Özbağlanım ve Cepstral analiz kullanarak nöromüsküler hastalıkların sınıflandırılması

Bu çalışma, yapay sinir ağlarından yararlanılarak myopathy ve neuropathy nöromüsküler hastalıkların sınıflandırlmasını amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada neuropathy, myopathy ve normal olmak üzere toplam 59 kişiden kaydedilen Elektromyogram (EMG) işaretleri kullanılmıştır. EMG işaretlerine, öz bağlanımlı (Autoregressive: AR) ve Cepstral metotları uygulanarak katsayılar elde edilmiştir. Bu katsayılar yapay sinir ağlarına'(YSA) girdi olarak kullanılmıştır. AR ve Cepstral'a ait katsayılar YSA da eğitime tabii tutulduktan sonra sınıflama ve test performansları incelenmiştir.

Neuromuscular disease classification using autoregressive and Cesptral analysis

The aim of this study is to classify myopathy and neuropathy neuromuscular disease using artificial neural network (ANN). Electromyogram (EMG) signals are recorded from myopathy, neuropathy and normal of neuromuscular disease of totally 59 subjects. By applying Cepstral and Autoregressive (AR) methods to the EMG signals, Cepstral and AR coefficients are obtained. These coefficients are then used as inputs to the ANN. After they are trained by ANN, classification and test performance are investigated.

___

  • 1. Deluca C.J., Towards understanding the EMG signal ch 3 of muscles alive, fourth edition, Williams & Wilkonson, Bultimore, 1978.
  • 2. Frize M., Ennett M., Stevenson M., Trigg C.E., Clinical decision support for intensive care unit using ANN, Medical Eng. Phy., 23, 217-225,2001.
  • 3. Coatrieux JL. Interference electromyogram processing - Part II: experimental and stimulated EMG AR modeling. Electromyogram Clin Neurophysiol, 23, 481-490, 1983.
  • 4. Maranzana MF., Molinari R., Somma-Riva G., The parameterization of the electromyographic signal. Elect Clin Neurophysiol, 24, 47-65,1984.
  • 5. Basmajian JV, Glopal DN, Ghista DN., Electrodiagnostic model for motor unit action potential (MUAP) generation. American J. Phys Medic, 64, 279-294, 1985.
  • 6. Abel E.W., Zacharia P.C., Forster A., Farrow T.L., Neural network analysis of the EMG interference pattern. Medical Engineering and Physics, 18, 12-17, 1996.
  • 7. Savelberg HH, Herzog W, Prediction of dynamic tendon forces from electromyographic signals: an artificial neural network approach, J Neurosci Methods, 30, 65-74, 1997.
  • 8. Liu MM, Herzog W, Savelberg HH. Dynamic muscle force predictions from EMG: an artificial neural network approach, J Electromyogr Kinesiol, 9 (6), 391-400, 1999.
  • 9. Kumaravel N. and Kavitha V., Automatic diagnosis of neuromuscular disease using neural network, Biomed. Sci. Instrum., 90, 245- 250, 1994.
  • lO.Nussbaum MA, Martin BJ, Chaffin DB., A neural network model for simulation of torso muscle coordination, J Biomech, 30(3), 251-8,1997.
  • 11.Nussbaum MA, Chaffin NB, Evaluation of artificial neural network modeling to predict torso muscle activity, Ergonomics, 39(12), 1430-44, 1996.
  • 12.Nussbaum MA, Chaffin DB, Martin BJ., A back-propagation neural network model of lumbar muscle recruitment during moderate static exertions, J Biomech, 28(9), 1015-24,1995.
  • 13.Pattichis CS, Elia GA, Autoregressive and Cepstral analysis the motor unit potential, Med Eng Phys, 405-19, 1999.
  • 14.Güler, I, Kıymık M.K., Akın M., Alkan A., AR spectral analysis of EEG signals by using maximum likelihood estimation, Computers in Biology and Medicine, 31, 441-450, 2001.
  • 15. Proakis JG, Manolakis DG. Digital signal processing. Principles algorithms and applications. 2nd Ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company, 1992.
  • 16. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control, 19, 716-723, 1974.
  • 17.Atal BS. Effectiveness of linear prediction characteristics of the speech wave for automatic speaker identification and verification, J Aoust Soc Amer, 55: 1304-12,1974.
  • 18.Rumelhart DE., McClelland JL., Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol 1, MIT press, Cambridge, MA, 1988.
  • 19.Fredric M.H., Ivica K., Principles of Neurocomputing for Science and Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2001.
  • 2O.Hanley J.A., McNeil B.J., The meaning and use of the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, Radiology, 143, 29-36, 1982.
  • 21.Basher IA, Hajmeer M, Artificial neural network fundamentals, computing, design and application, Journal Microb Methods, 43, 3-31,2000.
  • 22.Haykin S., Neural network- a comprehensive foundation, Macmillan Publishing, 1994