ÖĞRETMEN KONUŞMASI ANALİZİ İLE YANSITICILIK: HİZMET ÖNCESİ İNGİLİZCE ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN DURUMU

Reflective practices are considered significant in terms of increasing the level of reflective and critical thinking of language teachers by promoting self-evaluation. Analysis of classroom interaction can be regarded as one of the ways to improve teacher reflection. This study aims at investigating reflectivity of pre-service English teachers by engaging them in the analysis of their language use through a framework that enabled them focus on self-evaluation of teacher talk and various aspects of classroom interaction. For this purpose, a total of 44 pre-service teachers in the English Language Teaching programmes of two universities in Turkey participated in the study. The participants consisted of a control group and a study group. The study group received training on the analysis of their own talk by using the self-evaluation of teacher talk framework. The study was conducted through mixed methods approach. Quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire while qualitative data were collected through reflective diaries. The results indicated that although both groups improved their reflectivity, pre-service English teachersin the study group were able move upwards in reflectivity levels compared to the control group through the use of a specific framework. The study might be of interest of teacher trainers, pre-service teachers and researchers as it provides useful implications for the role of reflection in teaching.

REFLECTIVITY THROUGH THE ANALYSIS OF TEACHER TALK: THE CASE OF PRE-SERVICE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS

Reflective practices are considered significant in terms of increasing the level of reflective and critical thinking of language teachers by promoting self-evaluation. Analysis of classroom interaction can be regarded as one of the ways to improve teacher reflection. This study aims at investigating reflectivity of pre-service English teachers by engaging them in the analysis of their language use through a framework that enabled them focus on self-evaluation of teacher talk and various aspects of classroom interaction. For this purpose, a total of 44 pre-service teachers in the English Language Teaching programmes of two universities in Turkey participated in the study. The participants consisted of a control group and a study group. The study group received training on the analysis of their own talk by using the self-evaluation of teacher talk framework. The study was conducted through mixed methods approach. Quantitative data were collected through a questionnaire while qualitative data were collected through reflective diaries. The results indicated that although both groups improved their reflectivity, pre-service English teachersin the study group were able move upwards in reflectivity levels compared to the control group through the use of a specific framework. The study might be of interest of teacher trainers, pre-service teachers and researchers as it provides useful implications for the role of reflection in teaching.

___

Al-Hassan, O., Al-Barakat, A., & Al-Hassan, Y. (2012). Pre-service teachers' reflections during field experience. Journal of Education for Teaching, 38(4), 419-434.

Anderson, N. A., Barksdale, M. A. & Hite, C. E. (2005). Preservice teachers’ observations of cooperating teachers and peers while participating in an early field experience. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(4), 97-117.

Arrastia, M. C., Rawls, E. S., Brinkerhoff, E. H., & Roehrig, A. D. (2014). The nature of elementary preservice teachers’ reflection during an early field experience. Reflective Practice, 15(4), 427-444.

Aşık, A. & Kuru Gönen, S. İpek. (2016) Pre-service EFL teachers’ reported perceptions of their development through SETT experience. Classroom Discourse, 7(2), 164-183.

Chen, D., Lumpe, A. & Bishop, D. (2013). Assessment of teacher candidate reflection in e-portfolios. In J. Herrington, A. Couros & V. Irvine (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology 2013 (pp. 1872-1881). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/p/112224. (Access Date: 10. 03.2016)

Cohen-Sayag, E. & Fischl, D. (2012). Reflective writing in pre-service teachers' teaching: what does it promote?. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 37(10), 20-36.

Cunningham-Florez, M. A. (2001). Reflective teaching practice in adult ESL settings. ERIC Digest.http://www.cal.org/ncle/digest/reflect.htm. 1-7. (Access Date: 11.05.2009)

Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Publishing.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing 21st-century teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314.

Dervent, F. (2015). The effect of reflective thinking on the teaching practices of preservice physical education teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 25(3), 260-275. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educational process. Lexington, MA: Heath.

Downey. J. (2008). ‘It’s not as easy as it looks’: Preservice teachers’ insights about teaching emerging from an innovative assignment in educational psychology. Teaching Educational Psychology, 3(1), 1-11.

Erginel, S. Ş. (2006). Developing reflective teachers: A study on perception and improvement of reflection in preservice teacher education. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University.

Lyngsnes, K. M. (2012). Embarking on the Teaching Journey: Pre-service Teachers Reflecting upon Themselves as Future Teachers. World Journal of Education, 2(2), 2-9.

