Çöp sızıntı suyu arıtımı için denitrifikasyon ve kısmi nitrifikasyon proseslerinin performansı

Bu çalışma, çöp sızıntı sularından amonyum-azotun giderimi için ardışık anoksik hareketli yatak biofilm (AnoxHYBR) ve aerobik ardışık kesikli(AeAKR) reaktörün performansını araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaç için, AnoxHYBR ve AeAKR 48 sa.’lik döngü süresinde işletilmiştir. Her iki reaktör performansı kimyasal oksijen ihtiyacı (KOİ), çözünmüş organik karbon (ÇOK), inorganik karbon (İK), amonyum (NH4 +), nitrit (NO2 -), nitrat (NO3 -), toplam azot (TA) renk (Pt-Co ve RES) ve pH parametreleri ile değerlendirilmiştir. Ek olarak, AeAKR performansı serbest amonyum (SA) ve serbest nitröz asit (SNA) konsantrasyonları açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Ardışık sistemdekitoplam KOİ ve amonyumun giderim verimi sırasıyla %75 ve %65, AnoxHYBR'de NO3 - giderim verimi yaklaşık %55 olarak elde edilmiştir. AeAKR'de başarılı bir kısmi nitrifikasyon prosesi gerçekleştirilerek 24 sa. ve 48 sa.’lik hidrolik bekletme süresinde sırasıyla yaklaşık 1630.16 ve 1702.92 mg/L nitrit birikimi gözlemlenmiştir. Bu çalışma, ardışık denitrifikasyon/kısmi nitrifikasyon kullanımının, ham çöp sızıntı suyundan KOİ ve amonyumun giderimi için etkili bir yol olduğunu göstermektedir. Ancak, deşarj standartlarına uygun çıkış su kalitesini elde etmek için ön ve/veya son arıtım olarak ilave arıtma yöntemleri uygulanması önerilmektedir.

Performances of sequential denitrification and partial nitrification process for treatment of landfill leachate

This study aims at investigating the sequential denitrification and the partial nitrification performance of anoxic moving bed reactor (AnoxMBBR)-aerobic sequencing batch reactor (AeSBR) to remove ammonium-nitrogen from landfill leachate (LFL). For this purpose, AnoxMBBR and AeSBR were set-up and operated at a cycle time of 48-h. The both reactor performances were evaluated by chemical oxygen demand (COD), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), inorganic carbon (IC), ammonium (NH4 +), nitrite (NO2 -), nitrate (NO3 -), total nitrogen (TN), color (Pt-Co and RES) and pH parameters. Additionally, the AeSBR performance was evaluated in terms of free ammonium (FA) and free nitrous acid (FNA) concentrations. In the sequential system, total removal efficiency of COD and ammonium was about 75% and 65%, respectively. In AnoxMBBR, also, NO3 - removal efficiency was about 55%. The partial nitrification was successfully occurred in AeSBR and the nitrite accumulation at 24-h and 48-h was about 1630.16 and 1702.92 mg/L, respectively. The results of this study suggest that use of sequential denitrification/partial nitrification is an effective way to remove COD and ammonium from raw LFL However, additional treatment methods to this sequential system can be applied as pretreatment and/or post treatment for achieving the desired water quality because effluent TN and COD values are still not meet with the discharge standards of 40 mg N/L and 600 mg COD/L.

