Recovery of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in healthy and diarrhoeic pets by three culture methods and identification of the isolates by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR)

Bu çalışmada, sağlıklı ve ishalli kedi ve köpeklerde 3 farklı kültür metodu kullanılarak termofilik Campylobacter türlerinin prevalansının belirlenmesi amaçlandı. Bu amaçla, 120 köpek, 15 kediden rektal svap örneği toplandı ve bunların 14’ü (12 köpek ve 2 kedi) ishalli hayvanlardan alındı. Termofilik Campylobacter spp.’nin izolasyonunda, tüm örnekler için CCDA (cefoperazone, amphotericin B) ya da CAT suplement (cefoperazone, amphotericin and teicoplanin) ilave edilmiş modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA)’a (sefoperazon, amfoterisin B) direkt ekim, ishalli hayvanlardan alınan örnekler için de %5 defibrine koyun kanı ilave edilmiş Mueller- Hinton Agar üzerine membran fltrasyon yöntemi kullanıldı. İzolatların identifikasyonu multipleks polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu (mPZR) ile gerçekleştirildi. Campylobacter türlerinin köpek ve kedilerde genel prevalansı sırasıyla %40.0 ve %26.7 olarak bulundu. Campylobacter jejuni en sık rastlanan tür olup 36 köpek ve 4 kediden izole edildi. Ayrıca, 10 köpek ve 1 kediden C. upsaliensis, 5 köpekten C. coli ve 2 sağlıklı köpekten C. lari izole edildi. Termofilik Campylobacter spp. izolasyonu için CAT selektif suplementin kullanıldığı metot köpeklerde daha duyarlı iken ishalli köpeklerde membran filtrasyonun en uygun metot olduğu görüldü. Bu sonuçlar, özellikle sağlıklı köpeklerde oldukça yüksek oranlarda bulunan Campylobacter spp. taşıyıcılığının halk sağlığı için göz ardı edilemez risk oluşturduğunu göstermektedir.

Sağlıklı ve ishalli pet hayvanlarda Termofilik Campylobacter spp.’nin üç kültür metodu ile izolasyonu ve izolatların multipleks polimeraz zincir reaksiyonu m(PZR) ile identifikasyonu

In this study, the determination of prevalence of thermophilic Campylobacter species in dogs and cats with and without diarrhoea using 3 diferent cultural methods was aimed. For this purpose, rectal swabs were collected from 120 dogs and 15 cats and 14 of them (12 dogs and 2 cats) were taken from diarrhoeic animals. The isolation of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. was conducted by direct plating onto modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA) supplemented with CCDA (cefoperazone, amphotericin B) or CAT (cefoperazone, amphotericin and teicoplanin) for all samples and membrane filtration method onto Mueller-Hinton Agar supplemented with 5% defibrinated sheep blood for samples from diarrhoeic pets and identification of isolates was performed using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR). The overall prevalence of Campylobacter species was found to be 40.0% and 26.7% in dogs and cats, respectively. Campylobacter jejuni was the most frequent bacterium isolated from 36 dogs and 4 cats. C. upsaliensis, C. coli and C. lari were isolated from 10 dogs and 1 cat, 5 dogs and 2 healthy dogs respectively. For the isolation of thermophilic Campylobacter spp., whilst the method using CAT as selective supplement being more sensitive in dogs, the membrane filtration appeared as the most suitable method in diarrhoeic dogs. These results showed the occurrence of a relatively high carriage of Campylobacter spp., particularly in healthy dogs that may constitute a non negligible risk for public health.

