Tek kanallı, çok kanallı ve dönen jetlerin ısı transferine etkileri

Bu çalışmada dairesel kesitli bir lüleden çıkan tek kanallı, çok kanallı (4) ve dönen çok kanallı hava jetlerin ısı transferine etkileri deneysel karşılaştırılmıştır. Deneyler tek kanallı, çok kanallı ($theta$=0°) ve dönen ($theta$=22,5°, 41° ve 50°) jetler için, sabit Reynolds sayısı Re=20 000 değerinde H/D= 6, 8 ve 10, lüle-levha mesafelerinde yapılmış ve lüle çapı 15 mm alınmıştır. Deneylerde levha üzerindeki sıcaklıklar, sıvı kristal metodu ile ölçülmüştür. Sonuçta tek kanallı, çok kanallı ($theta$=0°) ve dönen jetlerin Nusselt sayılarının, durma noktasından radyal yöndeki değişimleri elde edilmiştir. Bunlar için maksimum Nusselt sayısı tek kanallı, çok kanallı ve $theta$ =22,5° açılı dönen jetlerde durma noktasında ve $theta$=41° ile 50° açılı dönen jetlerde ise durma noktasından yaklaşık X/D=2,5 değerinde meydana geldiği gözlenmiştir.

In the present study, the heat transfer effects of conventional (single-channel), multi-channel (four-channel) and multi-channel swirling air jets issuing from a cylindrical nozzle were compared experimentally. Experiments were performed for the conventional, multi-channel ($theta$= 0°) and swirling ($theta$ = 22,5°, 41° and 50°) jets at constant ; Reynolds number of Re=20 000 and nozzle-to-plate distance of H/D= 6, 8 and 10 with a nozzle diameter of 15 mm. In the experiments, the surface temperature of the I plate was measured by liquid crsytal method. Consequently the changes of Nusselt numbers in radial directions from stagnation point were obtained for the conventional, multi-channel and swirling jets. It was observed that the maxsimum Nusselt number occured at the stagnation point for the conventional, multi-channel and swirling jets of $theta$ =22,5°, and occured at approximately X/D=2,5 for swirling jets of $theta$=41° and 50°.

___

  • 1.S. Karadeniz, Kaynak Makinaları, DEU Müh. Fak. Yayınları, İzmir 2003
  • 2.Electrical Hazards, American Welding Society, Safety' and Health, Fact Sheet No:5, March 1997
  • 3.Electric and Magnetic Fields, American Welding Society, Safety and Health, Fact Sheet No:17, January 1996
  • 4.Pacemakers and Welding, American Welding Society, Safety and Health, Fact sheet No:16, March 1997
  • 5.Welding Safety Makes Sense, Mike Pankratz
  • 6.Arc Welding Safety, Lance Fluegel and Bradley Rein, May 1989
  • 7.Safety and Health, Fact Sheet No.7 American Welding Society, September 1995
  • 8.Welding Hazards AFSCME Fact Sheet Health and Safety, www.afscme.org
  • 9.Cadmium Exposure From Welding and Allied Processes, American Welding Society, Safety and Health, Fact Sheet No:22, January 2002
  • 10.Fumes and Gases, American Welding Society, Safety and Health, Fact Sheet No:l, October 1998
  • 11.Radiation, American Welding Society, Safety and Health, Fact Sheet No:2, March 1997
  • 12.Dawna L.Cyr, Steven B. Johnson, Welding Safety on the Farm, Üniversite of Main, Agust 1995
  • 13.Ronald P. Nielsen, Osha Welding Safety, Newyork, 1994
  • 14.Mechanical Hazards, American Welding Society, Safety and Health Fact Sheet No.8 September 1995
  • 15.Tripping and Falling, American Welding Society, Safety and Health, Fact Sheet No:9, September 1995
  • 16.Falling objects, American Welding Society, Safety and Health, Fact Sheet No: 10, September 1995