___

  • [1] Renou S, Givaudan JG, Poulain S, Dirassouyan F, Moulin P. “Landfill leachate treatment: review and a opportunity”. Journal of hazardous materials, 150(3), 468-493, 2008.
  • [2] Calabrò PS, Gentili E, Meoni C, Orsi S, Komilis D. “Effect of the recirculation of a reverse osmosis concentrate on leachate generation: A case study in an Italian landfill”. Waste Management, 76, 643-651, 2018.
  • [3] El-Fadel M, Findikakis AN, Leckie JO. “Modeling leachate generation and transport in solid waste landfills”. Environmental technology, 18(7), 669-686, 1997.
  • [4] Alimba CG, Bakare AA. “In vivo micronucleus test in the assessment of cytogenotoxicity of landfill leachates in three animal models from various ecological habitats”. Ecotoxicology, 25(2), 310-319, 2016.
  • [5] The World Bank. “Solid Waste Management Brief”. http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/urbandevelopmen t/brief/solid-waste-management (08.10.2020).
  • [6] Kulikowska D, Klimiuk E. “The effect of landfill age on municipal leachate composition”. Bioresource Technology, 99(13), 5981-5985, 2008.
  • [7] Chofqi A., Younsi A, Lhadi EK, Mania J, Mudry J, Veron A. “Environmental impact of an urban landfill on a coastal aquifer (El Jadida, Morocco)”. Journal of African earth sciences, 39(3-5), 509-516, 2004.
  • [8] Slack RJ, Gronow JR, Voulvoulis N. “Household hazardous waste in municipal landfills: contaminants in leachate”. Science of the total environment, 337(1-3), 119-137, 2005.
  • [9] Hongjiang LI, Youcai ZHAO, Lei SHI, Yingying GU. “Threestage aged refuse biofilter for the treatment of landfill leachate”. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 21(1), 70-75, 2009.
  • [10] Eggen T, Moeder M, Arukwe A. “Municipal landfill leachates: a significant source for new and emerging pollutants”. Science of the Total Environment, 408(21), 5147-5157, 2010.
  • [11] Zainol NA, Aziz HA, Yusoff MS. “Characterization of Leachate from Kuala Sepetang and Kulim landfills: a comparative study”. Energy and Environment Research, 2(2), 45-52, 2012.
  • [12] Anthonisen AC, Loehr RC, Prakasam TBS, Srinath EG. “Inhibition of nitrification by ammonia and nitrous acid”. Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation), 835-852, 1976.
  • [13] Van Hulle SW, Volcke EI, Teruel JL, Donckels B, van Loosdrecht MC, Vanrolleghem PA. “Influence of temperature and pH on the kinetics of the Sharon nitritation process”. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology: International Research in Process, Environmental & Clean Technology, 82(5), 471-480, 2007.
  • [14] Bashir MJ, Aziz HA, Yusoff MS, Adlan MN. “Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of ammoniacal nitrogen removal from semi-aerobic landfill leachate using ion exchange resin”. Desalination, 254(1-3), 154-161, 2010.
  • [15] Ferraz FM, Povinelli J, Vieira EM. “Ammonia removal from landfill leachate by air stripping and absorption”. Environmental technology, 34(15), 2317-2326, 2013.
  • [16] Chen Z, Wang X, Yang Y, Mirino Jr MW, Yuan Y. “Partial nitrification and denitrification of mature landfill leachate using a pilot-scale continuous activated sludge process at low dissolved oxygen”. Bioresource technology, 218, 580-588, 2016.
  • [17] Wiszniowski J, Robert D, Surmacz-Gorska J, Miksch K, Weber JV. “Landfill leachate treatment methods: A review”. Environmental chemistry letters, 4(1), 51-61, 2006.
  • [18] Atmaca E. “Treatment of landfill leachate by using electroFenton method”. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 163(1), 109-114, 2009.
  • [19] Phan TN, Van Truong TT, Ha NB, Nguyen PD, Bui XT, Dang BT, Doan VT, Park J, Guo W, Ngo HH. “High rate nitrogen removal by ANAMMOX internal circulation reactor (IC) for old landfill leachate treatment”. Bioresource Technology, 234, 281-288, 2017.
  • [20] Ilies P, Mavinic DS. “The effect of decreased ambient temperature on the biological nitrification and denitrification of a high ammonia landfill leachate”. Water Research, 35(8), 2065-2072, 2001.
  • [21] Liu J, Zhang P, Tian Z, Xu R, Wu Y, Song Y. “Pollutant removal from landfill leachate via two-stage anoxic/oxic combined membrane bioreactor: Insight in organic characteristics and predictive function analysis of nitrogen-removal bacteria”. Bioresource technology, 317, 124037, 2020.
  • [22] Fu Z, Yang F, An Y, Xue Y. “Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification coupled with phosphorus removal in an modified anoxic/oxic-membrane bioreactor (A/O-MBR)”. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 43(2), 191-196, 2009.
  • [23] Zhang F, Peng Y, Miao L, Wang Z, Wang S, Li B. “A novel simultaneous partial nitrification Anammox and denitrification (SNAD) with intermittent aeration for cost-effective nitrogen removal from mature landfill leachate”. Chemical Engineering Journal, 313, 619-628, 2017.
  • [24] Ge S, Wang S, Yang X, Qiu S, Li B, Peng Y. “Detection of nitrifiers and evaluation of partial nitrification for wastewater treatment: a review”. Chemosphere, 140, 85-98, 2015.
