GİRİŞ ve AMAÇ: Suçiçeği, duyarlı bireylerde generalize ekzantematöz döküntü ile karakterize, çocukluk döneminde sık görülen bir klinik tablodur. YÖNTEM ve GEREÇLER: Ülkemizde suçiçeği aşısının çocukluk çağı rutin aşılama takvimine alındığı 2013 yılından önceki ve sonraki dönemlerde gelişen olguların demografik, klinik-laboratuvar özelliklerinin değerlendirilmesi ve kıyaslanması amaçlanmıştır. BULGULAR: : Bu çalışma, Ocak 1994-Nisan 1997 tarihleri arasında Dr. Sami Ulus Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Merkezi’nde tanı alan 502 (1. grup), Ocak 2016-2020 tarihleri arasında Mengücek Gazi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi’nde tanı alan 170 (2. grup) suçiçeği olgusunun retrospektif incelenmesi ile yapılmıştır. TARTIŞMA ve SONUÇ: İki grupta da hastaların çoğunluğu erkeklerden oluşmaktaydı (%57 vs %54.2). Ortalama yaş birinci grupta 4.4 (±3) iken ikinci grupta 6.8 (±3.6) idi. Ana gruplardaki hastalar yaşlarına göre 0-4, 5-10, 11-15 yaş grubu olmak üzere 3’er alt gruba ayrıldı. Buna göre; birinci ve ikinci gruptaki hastaların çoğunluğunu 0-4 yaş grubu hastalar oluşturmaktaydı. Birinci gruptan 47, ikinci gruptan ise 5 hasta hastaneye yatırılarak izlenmişti. Birinci gruptaki en sık komplikasyonlar alt solunum yolu enfeksiyonu ve deri-yumuşak doku enfeksiyonuydu. İkinci gruptaki en sık komplikasyon ise alt solunum yolu enfeksiyonuydu. Sonuç: Bildirilen ve komplikasyon gelişen olgu sayısında aşılama sonrasında anlamlı oranda azalma saptanması, aşı karşıtlığının giderek arttığı bu dönemde ciddi önem arz etmektedir.
INTRODUCTION: Chickenpox is a common clinical picture in childhood, characterized by a generalized exanthematous rash in susceptible individuals. METHODS: It was aimed to evaluate and compare the demographic, clinical-laboratory characteristics of cases that developed in our country before and after 2013 when the chickenpox vaccine was included in the routine childhood vaccination calendar. RESULTS: This study was conducted by retrospective examination of 502 chikenpox cases diagnosed at Dr. Sami Ulus Child Health and Diseases Center between January 1994-April 1997 (1st group) and 170 cases at Mengücek Gazi Training and Research Hospital between January 2016-2020 (2nd group). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Most of the patients were males in both groups (57% vs 54.2%). The mean age was 4.4 (± 3) in the first group and 6.8 (± 3.6) in the second group. The patients in the main groups were divided into 3 subgroups, as 0-4, 5-10, and 11-15 age groups. According to this; most of the patients in the first and second groups were in the 0-4 age group. 47 patients from the first group and 5 patients from the second group were hospitalized. The most common complications in the first group were lower respiratory tract infection and skin-soft tissue infection and in the second group was lower respiratory tract infection. Conclusion: The significant decrease in the number of reported cases and complications after vaccination is really important in this period of anti-vaccination thoughts are gradually increasing.
___
1. Tsintsof A, Delprado WJ, Keogh AM. Varicella zoster myocarditis progressing to cardiyomyopathy and cardiac transplantation. Br Hearth J 1993; 70: 93-5.
2. Clinical features of varicella-zoster virus infection: Chickenpox. Uptodate.com. Erişim Tarihi: 06.02.2020
3. Feigin RD, Cherry JD. Textbook of pediatric infections Diseases. Philadelphia; WB saunders CO, 1981; p.1206-31, p.684- 721.
4. Gnann JW Jr. Varicella-zoster virus: atypical presentations and unusual complications. J Infect Dis 2002; 186 Suppl 1:S91.
5. Laupland KB, Davies HD, Low DE, et al. Invasive group A streptococcal disease in children and association with varicella-zoster virus infection. Ontario Group A Streptococcal Study Group. Pediatrics 2000; 105:E60.
6. de Benedictis FM, Osimani P. Necrotising fasciitis complicating varicella. Arch Dis Child 2008; 93:619.
