TERTIARY EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT OF QUALITY: A RESEARCH IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY CONTEXT - YÜKSEK ÖĞRETİM VE KALİTE YÖNETİMİ: GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKE BAĞLAMINDA BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Yüksek öğretim, ulusal düzeyde ekonomik büyümenin en önemli adımlarından biri olarak kabul edilir. Bununla birlikte, literatürde hem çok kapsamlı bir veri setine sahip hem de gelişmekte olan ülkeler bağlamına dayanan yüksek öğretim kurumlarının kalite seviyesini artırmaya yönelik çabalar üzerine bilindiği kadarıyla çok az araştırma yapılmıştır. Çalışma bu nedenle Türkiye yüksek öğretim kurumlarında kalite yönetimi çabalarının mevcut durumunu incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada veriler 149 Türk üniversitesinin 672 ünitesinden toplanmıştır. Bulgulara göre katılımcı kuruluşların yarısından fazlasında herhangi bir kalite yönetimi sertifikası bulunmamakta veya herhangi bir Kalite yönetimi sertifikası alma çabası göstermemektedirler. Bulguların sonuçlarına göre, bazı önemli gelişmelere rağmen, kalite çalışmaların Türkiye yüksek öğretim kurumlarını tam anlamıyla kapsaması için henüz çok uzun ve zor bir yolunun olduğunu göstermiştir.

YÜKSEK ÖĞRETİM VE KALİTE YÖNETİMİ: GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKE BAĞLAMINDA BİR ARAŞTIRMA - TERTIARY EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT OF QUALITY: A RESEARCH IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY CONTEXT

Tertiary education is accepted as one of the engines of economic growth at national level. However, as far as is known, there have been only a few research studies in literature on efforts to increase quality level of tertiary education institutions that have both an extensive data set and are based on the context of a developing country. Therefore, this study aims to examine the current situation of quality management efforts in Turkish tertiary education Institutions. The data for this study were collected from 672 units of 149 Turkish universities. According to the findings, more than half of the participating organizations did not have any quality management certificate, nor were they making any quality management efforts. Therefore, the findings indicated that there is still a very long and arduous way to be covered by Turkish tertiary education ınstitutions in spite of some important developments.