  • [25] Sinha B, Annachhatre AP. “Partial nitrificationoperational parameters and microorganisms involved”. Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology, 6(4), 285-313, 2007.
  • [26] Erguder TH, Boon N, Vlaeminck SE, Verstraete W. “Partial nitrification achieved by pulse sulfide doses in a sequential batch reactor”. Environmental science & technology, 42(23), 8715-8720, 2008.
  • [27] Peng Y, Zhang S, Zeng W, Zheng S, Mino T, Satoh H. “Organic removal by denitritation and methanogenesis and nitrogen removal by nitritation from landfill leachate”. Water Research, 42(4-5), 883-892, 2008.
  • [28] Yuan Q, Oleszkiewicz JA. “Low temperature biological phosphorus removal and partial nitrification in a pilot sequencing batch reactor system”. Water Science and Technology, 63(12), 2802-2807, 2011.
  • [29] Gabarró J, Ganigué R, Gich F, Ruscalleda M, Balaguer, MD, Colprim J. “Effect of temperature on AOB activity of a partial nitritation SBR treating landfill leachate with extremely high nitrogen concentration”. Bioresource technology, 126, 283-289, 2012.
  • [30] Zeng W, Wang X, Li B, Bai X, Peng Y. “Nitritation and denitrifying phosphorus removal via nitrite pathway from domestic wastewater in a continuous MUCT process”. Bioresource technology, 143, 187-195, 2013.
  • [31] Welander U, Henrysson T, Welander T. Biological nitrogen removal from municipal landfill leachate in a pilot scale suspended carrier biofilm process”. Water research, 32(5), 1564-1570, 1998.
  • [32] Brenner A, Argaman Y. “Effect of feed composition, aerobic volume fraction and recycle rate on nitrogen removal in the single-sludge system”. Water Research, 24(8), 1041-1049, 1990.
  • [33] Jianlong W, Ning Y. “Partial nitrification under limited dissolved oxygen conditions”. Process Biochemistry, 39(10), 1223-1229, 2004.
  • [34] American Public Health Association, APHA. “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater”. American Public Health Association, Water Environment Federation, and American Water Works Association, Washington, DC, America, Standard Method, 20th ed. 1998.
  • [35] Østergaard N. “Biogasproduktion Idet Thermofile Temperaturinterval”. Kemiteknik. Dansk Teknologisk Institut, Taastrup, Danish, STUB Rapport, 21, 1985.
  • [36] Zhong Q, Li D, Tao Y, Wang X, He X, Zhang J, Zhang J, Guo W, Wang L. “Nitrogen removal from landfill leachate via ex situ nitrification and sequential in situ denitrification”. Waste Management, 29(4), 1347-1353, 2009.
  • [37] Miao L, Wang S, Li B, Cao T, Xue T, Peng Y. “Advanced nitrogen removal via nitrite using stored polymers in a modified sequencing batch reactor treating landfill leachate”. Bioresource Technology, 192, 354-360, 2015.
  • [38] Yapsakli K, Aliyazicioglu C, Mertoglu B. “Identification and quantitative evaluation of nitrogen-converting organisms in a full-scale leachate treatment plant”. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(3), 714-723, 2011.
  • [39] Li L, Yan G, Wang H, Chu Z, Li Z, Ling Y, Wu T. “Denitrification and microbial community in MBBR using A. donax as carbon source and biofilm carriers for reverse osmosis concentrate treatment”. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 84, 133-143, 2019.
  • [40] Chen S, Sun D, Chung JS. “Simultaneous removal of COD and ammonium from landfill leachate using an anaerobic–aerobic moving-bed biofilm reactor system”. Waste Management, 28(2), 339-346, 2008.
  • [41] Maurer M, Fux C, Graff M, Siegrist H. “Moving-bed biological treatment (MBBT) of municipal wastewater: denitrification”. Water science and technology, 43(11), 337-344, 2001.
  • [42] Wang S, Li Z, Gao M, She Z, Guo L, Zheng D, Zhao Y, Ma B, Gao F, Wang X. “Long-term effects of nickel oxide nanoparticles on performance, microbial enzymatic activity, and microbial community of a sequencing batch reactor”. Chemosphere, 169, 387-395, 2017.
  • [43] Vilchez R, Pozo C, Gómez MA, Rodelas B, González-López J. “Dominance of sphingomonads in a copper-exposed biofilm community for groundwater treatment”. Microbiology, 153(2), 325-337, 2007.
  • [44] Spagni A, Marsili-Libelli S. “Nitrogen removal via nitrite in a sequencing batch reactor treating sanitary landfill leachate”. Bioresource Technology, 100(2), 609-614, 009.
  • [45] Ranjan K, Chakraborty S, Verma M, Iqbal J, Kumar RN. “Cotreatment of old landfill leachate and municipal wastewater in sequencing batch reactor (SBR): Effect of landfill leachate concentration”. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 51(4), 377-387, 2016.
  • [46] Glass C, Silverstein J, Oh J. “Inhibition of denitrification in activated sludge by nitrite”. Water Environment Research, 69(6), 1086-1093, 1997.
  • [47] Vadivelu VM, Keller J, Yuan Z. “Effect of free ammonia on the respiration and growth processes of an enriched Nitrobacter culture”. Water Research, 41(4), 826-834, 2007.
  • [48] Su Kirliliği Kontrol Yönetmeliği. “Deşarj Standartı Arama”. https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/mevzuat?MevzuatNo=722 1&MevzuatTur=7&MevzuatTertip=5 (08.10.2020).
Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-7009
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Geri kazanılmış asfalt malzemenin uzun süreli filtrasyon performansı