7. Shirley R, Mackey S, Meagher P. Necrotising fasciitis: a sequelae of varicella zoster infection. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64:123.
8. Vugia DJ, Peterson CL, Meyers HB, et al. Invasive group A streptococcal infections in children with varicella in Southern California. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1996; 15:146.
9. Zurawski CA, Bardsley M, Beall B, et al. Invasive group A streptococcal disease in metropolitan Atlanta: a population-based assessment. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27:150.
10. Marin M, Watson TL, Chaves SS, et al. Varicella among adults: data from an active surveillance project, 1995-2005. J Infect Dis 2008; 197 Suppl 2:S94.
11. Straus SE, Ostrove JM, Inchauspé G, et al. NIH conference. Varicella-zoster virus infections. Biology, natural history, treatment, and prevention. Ann Intern Med 1988; 108:221.
12. Johnson R, Milbourn PE. Central nervous system manifestations of chickenpox. Can Med Assoc J 1970; 102:831.
13. Brunell PA. Textbook of pediatric infectious diseases. Philadelphia; WB saunders 1987; p.1602-7.
14. Wharton M. The epidemiology of varicella-zoster virus infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1996; 10:571.
15. Heininger U, Seward JF. Varicella. Lancet 2006; 368:1365.
16. Balfour HH Jr, Bean B, Laskin OL, et al. Acyclovir halts progression of herpes zoster in immunocompromised. N Engl J Med 1993; 308: 1448-53.
17. Guess HA, Broughton DD, Melton LJ 3rd, et al. Chickenpox hospitalizations among residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1962 through 1981. A population-basedstudy. Am J Dis Child 1984; 138: 1055-7.
18. García-Doval I, Pérez-Zafrilla B, Descalzo MA, et al. Incidence and risk of hospitalisation due to shingles and chickenpox in patients with rheumatic diseases treated with TNF antagonists. Ann Rheum Dis 2010; 69:1751.
19. Anderson DR, Schwartz J, Hunter NJ, et al. Varicella hepatitis: a fatalcase in a previously healthy, immunocompetent adult. Report of a case, autopsy, and review of the literature. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 2101-6.
20. Eshchen J, Reif L. Waron M, et al. Hepatic lesion in chickenpox. Gastroenterology 1973; 64: 462-6.
21. Nathas S, Pang AS, Singh Sıdhu DS, et al. Necrotising soft tissue infections as a complication of chickenpox. Singapore Med J 1995; 36: 656-60.
22. Uğur C, Say AZ. Suçiçeği ve komplikasyonlarının değerlendirilmesi. Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni 2018; 49(2); 205-8
23. Krugma S. VZV infection. Infectious diseases of children. Toronata: the CV Mosby CO 1985; p.433-50.
24. Spackova M, Muehlen M, Siedlar A. Complications of varicella after implementation of routine childhood varicella vaccination in Germany. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2010; 29(9):884-6.
25. Rafila A, Pitigoi D, Arama A, et al. The clinical and epidemiological evolution of varicella in Romania during 2004 and 2013. J Med Life 2015; 8(1):16-20.
26. Blumental S, Sabbe M, Lepage P, et al. Varicella Paediatric hospitalisations in Belgium: a 1-year national survey. Arch Dis Child 2016;101:16-22.
27. Dilek M, Helvacı M, Aksu N. Suçiçeği komplikasyonlarının değerlendirilmesi. Abant Med J 2015; 4(4):360-5.
28. Marchetto S, de Benedictis FM, de Martino M, et al. Epidemiology of hospital admissions for chickenpox in children: an Italian multicenter study in the pre-vaccine era. Acta Paediatr 2007;96(10):1490-3.
29. Chaves SS, Zhang J, Civen R, et al. Varicella disease among vaccinated persons: clinical and epidemiological characteristics, 1997-2005. J Infect Dis 2008; 197 Suppl 2:S127.
30. Weinmann S, Chun C, Mullooly JP, et al. Laboratory diagnosis and characteristics of breakthrough varicella in children. J Infect Dis 2008; 197 Suppl 2:S132.
31. Bullowa JE, Wishick SM. Complications of varicella. Am J Dis Child 1939; 49: 923.
32. Mermelstein RH, Freireich AW. Varicella pneumonia. Ann Intern Med 1963; 55: 456-63.
33. Peterson CL, Mascola L, Chao SM, et al. Children hospitalized for varicella: A prevaccine review. J Pediatr 1996; 129: 529-36.