___

  • Akan, B. (2014). Toplam kalite yönetimi çerçevesinde öğrenci memnuniyeti: Namık Kemal Üniversitesi Hayrabolu Meslek Yüksekokulu uygulaması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(10), 106-123.
  • Alves, H. & Raposo, M. (2007). Conceptual model of student satisfaction in higher education. Total Quality Management, 18(5), 571–588.
  • Aly, N. & Akpovi, J. (2001). Total quality management in California public higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 9(3), 127-131.
  • Ambert, A., Adler, P.A., Adler, P. & Detzner, D.F. (1995). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(4), 879-893.
  • Antony, J., Fergusson, C. Warwood, S. & Tsang, H.Y. (2004). Comparing total quality management success factors in UK manufacturing and service industries: Some key findings from a survey. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 1(2), 32-45.
  • Asif, M. & Searcy, C. (2014): Determining the key capabilities required for performance excellence in higher education. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(1), 22-35.
  • Basari, G., Altinay, Z., Dagli, G. & Altinay, F. (2016). Assessment of the quality management models in higher education. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), 107-121.
  • Batra, R. & Pall, A.S. (2015). Adoption and assessment of hospital information systems: A study of hospitals in Jalandhar. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management Research and Innovation, 11(3), 205-208.
  • Bayraktar, E. Tatoglu, E. & Zaim, S. (2008). An instrument for measuring the critical factors of TQM in the Turkish higher education. Total Quality Management, 19(6), 551-574.
  • Bayraktar, E., Tatoglu, E. & Zaim, S. (2013): Measuring the relative efficiency of quality management practices in Turkish public and private universities. Journal of Operational Research Society, 64, 1810-1830.
  • Bengisu, M. (2007). Yüksek eğitimde toplam kalite yönetimi. Journal of Yaşar University, 2(7), 739-749.
  • Chen, C-Y., Chen, P-C. & Chen, P-Y. (2014). Teaching quality in higher education: An introductory review on a process-oriented teaching-quality model. Total Quality Management, 25(1), 36-56.
  • Cooper, D., Ezzamel, M. & Qu, S.Q. (2017). Popularizing a management accounting idea: The case of balanced scorecard. Contemporary Accounting Research, 34(2), 991-1025.
  • Coşkun, S. (2011). Strategic management and total quality management: Similarities, differences and their implications for public administration. TODAİE’s Review of Public Administration, 5(2), 59-94.
  • Cruickshank, M. (2003). Total quality management in the higher education sector: A literature review from an international and Australian perspective. TQM & Business Excellence, 14(10), 1159-1167.
  • Dlacic, J., Arslanagic, M., Kadic-Maglajlic, S., Markovic, S. & Raspor, S. (2014). Exploring perceived service quality, perceived value, and repurchase intention in higher education using structural equation modelling. Total Quality Management, 25(2), 141-157.
  • Duarte, R., Ramos-Pires, A. & Gonçalves, H. (2014). Identifying at-risk students in higher education. Total Quality Management, 25(8), 944-952.
  • Duque L.C. (2014). A framework for analysing higher education performance: Students’ satisfaction, perceived learning outcomes, and dropout intentions. Total Quality Management, 25(1), 1-21.
  • Elmuti, D., Kathawala, Y. & Manippallil, M. (1996). Are total quality management programmes in higher education worth the effort?. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 13(6), 29-44.
  • Eryılmaz, M.E. & Eryılmaz, F. (2015). Active and passive resistance to organizational change: A case of entrepreneurship minor program in a public university, in Szopa, A./Karwowski, W./Barbe, D. (eds.): Competitive strategies for academic entrepreneurship: Commercialization of research-based products, Hershey, USA: IGI Global, 51-69.
  • Escanciano, C., Fernandez, E. & Vazquez, C. (2001). Influence ISO 9000 certification on the progress of Spanish industry towards TQM. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(5), 481-494.
  • Fernando, M. (2001): Are popular management techniques a waste of time?. Academy of Management Perspectives, 15(3), 138-140.
  • Fuentes, M.M., Montes, F.J.L. & Fernandez, L.M.M. (2006). Total quality management, strategic orientation and organizational performance: The case of Spanish companies. Total Quality Management, 17(3), 303-323.
  • Gamage, D.T., Suwanabroma, J., Ueyama, T. ,Hada, S. & Sekikawa, E. (2008). The impact of quality assurance measures on student services at the Japanese and Thai private universities. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(2), 181-198.
  • Gamboa, A.J. & Melao, N.F. (2012). The impacts and success factors of ISO 9001 in education: Experiences from Portuguese vocational schools. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 29(4), 384-401.
  • Gotzamani, K.D. & Tsiotras, G.D. (2001). An empirical study of ISO 9000 standards’ contribution towards total quality management. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management. 18(5), 481-494.
  • Guimarães, R.R.M. (2013). The future of higher education in BRIC countries: A demographic perspective. Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, 30(2), 549-566.
  • Gyimah-Brempong, K., Paddison, O. & Mitiku, W. (2006). Higher education and economic growth in Africa. Journal of Development Studies, 42(3), 509-529.