___

  • 1. Foster G, Holm es B, Steigerwalt AG, Lawson PA, Thorne P, Byrer DE, Ross H, Xerry J, Thompson PM, Collins MD: Campylobacter insulaenigrae sp. nov., isolated from marine mammals. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol, 54, 2369-2373, 2004.
  • 2. Humphrey T, O’brien S, Madsen M: Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: A food production perspective . Int J Food Microbiol, 117 (3): 237-257, 2007.
  • 3. On SLW: Taxonomy of Campylobacter, Arcobacter, Helicobacter and related bacteria: C urrent status, future prospects and immediate concerns. J Appl Microbiol, 90, 1-15, 2001.
  • 4. Friedman C, Neimann J, Wegener H, Tauxe R: Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections in the United States and other industrialized nations. In, Nachamkin I, Blaser M.J (Ed): Campylobacter.
  • 2 nd ed., 121-138. Washington DC, USA: American Society for Microbiology Press, 2000.
  • 5. Skirrow MB: Epidemiology of Campylobacter enteritis. Int J Food Microbiol, 12 (1): 9-16, 1991.
  • 6. Skirrow MB: Diseases due to Campylobacter, Helicobacter and related bacteria. J Comp Pathol, 111 (2): 113-149, 1994.
  • 7. Alterkuse SF, Hunt JM, Tollefson LK, Madden JM: Food and animal sources of human Campylobacter jejuni infection. J Am Vet Med Assoc , 204 (1): 57-61, 1994.
  • 8. Aydin F, Atabay HI, Akan M: The isolation and characterisation of Campylobacter jejuni subsp. jejuni from domestic geese (Anser anser). J Appl Microbiol, 90 (4): 637-642, 2001.
  • 9. Aydin F, Gumussoy KS, Ica T, Sumerkan B, Esel D, Akan M, Ozdemir A: The prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in various sources in Kayseri, Turkey, and molecular analysis of isolated strains by PCR-RFLP. Turk J Vet Anim Sci, 31 (1): 13-19, 2007.
  • 10. Butzler PJ: Campylobacter, from obscurity to celebrity. Clin Microbiol Infect, 10 (10): 868-876, 2004.
  • 11. Newell DG, Fearnley C: Sources of Campylobacter colonisation in broiler chicken. Appl Environ Microbiol, 69 (8): 4343-4351, 2003.
  • 12. Arikoglu C, Aydin F: The prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni in domestic and wild animal in Kars district. Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg , 3 (2): 173-180, 1997.
  • 13. Studahl A, Andersen Y: Risk factors for indigenous Campylobacter infection: A Swedish case-control study. Epidemiol Infect, 125 (2): 269-275, 2000.
  • 14. Alterkuse SF, Stern NJ, Fields PI, Swerdlow DL: Campylobacter jejuni - An emerging foodborne pathogen. Emerg Infect Dis, 5 (1): 28-35, 1999.
  • 15. Peterson M: Campylobacter jejuni enteritis asociated with consumption of raw milk. J Environ Health, 65 (9): 20-21, 2003.
  • 16. Andrzejewska M, Szczepańska B, Klawe JJ, Spica D, Chudzińska M: Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli species in cats and dogs from Bydgoszcz (Poland) region. Pol J Vet Sci, 16 (1): 115-120, 2013.
  • 17. Procter TD, Pearl DL, Finley RL, Leonard EK, Janecko N, Reid- Smith RJ, Weese JS, Peregrine AS, Sargeant JM: A cross-sectional study examining campylobacter and other zoonotic enteric pathogens in dogs that frequent dog parks in three cities in South-Western Ontario and risk factors for shedding of Campylobacter spp. Zoonoses Public Health 2013. DOI: 10.1111/zph.12062
  • 18. Salihu MD, Magaji AA, Abdulkadir JU, Kolawale A: Survey of thermophilic Campylobacter species in cats and dogs in north-western Nigeria. Vet Ital, 46 (4): 425-430, 2010.
  • 19. Damborg P, Olsen KEP, Nielsen EM, Guardabassi L: Occurence of Campylobacter jejuni in pets living with human patients infected with C. jejuni. J Clin Microbiol, 42 (3): 1363-1364, 2004.
  • 20. Gurgan T, Diker KS: Abortion associated with Campylobacter upsaliensis. J Clin Microbiol, 32 (12): 3093-3094, 1994.
  • 21. Aydin F, Gumussoy KS, Atabay HI, Ica T, Abay S: Prevalence and distribution of Arcobacter species in various sources in Turkey, and molecular analysis of isolated strains by ERIC-PCR. J Appl Microbiol, 103 (1): 27-35, 2007.
  • 22. Sandberg M, Bergsjo B, Hofshagen M, Skjerve E, Kruse H: Risk factors for Campylobacter infection in Norwegian cats and dogs. Prev Vet Med, 55 (4): 241-253, 2002.
  • 23. Wang G, Clark CG, Taylor TM, Pucknell C, Barton C, Price LD, Woodward L, Rodgers FG: Colony Multiplex PCR Assay for Identification and Diferentiation of Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis and C. fetus subsp. fetus. J Clin Microbiol, 40 (12): 4744-4747, 2002.
  • 24. Bolton FJ, Hutchinson DN, Coates, D: Comparison of three selective agars for isolation of Campylobacters. European J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, 5, 466-468, 1986.
  • 25. Koene MG, Houwers DJ, Dijkstra JR, Duim B, Wagenaar JA: Simultaneous presence of multiple Campylobacter species in dogs. J Clin Microbiol, 42 (2): 819-821, 2004.
  • 26. Acke E, Mc Gill K, Golden O, Jones BR, Fanning S, Whyte P: A comparison of diferent culture methods for the recovery of Campylobacter specis from pets. Zoonoses Public Health , 56 (9-10): 490-495, 2009.
  • 27. Shin E, Lee Y: Comparison of three different methods for Campylobacter isolation from porcine intestines. J Microbiol Biotechnol, 19 (7): 647-650, 2009.
  • 28. Aspinall ST, Wareing DR, Hayward PG, Hunchinson DN: A comparison of a new Campylobacter selective medium (CAT) with membrane filtration for the isolation of thermophilic C ampylobacters including Campylobacter upsaliensis. J Appl Bacteriol, 80 (6): 645-650, 1996.
  • 29. Workman SN, Mathison GE, Lavoie MC: Pet dogs and chicken meat as reservoirs of Campylobacter spp., in Barbados. J Clin Microbiol, 43 (6): 2642-2650, 2005.
  • 30. Gargiulo A, Rinaldi L, D’angelo L, Dipineto L, Borrelli L, Fioretti A, Menna LF: Survey of Campylobacter jejuni in stray cats in southern Italy. Lett Appl Microbiol, 46 (2): 267-270, 2008.
  • 31. Koene MG, Houwers DJ, Dijkstra JR, Duim B, Wagenaar JA: Strain variation within Campylobacter species in fecal samples from dogs and cats. Vet Microbiol, 133 (1-2): 199-205, 2009.
  • 32. Acke E, Mc Gill K, Golden O, Jones BR, Fanning S, Whyte P: Prevalence of thermophilic Campylobacter species in houshold cats and dogs in Ireland. Vet Rec, 164 (2): 44-47, 2009.
  • 33. Westgarth C, Porter CJ, Nicolson L, Birtles R J, Williams NJ, Hart CA, Pinchbeck GL, Gaskell RM, Christley RM, Dawson S: Risk factors for the carriage of Campylobacter upsaliensis by dogs in a community in Cheshire. Vet Rec, 165 (18): 526-530, 2009.
  • 34. Engvall EO, Brandstrom B, Andersson L, Baverud V, Trowald-Wigh G, Englund L: Isolation and identification of thermophilic Campylobacter species in faecal samples from Swedish dogs. Scand J Infect Dis, 35 (10): 713-718, 2003.
  • 35. Gondrosen B, Knaevelsrud T, Dommarsnes K: Isolation of thermophilic campylobacters from Norwegian dogs and cats. Acta Vet Scand, 26 (1): 81-90, 1985.
  • 36. Shen Z, Feng Y, Dewhirs FE, Fox JG: Coinfection of enteric Helicobacter spp. and Campylobacter spp. in cats. J Clin Microbiol, 39 (6): 2166-2172, 2001.
  • 37. Hald B, Pedersen K, Waino M, Jorgensen JC, Madsen M: Longitudinal study of the excretion patterns of thermophilic campylobacter spp. in young pet dogs in Denmark. J Clin Microbiol, 42 (5): 2003-2012, 2004.
  • 38. Rosef O, Johnsen G, Stolen A, Klaeboe H: Similarity of Campylobacter lari among human, animal and water isolates in Norway. Foodborne Pathog Dis, 5 (1): 33-39, 2008.
Kafkas Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-6045
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1995
  • Yayıncı: Kafkas Üniv. Veteriner Fak.
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Efects of stocking density and litter type on litter quality and growth performance of broiler chicken

