official neighborhoods in Cincinnati, Criminology, 40(3): 681-710.