___

• Adler, P. S. and Borys, B. (1996). Two types of bureaucracy: enabling and coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61-89.
• Altınkılıç, Ş. (2008). The analysis of job satisfaction and life satisfaction of preschool teachers. Unpublished master's thesis, Yeditepe University.
• Altınkurt, Y. and Yılmaz, K. (2012). Relationship between management by values, organizational justice, and job satisfaction in secondary schools. Sakarya University Faculty Journal of Education, 2(4), 50-68.
• Aydın, M. (2010). Educational management. Ankara, Hatipoğlu Publications.
• Aytaç, M. and Öngen, B. (2012). The structure of environmental attidutes: first-order confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Statistics, 5, 14-22.
• Baron, R. M. and Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
• Buluç, B. (2009). The relationship between bureaucratic school structure and leadership styles of school principals in primary schools. Education and Science, 34(152), 71-86.
• Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2012). New structure and behavior in school management. Ankara, Pegem Academy.
• Cerit, Y. (2012). The relationship between bureaucratic school structure and classroom teachers’ professional behaviours. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 18(4), 497-521.
• Cohen-Charash, Y. and Spector P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: a meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321.
• Çelik, H. E. and Yılmaz, V. (2013). Structural equation modeling. Ankara, Anı Publishing.
• Çelik, O. T. and Gürsel, M. (2017). The relationship between elementary school teachers' perceptions of organizational justice and job satisfaction. Inonu University Journal of the Graduate School of Education, 4(7), 47-56.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. and Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Multivariate statistics for social sciences spss and lisrel practises. Ankara, Pegem Academy.
• Demirtaş, Z. (2010). Teachers’ job satisfaction levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1069–1073.
• Demirtaş, Z., Özdemir, T. Y. and Küçük Ö. (2016). Relationships between bureaucratic structure of schools, organizational silence and organizational cynicism. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 22(2), 193-216.
• Dönder, H. H. (2006). Teachers’ organizational citizenship behavours and bureaucracy. Unpublished master's thesis. Afyonkarahisar Kocatepe University.
• Ho, C. and Au. W. (2006). Teaching satisfaction scale: measuring job satisfaction of teachers. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(1), 172-185.
• Hoy, W. K. and Sweetland S. R. (2001). Designing better schools: the meaning and nature of enabling school structure. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(3), 296-321.
• Hoy, W. K. and Tarter, C. J. (2004). Organizational justice in schools: no justice without trust. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4), 250-259.
• Hoy, W. K. and Miskel C. G. (2010). Educational administration theory, research and practice. Ankara, Nobel Publishing Distribution.
• Karaca, D. (2015). The effect of the bureaucracy level of elementary and secondary schools on the professionalism of teachers. Unpublished Phd dissertation. Pamukkale University.
• Karasar, N. (2010). Scientific research method. Ankara, Nobel Publishing Distribution.
• Karaman, K., Yücel, C. and Dönder, H. (2008). According to teacher's opinions, relationship between bureaucracy in schools and organizational citizenship. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 53, 49-74.
• Kuş, E. (2009). Quantitative-Qualitative Research Techniques. Ankara, Ani Publishing.
• Okpogba, D. (2011). Organizational structure, collegial trust, and college faculty teaching efficacy: a case study. Unpublished Phd dissertation. Oklahoma State University.
• Ömeroğlu, Ö. (2006). the relationship between bureaucracy in school management and teachers’ attitudes towards school. Unpublished master's thesis. Dokuz Eylül University.
• Özdemir, S. and Kılınç, A. Ç. (2014). The relationship between bureaucratic school structure and teachers' level of academic optimism. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 10(1), 1-23.
• Özer, N. (2010). An investigation of primary schools in terms of organizational dynamism, bureaucracy and organizational norms. Unpublished Phd dissertation. İnönü University.
• Öztürk, N. (2001). Bureaucratization in high schools and stress levels of teachers. Unpublished Phd dissertation. Dokuz Eylül University.
• Rai, S. G. (2013). Impact of organizational justice on satisfaction, commitment and turnover intention: can fair treatment by organizations make a difference in their workers’ attitudes and behaviors?. Journal of Human Sciences, 10(2), 260-284.
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. Sociological methodology, 13, 290-312.
• Taşdan, M. and Yılmaz, K. (2008). Organizational citizenship and organizational justice scales' adaptation to turkish. Education and Science, 33(150), 87-96.
• Watts, D. M. (2009). Enabling school structure, mindfulness, and teacher empowerment: test of a theory. Unpublished Phd dissertation. The University of Alabama.Weber, M. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York, Macmillan Publishing.
• Yılmaz, A. İ. and Beycioğlu, K. (2017). Teachers’ perceptions regarding bureaucratic structures in schools. Anadolu University Journal of Education Faculty, 1(2), 1-23.
• Zembat, R., Şahan, B., Bayındır, D., Yılmaz, E. and Tunçeli, H. İ. (2014). An investigation of the relationship between bureaucratic characteristics of pre-school education institutions and job satisfaction of teachers. 1. Eurasian Educational Research Congress, İstanbul, April 24-26.