Mersin İlinin Organik Atık Potansiyelinin Biyogaz Enerji Üretimine Etkisi

Bu çalışmanın amacı; Mersin ilinde bitkisel, hayvansal, mutfak ve endüstriyel arıtma çamuru tesislerinden elde edilen organik atıkların mevcut durumu ve biyogaz enerji üretim potansiyelini belirlemek ve konuya ilişkin yerel ölçekte sürdürülebilir çözümler oluşturmaktır. Çalışmada hayvan ve bitkilere ait veriler Mersin İl Tarım ve Orman Müdürlüğünden, mutfak ve endüstriyel atıklara ilişkin veriler ise Mersin Büyükşehir Belediyesinden alınmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda, Mersin ilinde hayvansal, bitkisel, mutfak ve arıtma çamuru tesisinde üretilen günlük organik madde miktarının 16801.48 ton olduğu ve bu atıklardan üretilen biyogaz miktarının 557432.47 m3 , metandan üretilen elektrik enerjisi ise 2619.93 MWh olarak elde edilebilecektir. Organik atıklardan üretilen elektrik miktarının %57’si hayvan gübresinden %33’ü arıtma çamurundan, %6’sı mutfak atıklarından ve %4’ü de tarımsal atıklarından elde edilebilecektir. Mersin ili için elektrik üretiminde hayvan gübresi ve arıtma çamurunun içerdiği organik madde bakımından önemli potansiyele sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, kurulacak biyogaz tesislerinin işletmelere ticari değer katkısı da sağlayabilecektir.

The effect of organic waste potential of Mersin province on biogas energy production

In this study is to determine the current status of organic wastes obtained from plant, animal, kitchen and industrial sewage sludgeplants in Mersin province and to generate biogas energy production potential and to create sustainable solutions at the local level.Data on animals and plants were obtained from Mersin Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry and data on kitchen andindustrial wastes were obtained from Mersin Metropolitan Municipality. As a result of this study, the daily organic matter producedin animal, vegetable, kitchen and sewage sludge plant in Mersin province is 16801.48 tons and the amount of biogas producedfrom these wastes is 557432.47 m3and the electricity generated from methane is 2619.93 MWh. The amount of electricity producedfrom organic wastes; 57% can be obtained from animal manure, 33% from treatment sludge, 6% from kitchen waste and 4% fromagricultural waste. In Mersin province, it has been determined that animal manure and sewage sludge have significant potential interms of organic matter. In addition, the biogas facilities to be established will provide commercial value contribution to theenterprises.

