Macaristan'da Yönetici Osmanlı Aileleri

16'ncÖ ve 17'nci yüzyÖl OsmanlÖ arûiv kaynaklarÖnda anÖlan, yüksek görevlerde bulunanlarÖn ailevî iliûkilerini saptamak genellikle oldukça zordur. Yine de kimi önemli sülaleleri izlemek mümkündür. AyrÖca sülale fertleri arasÖnda akrabalÖk baİlarÖ olmayan birkaç grubu da bu kapsama sokmak yerindedir. BunlarÖn arasÖnda Türk asÖllÖ olanlar da bulunmaktadÖr. Fakat çoİu Balkanlardan gelen ùslâmiyete sonradan girmiû olan kimselerdir. ùlk grubun en iyi bilinen örneİi 1546 yÖlÖnda Budin/Buda vilayetinin ilk tahririni yapan ve 1549'da paûalÖİÖn defterdarlÖİÖ görevine getirilen ÇandarlÖzade Halil Bey'dir. Slav kökenli olan ailelerden YahyalÖlar ve Sokollular baûta gelir. Yahya Paûa'nÖn neslinden ve akrabalarÖndan Bali, Mehmed ve Arslan PaûalarÖn Budin beylerbeyliİine atanmÖû olmalarÖ, Arslan, Derviû ve Mehmed Beylerin ise birer sancak beyi olarak görevlendirilmeleri bu sülalenin ne kadar nüfuzlu olduİunu ve faaliyet alanlarÖnÖn 1540'lÖ yÖllardaBalkanlardan Macar topraklarÖna kaydÖİÖnÖ açÖk bir ûekilde göstermektedir. Sokollular ise 1566'dan 17'nci yüzyÖlÖn ilk on yÖllarÖna kadar yönetici konumundaydÖlar. Aranid lakabÖyla karûÖmÖza çÖkan kiûiler ise meûhur bir Arnavut ailesine mensuptular. Dört-beû kiûiden oluûan doİulu bir klan (Ulama, Kanber, "Deriel", Mehmed Han ve Velican Bey) Tekeli boyuna, Zulkadirlilere ve bilinmeyen soya baİlÖ olup bir dönem ùran ûahÖna da hizmet ettiler. HÖrvat asÖllÖ, kariyerinin ilk safhasÖnda Yahyapaûaoİlu Mehmed Bey'in voyvodasÖ olan ve bu ocak ile sonradan da iliûkide kalan KasÖm Bey/Paûa ise kendi adamlarÖndan daha kalabalÖk bir ûebeke oluûturabildi. Büyük olasÖlÖkla Macar asÖllÖ, aralarÖnda sÖkÖ iliûki baİlarÖ olan bir ümera grubu da ùskender, Deák (Kâtip) Mehmed ve Macaroİlu Ali Paûa'dan meydana geldi. Bu aile ve gruplarÖn gerçek gücünü, neyi ve ne kadar etkileyebildiklerini, beklenenin ötesine giden tutumlarÖnÖ merkezin hangi ölçüde frenleyebildiİini veya frenlemek istediİini, onlarla ne tür iç siyaset oyunlarÖna girdiİini yeterince bilmiyoruz. TartÖûmasÖz olan bir ûey varsa o da üzerinde durduİumuz dönemde sistemin oldukça aksaksÖz yürüdüİüdür. Bunun en önemli nedenlerinden biri, belki de en önemlisi, onlara olaİanüstü iyi gelir saİlanmÖû olmasÖ, ayrÖca da hem prestij hem imkânlar açÖsÖndan özel duruma sahip olmalarıdır.

