TRANSOBTURATOR TAPE OPERASYONUNDA SIK KULLANILAN İKİ CERRAHİ TEKNİĞİN BAŞARI VE KOMPLİKASYON ORANLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

AMAÇ: Stres üriner inkontinansın cerrahi tedavisinde son on yılda en sık tercih edilen yöntemlerden biri olan transobturator tape operasyonu için ‘iç-dış’ ve ‘dış-iç’ olmak üzere iki farklı cerrahi tekniği tariflenmiştir. Bu araştırma, 5 yıllık bir dönemde, stres üriner inkontinans nedeniyle transobturator tape operasyonu yapılmış hastalarda her iki teknikle ilişkili başarı, komplikasyon ve hasta memnuniyet oranlarını karşılaştırmayı amaçlamıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Transobturator tape, Stres üriner inkontinans, Cerrahi teknik

COMPARING THE SUCCESS AND COMPLICATION RATES OF TWO SURGICAL TECHNIQUES FOR TRANSOBTURATOR TAPE PROCEDURE

OBJECTIVE: Transobturator tape procedure is one of the preferred methods for the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. This procedure can be performed with either ‘internal-external’ or ‘external-internal’ techniques. This study aims to compare the success, complication and patient satisfaction rates of internal-external and external-internal techniques in patients who underwent transobturator tape procedure during a period of five years.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients who were operated with ‘external-internal’ transobturator tape technique and 42 patients who were operated with ‘internal-external’ tension-free vaginal tape-obturator technique were included. Patients were assessed in aspect of success rates, postoperative complication rates, pelvic examination findings, stress test results, operation satisfaction and quality of life scales.RESULTS: The patients in both groups were statistically similar in terms of age, body mass index and menopausal status. Vaginal / groin pain and postoperative voiding difficulty were significantly more frequent in the internal-external technique group (respectively p=0.043 and p=0.001). Both objective and subjective success rates were statistically similar in both groups. The patient satisfaction and life quality rates scores were also statistically similar in both groups.CONCLUSIONS: Transobturator tape procedure provides high success rates in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. As for both internal-external and external-internal techniques, the success rates, the patient satisfaction and postoperative life quality scores were similar.

Keywords:

Transobturator tape, Stress urinary incontinence, Surgical technique,

PDF

___

Silva WA. Treatment of stress urinary incontinencemidurethral sling: top-down, bottom-up, ‘outside-in’ or ‘inside-out’. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2007; 50: 362-75.
LatthePM, Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P. Tranobturator andretropubic tape proceduresin stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. BJOG 2007; 114: 522-31.
Delorme E. Transobturator urethral suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stressurinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol 2001; 11: 1306-13.
De Leval J. Nover surgical technique for the treatment offemale stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 724-30.
Waltregny D, Gaspar Y, Reul O, Hamida W, Bonnet P, de Leval J. TVT_O for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: Results of a procpective study after a 3-year minimum follow-up, Eur Urol 2008; 53: 401-10.
Lee KS, Choo MS, Lee YS et al. Prospective comparison ofthe ‘inside-out’ and ‘outside-in’ transobturator tape procedures for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. IntUregynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008; 19: 577-82.
Debodinance P, Trans-obturator urethral sling for the surgical correction of female stress urinary incontinence: Outside-in (Monarc®) versus inside-out (TVT-O®) Are the two ways…,European journal of obstetrics, gynecology2007;133:2, 232-238.
Costa P, Delmas V, Trans-obturator-tape procedure - ‘insideout or outside in’: current concepts and evidence base. Current Opinion in Urology: 2004; 14:6 :313-315.
Spinosa PJ, Dubuis YP, Riederer BM. Transobturator surgeryfor female stress incontinence: a comparative anatomical study of outside-in vs inside-out techniques, BJU İnternational 2007;100:5,1097-1102.
Abdel-fattah M, Ramsey I, Pringle S et al. Randomisedprospective single-blinded study comparing ‘inside-out’ versus ‘outside-in’ transobturator tapes in the management of urodynamic stress incontinence: 1-year outcomes from the E-TOT study. BJOG 2010; 117;7 : 870-877.
Reisenauer C, Kirschniak A, Wallwiener D, Transobturatorvaginal tape inside-out. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2006; 127:1, 123-129.
Cindolo L, Salzano L, Rota G et al. Tension-free transobturator approach for female stress urinary incontinence. Minerva Urol Nefrol 2004. 56(1):89-98.
Darcq C, Guy L, Mansoor A. et al. Compression of the bulbar urethra by transobturator suburethral tape: anatomical study. Prog Urol 2004. 14(4):507-11; discussion 511.
Pang MW, Leung HY, Chan LW et al. The impact of urinaryincontinence on quality of life among women in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J 2005. 11(3):158-63.
Digesu GA, Chaliha C, Salvatore S et al. The relationship ofvaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life. BJOG 2005. 112(7):971-6.