Short term Outcomes of Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision for the Surgical Treatment of Colon Cancer

INTRODUCTION: Since the description of complete mesocolic excision (CME) technique and use of robotic surgery, important advances have been made in the field of colorectal surgery in recent years. However, limited data exists regarding the feasibility of robotic surgery in the CME technique. In this study, we aimed to present the details of our operative technique and evaluate postoperative clinical outcomes in a series of patients undergoing robotic CME procedure. METHODS: Included in this study were 98 patients undergoing robotic CME for colon adenocarcinoma between November 2014 and May 2017. Patient data were recorded prospectively and reviewed retrospectively. Data on perioperative clinical findings, histopathologic data and postoperative 30-day outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: There were 60 male (61.2%) and 38 female patients with a mean age of 64.4±12.2 years and body mass index of 27.3±4.6 kg/m2. In this series, sigmoid colon cancer was the most common (48.9%) and this was followed by right colon (23.5%), left colon (16.3%), transverse colon (%6.1) and synchronous cancers (5.1%). The mean operative time was 263.6±85.9 min and blood loss was 98.9±108.0 ml (median, 55 ml; range, 10-800 ml). Intraoperative complication occurred in 5 patients (5.1%). Two cases were converted to open surgery (2%). On histopathologic examination, all the surgical margins were clear and the mean number of harvested lymph nodes was 34.7±15.2. The mean time to first bowel movement and receiving oral solid diet were 3.5±1.3 and 3.5±1.7 days, respectively. The mean length of hospital stay was 6.3±2.6 days. The postoperative complication rate was 19.4%. DISCUSSION and CONCLUSION: For the surgical treatment of colon cancer, CME can be safely performed with the technical advantages of the robot. Robotic CME may provide accurate staging of the disease with a high number of harvested lymph nodes and this may translate into favorable oncologic outcomes.

Sol Kolon Kanserinin Cerrahi Tedavisinde Robotik Komplet Mezokolik Eksizyonun Kısa Dönem Sonuçları

GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Komplet mezokolik eksizyon (KME) tekniğinin tanımlanması ve robotik cerrahinin uygulanması ile son yıllarda kolorektal cerrahi alanında önemli gelişmeler kaydedilmiştir. Ancak, KME tekniğinde robotik cerrahinin uygulanabilirliği hakkında veri azdır. Bu çalışmada robotik KME uyguladığımız hasta serisi üzerinden ameliyatın teknik ayrıntılarını ve postoperatif sonuçları sunmayı amaçladık. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Çalışmaya Kasım 2014 ve Mayıs 2017 tarihleri arasında kolon adenokanseri nedeni ile robotik KME ameliyatı yapılan toplam 98 hasta alındı. Veriler prospektif olarak kayıt edildi ve retrospektif incelendi. Hastaların perioperatif klinik bulguları, histopatolojik verileri ve postoperatif ilk 30 gün sonuçları değerlendirildi. BULGULAR: Hastaların 60’ı (%61.2) erkek ve 38’si kadın, yaş ortalaması 64.4±12.2 yıl ve vücut kitle indeksi 27.3±4.6 kg/m2 idi. Serimizde en sık sigmoid kolon tümörü mevcuttu (%48.9), bunu sağ kolon (%23.5), sol kolon (%16.3), transvers kolon (%6.1) ve senkron yerleşimli tümörler (%5.1) izledi. Ortalama ameliyat süresi 263.6±85.9 dk ve kanama miktarı 98.9±108.0 ml (ortanca=55 ml, aralık=10-800 ml) idi. Toplam beş hastada (%5.1) intraoperatif komplikasyon gelişti. İki hastada (%2) açık cerrahiye geçildi. Histopatolojik incelemede hiçbir hastada cerrahi sınırlarda tümör saptanmadı ve çıkarılan ortalama lenf nodu sayısı 34.7±15.2 idi. İlk defekasyon ve oral katı gıda alımı için geçen süre sırasıyla 3.5±1.3 ve 3.5±1.7 gün ve ortalama hastanede yatış süresi 6.3±2.6 gün idi. Ameliyat sonrası komplikasyon %19.4 hastada gelişti. TARTIŞMA ve SONUÇ: Kolon kanserinin cerrahi tedavisinde KME robotun sağladığı teknik avantajlar sayesinde güvenle yapılabilir. Robotik KME daha yüksek sayıda lenf nodu çıkarılması ile daha doğru bir evreleme yapılmasını sağlayabilir ve onkolojik sonuçlara olumlu yönde katkıda bulunabilir.

___

Hohenberger W, Weber K, Matzel K, et al. Standardized surgery for colonic cancer: complete mesocolic excision and central ligation--technical notes and outcome. Colorectal Dis 2009;11:354-64.

West NP, Hohenberger W, Weber K, et al. Complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation produces an oncologically superior specimen compared with standard surgery for carcinoma of the colon. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:272-8.

Gouvas N, Agalianos C, Papaparaskeva K, et al. Surgery along the embryological planes for colon cancer: a systematic review of complete mesocolic excision. Int J Colorectal Dis 2016;31:1577-94.

Siani LM, Pulica C. Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with central vascular ligation in right colon cancer: Long-term oncologic outcome between mesocolic and non-mesocolic planes of surgery. Scand J Surg 2015;104:219-26.

Huang JL, Wei HB, Fang JF, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open complete mesocolic excision for right colon cancer. Int J Surg 2015; 23:12-7.

Jamali FR, Soweid AM, Dimassi H, et al. Evaluating the degree of difficulty of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Arch Surg 2008;143:762-7.