___

  • [1] Karayılmazlar S., Saracoglu N., Çubuk Y. and Kurt R., “Biomass Power in Turkey Evaluation of production”, Bartin Journal of the Faculty of Forestry, 13(19): 63- 75, (2011).
  • [2] Tınmaz Köse E., “Determination and Digital Mapping of Biogas Energy Potential of Animal Manures in Thrace Region”, Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 23(6): 762-772, (2017).
  • [3] Mao C., Feng Y., Wang X. and Ren G., “ Review on Research Achievements of Biogas from Anaerobic Digestion”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45: 540-555, (2015).
  • [4] McCarthy P.L., “One hundred years of anaerobic digestion, anaerobic Digesiton”, Amsterdam : Elsevier Biochemical Press BV, 3-22, (1981).
  • [5] Hartmann H., Angelidaki I. and Ahring B. K., “ Co - digestion of The Organic Fraction Municipal Waste With Other Waste Types, In: Biomethanization of The Organic Fraction Municipal Waste”, J.Mata- Alvarez (ed.), IWA Publishing, London,UK, (2002).
  • [6] Baban A., Timur H., Ciliz N., Olgun H. And Akgun F., “Back of Poultry and Barn Fertilizers” Final Project of TUBITAK-MAM, (2001).
  • [7] Mature H., Dogru M. And Hovvarth C. R., “ Use of Solid Wastes in Energy Conversion and Gasifiers”, IV. National Installation Engineering Congress and Exhibition, (1999).
  • [8] Bayram A., “Pirina as a Renewable Energy Source : Production, properties and evaluation”, Renewable Energy Resources Symposium, 106-112, (2001).
  • [9] Coskun T., Manav N., Debik E., Binici M.S., Tosun C., Mehmetli E. and Baban A., “Anaerobic Digestion of Cattle Wastes”, Journal of Engineering and Natural Sciences Journal of Engineering and Science, Sigma 3: 1-9, (2011).
  • [10] Kumbur H., Ozer Z., Ozsoy D.Y. and Hunter D.E., “The climate of Turkey in Comparison of Potential Environmental Effects of Traditional and Renewable Energy Sources”, III. Renewable energy Resources Symposium, 7, (2001).
  • [11] Başçetinçelik A., Ozturk A. And Karaca C., “Türkiye of Agricultural Biomass for Power Generation Facilities”, IV. New and Renewable Energy Resources Symposium,Website. (Date of access. 05.05.2011). http://www.mmo.org.tr/resimler/dosya_ekler/32590c74a 229a9f_ek.pdf?dergi=563
  • [12] Sozer S. and Yaldız O., “ A Research on Biogas Production from Bovine Fertilizer and Whey Mixtures” Akdeniz University Faculty of Agriculture Department of Agricultural Machinery, 19(2):179-183, (2006).
  • [13] Toruk F. and Eker B., “Usability of Biogas Energy in Thrace Region”, II. Renewable Energy Resources Symposium, 1-6, (2003).
  • [14] Akbulut A. and Dikici A., “ Biogas potential and cost analysis of Elazig Province”, Firat University, Eastern Anatolia Research Center, 36-41, (2004).
  • [15] Koçer N. and Ünlü A., “Biomass Potential and Energy Production of the Eastern Anatolia Region”, Center, Eastern Anatolia Research, 175-181, (2007).
  • [16] Öztürk M. and Yüksel Y.E., “Energy structure of Turkey for sustainable development”,Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53: 1259–1272,(2016).
  • [17] Şenol H., Elibol E.A., Açıkel Ü. and Şenol M., “ Main Organic Waste Sources of Biogas Production in Ankara”, BEU Journal of Science, 6(2): 15-28, (2017).
  • [18] Kalyuzhnyi S., “Energy Potential of Anaerobic Digestion of Wastes Produced in Russia Via Biogas and Microbial Fuel Cell Technologies”, IUPAC, Pure and Applied Chemistry, 80(10): 2115–2124, (2008).
  • [19] Güç A., " Biogas Production from Cattle Waste and Evaluation of Environmental Effects for Uşak Province”, Master Thesis, Ege University, Department of Solar Energy, 5-10, (2010).
  • [20] Dimitrova D., Georgiev K., Cheriyska I.,Garvanska S.M. and Kolev N., “Biogas Potential in Bulgaria. Summary Report”, Project: BiG>East (EIE/07/214), Institute of Soil Science Nikola Poushkarov, (2009).
  • [21] Türker M., “ Anaerobic biotechnology : Turkey and on worldwide trends”, Cevkor Foundation Publications, (2008).
  • [22] Meyer - Aurich A., Schattauer A., Hellebrand HJ., Klauss H., Plöchl M. and Berg W., “Impact of uncertainties on greenhouse gas mitigation potential of biogas production from agricultural resources”, Renewable Energy, 37: 277-284, (2012).
  • [23] Konstantinos S., “Biogas Potential in Greece”, Summary Report”, Project : BiG>East (EIE/07/214) WP 2.8 Deliverable 2.2, Centre for Renewable Energy Sources (CRES), (2009).
  • [24] Haefke C., “Biogas-to-Energy Potential in Illinois. U.S. DOE Midwest Clean Energy Application Center”, 10th Annual Conference on Renewable Energy from Organics Recycling Des Moines, October 18- 20, Iowa, USA. http://www.chpcentermw.org/pdfs/101810 _Haefke2.pdf
  • [25] GDM., “Republic of Turkey Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry General Directorate of Meteorology ”, https://www.mgm.gov.tr/?il=Mersi n , (2018).
  • [26] Anonymous., https://www.gezilecekyerler.biz/aydinlik- nerede-hangi-sehirde/,(2018).
  • [27] Ilgar R., “A Study on the Determination of Çanakkale Biogas Potential According to Animal Presence”, Doğu Geography Journal, 21 (35), 89-106.:.
  • [28] MAF., “Republic Of Turkey Ministry Of Agriculture And Forestry ”, Mersin Directorate of Provincial Agriculture And Forestry. https://mersin.tarimorman.gov.tr/# ,(2018).
  • [29] TSI., “ Turkey Statistical Institute of the Republic of Turkey ” , Statistics by Subject, Agriculture , http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=kategorist (Accessed :27.02 2019).
  • [30] Dağ Ö., “Biogas Production Project for Domestic Wastes”,http://ozgurdag4941.blogspot.com.tr/2014/12/ ev-atiklarindan-biyogaz-uretim-projesi.html?m=1 (Accessed : 01.02.2019).
  • [31] Anonymous., “Environment and urban ministry”, 2011. Report on the Technical-Economic Principles of the Suluova Biogas Plant, Turkish - German Biogas Project, Ankara, (2011).
  • [32] Köse T. E., “ Determination and Digital Mapping of Biogas Energy Potential of Animal Manures in Thrace Region”, Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 23(6): 762-772, (2017).
  • [33] Anonymous., “Biogas Production from Sewage Sludge and Energy Saving”, https://www.yenienerji.info/proje/ aritma- camurundan - biyogaz – uretimi - ve- enerji - tasarrufu, (2017).
  • [34] Yiğit K.S., Gündüz M., Şerit G., Yeğin M., Saraç M., Bayram İ., Bostan Ü. and Pir H., “Biogas Production and Energy Savings From Waste Water Treatment Sludge”, Kocaeli and IZAYDAS ISU study report, Turkey, (2011).
  • [35] Acaroğlu M., “ Alternative Energy Sources ”, Nobel Publication, No: 1253, 609 , Ankara, (2007).
  • [36] Kaya D., “Evaluation of the Use of Domestic Sewage Sludge in Biogas Production”, ICCI – International Energy and Environment Fair and Conference, (2010).
  • [37] Şenol H., Elibol E.A., Açıkel, Ü. and Şenol M., “Main Organic Waste Sources of Biogas Production in Ankara”, BEU Journal of Science, 6(2): 15-28, (2017).
  • [38] Öztürk, H. H., “ Renewable Energy Resources and Usage”, Technical Publishing, 367, Ankara, (2008).
  • [39] Aybek A., Üçok S., Bilgili M.E. and İspir, M., “Determination of Biogas Energy Potential of Some Agricultural Wastes in Kahramanmaraş Province”, UU Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, 29(2): 25-37, (2015).
  • [40] Anonymous., “ South Aegean Development Agency”, South Aegean Renewable Energy Working Report , Pamukkale, Denizli, (2011).
  • [41] Koçar G., Eryaşar A., Ersöz Ö., Arıcı Ş. and Durmuş A., “Biogas Technologies”, Ege University Press, Izmir, (2010).
Politeknik Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1302-0900
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1998
  • Yayıncı: GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Karbon Fiber Takviyeli Silikon Matrisli Kompozit Malzemelerin Statik Katlama Sonrası Mekanik Davranışlarının Analiz Edilmesi

