Kentler ve Yeni Kentsel Kuramlar: Kentleşmeyi Merkezine Alan Üç Kuram Üzerine

Bugün çoğunluğu kentlerde yaşayan nüfusun, yakın gelecekte kentleşme eğiliminin de devam etmesiyle, daha da artacağı kesin olarak beklenmektedir. Geleceğin kentlerinin bugünün kentlerinden farklı olacağı bilinmektedir. Bu noktada kentlere ilişkin araştırmaların önemi de artmaktadır. Bu makalede yakın zamanda öne çıkan üç farklı kentleşme yaklaşımı, Gezegensel Kentleşme, Postkoloniyal Kentleşme ve Birleşmeler Kentleşmesi ele alınacaktır. Farklı kuramsal düşünce temellerine sahip ancak aralarındaki sınır çizgileri keskin olmayan bu üç yaklaşımın ortak özelliği, şehirlere, kentleşmeye ve kentselliğe ilişkin bugüne kadar bilinegelen doğrusallıkları, hiyerarşileri ve sınıflandırmaları eleştirmesidir. Gezegensel Kentleşme kent-kır ikilemini, Postkolonyal Kentleşme Küresel Kuzey-Güney veya Batı-Doğu ikilemini ve Birleşmeler Kentleşmesi de geçmişi-potansiyeli, gerçekleşeni-olasılığı veya sosyal-nesnel olanı sorgulamaktadır. Makalede, bu üç kentsel yaklaşıma yönelik eleştiriler de dikkate alınarak, genel bir değerlendirme yapılmaktadır.

Cities and New Urban Theories: On Three Theories That Center Urbanization

Today, the majority of the population living in cities is expected to increase with the continuation of urbanization trend in the near future. It is known that the cities of the future will be different from the cities of today. At this point, the importance of the researches about the cities increases. In this article, three recent urbanization approaches, Planetary Urbanization, Postcolonial Urbanization and Assemblage Urbanization will be discussed. The common feature of these three approaches, which have different theoretical thought bases with no delineating lines among them, is that they criticize the ongoing linearities, hierarchies and classifications of cities on urbanization and urbanity. Planetary and Postcolonial Urbanization question urban-rural dilemma and Global North-South or West-East divide, respectively while Assemblage Urbanization examines past-potential, actual-virtual or social-practical. In the article, a general evaluation is carried out by taking criticisms towards these three urban approaches into consideration.

