Sosyometrinin Sosyoloji İçinde Kariyeri

Bu yazının konusu bilimde değişmeye yol açan etmenleri tanımlamaktır. Bu nedenle, Sosyometri örnek alınmış ve konu ile ilgili araştırma yapılmıştır. Bilgi Sosyolojisi ve Bilim Sosyolojisi perspektifleri ile bilimsel değişmeyi etkileyen içsel ve dışsal faktörler analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucu birkaç kuramsal sonucu desteklemiştir. Bilimsel gelişme ve değişmeyi etkileyen faktörler arasında entelektüel akımlar, bilimsel krizler, bilim dalları, akademisyenler ve ekoller arasında yaşanan rekabet, parasal destekler, teknolojik buluşlar, kuramsal birleşmeler ve yöntemsel gelişmeler sayılabilir

THE CAREER OF SOCIOMETRY WITHIN SOCIOLOGY

The subject of this paper is to define factors that have effects on change in science. Particularly, change in science with an examination of the career of Sociometry within sociology was studied. The sociology of science and sociology of knowledge perspectives are employed to explore the internal and external factors affecting Sociometry. The results support a number of theoretical conclusions. These are several factors effecting scientific changes and development: intellectual currents, crisis within the science, competition among scientists, schools, and paradigms, funding, innovations in the technology of research, theoretical integration and methodological clarification and advancement

___

  • ALEXANDER, J. C. (1987). Sociological Theory Since World War-II. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • BARNES, B. (1976). Interest and the Growth of Knowledge. London: Routhedge & Kegan Paul.
  • BARNES, B. (1982). Kuhn and Social Science. New York: Columbia University Pres.
  • BARNES, J. A. (1969). "Graph Theory and Social Networks." Sociology, 3.
  • BLAU, P. M. (1994). Structural Contexts of Opportunities. Chicago: University of Chicago
  • BLOOR, D. (1991). Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • BRANFENBRENNER, U. (1945). The Measurement of Sociometry Status. Structure and Development. New York: Beacon House.
  • BORGATTA, A. F. (1951). "A Diagnostic Note on the Construction of Sociograms and Action Diagrams." Sociometry, 13(12): 300-8.
  • CARTWRIGHT, D. (1979). "Contemporary Social Psychology in Historical Perspective." Social Psychology Quarterly, 42(1): 82-93.
  • CHAPIN, F. S. (1940). "Trends in Sociometrics and Critique." Sociometry, 3(10): 245-62.
  • COLEMAN, J. S. (1958). "Relational Analysis." Human Organization, 17: 28-36.
  • COLLINS, H and T. Pinch. (1993). The Golem: What Everyone Should Know About Science? New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • COLLINS, H. (1975). Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Knowledge. London: Sage.
  • FESTINGER, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • FRIEDRICHS, R. W. (1970). A Sociology of Sociology. Toronto: The Free Press.
  • HANCERLIOĞLU, O. (1987). Toplumbilim Sözlüğü. Istanbul: Remzi Kitapevi.
  • HOMANS, G. C. (1956). Social Behaviour as Exchange. London: Routledge and Kegan Press.
  • HOMANS, G. C. (1961). Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Inc.
  • HOMANS, G. C. (1974). Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms. (rev. ed.) New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Inc.
  • HOUSE, J. (1977). "The Three Faces of Social Psychology." Sociometry, 40(2): 161- 177.
  • JENNINGS, H. H. (1947). Sociometry of Leadership. New York: Beacon House.
  • KHUN, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • LEWIN, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • LEWIN, K. (1951). Field Theory in the Social Sciences. New York: Harper.
  • MANNHEIM, K. (1968). Ideology and Utopia. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, Inc.
  • MCGRATH, J. E. and I. Altman. (1996). Small Group Research: A Synthesis and Critique of the Field. New York: Halt, Rinehart and Winston
  • MERTON, K. R. (1973). The Sociology of Science. Chicago: The University of Chicago
  • MORENO, J. L. (1937). "Sociometry in Relation to Other Social Sciences." Sociometry, 1: 206-19.
  • MORENO, J. L. (1934). Who Shall Survive? New York: Beacon House
  • MORENO, J. L. (1951). Sociometry. Experimental method and the Science of Society. New York: Beacon House.
  • MORENO, J. L. (1955). "The Sociometric School and the 'Science of Men'." Sociometry. 18(10): 271-90.
  • MORENO, J. L. (1960). The Sociometry Reader. New York: Free Press.
  • MORENO, J. L. (1969). Psychodrama. New York: Beacon House.
  • MULLINS, N. (1973). Theories and Theory Groups in Contemporary American Sociology. New York: Harper and Row Publications.
  • NORTHWAY, M. L. (1962). A Primer of Sociometry. Canada: University of Toronto Press.
  • PARSONS, T. (1951). The Social System. Glencoe: Free Press.
  • POPPER, R. K. (1972). Objective Knowledge. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • SPERBER, L. (1990). Fashions in Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  • TAYLOR, H. F. (1970). Balance in Small Groups. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhald Company.
  • TOEMAN, Z. (1963). The Double Situation in Sociometry. New York: Beacon House.
  • WEBER, M. (1949). Methodology of the Social Sciences. Glencoe: Free Press.