METİN PETEK, HAKAN ÜSTÜNER, Derya YEŞİLBAĞ

Investigation of relationships between DNA integrity and fresh semen parameters in rams

SELİM ALÇAY, Berk TOKER, BURCU ÜSTÜNER, ZEKARİYA NUR, Hakan SAĞIRKAYA, Mustafa Kemal SOYLU

Survey for the presence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in the bull frozen semen samples and blood samples of cattle, sheep and camel by nested-PCR

Faham KHAMESIPOUR, Abbas DOOSTI, Mohammad SEBDANI MAZROUEI

The evaluation of important biomarkers in healthy cattle

NAZLI ERCAN, Nevin TUZCU, ONUR BAŞBUĞ, Kurtuluş GÖK, HAKAN IŞIDAN, YUSUF ZİYA OĞRAK

Karaciğer ve dalak laserasyonları ile birlikte bulunan intraperitoneal mesane rüptürünün ayırıcı tanısında intravenöz fluoresceinin etkinliğinin araştırılması: Tavşan modelinde deneysel bir çalışma

Kürşat ÇEÇEN, ÖZGÜR AKSOY, Ramazan KOCAASLAN, BAŞAK KURT, SADIK YAYLA, Mert Ali KARADAĞ, Aslan DEMİR, Erdinç ÜNLÜER

Efects of dietary yeast cell wall supplementation on performance, carcass characteristics, antibody production and histopathological changes in broilers

SAKİNE YALÇIN, SUZAN YALÇIN, HANDAN ESER, Aydın ŞAHİN, S. Songül YALÇIN, KADRİ ŞAFAK GÜÇER

Fare embriyonik kök hücrelerden nöronal hücrelerin farklılaşması

Nurcan UMUR, Elgin TÜRKÖZ, H. Seda VATANSEVER, Kemal ÖZBİLGİN, Ahmet Şükrü UMUR

Effect of knockdown TAGLN on the migration capacity of wuzhishan pig's bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

Ling YANG, Fang TANG, Lan LIU, Weimin ZHAO, Yiting TANG, Ying CHENG, Jingliang WEI, Shulin YANG, Yulian MU, Shutang FENG, Kui LI

Efect of rapid chilling and pelvic suspension on meat quality of Longissimus dorsi Muscle of lamb

TOLGA KAHRAMAN, Ghassan ISSA, ENVER BARIŞ BİNGÖL, EMEK DÜMEN, ERGÜN ÖMER GÖKSOY, SERKAN KEMAL BÜYÜKÜNAL

Efects of cage and floor housing systems on fattening performance, oxidative stress and carcass defects in Broiler chicken

Ülkü Gülcihan ŞİMŞEK, MİNE ERİŞİR, MEHMET ÇİFTÇİ, PINAR TATLI SEVEN