Formisano G, Misitano P, Giuliani G, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy: technique and outcomes. Updates Surg 2016;68:63- 9.

Yiğit T, Kozak O, Çetiner S, et al. Robotik kolon cerrahisi. Turk J Colorectal Dis 2007;17:112- 20.

Zimmern A, Prasad L, Desouza A, et al. Robotic colon and rectal surgery: a series of 131 cases. World J Surg 2010;34:1954-8.

Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, et al. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:377-81.

Ozben V, Baca B, Atasoy D, et al. Robotic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer. Surg Endosc 2016;30:4624-5.

Aghayeva A, Baca B, Atasoy D, et al. Robotic complete mesocolic excision for splenic flexure of colon cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59:1098.

Ballantyne GH, Merola P, Weber A, et al. Robotic solutions to the pitfalls of laparoscopic colectomy. Osp Ital Chir 2001;7:405-12.

Isik O, Gorgun E. How Has the Robot Contributed to Colon Cancer Surgery? Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2015;28:220-7.

Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Farinacci F, et al. Robotic right colectomy for cancer with intracorporeal anastomosis: short-term outcomes from a single institution. Int J Colorectal Dis 2013;28:807-14.

Bae SU, Saklani AP, Lim DR, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted versus open complete mesocolic excision and central vascular ligation for right-sided colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:2288-94.

Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, et al. Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:433-41.

Spinoglio G, Bellora P, Monni M. Robotic technology for colorectal surgery: Procedures, current applications, and future innovative challenges. Chirurg 2017;88(Suppl 1):29-33.

D'Annibale A, Pernazza G, Morpurgo E, et al. Robotic right colon resection: evaluation of first 50 consecutive cases for malignant disease. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:2856-62.

Mathew R, Kim SH. Robotic right hemicolectomy with D3 lymphadenectomy and complete mesocolic excision: technical detail. OA Rob Surg 2013;1:6.

Trastulli S, Coratti A, Guarino S, et al. Robotic right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis compared with laparoscopic right colectomy with extracorporeal and intracorporeal anastomosis: a retrospective multicentre study. Surg Endosc 2015;29:1512-21.

Tarta C, Bishawi M, Bergamaschi R. Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis: a review. Tech Coloproctol 2013;17:479-85.

Benlice C, Stocchi L, Costedio MM, et al. Impact of the specific extraction-site location on the risk of incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2016;59:743-50.

Huettner F, Pacheco PE, Doubet JL, et al. One hundred and two consecutive robotic-assisted minimally invasive colectomies--an outcome and technical update. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:1195- 204.

Delaney CP, Lynch AC, Senagore AJ, et al. Comparison of robotically performed and traditional laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1633-9.

D’Annibale A, Morpurgo E, Fiscon V, et al. Robotic and laparoscopic surgery for treatment of colorectal diseases. Dis Colon and Rectum 2004;47: 2162-8.

Luca F, Cenciarelli S, Valvo M, et al. Full robotic left colon and rectal cancer resection: technique and early outcome. Ann Surg Oncol 2009;16:1274-8.
Kocaeli Tıp Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-0758
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: -
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Plantar Fasiiti Olan Hastalarda Kinesiotaping Uygulamasının Ağrı, Denge Ve Düşme Riski Üzerine Etkisi

Mehmet AĞIRMAN, Mustafa Yemliha AYHAN, Ahmet Salim GÖKTEPE, Engin ÇAKAR

Cases of Unilateral Breast Atrophy During Lactation

ŞADİYE NURAY KADIOĞLU VOYVODA, TÜLAY ÖZER

Superior Semisirküler Kanal Dehissansında Distorsiyon Ürünü Otoakustik Emisyon Ölçüm Değerlerinin Araştırılması

Semih ÖNCEL, Birgül TUHANİOĞLU, Sanem Okşan ERKAN, Nezahat ERDOĞAN, Zeynel Abidin ERKAN

The Effect Of Lidocaine On The Effıciency Of Electroconvulsive Therapy

Ayşe Zeynep TURAN, MEHMET YILMAZ, Vildan KILIÇ YILMAZ, Aslı Duygu AYDAŞ, Öyküm FINDIK

Laktasyon Döneminde Gelişen Unilateral Meme Atrofisi Olguları

Tülay ÖZER, Nuray VOYVODA

İdiopatik Pes Ekinovaruslu Hastalarda Ponseti Yöntemiyle Tedavi Sonuçlarımız

Ümit TUHANİOĞLU, Şükrü SOLAK, Alper GÜLTEKİN, Fırat SEYFETTİNOĞLU, Hasan Ulaş OĞUR

Morphometric Analysis of Coracoid Process And Glenoid Cavity In Terms of Surgical Approaches: An Anatomical Study

SİBEL ÇIRPAN, Gökşin Nilüfer YONGUÇ, MUSTAFA GÜVENÇER

Evaluation of Stroke Frequency in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Cisplatin and Docetaxel

Serhan YILDIRIM, Zahide YILMAZ, Ülkü Türk BÖRÜ

Geç Dönemde Başvuran Santral Retinal Arter Okluzyon Vakasında Hiperbarik Oksijen Tedavisi Sonrası Görme Artışı

Hüsamettin AKSOY, Mustafa GÖK

Kardiyak Tamponad Gelişen ya da Masif Perikardiyal Effüzyonu Olan Hastalarda Akut Böbrek Yetmezliği

Yiğit ÇANGA, Mert İlker HAYIROĞLU, Koray KALENDEROĞLU, Ahmet Okan UZUN, Ayça GÜMÜŞDAĞ, Seçkin PEHLİVANOĞLU, Emrah BOZBEYOĞLU, Özlem YILDIRIMTÜRK