  • Hackman, J.R. & Wageman, R. (1995). Total quality management: Empirical, conceptual and, practical issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 309-342.
  • Johannsen, C.G. (1996). Strategic issues in quality management: I. Theoretical considerations. Journal of Information Science, 22(3), 155-164.
  • Kennedy, M.T. & Fiss, P.C. (2009). Institutionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among US hospitals. Academy of Management Journal, 52 (5), 897-918.
  • Kimberly, J.R. & Evanisko, M.J. (1981). Organizational innovation: The influence of individual organizational and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689-713.
  • Koch, J.V. (2003). TQM: Why is its impact in higher education so small?. The TQM Magazine, 15(5), 325-333.
  • Küskü, F. (2003). Employee satisfaction in higher education: The case of academic and administrative staff in Turkey. Career Development International, 8(7), 347-356.
  • Langstrand, J., Cronemyr, P. & Poksinska, B. (2012). Practise what you preach: Quality of education in education on quality. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 26(11-12), 1202-1212.
  • Lazibat, T., Bakovic´, T. & Duzevic´ I. (2014). How perceived service quality influences students’ satisfaction? Teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Total Quality Management, 25(8), 923-934.
  • Manyaga, T. (2008). Standards to assure quality in tertiary education: The case of Tanzania. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(2), 164-180.
  • Mehta, N., Verma, P. & Seth, N. Total quality management implementation in engineering education in India: An interpretive structural modelling approach. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(2), 124-140.
  • Mizikaci, F. (2006). Higher Education in Turkey. Bucharest: Unesco European Center of Higher Education.
  • Motwani, J. & Kumar, A. (1997). The need for implementing total quality management in higher education. International Journal of Educational Management, 11(3), 131-135.
  • Öncel, M. & Sevim, Ş. (2014). Sürdürülebilir rekabet üstünlüğü sağlamada kurumsal itibar yönetimi: Yükseköğretimde yapılandırılmasına yönelik bir model önerisi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(4), 139-156.
  • Özen, Ş. (2002). Toplam kalite yönetiminin Türkiye’de yeniden kurgulanması: Koşul bağımlı türdeşleşme testi. Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 35(81), 105-142.
  • Özer, M. (2012). Türkiye yükseköğretimi için kalite güvence sistemi yaklaşımları. Eğitime Bakış, 8(22), 15-20.
  • Özer, M., Gür, & B.S.Küçükcan, T. (2010): Yükseköğretimde kalite güvencesi. Ankara: Pelin Offset.
  • Öztan, E. & Doğan, S.N. (2015): Akademinin cinsiyeti: Yıldız Teknik Üniversitesi örneği üzerinden üniversite ve toplumsal cinsiyet. Çalışma ve Toplum, 3, 191-222.
  • Raharjo, H., Xie, M.,Goh, T.N. & Brombacher, A.C. (2007): A methodology to improve higher education quality using the quality function deployment and analytic hierarchy process. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 18(10), 1097-1115.
  • Reja, U.,Mafreda, K.L., Hlebec, V. & Vehovar, V. (2003), Open-ended vs. close-ended questions in web questioannaires. Development in Applied Statistics, 159-177.
  • Sahney, S.D., Banwet, D.K. & Karunes, S. (2006): An integrated framework for quality in education: Application of quality function deployment, interpretive structural modelling and path analysis. Total Quality Management, 17(2), 265-285.
  • Saraph, J.V., Benson, P.G. & Schroeder, R.G. (1989): An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management. Decision Sciences, 20(4), 810-829.
  • Sila, I. (2007): Examining the effects of contextual factors on TQM and performance through the lens of organizational theories: An empirical study. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 83-109.
  • Skordoulis, R.T. (2004). Change management in higher education: Top-down or bottom up?. International Journal of Applied Management Education and Development, 1(3), 1-23.
  • Sohail, M.S., Rajadurai, J. & Rahman, N.A.A. (2003): Managing quality in higher education: A Malaysian case study. The International Journal of Educational Management, 17(4), 141-146.
  • Staw, B.M. & Epstein, L.D. (2000). What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and ceo pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 523-556.
  • Şentürk, B. (2015): Çokuz ama yokuz: Türkiye’deki akademisyen kadınlar üzerine bir analiz. Vira Verita, 2, 1-22.
  • Tari, J.J. & Dick, G. (2016). Trends in quality management research in higher education institutions. Journal of Service Theory and Practice, 26(3), 273-296.
  • Visakorpi, J., Stankovic, F., Pedrosa, J. & Rozsnyai, C. (2008). Türkiye’de yükseköğretim: Eğilimler, sorunlar, fırsatlar. Yayın No: TÜSİAD-T/ 2008-10/473. TÜSİAD Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • Walfish, S., McAlister, B., O’Donnel, P. & Lambert, M. (2012). An investigation of self-assessment bias in mental health providers. Psychological Reports, 110(2), 639-644.
  • Wayhan, V.B & Balderson, E.L. (2007). TQM and financial performance: What has empirical research discovered?. Total Quality Management, 18(4), 403-412.
  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
  • Yıldız, S.M. (2014) Service quality evaluation in the school of physical education and sports: An empirical investigation of students’ perceptions. Total Quality Management, 25(1), 80-94.
Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