Leading Families in Ottoman Hungary

It is often rather difficult to figure out the family relationships of high-ranking officials in Hungary mentioned in the sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Ottoman sources. Nevertheless, it is possible to follow the fortunes of members of certain important kinship groups. Also worthy of attention are prominent individuals who were not affiliated by blood, but who belonged to common networks. Among these, we find individuals of Turkish origin, but encounter many more who were renegades, from families which hailed from the Balkans. Those from Turkey are best represented by ÇandarlÖzade Halil bey, who drew up the first cadastral surveys of the sancaks comprising the vilayet of Budin/Buda in 1546 and who went on to become defterdar of the same province in 1549, while the most significant families of Slav background were the YahyalÖs and the Sokollus. The fact that three of Yahya paûa's offspring and other relations (Bali, Mehmed, and Arslan paûas) were appointed governors of Buda and another three (Arslan, Derviû, and Mehmed beys) were each charged with setting up a new sancak shows how influential this kinship group was, and that it transferred its main field of activity from the Balkans to the Hungarian territories in the 1540s. The Sokollus occupied high administrative positions from 1566 up until the 1620s. District governors with the cognomen Aranid were descended from a well-known Albanian noble family. One kinship group, with four or five members (Ulama, Kanber, 'Deriel', Mehmed Han, and Velican beys), originated from the eastern parts of the Empire; certain of them belonged to the Tekeli tribe and another was of Zulkadirli background, while the remainder were of unknown descent and had been in the shah of Iran's service before coming to Hungary. Of Croatian origin, KasÖm bey and paûa, who began his career as a voyvoda for Yahyapaûaoİlu Mehmed bey and who remained in close contact with the bey's kinsfolk, was able to create quite a large following from among his subordinates. A smaller group of interrelated ümera - ùskender, Deák ('Scribe') Mehmed, and Macaroİlu Ali paûa - probably had Hungarian forebears. It is still difficult to determine the real strength of these families and groupings, and also the kinds of developments they could influence and how far this influence went. Other issues are the extent to which the centre - if it so wished - could check their actions, should these go beyond the limits customary, and the kinds of political games the centre played with them. However, what cannot be disputed is that the system generally functioned rather efficiently in the period under discussion. An important reason for this - perhaps the most important one - was the very great remuneration given these officials, while the enormous prestige and extraordinary possibilities accompanying their roles also played a part

___

Budapest, Magyar Tudományos Akadémia,

Keleti Gytjtemény, Török O. 215

ùstanbul, BaûbakanlÖk OsmanlÖ Arûivi, A. NúT 1141 Kepeci 74, 209, 214, 218, 244, 262, 266

Maliye defteri 34, 563

Mühimme defteri 1, 2, 4

Tapu defteri 298, 441, 443

Wien, Haus-, Hof- und Staatsarchiv, Ehemalige Konsularakademie, Krafft 137, 284.

Wien, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Türk. Hss. Mxt. 632 (Flügel 1376).

A budai basák magyar nyelvt levelezése I. 1553-1589. Editör Sándor Takáts, Ferencz Eckhart, Gyula Szekft, Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, Budapest 1915.

Austro-Turcica 1541-1552. Diplomatische Akten des habsburgischen Gesandtschaftsverkehrs mit der Hohen Pforte im Zeitalter Süleymans des Prächtigen. Haz. Sreyko M. Dzaja-Günter Weiß. (Südosteuropäische Arbeiten, 95.) R. Oldenbourg Verlag, München 1995.

ALTAYLI, Yasemin, "Budin beylerbeyi Arslan Paûa (1565-1566)", OTAM, 19 (2006), s. 33-51.

BABINGER, Franz, Hans Dernschwams Tagebuch einer Reise nach Konstantinopel und Kleinasien (1553/55), Duncker und Humblot, München-Leipzig 1923.

BABINGER, Franz, Das Ende der Arianiten. (Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-historische Klasse. Sitzungsberichte, Jahrgang 1960, Heft, 4.) München 1960.

BABINGER, Franz, "Arianiti Comneno, Schwiegervater Skanderbegs", Aufsätze und Abhandlungen zur Geschichte Südosteuropas und der Levante. III. München 1976, s. 257-265.

