The Idealism-Realism Debate in International Relations and Idealists? Ways of Ensuring the Peace - Uluslararası İlişkilerde İdealizm-Realizm Tartışması Ve İdealistlerin Barışı Sağlama Yolları

Öz In 1919, Within the finishing of First World War, International Relations established as a dicipline and put many newnesses in the world. After First World War, people who saw the bad subsequents of war, didn’t want to live such a bad thing once again. International Relations Dicipline didn’t also become indifferent this situation and ıt became to one of the acceptors of this subject with a great debate. This was Idealism-Realism Debate. It tried to both remain the peace, to prevent the war and to brought in the identity to own dicipline. Idealists who dated back to Stoicism theirselves, brought forward assumptions that were logical ın their own era to prevent the war, to ensure the peace and to resolve to problems. These were International Law that had hard sancions, everybody accepted and obeyed it, International Organization that included every states without making discrimination and Disarmament ınternationally. According to them, in such a situation, ensuring the peace will be easier and possible. Realists who dated back to Peleponnesian War theirselves, on the contrary to Idealists, maintained that war couldn’t prevent, was unavoidable and necessary because of human nature and They criticized the Idealists. This article will examine The, İdealism , İdealists, their assumptions, Realism, its assumptions, Idealism-Realism Debate and Idealists’ assumptions that brought forward to prevent the war, to ensure the peace and to resolve the problems.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

I. Dünya Savaşı, Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplini, Barış ve Savaş, İdealizm, Realizm

PDF

___

ARI, T., (2004), Uluslararası Ilişkiler ve Dış Politika, 5. Baskı, Alfa Yayınları, Istanbul.

BURCHILL, S., (2001), “Realism and Neo-Realism”, Theories of International Relations, (ed.) Scott Burchill, Palgrave, New York.

CALIS, S. OZLUK, E.,(2007), “Uluslararası İlişkiler Tarihinin Yapısökümü: İdealizm-Realizm Tartışması”, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, No. 18, (225-243).

DONELLY, J., (2000), Realism and International Relations, Cambridge University Pres, Cambridge.

DUNN, F.S., (1948), “The Scope of International Affairs”, World Politics, Vol.1, No. 1, October, (142146).

DUNNE, A.P., (1996), International Theory: To The Brink and Beyond, Greenwood Pres, Westport.

ERALP, A. (1996), “Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininin Oluşumu: İdealizm-Realizm Tartışması”, Atilla Eralp (ed.), Devlet, Sistem, Kimlik: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Temel Yaklaşımlar, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.

FALK, R. A., (1989), “Normative International Politics: A General Introduction”, World Politics Debated, (ed.) Herbert M. Levine, McGrow-Hill Book, New York.

HERZ, J.H.,(1981), “Political Realism and Human Interests”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2, June, (204-236).

_________, (1950), “Idealist Internatonalism and Security Dilemma”, World Politics, Vol.2, No.2, January, (157-180).

HOBDEN, S., (1999), “Theorising The International System: Perspectives from Historical Sociology”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 25, No.2, (257-271).

KEGLEY, C.W.W., EUGENE, R., (1996), American Foreign Policy: Pattern and Process, St. Martin Press, New York.

LEBOW, R.N., KELLY, R., (2001), “Thucydides and Hegemony Athens and the United States”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 27, Issue 4, (593-610).

LITTLE, R., (1999), “Historiography and International Relations”, Review of International Studies, Vol.25, Issue 2, (291-299).

MAYALL, J., (1994), “Nationalism in the Study of International Relations”, Contemporary International Relations; A Guıde to Theory, (ed.) A.J. Groom, Margot Light, Pinter Publisher, London.

SCOTT, S.V., (2004), “Is There Room for International Law in Realpolitic?: Accounting for the US Attitude Towards International Law”, International Studies,Vol. 30, No.1, January, (71-88).

SPEGELE, R. D., (1987), “Three Forms of Political Realism”, Political Studies, Vol. 35, Issue 2, June, (189-210).

TORTOLA, D., (2005), “Twenty Years’ Crisis by Edward H. Carr”, Crossroads, Vol. 5, No.1, (7881).

WELCH, D. A., (2003), “Why International Relations Theorists Should Stop Reading Thucydides”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 29, Issue 3, July, (301-319).

http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/leagueofnations.htm, (11.04.2010).

http://www.infoplease.com/ce6/history/A0827317.html, (13.04.2010).

http://militaryhistory.about.com/od/militarystrategies/p/washingtontreat.htm,(15.04.2010).

http://www.shvoong.com/society-and-news/news-items/61476-philosophy-luck/, (16.10.2010).