G20 ÜLKELERİNİN EKONOMİK PERFORMANSLARININ GRİ İLİŞKİSEL ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ - ASSESSING THE ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF THE G20 MEMBERS BY USING GREY RELATIONAL ANALYSIS

Eda BÜYÜKGEBİZ KOCA, Mustafa Zihni TUNCA

KARİYER SEÇİM NİYETİNDE AİLENİN VE MESLEĞE YÖNELİK BİREYSEL TUTUMUN ETKİSİ: BÜRO HİZMETLERİ VE SEKRETERLİK ÖĞRENCİLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA - THE EFFECT OF PARENTAL AND INDIVIDUAL ATTITUDES IN CAREER CHOOSE INTENTION FOR THE OCCUPATION: RESEARCH ON OFFICE SERVICES AND SECRETARY STUDENTS

Dilek ESEN

ULUSLARARASI AKTÖRLERİN KÜRESEL SAĞLIK POLİTİKALARI ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ: TEORİK BİR İNCELEME - THE EFFECTS OF INTERNATIONAL ACTORS ON GLOBAL HEALTH POLITICS: A THEORETICAL REVIEW

Erdal EKE, Selin EROYMAK

KAMU YÖNETİMİ BÖLÜMLERİNDE MESLEK ETİĞİ DERSİ VE GEREKLİLİĞİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME - AN ASSESMENT ON THE COURSE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS COURSE AND ITS NECESSITY IN DEPARTMENTS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION

Ali Fuat GÖKÇE

DÜNYA’DA VE TÜRKİYE’DE KARBON TİCARETİ VE KARBON MUHASEBESİ UYGULAMALARI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA - A RESEARCH ON CARBON TRADE AND CARBON ACCOUNTING APPLICATIONS IN THE WORLD AND TURKEY

Cennet GÜRBÜZ, Özlem Nilüfer Karataş ARACI, İsmail BEKCİ

2000 SONRASI YAŞANAN FİNANSAL KRİZLERİN TÜRKİYE'NİN DIŞ TİCARETİ ÜZERİNE ETKİLERİ - THE EFFECTS OF FINANCIAL CRISES AFTER 2000 ON TURKEY'S FOREIGN TRADE

Çiğdem UÇAR, Selim Adem HATIRLI, Kübra ÖNDER

ULUSLARARASI SERMAYE AKIMLARININ MAKROEKONOMİK GÖSTERGELER İLE İLİŞKİSİ - THE RELATIONSHIP OF INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL FLOWS WITH MACROECONOMIC INDICATORS

Şirin KOVUSOVA, Remzi BULUT

ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN FİNANSAL OKURYAZARLIK DÜZEYLERİNİN ANALİZİ: BANKACILIK ve FİNANS BÖLÜMÜ ÖĞRENCİLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR UYGULAMA - ANALYSIS OF THE FINANCIAL LITERACY LEVELS OF UNIVERSITY STUDENTS: AN APPLICATION ON DEPARTMENT OF BANKING AND FINANCE

Murat KAYA, Hidayet GÜNEŞ

TERTIARY EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT OF QUALITY: A RESEARCH IN A DEVELOPING COUNTRY CONTEXT - YÜKSEK ÖĞRETİM VE KALİTE YÖNETİMİ: GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKE BAĞLAMINDA BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Mehmet ERYILMAZ, Ebru AYDOĞAN, Gülcan PETRİÇLİ, Duygu ACAR ERDUR, Esen CİMİLİ KARA, Olcay BEKTAŞ

RUS DIŞ POLİTİKASINDA GÜVENLİK FAKTÖRÜ - SECURITY FACTOR IN RUSSIAN FOREIGN POLICY

Ege DEMİREL