Patellar Clunk Syndrome: a Case Report

Patellar clunk syndrome (PCS) is one of the intraarticular mechanical problems that generally occur three to eight months after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) surgery. The prevalence of PCS was reported as 0-7.5 %, which varies due to the type of implants used.The cause of this clinical syndrome is thought to be the growth of a fibrous nodule on the inferior aspect of the quadriceps tendon near the superior pole of the patella. Early cyst resection with open surgical or arthroscopic procedures provides a dramatic improvement in symptoms


1. Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH. The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: A modification of the total condylar design: two to four-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(9):1317-23.

2. Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Booth RE Jr, et al. The patellar clunk syndrome. A complication of posterior- stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. 1989;241:203-8.

3. Clarke HD, Fuchs R, Scuderi GR, et al. The influence of femoral component design in the elimination of patellar clunk in posterior-stabilized totalknee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(2):167-71.

4. Lonner JH, Jasko JG, Bezwada HP, et al. Incidence of patellar clunk with a modern posterior-stabilized knee design. Am J Orthop (BelleMead NJ). 2007;36(10):550-3.

5. Costanzo JA, Aynardi MC, Peters JD, et al. Patellar clunk syndrome after total knee arthroplasty; risk factors and functional outcomes of arthroscopic treatment. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29(9 Suppl):201-4.

6. Dennis DA, Kim RH, Johnson DR, et al. The John Insall Award: control-matched evaluation of painful patellar crepitus after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(1):10-7.

7. Hoops HE, Johnson DR, Kim RH, et al. Control-matched computational evaluation of tendo-femoral contact in patients with posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2012;30(9):1355-61.

8. Pollock DC, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA. Synovial entrapment: a complication of posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg. 2002;84-A(12):2174-8.

9. Callaghan JJ, Insall JN, Greenwald AS, et al. Mobile- bearing knee replacement: concepts and results. Instr Course Lect. 2001;50:431-49. 10. Kim YH, Yoon SH, Kim JS. The long-term results of simultaneous fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing total knee replacements performed in the same patient. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(10):1317-23.

11. Nimrod S, Schwarzkopf R, Diskin B, et al. Incidence of patellar clunk syndrome in fixed versus high-flex mobile bearing posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplasty. 2014;29(10): 2021-4.

12. Kwak JY, Jeong JH, Lee SH, et al. Comparison of the clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty with the LCS rotating platform mobile bearing knee system and the PFC Sigma RP-F mobile bearing knee system. Clin Orthop Surg. 2012;4(4):256-62.

13. Conrad DN, Dennis DA. Patellofemoral crepitus after total knee arthroplasty: etiology and preventive measures. Clin Orthpo Surg. 2014;6(1):9-19.

14. Meftah M, Ranawat AS, Ranawat CS. The natural history of anterior knee pain in 2 posterior-stabilized, modular total knee arthroplasty designs. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26(8):1145-8.

15. Fukunaga K, Kobayashi A, Minoda Y, et al. The incidence of the patellar clunk syndrome in a recently designed mobile-bearing posteriorly stabilised total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(4):463-8.

16. Okamoto T, Futani H, Atsui K, et al. Sonographic appearance of fibrous nodules in patellar clunk syndrome: a case report. J Orthop Sci. 2002;7(5):590-3.

17. Koh YG, Kim SJ, Chun YM, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of patellofemoral soft tissue impingement after posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2018;15(1): 36-9.

18. Dajani KA, Stuart MJ, Dahm DL, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of patellar clunk and synovial hyperplasia after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2010;25(1): 97-103.

Kaynak Göster