Mediating processes of expert interpreting: A deliberate practice approach

Sözlü yeteneğe dayanan dil etkinlikleri yani dili anlama ve üretme en zor olgular olarak kabul edilir. Son çalışmalar (Ericsson, 2002) yorumlama sürecinde uzmanlık, ulaşma, eğitim faaliyetlerinin önemli olduğunu göstermiştir. Ancak, uzmanca yorumlamada arabulucu süreçleri nasıl işlemektedir halen önemli ölçüde bilinmemektedir. Bu çalışmada görev analizi, geriye dönük protokoller ve günceler yoluyla uzman bir yorumlama uzmanının arabuluculuk mekanizmalarını tanımlamaya çalıştık. Bu çalışmanın sonuçları kasıtlı uygulama teorisine göre performans yaklaşımının uzman performans çalışmalarının sürekli takip edilmesi gerektiğini göstermiştir. Bu çalışmada katılımcı etkili bir öğretim aldığını bildirmiştir. Geleneksel yorumlama alıştırmalarını takip eden uygun geribildirim ve alışılmış tekrarların katılımcının yorumlama becerilerine olumlu katkıları olduğu görülmektedir.

Interpreting is considered to be the most elusive phenomena in skilled language activities i.e., comprehension and production of a language. Recent studies (Ericsson, 2002) have shown that attainment of expertise in interpreting is a matter of designed training activities, namely deliberate practice. However, the processes mediating expert interpreting are remained largely unknown. In this paper, we have tried to describe mediating mechanisms of expert performance of a highly expert interpreter through task analysis, retrospective protocols and diaries. The result of this study is in support of deliberate practice theory, that is, expert performance approach requires interpreters to follow certain performance activities. The participant of this study reported getting effective instruction when he was receiving formal interpreting training followed by proper feedback and monotonous repetition. In his retrospective interview the elite interpreter showed a high degree of motivation too.

___

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Brown, R. A. (2004), Motivation for learning English among Japanese university students. Information and Communication Studies, 32,1-12

Chi, M., Glaser, R. and Rees, E. (1982). Expertise in problem solving. In R. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (pp. 7-75). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

Dillinger, M. (1989). Component processes of simultaneous interpreting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Educational Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Dornyei, Z. (2002). The motivational basis of language learning tasks. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Individual differences in second language acquisition (pp.137-158). Amesterdam: John Benjamins.

Dornyei (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Dornyei, Z. & Otto, I. (1998). Motivation in action: A process model of L2 motivation. Working papers in applied linguistics, 4, 43-69.

Ehrman, M. E. & Oxford, R. L. (1995).Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. Modern Language Journal, 79(1), 67-89.

Ellis, R. (1985) Understanding Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition . Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2end ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In K. A. Ericsson (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 1-50). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Ericsson, K. A. (2000). How experts attain and maintain superior performance: Implications for the enhancement of skilled performance in older individuals. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 8, 346-352.

Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Prospects and limits in the empirical study of expertise: An introduction. In K. A. Ericsson and J. Smith (Eds.), Toward a general theory of expertise: Prospects and limits (pp. 1-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. Th., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406.

Ericsson, K. A., & Lehmann, A. C. (1996). Expert and exceptional performance: Evidence of maximal adaptations to task constraints. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 273-305.

Gardner, R. C., Tremblay, P. F., & Masgoret, A. (1997). Towards a full model of second language learning: An empirical investigation, Modern Language Journal, 81, 334- 362.

Gardner, R. & MacIntyre, P. (1991).An instrumental motivation in language study: Who says it isn’t effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 57-72.

Ioup, G. (1995). Evaluating the need for input enhancement in post-critical period language acquisition. In D. Singleton & Z. Lengyel (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition. (pp. 35-123). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.

Marinova- Todd, S. H., Marshal, D. B., & Snow, C. E. (2000). Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly,34(1), 9-34.

Naiman, N., Frohlich, M.,Stern, H. & Todesco, A. (1978). The good language learners. Research in Educational Series, 7. Toronto: The Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

Pintrich, P. R. (1999). Taking control of research on volitional control: Challenges for future theory and research. Learning and individual differences, 11(3), 335-354.

Rajabi, P. (2009). Cultural orientation and reading comprehension models: The case of Iranian rural and urban students. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 3(1), 75- 82.

Rahimi, A., & Abedini, A. (2009). The interface between EFL learners’ self-efficacy concerning listening comprehension and listening proficiency. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 3(1), 14-28

Simon, H. A., & Chase, W. G. (1973). Skill in chess. American Scientist, 61, 394-403

Taguchi, E. (1997). The effects of repeated readings on the development of lower identification skills of FL readers. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 97-119.

Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for language teachers . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wolters, C. A. (1999). “The relation between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of learning strategies”, Learning and Individual Differences, 11(3), 281-299.

Wolters, C. A. (2003). Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(4), 189-205.

Zimmerman, B., and Martinez-Pones, M. (1990). “Student differences in self-regulted learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use”, Journal of Educational Psychology , 82, 51-59.