Ekrem LAÇİN, ÖMER ÇOBAN, Muhammet İrfan AKSU, Nilüfer SABUNCUOĞLU, Huseyin DAS

The effects of different breeding methods on fattening performance and parameters related to slaughter, carcass and some meat quality in broiler chickens

Bu araştırma altlıklı yer sistemi (FBG) ve kafeste (CBG) yapılan etlik piliç yetiştiriciliğinin besi performansı, kesim, karkas ve bazı karkas kalite parametrelerinin karşılaştırılması amacıyla yürütülmüştür. Hayvan materyali olarak 90 adet bir günlük Ross-308 erkek broyler civciv kullanılmıştır. FBG ve CBG gruplarında canlı ağırlık ve kümülatif canlı ağırlık değerleri arasındaki farklılığın istatistiksel olarak çok önemli (P0.05) olduğu tespit edilmiştir. FBG ve CBG gruplarında sıcak ve soğuk karkas randımanı ile boyun, kanat, but ve kuyruk oranlarına ait değerler arasında istatistiksel olarak farklılığın olmadığı (P>0.05), göğüs oranına ait değerler bakımından ise önemli (P

Farklı yetiştirme metotlarının etlik piliçlerde besi performansı, kesim ve Karkas özellikleri ile bazı et kalite parametreleri üzerine etkisi

The present study was aimed at the comparison of floor-based growth (FBG) and caged-based growth (CBG) systems in broiler production for growth performance and parameters related to slaughter, carcass and meat quality. Ninety one-day-old male Ross-308 chicks constituted the material of the study. It was determined that, in Groups FBG and CBG, the differences between body weight and cumulative body weight values were statistically very significant (P<0.01). The final body weights measured at the end of the trial and the mean body weight gain values in Groups FBG and CBG were determined as 2530 g - 2046 g and 2389.16 g - 1904.77 g, respectively. The end-trial final feed conversion rates of Groups FBG and CBG were determined as 1.82 and 1.88, respectively, and it was ascertained that the difference between the values of the two groups was statistically insignificant (P>0.05). While the hot and cold dressing percentages and the neck, wing, drumstick and tail percentages did not statistically differ between Groups FBG and CBG (P>0.05), values pertaining to breast meat displayed significant differences (P<0.05). It was determined that the L*, b* and C* values pertaining to breast meat and the L*, a*, b* and C* values pertaining to chicken drumsticks displayed statistically significant differences (P<0.05, P<0.01) between the trial groups.

