ASEAN VE GÜNEYDOĞU ASYA BÖLGESELCİLİĞİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

ASEAN, güneydoğu Asya’da, öncüllerine nispeten devamlılık sağlayabilmiş ve gün geçtikçe daha da ciddi adımlar atarak, bölgesel, aynı zamanda küresel anlamda büyük ekonomilerin dikkatini çekerek bölgesel bir kimlik oluşturma konusunda son derece önemli adımlar atabilmiş bir teşkilattır. ASEAN’ın imzalandığı zaman zarfında bölünme ve çatışma, güneydoğu Asya bölgesini teşkil eden devletlerde her şekilde ortaya çıkmakta ve bölgesel devletlerarası ilişkilerde yıkıcı etkiler oluşturmaktaydı. Bölge devletlerinin birçoğunun bağımsızlıklarını yeni kazanmış olmaları, sömürgeci güçler tarafından keyfi olarak çizilmiş sınırlardan kalan problemler ve uzlaşmazlıklar, güneydoğu Asya'nın bölgeselciliği yolundaki en büyük engelleri teşkil etmekteydi. Bununla birlikte bölge devletlerinin uluslararası politikaları da istikrar oluşturmaktan uzaktı. Daha geniş çerçevede ise, bölge devletleri kendilerini büyük güçler tarafından iç işlerine müdahalelerin ve Soğuk Savaş dönemi çatışmalarının hedefi ve aracı olarak görmekteydiler. ASEAN zaman içerisinde gücünü siyasi bir güce çevirebilmiş, sağladığı platform sayesinde bölgesel çatışmalar engellenmiştir. Bu çalışmada, ASEAN’ın güneydoğu Asya bölgeselciliği üzerindeki etkisi incelenecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

