FİKRET SOYER, MAHMUT GÜLLE, ORCAN MIZRAK, SERKAN ZENGİN, ERDİ KAYA

ANALYSIS OF RESILIENCY LEVELS OF DISABLED INDIVIDUALS DOING SPORTS ACCORDING TO SOME VARIABLES

Bu araştırmanın amacı; spor yapan bedensel engelli bireylerin yılmazlık düzeylerinin bazı değişkenler açısından farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığının incelenmesidir. Araştırmanın evrenini Konya ilinde yaşayan 143 (115 erkek 28kadın) bedensel engelli birey oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmada, araştırmacılara yönelik kişisel bilgi formu ve Gürgan (2006a) tarafından geliştirilen Yılmazlık Ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Engellilerin yılmazlık düzeyleri; yaş, cinsiyet, medeni durum ve eğitim düzeyleri açısından incelenmiştir. Elde edilen verilerin hesaplanmasında ise SPSS 19 istatistik paket programı kullanılmıştır. Verilerin normallik sınaması OneSample KolmogorovSimirnov test ile yapılmış olup verilerin normal dağılım göstermediği görülmüştür. Bu nedenle veriler test edilmesinde non-parametrik testlerden, Mann-Whitney U Testi ile Kruskal-Wallis test bataryaları kullanılmıştır. Bu çalışmada hata düzeyi 0,05 olarak kabul edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak; spor yapan bedensel engelli bireylerin, yaş ve eğitim değişkenine göre yılmazlık düzeyleri bakımından anlamlılık gösterdiği bulgulanmıştır. Medeni durum, cinsiyet düzeyleri açısından ise herhangi bir anlamlık bulgulanamamıştır.

SPOR YAPAN BEDENSEL ENGELLİ BİREYLERİN ÇEŞİTLİ DEĞİŞKENLERE GÖRE YILMAZ DÜZEYLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

The purpose of this study is to examine if resiliency levels of disabled individuals doing sports varies according to some variables or not. 143 disabled individual (115 male and 28 female) living in the provinces of Konya and Karaman constitutes the study's population. Personal information form and "Resiliency Scale" developed by Gürgan (2006a) were used to evaluate the researchers in this study. Resiliency levels of disabled people were examined in terms of age, gender, marital status and educational level. SPSS 19 statistical software package was used for the evaluation of the obtained data. Test of normality of data was performed with OneSample KolmogorovSimirnov test and it was seen that data has not shown a normal distribution. For this reason, non-parametric tests, Mann-Whitney U Test and Kruskal-Wallis test batteries were used in testing of these data. The error performance parameter was accepted as 0,05 in this study. As a result, it is found that disabled individuals doing sports show significant difference according to age and educational level in terms of their resiliency levels. It wasn't found any significant difference in terms of marital status and gender.

PDF

___

1. Baltaş, A. ve Baltaş, Z. Stres ve başa çıkma yolları. İstanbul: Remzi Yayınevi. (2002). [in Turkish]
2. Benard, B., The foundations of the resiliency paradigm. Premier Issue. 1996.
3. Garmezy, N., Rutter, M. Stress, coping and development in children. New York, Mc Graw- Hill(1985).
4. Gordon, K., Resilient Hispanic Youths Self- Concept and Motivational Patterns. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18, 1, 63, 1996.
5. Gürgân, U., Resilience scale (YÖ):Scale development, reliability and validity work , Ankara University , Faculty of educational sciences journal, 32 (2);45-74, 2006. [in Turkish with English Abstract]
6. Gürgân, U., Effect of the psychological counselor in the group to the resilience level of the students, doctoral thesis, Ankara University, Institute of education sciences, Department of education sciences , Program of psychological counseling and guidance, Ankara, 2006. [in Turkish]
7. Hoge, E. A., Austin, E. D. & Pollack, M. H. (2007). Resilience: Research evidence and conceptual considerations for posttraumatic stress disorder. Depression and Anxiety, 24, 139152. doi:10.1002/da.20175(2007).
8. Howard, S., & Johnson, B., What Makes The Difference? Children and Teachers Talk About Resilient Outcomes For Children "At Risk". Educational Studies, 26 (3), 2000.
9. Jew, C. L., Green, K. E., Kroger, J. Development and validation of a measure of resiliency. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 32, 75-89. (1999).
10. Jew, C. L., Green, K. E., Kroger, J. (1999). Development and validation of a measure of resiliency. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 32, 75-89(1999).
11. Kirby, L.D., Fraser, M. W. Risk and resilience in childhood. In M. Fraser (Ed.), Risk and resilience in childhood (pp. 10-33). Washington, DC: NASW Press. (1997).
12. Margalit, M., Resilience model among individuals with learning disabilities: proximal and distal influences. Learning Disabilities Research Practice, 18, 2, 82-87. 2003.
13. Masten, A. S. Reed, M. J. Resilience in development. In C. R. Snyder S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The handbook of positive psychology (pp. 74- 88). Oxford University Press. (2002).
14. Masten, A. S., Morison, P., Pellegrini, D. Teliegen, A. (1990). Competence under stress: risk and protective factors. In J. Rolf, A. S. (1990).
15. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. H. Nuechterlein S. Weintraub (1998), Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology (pp. 236-256). New York: Cambridge University Press. (1998),
16. Miller, M., Resilience Elements in Students With Learning Disabilities. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58, 2002
17. Öğülmüş, S., Resilience as a personality trait. I. National child and crime symposium: Reasons and preventions Works, 29-30 March 2001. [in Turkish with English Abstract]
18. Rak, C. F., & Patterson, L. E., Promoting Resilience in At-Risk Children, Journal Of Counseling & Development, 74 (4), 368374. 1996.
19. Sarı, O. T. Kaynaştırma Eğitimi ve Rehberlik. Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik. Birsen Yayınevi (sf 331-341). İstanbul. (2004). [in Turkish]
20. Vance, E., & Sanchez, H., Creating A service System That Builds Resiliency. NC Department Of Health And Human Services. 1998.
21. Werner, E. E., Smith, R. S. Overcoming the odds: High-risk children from birth to adulthood. New York: Cornell University Pres. (ED 344979) (1992).