Ayşegül BAYIN SARIAHMETOĞLU, Recep İYİSAN, Aslı YALÇIN DAYIOĞLU, Mustafa HATİPOĞLU

İçme suyu dağıtım sistemlerinde sızıntı yönetimi ve şebeke rehabilitasyonu için fayda maliyet analizi

Fatih Mehmet DURMUŞÇELEBİ, Özgür ÖZDEMİR, Mahmut FIRAT

Farklı kür sıcaklıklarında kireçle stabilize edilmiş yüksek plastisiteli killi bir zeminin kayma mukavemeti parametrelerinin Yanıt Yüzey Yöntemi (YYY) ile tahmini

Hakan Alper KAMİLOĞLU, Hüseyin TURAN

Astrazon Black MBL boyasının yenilikçi bir adsorbent ile giderimi: Taguchi metodu ile işletme parametrelerinin optimizasyonu

Elanur ADAR

26 Eylül 2019 Marmara Denizi depremi’nin (5.8 Mw) İstanbul ve çevre illerde oluşturduğu zemin etkilerinin değerlendirilmesi

Hamdullah LİVAOĞLU, Fadime SERTÇELİK

Güvenlik kriteri olarak çarpışmaya kadar geçen süre ve takip zaman aralığı karşılaştırılması

Ehsan RAMEZANI-KHANSARI, Fereidoon MOGHADAS NEJAD, Sina MOOGEH

Bahatlar volkanitlerinin (Emet-Kütahya) petrografisi ve jeokimyası

Cafer ÖZKUL, Recep Uğur ACAR, Mehmet DEMİRBİLEK

TOPEX V28.1 gravite verilerinin denizler hariç ana kara genelinde kullanılabilirliği; Batı Anadolu örneği

Tolga GÖNENÇ

Taşıyıcı hafif betonun enerji performansı açısından değerlendirilmesi: Bir örnek çalışma

Safa NAYIR, Ümit BAHADIR, Şakir ERDOĞDU, Vedat TOĞAN

Kayaçların direkt çekme dayanımlarının indirekt çekme dayanımlarından elde edilmesi için alternatif bir yaklaşım

Kenan TÜFEKCİ, Servet DEMİRDAĞ, Nazmi ŞENGÜN, Tamer EFE, Raşit ALTINDAĞ