Mann, S. & Walsh, S. (2013). RP or ‘RIP’: A critical perspective on reflective practice. Applied Linguistics Review 2013, 4(2), 289 – 312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2013-0013

Mergler, A. G. & Spooner-Lane, R. S. (2012). What pre-service teachers need to know to be effective at values-based education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(8), 66-81.

Odhiambo, E. (2010). Classroom research: A tool for preparing pre-service teachers to become reflective practitioners. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies, 4, 1-14.

Puckett, J. B. & Anderson, R. S. (2002). Assessing field experience. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 91, 53-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tl.66.

Rodman, G. J. (2010). Facilitating the teaching-learning process through the reflective engagement of pre-service teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 35(2), 20-34.

Seedhouse, P. (2008). Learning to Talk the Talk: Conversation Analysis as a Tool for Induction of Trainee Teachers. Chapter in Professional Encounters in TESOL, InS. Garton & K. Richards (Eds), 42–57.Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Sert, O. (2015). Social Interaction and L2 Classroom Discourse. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Smith, K. & Lev-Ari, L. (2005). The place of the practicum in pre-service teacher education: The voice of the students. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3). 289-302. Subramaniam, K. (2013). Examining the content of preservice teachers’ reflections of early field experiences. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1851-1872.

Taggart, G. L., & Wilson, A. P. (2005). Promoting reflective thinking in teachers: 50 action strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Tan, A. L., Wettasinghe, C. M., Tan, S. C., & Hasan, M. (2010). Reflection of teaching: A glimpse through the eyes of pre-service science teachers. Paper presented at the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education (ASCILITE) Conference, Sydney, Australia, 5 - 8 December 2010.

Walsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: Teacher talk and learner involvement in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 3-23.

Walsh, S. (2003). Developing interactional awareness in the second language classroom through teacher self-evaluation. Language Awareness, 12(2), 124-142.

Walsh, S. (2006). Talking the talk of the TESOL classroom. ELT Journal, 60 (2), 133-141.

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring Classroom Discourse: Language in Action. London: Routledge.

Walsh, S. (2013). Classroom Discourse and Teacher Development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Walsh, S. & Mann, S. (2015). Doing reflective practice: a data-led way forward. ELT Journal, 69(4), 351-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccv018

Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1304-429X
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 5 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

GÖREVE YENİ BAŞLAYAN ORTAOKUL MATEMATİK ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIKLARI ZORLUKLAR

Hüseyin Bahadır YANIK, Osman BAĞDAT, Özlem GELİCİ, Mehtap TAŞTEPE

ÇÖZÜM ODAKLI KISA SÜRELİ AİLE DANIŞMANLIĞI KURAMINA DAYALI OLARAK GELİŞTİRİLEN EVLİLİK PROGRAMININ ÇİFTLERİN EVLİLİK UYUMLARINI ARTIRMADAKİ ETKİSİ

Şenol BAYGÜL, Raşit AVCI

MESLEĞE YENİ BAŞLAYAN ÖĞRETMENLERİN EĞİTİM FAKÜLTELERİNDE ALMIŞ OLDUKLARI ÖĞRETMENLİK EĞİTİMİNE İLİŞKİN GÖRÜŞLERİ

Ahmet BOZAK, Talip ÖZDEMİR, Durmuş SERASLAN

Lise Öğretmenlerinin İş Doyumları ve Bireysel Performansları Arasındaki İlişki

Aydan ORDU

FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMENLERİ, FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARI VE MAARİF MÜFETTİŞLERİNİN FEN ÖĞRETİMİ VE ÖĞRENİMİNE YÖNELİK İNANIŞLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Hasan Özgür KAPICI, Hakan AKÇAY

6, 7 VE 8. SINIF ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN YAZILI ANLATIM BECERİLERİNİN SÖZVARLIĞI VE SÖZCÜK SIKLIĞI DAĞILIMI AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ

Erkan ÇER, Hatice TURHAN AĞRELİM

A COMPARISON STUDY FOR THINKING SKILLS OF HIGHER EDUCATION STUDENTS IN TERMS OF VISUAL ARTS EDUCATION

Kani ÜLGER

ORTAOKUL SOSYAL BİLGİLER VE LİSE TARİH DERS KİTAPLARINDA HİNDİSTAN'DA KURULAN TÜRK DEVLETLERİNİN İŞLENİŞİ

Servet HALİ

ÖĞRETMEN KONUŞMASI ANALİZİ İLE YANSITICILIK: HİZMET ÖNCESİ İNGİLİZCE ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN DURUMU

S. İpek KURU GÖNEN, Asuman AŞIK

X VE Y KUŞAĞI KADINLARININ KARAR VERME TARZLARI BAKIMINDAN İNCELENMESİ

Nil ENGİZEK, Ahmet ŞEKERKAYA