BACQUÉ-GRAMMONT, Jean-Louis, "Etudes turco-safavids, XVI: Quinze lettres d'Uzun Suleyman Pasa Beylerbey du Diyar Bekir (1533-1534)", Anatolia Moderna/Yeni Anadolu 1 (1991), s. 137-186 + 15 belge.

BARKAN, Ömer Lûtfi, H. "933-934 (M. 1527-1528) malî yÖlÖna ait bir bütçe örneøi", ùstanbul Üniversitesi ùktisat Fakültesi MecmuasÖ, XV (1953-1954), s. 251-329.

ae Scientiarum Hungaricae, LIV (2001), s. 411-426.

DÁVID, Géza, "Egy távolról jött oszmán f?ember a magyar végeken: Ulama bég", Keletkutatás, 2002. ?sz-2006. tavasz, s. 62-82.

DÁVID, Géza-FODOR, Pál, "Az ország ügye mindenek el?tt való." A szultáni tanács Magyarországra vonatkozó rendeletei (1544-1545, 1552). "Affairs of State Are Supreme". The Orders of the Ottoman Imperial Council Pertaining to Hungary (1544-1545, 1552).

(História könyvtár, okmánytárak.) História-MTA Történettudományi Intézete, Budapest 2005.

EMECEN, Feridun M.-úAHùN, ùlhan, "OsmanlÖ taûra teûkilâtÖnÖn kaynaklarÖndan 957- 958 (1550-1551) tarihli sancak tevcîh defteri", Belgeler 23 (1999), s. 53-121.

FEKETE, Ludwig, Türkische Schriften aus dem Archive des Palatins Nikolaus Esterházy, 1606-1645. Fürst Paul Esterházy, Budapest 1932.

FEKETE, Lajos, Budapest a törökkorban. (Budapest története III.) Királyi Magyar Egyetemi Nyomda, Budapest 1944.

FOTIü, Aleksandar, "Yahyapaûa-oølu Mehmed Pasha's evkaf in Belgrade", Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 54 (2001), s. 437-452.

GÉVAY, Antal, A' budai pasák. Strauss Antal özvegye, Bécs 1841.

GÖKBùLGùN, M. Tayyib, "Kanunî Sultan Süleyman devri baûlarÖnda Rumeli eyaleti, livalarÖ, ûehir ve kasabalarÖ", Belleten, XX/78 (1956), s. 247-285.

GÖKBùLGùN, M. Tayyib. "Mihal-oøullarÖ", ùslâm Ansiklopedisi, VIII. Millî Eøitim BasÖmevi, ùstanbul 19874, s. 285-292.

ùNALCIK, Halil, Hicrî 835 tarihli sûret-i defter-i sancak-i Arvanid. (Türk Tarih Kurumu YayÖnlarÖ, XIV/1.) Türk Tarih Kurumu BasÖmevi, Ankara 1954.

ùNALCIK, Halil, "Stefan Duûan'dan OsmanlÖ ùmperatorluøuna. XV. asÖrda Rumeli'de hÖristiyan sipahiler ve menûeleri", Fatih devri üzerinde tetkikler ve vesikalar. I. (Türk Tarih Kurumu YayÖnlarÖ, XI/6a.) Türk Tarih Kurumu BasÖmevi, Ankara 19872, s. 137-184.

ùPÇùO÷LU, Mehmed, "Kanunî Süleyman'Ön Estergon (Esztergom) seferi 1543. Yeni bir kaynak", OsmanlÖ AraûtÖrmalarÖ, X (1990), s. 137-159.

ISTVÁNFFY, Miklós, Magyarok dolgairól írt históriája. Tállyai Pál XVII. századi fordításában. Sajtó alá rendezte Péter Benits. I/2, 13-24. könyv, Balassi Kiadó, Budapest 2003.

JACOB, Georg, Türkische Urkunden aus Ungarn. Heft 1-3, Veröffentlichungen der Doktor-Hermann-Thorning Gedächtnis-Stiftung, Kiel (1917-1919).