PDF

___

1. Abrahamsson P, Tauson R: Aviary systems and conventional cages for laying hens. Effects on production, egg quality, health and bird location in three hybrids. Acta Agricult Scand, Section A, 45, 191-203, 1995.
2. Rodriguez B, Valdivie M, Dieppa O: Body damages associated with high stocking densities of broiler chickens in cages. Cuban J Agr Sci, 39, 61-66, 2005.
3. Santoso U: Effects of house type and early feed restriction on performance and fat deposition in unsexed broilers. J Ilmu Ternak Dan Vet, 7, 84-89, 2002.
4. Swain BK, Sundaram RNS, Barbuddhe SB, Nirmale AV: Influence of cage and deep litter rearing systems on the performance of broilers. Indian J Anim Sci, 79, 467-469, 2002.
5. Wang SU, Zhang X, Huang BL, Sheng F, Li K, Ren S: Comparsion among differenet broiler-rearing technical crafts. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 13, 96-98, 1997.
6. Awoniyi TAM: The effect of housing on layer-chicken’s productivity in the 3-tier cage. Int J Poult Sci, 2, 438-441, 2003.
7. Fouad MA, Abdel AH, Razek AH, Badawy EM: Broilers welfare and economics under two management alternatives on commercial scale. Int J Poult Sci, 7, 1167–1173, 2008.
8. Duncan IJH: The pros and cons of cages. World’s Poult Sci J, 57, 381-390, 2001.
9. AOAC: Official Methods of Analysis. 15 ed., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, (Washington, D.C.), 1990.
10. Huff W: Evaluation of tibial dyschondroplasia during aflatoxicosis and feed restriction in young broiler chickens. Poult Sci, 59, 991-993, 1980.
11. Yalcin S, Ozkan S, Acıkgoz Z, Ozkan K: Effect of dietary methionine on performance, carcass characteristics and breast meat composition of heterozygous naked neck (Na/Na+) birds under spring and summer conditions. Br Poult Sci, 40, 688-694, 1999.
12. Mathes M, Möllerherm L, Krell U: Geflügel. (Deutscher Fachverlag GmbH, Frankfurt), 1997.
13. Pingel H, Wicke M, Lengerken GV: Gewinnung und Qualitöt von Geglügelfleisch. In, Branscheid W, Honikel KO, Lengerken GV, Troeger K (Eds): Qualitöt von Fleisch und Fleischwaren. pp. 301-334, Deutscher Fachverlag, Germany. 1998.
14. Barbut S: Poultry Products Processing. An Industry Guide. CRC Press, USA, 2002.
15. Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences: SPSS for Windows release 10.01. SPSS Inc., Chicago, 1996.
16. Hypes WA, Carpenter GH, Peterson RA, Jones WT: Productive performance of conventional floor-reared broilers high density cage brooded broilers. J Appl Poult Res, 3, 238-243, 1994.
17. Turkyilmaz MK, Nazligul A, Bardakcioglu HE: The effect of the floor and cage rearing systems on some production traits and livestock economics in broilers. J Vet Sci, 18, 99-105, 2002.
18. Elibol O: Comparison of broiler raising in cages with floor system in regard to some important characteristics. PhD Thesis, University of Ankara, Grad. Sch. of Nat. and Appl. Sci., 1991.
19. Reece FN, Deaton JW, May JD, May KN: Cage versus floor rearing of broiler chickens. Poult Sci, 50, 1786-1790, 1971.
20. Andrews LD, Seay RL, Harris GC, Nelson GC: Flooring materials for caged broilers and their effect upon performance. Poult Sci, 53, 1141-1146, 1974.
21. Andrews LD: Cage rearing of broilers. Poult Sci, 51, 1194-1197, 1972.
22. Andrews LD, Nelson GS, Harris GC, Goodwin TL: Performance of five strains of broilers in a four-tier cage system with plastic mat floors. Poult Sci, 54, 54-58, 1975.
23. Athar MA, Pervez E, Asghar MN, Asghar AM, Zoyfro V: Effect of cage and floor rearing and their mutual transfer on the performance of broiler chicken. Pakistan J Agr Res, 11, 192-196, 1990.
24. Zhao FR, Geng AL, Li BM, Shi ZX, Zhao YJ: Effects of environmental factors on breast blister incidence, growth performance and some biochemical indexes in broilers. J Appl Poult Res, 18, 699-706, 2009.
25. Welch SW, Metcalfe PF, Wesley R: Broilers in cages. World’s Poult Sci J, 27, 132-142, 1970.
26. Akpobome GO, Fanguy RC: Evaluation of a cage floor system for production of commercial broilers. Poult Sci, 72, 274-280, 1992.
27. Yildiz G, Koksal BH, Sizmaz O: Effects of dietary boric acid and yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation on performance, carcass traits and some blood parameters of broilers. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 17 (3): 429-434, 2011.
28. Andrews LD, Goodwin TL: Performance of broilers in cages. Poult Sci, 52, 723-728, 1973.
29. Wariss PD, Wilkins LJ, Knowles TG: The influence of ante-mortem handling on poultry meat quality. In, Richardson RI, Mead GC (Eds): Poultry Meat Science. Poultry Sci, Symposium Series, 25, 223-230, 1999.
30. Yetisir R, Karakaya M, Ilhan F, Yilmaz MT, Ozalp B: Effects of different lighting programs and sex on some broiler meat quality properties affecting consumer preference. J Anim Prod, 49, 20-28, 2008.
31. Quio M, Fletcher DL, Northhcutt JK, Smith DP: The relationship between raw broiler breast meat color and composition. Poult Sci, 81, 422- 427, 2002.
32. Goksoy EO, Aksit M, Kırkan S: The effects of organic acid and organum onites supplementations on some physical and microbial characteristics of broiler meat obtained from broilers kept under seasonal heat stress. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg, 16 (Suppl-A): S41-S46, 2010.
33. Ponsano EHG, Pinto MF, Garcia-Neto M, Lacava PM: Performance and color of broilers fed diets containing Rhodocyclus gelatinosus biomass. Rev Bras Cienc Avic, 6, 237-242, 2004.
34. Northcutt JK: Factors affecting poultry meat quality. Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin 1157. The University of Georgia College of Agric. and Env. Sci., 1997.
35. Fletcher DL: Poultry meat colour. In, Richardson RI, Mead GC (Eds): Poultry Meat Science. Poultry Sci. Symposium Series, 25, 159-175, 1999.
36. Petracci M, Bianchi M, Betti M, Cremonini, M, Laghi AL, Cavani C, Pallucci G: Realtionships between raw broiler breast meat colour and low-resolution NMR relaxation properties. Proceedings of the XXII World’s Poultry Congress, June 8-13, Istanbul, 2004.
37. Aksu T, Aksu MI, Yoruk MA, Karaoglu M: Effects of organically-complexed minerals on meat quality in chickens. Br Poult Sci, 52, 558-565, 2011.