___

  • Amin, A. & Graham, S. (1997). The Ordinary City. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 22(4): 411–29.
  • Angelo, H. & Wachsmuth, D. (2014). Urbanizing urban political ecology: A critique of methodological cityism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 16-27.
  • Arslan Avar, A. (2009). Lefebvre in Üçlü Algılanan, Tasarlanan, Yaşanan Mekan- Diyalektiği, Dosya 17, Ankara: TMMOB Mimarlar Odası Ankara Şubesi Yayını, s. 7-16.
  • Batty, M. & Longley P. (1994). Fractal Cities: A Geometry of Form and Function. San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Benenson, I. & Torrens, P.M. (2004). Geosimulation: Automata-based Modeling of Urban Phenomena. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  • BİB, Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı (2009). Kentleşme Şurası Komisyon Raporları. Ankara: Bayındırlıkve İskan Bakanlığı.
  • Brenner, N. & Schmid, C. (2014). The ‘Urban Age’ in Question. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3), 731–755.
  • Brenner, N. (Ed.) (2014). Implosions/Explosions: Towards a Study of Planetary Urbanization. Berlin: Jovis.
  • Castells, M. (1977). The Urban Question. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Castells, M. (1978). City, Class and Power. London: Macmillan.
  • Cochrane, A. (2018). Here, There and Everywhere: Rethinking the Urban of Urban Politics. Kevin Ward, Andrew E.G. Jonas, Byron Miller & David Wilson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook on Spaces of Urban Politics içinde (s. 14-25). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Comaroff, J. & Comaroff, J.L. (2012). Theory from the South: How EuroAmerica is Evolving toward Africa. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
  • Davis, K. (1955). The Origin and Growth of Urbanization in the World. American Journal of Sociology, 60(5):429–437.
  • De Roo, G. (2010). Planning and Complexity: An Introduction. Gert de Roo & Elisabete A. Silva (Eds.), A Planner’s Encounter with Complexity. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, Surrey.
  • DeLanda, M. (2002). Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy. London: Continuum.
  • DeLanda, M. (2006). A New Philosophy of Society: Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.
  • Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1987 [1980]). A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Çeviri: B. Massumi, Athlone Press, London.
  • Ernstson, H. (2014). Pluralizing or Provicializing Urban Political Ecology? [In a World of Cities]. Situated Ecologies. Erişim: http://www.situatedecologies.net/archives/936.
  • Eyrice Tepeciklioğlu, E. (2013). Postkolonyal Kuram Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplinini Dekolonize Etmek. Ege Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 4(2), 91.
  • Farías, I. (2011). The politics of urban assemblages. City, 15(3–4), 365–374.
  • Harvey, D. (1973). Social Justice and The City. Johns Hopkins Studies in Urban Affairs, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Harvey, D. (1985). Consciousness and the Urban Experience: Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
  • Harvey, D. (1989). The Urban Experience. Baltimore, Maryland: John Hopkins University Press.
  • Harvey, D. (1996). Cities or Urbanization? City, 1(1–2), 38–61. Iossifova, D., Gasparatos, A. & Doll, C.N.H. (Eds.) (2018). Defining the Urban. Oxon: Routlegde.
  • Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities: The Failure of Town Planning. New York: Random House/Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  • Jayne, M. & Ward, K. (Eds.) (2017). Urban Theory New Critical Perspectives. Oxon: Routledge.
  • Jonas, A., Miller, B., Ward, K. & Wilson, D. (2018). Spaces of Urban Politics. Kevin Ward, Andrew E.G. Jonas, Byron Miller & David Wilson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook on Spaces of Urban Politics içinde (s. 1-10). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Latour, B. (2005). Re-assembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991 [1974]). The Production of Space. Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Cambridge: Blackwell.
  • Lefebvre, H. (2003 [1970]). The Urban Revolution. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
  • Marx, K. (1976). Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Vol. 1. Giriş: E. Mandel, Çeviri: B. Fowkes. Harmondsworth, NY: Penguin Books.
  • McFarlane, C. (2011). The city as assemblage: Dwelling and urban space. Environment and Planning D, 29(4), 649–671.
  • Merrifield, A. (2013). The Urban Question under Planetary Urbanization. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 910.
  • Miller, B. & Jonas, A. (2018). Spaces of The Environment and Nature. Kevin Ward, Andrew E.G. Jonas, Byron Miller & David Wilson (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook on Spaces of Urban Politics içinde (s. 107-109). Oxon: Routledge.
  • Mumford, L. (1938). The Culture of Cities. New York City: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
  • Portugali, J. (2000). Self-Organisation and the City. Heidelberg: Springer.
  • Robinson, J. & Roy, A. (2016). Global Urbanisms and the Nature of Urban Theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 181–186.
  • Robinson, J. (2006). Ordinary Cities: Between Modernity and Development. London: Routledge.
  • Roy, A. (2005). Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71: 147–158.
  • Roy, A. (2009). The 21st-Century Metropolis: New Geographies of Theory. Regional Studies, 43, 819–830.
  • Roy, A. (2016). Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 2000–2009.
  • Said, E.W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon.
  • Sancar, C. (2017). Urbanization in Turkey in Terms of Lobalization and Environmental Problems. Halil İbrahim Aydın, Magdalena Ziolo, Aniela Bălăcescu (Eds.), Economic Development: Global and Regional Studies içinde (s. 263-285). London: Ijopec Publication.
  • Schlichtman, J.J. (2018). Sociology: The Sociological ‘Urban’. Deljana Iossifova, Christopher N.H. Doll, Alexandros Gasparatos (Eds.), Defining the Urban: Interdisciplinary and Professional Perspectives içinde (s. 11-26). Oxon: Routlegde.
  • Schmid, C. (2008). Henri Lefebvre’s Theory of the Production of Space: Towards a Three- Dimensional Dialectic. Kanishka Goonewardena, Stefan Kipfer, Richard Milgrom, Christian Schmid (Eds.), Space, Difference, Everyday Life: Reading Henri Lefebvre içinde (s.27-45). London: Routledge.
  • Scott, A. & Storper, M. (2015). The Nature of Cities: The Scope and Limits of Urban Theory. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(1), 1–15.
  • Shin, H.B. (2018). Geography: Rethinkinf the ‘Urban’ and ‘Urbanization’. Deljana Iossifova, Christopher N.H. Doll, Alexandros Gasparatos (Eds.), Defining the Urban: Interdisciplinary and Professional Perspectives içinde (s. 27-39). Oxon: Routlegde.
  • Silva, A. & Clarke, C. (2005). Complexity, Emergence and Cellular Urban Models: Lessons Learned from Applying Sleuth to Two Portuguese Metropolitan Areas. European Planning Studies, 13(1): 93-116.
  • Storper, M. & Scott, A. (2016). Current Debates in Urban Theory: A Critical Assessment. Urban Studies, 53(6), 1117.
  • Thrift, N. (2008). Non-Representational Theory: Space, Politics, Affect. London: Routledge.
  • Tönnies, F. (1957). Community & Society (Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft). Çeviri: C.P., Loomis, East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
  • UN (2016). HABITAT III New Urban Agenda. United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development, Quito.
  • UN (2018). Revision of World Urbanization Prospects. Erişim: https:// www.un.org/development/desa/publications/2018-revision-of-worldurbanization-prospects.html (09.07.2019).
  • Walker, R. (2015). Building a Better Theory of the Urban: A Response to ‘Towards a New Epistemology of the Urban?’ City, 19(2–3): 183–191.
  • Weber, A. (1929). Theory of the Location of Industries. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Weber, M. (1958). The City. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Wezemael, J.V. (2010). Urban Governance and Social Complexity. Gert de Roo & Elisabete A. Silva (Eds.), A Planner’s Encounter with Complexity. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing.
  • Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a Way of Life. American Journal of Sociology, 44, 5-8.
  • Yetişkul, E. & Demirel, Ş (2017). Assembling Gentrification in Istanbul: The Cihangir Neighbourhood of Beyoğlu. Urban Studies, 55(15): 3336– 3352.
  • Yetişkul, E. (2017). Karmaşık Kentler ve Planlamada Karmaşıklık. Planlama, 27 (1), 7-15.
  • Young, R.J.C. (2003). Postcolonialism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Zimmer, A., Cornea, N. & Veron, R. (2018). Urban Political Ecology: Landscapes of Power. Deljana Iossifova, Christopher N.H. Doll, Alexandros Gasparatos (Eds.), Defining the Urban: Interdisciplinary and Professional Perspectives içinde (s. 212-222). Oxon: Routlegde.