KÁLDY-NAGY, Gyula, Harács-szed?k és ráják. Török világ a 16. századi Magyarországon. (K?rösi Csoma kiskönyvtár, 9.) Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest 1970.

KÁLDY-NAGY, Gyula, Kanuni devri Budin tahrir defteri (1546-1562). (Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coørafya Fakültesi YayÖnlarÖ, 177.) Ankara Üniversitesi BasÖmevi, Ankara 1971.

KÁLDY-NAGY, Gyula, A Budai szandzsák 1559. évi összeírása. (Pest megye múltjából, 3.) Pest megyei Levéltár, Budapest 1977.

KÁLDY-NAGY, Gyula, "Budin beylerbeyi Mustafa paûa", Belleten, 210 (1990), s. 649-663.

KEMAL PAúA-ZÂDE, Tevarih-i Âl-i Osman. X. defter. Haz. ú. Severcan. (Türk Tarih Kurumu YayÖnlarÖ, XVIII/13.) Türk Tarih Kurumu BasÖmevi, Ankara 1996.

KÖHBACH, Markus, Die Eroberung von Fülek durch die Osmanen 1554. Eine historischquellenkritische Studie zur osmanischen Expansion im östlichen Mitteleuropa. (Zur Kunde Südosteuropas, II/18.) Böhlau, Wien-Köln-Weimar 1994.

KUNT, ù. Metin, The Sultan's Servants. The Transformation of Ottoman Provincial Government, 1550-1650. (The Modern Middle East Series, 14.) Columbia University Press, New York 1983.

MERÉNYI, [Lajos], A kanizsai végek történetéhez. Hadtörténelmi Közlemények, X (1897), s. 258-265.

NEUMANN, Hubert, Türkische Urkunden zur Geschichte Ungarns und Polens. Der Islam, 8 (1918), s. 113-133.

PEÇEVÎ, ùbrahim, Tarih-i Peçevî. I. Yer yok, tarih yok.

REINDL, Hedda, Männer um BCyezid. Eine prosopographische Studie über die Epoche Sultan BCyezids II. (1481-1512). (Islamkundliche Untersuchungen, 75.) Klaus Schwarz Verlag, Berlin1983.

RÖMER, Claudia, "Einige Urkunden zur Militärverwaltung Ungarns zur Zeit SüleymCns des Prächtigen", Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, XLIII (1989), s. 23-80.

RÖMER, Claudia, "On Some C??-Estates Illegally Claimed by Arslan Pasa, Beglerbegi of Buda 1565-1566", Studies in Ottoman History in Honour of Professor V. L. Ménage.

Editör C. Heywood and C. Imber, ISIS, Istanbul 1994, s. 297-318.

SUDÁR, Balázs, A Palatics-kódex török versgytjteményei. Török költészet és zene a XVI. századi hódoltságban. (Humanizmus és reformáció, 29.) Balassi Kiadó, Budapest 2005.

SUDÁR, Balázs, A pécsi Jakováli Haszan pasa-dzsámi. Mtemlékek Nemzeti Gondnoksága, Budapest 2010.

SUDÁR, Balázs, Iszkender és Bethlen Gábor: a pasa és a fejedelem. Századok, 145 (2011), s. 975-996.

THÚRY, József, Török történetírók. II. (1521-1566). (Török-magyarkori történelmi emlékek. Második osztály: írók.) Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, Budapest 1896.

UZUNÇARúILI, ùsmail HakkÖ, ÇandarlÖ vezir ailesi. (Türk Tarih Kurumu YayÖnlarÖ, VII/66.) Türk Tarih Kurumu BasÖmevi, Ankara 1974.

VLORA, Ekrem Bey, Lebenserinnerungen. Band II (1912 bis 1925).

(Südosteuropäische Arbeiten, 67.) R. Oldenbourg Verlag, München 1973.

ZIROYEVIÇ, Olga, Tursko voyno uredyenye u Srbiyi (1459-1683). L'organisation militaire turque en Serbie (1459-1683), ùstoriyski ùnstitut, Belgrad 1974.