ASEAN, Güneydoğu Asya, Bölgeselcilik

PDF

___

Acharya, A. (2012). The making of Southeast Asia: International relations of a region. Singapore : Institute of Southeast Asian Studies Press.
Acharya, A. (2013). The Making of Southeast Asia: International Relations of a Region. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
Anthony, M. C. (2005). Regional Security in Southeast Asia : Beyond the ASEAN Way. Singapore: ISEAS Publications.
ASEAN. (2012). EAS. Chairman’s Statement of the 7th East Asia Summit (EAS): https://www.asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/documents/Final_Chairman%20Statement%20of%20the%207th%20EAS%20(Final).pdf adresinden alındı
ASEAN. (2016, 1 27). Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia Indonesia, 24 February 1976. 1 11, 2019 tarihinde https://asean.org/treaty-amity-cooperation-southeast-asia-indonesia-24-february-1976/ adresinden alındı
ASEAN. (2018). ARF. ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF): https://asean.org/asean-political-security-community/asean-regional-forum-arf/ adresinden alındı
ASEAN. (2018). History. 01 28, 2019 tarihinde https://asean.org/asean/about-asean/history/ adresinden alındı
ASEAN. (2018). Som. The 39th Meeting of the ASEAN Senior Officials: https://asean.org/39th-meeting-asean-senior-officials-drug-matters/ adresinden alındı
Ayers, D. M. (2000). Anatomy of a crisis : education, development, and the state in Cambodia, 1953 –1998. Hawai, USA: University of Hawai‘i Press.
Ba, A. D. (2006). Who's socializing whom? Complex engagement in Sino-ASEAN relations. The Pacific Review, 157-179. doi:10.1080/09512740500473163
BA, A. D. (2009). (Re)Negotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism, and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations. Stanford, California, USA: Stanford University Press.
Ball, W. M.-2. (1958, Winter, Vol. 12, No. 1). A Political Re-Examination of Seato. International Organization, 17-25.
Barnett, M. N. (1998). Dialogues in Arab politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bentley, G. C. (1986). Indigenous States of Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology Volume: 15 Issues: 1 , 275-305.
Buszynski, L. (2003, December). ASEAN, the Declaration on Conduct, and the South China Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 25(3), 343-362.
Butcher, J. G. (2013). The International Court of Justice and the territorial dispute between Indonesia and Malaysia in the Sulawesi Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 35(2), 235-257.
Calder, K., & Ye, M. (2004). Regionalism and Critical Junctures: Explaining the "Organization Gap" in Northeast Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, 191-226.
Dosch, J., & Mols, M. (1994). Why ASEAN Co-operation Cannot Work as a Model for Regionalism Elsewhere —A Reply. Economic Bulletin, Vol. 11, No. 2, 212-222.
Druce, S. C., & Baikoeni, E. Y. (2016). Circumventing Conflict: The Indonesia–Malaysia Ambalat Block Dispute. M. Oishi içinde, In Contemporary Conflicts in Southeast Asia (s. 137-156). Singapore: Springer.
Elson, R. (2006). Indonesia and the West: an Ambivalent, Misunderstood Engagement. Australian Journal of Politics and History, Volume 52, Number 2, 261-271.
Emmerson, D. K. (1996). Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore: A regional security core? R. J. Ellings, & S. W. Simon içinde, Southeast Asian Security in the New Millennium. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
Feeney, W. R.-8. (1984). The United States and the Philippines: The Bases Dilemma. Asian Affairs, 10(4), 63-85.
Gungwu, W. (2005). Nation-Building: Five Southeast Asian Histories. Singapore: ISEAS Publications.
Hopf, T. (2002). Social construction of international politics: identities & foreign policies. New York: Cornwell University Press.
Hund, M. (2003). ASEAN Plus Three: towards a new age of pan-East Asian regionalism? A skeptic’s appraisal. The Pacific Review, 16:3, 383-417. doi:10.1080/0951274032000085644
Johnston, A. I. (2003). Socialization in international institutions: The ASEAN Way and Internatioal Relation Theory. G. J. Ikenberry, & M. Mastanduno içinde, International relations theory and the Asia-Pacific (s. 107-162). New York, USA: Columbia University Press.
Jones, D. M., & Smith, M. L. (2002). ASEAN’s imitation community. Orbis, 93-109.
Kahler, M. (2000). Legalization as Strategy: The Asia-Pacific Case. International Organization, Vol. 54, No. 3, Legalization and World Politics, 549-571.
Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). Regionalism in Comparative Perspective. Cooperation and Conflict , 123-159.
Kaye, D. D. (2001). Beyond the Handshake. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kelly, G. P. (1986, September). Coping with America: Refugees from Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos in the 1970s and 1980s. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, Immigration and American Public Policy, 487, 138-149.
Khoman, T. (2012, Temmuz 9). ASEAN Conception and Evolution. Aralık 25, 2018 tarihinde ASEAN: https://asean.org/?static_post=asean-conception-and-evolution-by-thanat-khoman adresinden alındı
Legro, J. W. (2000). The Transformation of Policy Ideas. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 44, No. 3, 419-432.
Leifer, M. (1974). Great power intervention and regional order. M. W. Zacher, & R. S. Milne içinde, Conflict and stability (s. 181-201). Garden City, NJ: Anchor Press.
Michaud, J. (2006). Historical Dictionary of the Peoples of the Southeast Asian Massif. Oxford, UK: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
Narine, S. (2002). Explaining ASEAN: Regionalism in Southeast Asia. London, UK: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Paul, E. (2010). Obstacles to Democratization in Southeast Asia A Study of the Nation State, Regional and Global Order. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan Pub.
Peffer, N. (1954). Regional Security in Southeast Asia. International Organization, Vol. 8, No. 3, 311-315.
Pollard, V. K. (1970). ASA and ASEAN, 1961-1967: Southeast Asian Regionalism. Asian Survey, 10(3), 244-255.
Rüland, J. (2000). ASEAN and the Asian crisis: theoretical implications and practical consequences for Southeast Asian regionalism. The Pacific Review, 13:3, 421-451. doi:10.1080/09512740050147942
Saravanamuttu, J. (1986). Imperialism, dependent development and asean regionalism. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 16:2, 204-222. doi:10.1080/00472338685390101
Seng, T. S., & Cossa, R. A. (2001). Rescuing realism from the realists: A theoretical note on East Asian security. S. Simon içinde, In Many faces of Asian security (s. 15-47). Lanham: MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Severino, R. C. (2008). ASEAN. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies Press.
Smith, A. L.-7. (2002). TIMOR LESTE, TIMOR TIMUR, EAST TIMOR, TIMOR LOROSA'E: What's in a Name? Southeast Asian Affairs, Institute of Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS) , 54-77.
Sussman, G. (1998). Macapagal, the Sabah Claim and Maphilindo:. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 210-228. doi:10.1080/00472338380000141
Taylor, A. M. (1964). Malaysia, Indonesia - and Maphilindo. International Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2, 155-171.
Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization, 391-¬425. doi:10.1017/S0020818300027764
Yee, A. (1996). The causal effects of ideas on policies. International Organization, 69-108.