Atilla EVCİN, İsmail Sinan ATLI

Bir Döküm Atölyesindeki Çalışma Duruşlarının Dijital İnsan Modelleme Tabanlı REBA Yöntemi ile Ergonomik Analizi

Fulya ERDEMIR, Cengiz ELDEM

Mineral katkı içeren kalsiyum alüminat çimento esaslı harçların mekanik, dayanıklılık, termal ve içyapı özelliklerinin araştırılması

MURAT TUYAN, Kübra Sevcan SOYKAN, İrem NAMAL, Özge ANDIÇ ÇAKIR

Current Operational Amplifier Based Voltage-Mode MOS-C All-Pass Filter and Its Application

Hasan ÇİÇEKLİ, İhsan KARACAN, Ahmet GÖKÇEN

Mersin İlinin Organik Atık Potansiyelinin Biyogaz Enerji Üretimine Etkisi

Bekir YELMEN, Metin DAGTEKİN, Tarık M. ÇAKIR

On the Compression Properties and Erosion-Corrosion Behaviour of Al 6061/15%Sicp Composite

Osama M. IRFAN, Abdulaziz S. ALABOODI

Akım İşlemsel Kuvvetlendiricisi Tabanlı GerilimModlu MOS-C Tüm-Geçiren Süzgeç ve Uygulaması

Ahmet GÖKÇEN, Hasan ÇİÇEKLİ, İhsan KARACAN

B4C/SiC/Al2O3 Parçacık Takviyelendirilmiş Alüminyum Sandviç Köpük ile Ramor 500 Zırh Çeliğinin bir araya getirilmesi ve Balistik Performansının Araştırılması

Halil KARAKOÇ, AYTEKİN ULUTAŞ, Hanifi ÇİNİCİ

Analysis, Test and Management of the Meta-Heuristic Searching Process: An Experimental Study on SOS

Hamdi Tolga KAHRAMAN, Sefa ARAS, Yusuf SÖNMEZ, Uğur GÜVENÇ, Eyüp GEDİKLİ

Turkey’s Energy Efficiency and Its Relative Position against OECD and BRICS Countries

Fatih KARIK, Ümit İSKENDER, Cuma KILINÇ