Ercan BALCIOĞLU, Erkan PALA, Ali YILDIRIM

İNGİLTERE VE GALLER CEZA ADALET SİSTEMİNDE İNTERPROFESYONEL İŞBİRLİĞİ UYGULAMASINI GELİŞTİRMEK

İnterprofesyonel İşbirliği Uygulaması, birçok ülkede sağlık ve sosyal hizmet sisteminde önemli bir kavram olarak kabul edilmektedir. Son yıllarda, İngiltere ve Galler’de devlet, Ceza Adaleti Sistemine vatandaşın güvenini artırmak ve daha hızlı, etkili ve kaliteli hizmet sunabilmek için yoğun bir çaba sarf etmektedir. Bunu sağlamak için İnterprofesyonel İşbirliği Uygulaması yaklaşımının temel prensiplerini çeşitli uygulamalarla yaygınlaştırmaya ve yerleştirmeye çabalamaktadır. Tüm çabalara rağmen hala ceza adalet profesyonelleri arasında daha fazla ortakl çalışmanın geliştirilmesi gereklidir. Bu çalışmada öncelikle, İnterprofesyonel İşbirliği Uygulamasının temel faydaları ele alınacaktır. Daha sonra İnterprofesyonel İşbirliği Uygulamasının ceza adaleti sisteminde kullanılmasının olası faydalarına değinilecektir. Son olarak da, İnterprofesyonel İşbirliği Uygulamasından ceza adaleti sisteminde nasıl yararlanılabileceğine yönelik iki model önerilecektir. Sonuç olarak, etkisiz ve verimsiz ceza adalet sisteminin telafisi mümkün olmayan mağduriyetlere yol açtığı bu mağduriyetlerin ancak ceza adalet profesyonelleri arasında meslek öncesi ve meslek sonrasında ortaklık çalışmasının geliştirilmesiyle azaltılabileceği sonucuna varılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

İnterprofesyonel İşbirliği Uygulaması, Ceza Adalet Sistemi, Etkili Hukuk Sistemi, Ortaklık, Etkili Polislik, Birleşik Krallık.

-

Interprofessional Collaborative Practice has proved to be an important concept in the health and social care system across the world. The Criminal Justice System in England and Wales has, over the recent years, striven to deploy the central tenets of this phenomenon in an effort to enhance service delivery but more is needed to promote partnership working. This paper addresses the fundamental benefits of Interprofessional Collaborative Practice before moving on to recommending two models that could be utilised in the criminal justice system, highlighting the areas it could potentially benefit. The paper concludes that an ineffective and inefficient criminal justice system has serious repercussions, which can only be reduced through partnership work

Keywords:

Interprofessional Collaborative Practice, Criminal Justice System, Effective Judicial,

___

Barr H., Freeth D., Hammick M., Koppel I. and Reeves S. (2010). Evaluations of Interprofessional Education United Kingdom Review for Health and Social Care. London: CAIPE.
Guardian. (2013). CPS Severely Hampered by Lack of Resources, Says Report. 10 July 2013, London: Guardian News and Media.
Hough M., Bradford, B., Jackson, J. and Roberts, J. V. (2013). Attitudes to Sentencing and Trust in Justice Exploring Trends from the Crime Survey for England and Wales, Ministry of Justice
Howard League for Penal Reform. (2014a). Revealed: The Wasted Millions Spent on Needless Remand. London: Howard League for Penal Reform.
Howard League for Penal Reform. (2014b). Weekly Prison Watch. London: Howard League for Penal Reform.
Justice. (2014). HM Courts and Tribunals Service. London: Ministry of Justice.
Justice Gov. (2014). About the National Offender Management Service. London: Ministry of Justice.
Ministry of Justice. (2011). The Strengths and Skills of the Judiciary in the Magistrates’ Courts, Ipsos MORI- Ministry Of Justice Research Series 9/11. Ministry of Justice: London.
Ministry of Justice. (2012a). Provisional Statistics on the Timeliness of Criminal Court Cases. Ministry of Justice: London.
Ministry of justice. (2012b). Restorative Justice Action Plan for the Criminal Justice System. Ministry of Justice: London.
Ministry of Justice. (2012c). Provisional Statistics on the Timeliness of Criminal Court Cases. Ministry of Justice: London.
Ministry of Justice. (2012d). Court Statistics Quarterly October to December 2012 Ministry of Justice. Ministry of Justice: London.
Ministry of Justice. (2012e). Swift and Sure Justice: The Government's Plans for Reform of the Criminal Justice System. Ministry of Justice: London.
Ministry of Justice. (2013a: 14). Transforming the CJS: A Strategy and Action Plan to Reform the Criminal Justice System. Ministry of Justice: London.
Ministry of Justice. (2013b). Costs Per Place and Costs Per Prisoner, National Offender Management Service Annual Report and Accounts 2012-13 Management Information Addendum. Ministry of Justice: London.
Ministry of Justice. (2013c). Probation Trust Unit Costs, Financial Year 2012-13. Ministry of Justice: London.
Ministry of Justice. (2013d). Court Statistics Quarterly January to March 2013. Ministry of Justice: London.
Ministry of Justice. (2014). Safety in Custody Statistics England and Wales Update to March 2014. Ministry of Justice: London.
Morse, A. (2014). The Criminal Justice System: Landscape Review. London: National Audit Office & the House of Commons.
Office for Criminal Justice Reform. (2007). Joint Effective, Cracked, Ineffective and Vacated Trials in the Crown Court and the Magistrates' Courts. London: HMCS&CPS.
Policy Exchange. (2012). The Public Interest: Reforming the Crown Prosecution Service. London: Policy Exchange.
Reeves S., Lewin S., Espin S. and Zwarenstein M., (2010). Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social Care. London: Blackwell-Wiley.
The Economist. (2013). What price justice?. Jun 29th 2013, London: The Economist Newspaper Ltd.
WHO. (2010). Health Professions Networks Nursing & Midwifery Human Resources for Health Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Practice. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO Press.