Ülkü Ayşe TÜRKER ARAS, Samet KIRAT, Engin KORKMAZER

3717

Kadınların Yeterli Antenatal Bakım Hizmeti Almasına Etki Eden Faktörler

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'de Kuzey Doğu Anadolu'nun kırsal bir bölgesinde sağlık hekimleri tarafından verilen doğum öncesi bakımı ve etkileyen faktörleri nicel olarak araştırmaktı. Gereç ve yöntem: Doğum için ikinci basamak sağlık kuruluşuna başvuran hastalara gebelikleri boyunca kaç kez kontrole gittikleri soruldu. Ayrıca yanıt veren hastaların sosyodemografik özellikleri kaydedildi. Bulgular: Bu çalışmada yetersiz doğum öncesi bakım alan gebelerin oranı %41.0 idi. Dörtten daha az sayıda doğum öncesi bakım ziyaretine katılan gebelerde yetersiz doğum öncesi bakım için risk faktörleri incelendiğinde,

Factors Affecting Women's Access to Antenatal Care Services

Aim: The aim of this study was to quantitatively investigate the antenatal care provided by healthcare physicians in a rural area of North East Anatolia, Turkey, and the effective factors. Materials and methods: Patients who applied to a Second-tier health institution for delivery were asked how many times they went for a check-up during their pregnancy. In addition, the sociodemographic characteristics of the responding patients were recorded. Results: In this study, the rate of pregnant women who received inadequate antenatal care was 41.0%. Examining the risk factors for inadequate antenatal care in pregnant women who attended fewer than four antenatal care visits revealed that the risk was 2,115 (confidence interval [CI] = 1.328–3.368) times higher for those receiving spousal education for
Keywords:

Antenatal Care, Pregnants Infant Mortality, Health Service Delivery, Health Personnel,

PDF

___

  • 1. Rowe S, Karkhaneh Z, MacDonald I, Chambers T, Amjad S, Osornio-Vargas A, et al. Systematic review of the measurement properties of indices of prenatal care utilization. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020; 20:171.
  • 2. Milcent C, Zbiri S. Prenatal care and socioeconomic status: effect on cesarean delivery. Health Econ Rev. 2018;8:7.
  • 3. Nussey L, Hunter A, Krueger S, Malhi R, Giglia L, Seigel S,et al. Sociodemographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of people receiving inadequate prenatal care: A retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2020;42:591-600.
  • 4. Prenatal care and afterpartum care guide circular [Internet]. 2022 [updated 2022 Apr 25; cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: https://ilkoordinasyonweb.saglik.gov.tr/TR,5327/dogum-oncesi-bakim-dogum-sonrasi-bakim-rehberi-genelgesi.html.
  • 5. Kotelchuck M. An evaluation of the Kessner Adequacy of prenatal Care Index and a proposed Adequacy of prenatal Care Utilization Index. Am J Public Health. 1994;84:1414-20.
  • 6. Turkey population and health survey. [Internet]. 2022 [updated 2022 Apr 25; cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from: http://www.sck.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Turkiye-Nufus-ve-Sa%C4%9Flik-Arastirmasi-2013.pdf.
  • 7. Sangrajrang S, Laowahutanont P, Wongsena M, Muwonge R, Karalak A, Imsamran W, et al. Comparative accuracy of Pap smear and HPV screening in Ubon Ratchathani in Thailand. Papillomavirus Res. 2017;3:30-5.
  • 8. Antenatal Care. London, United Kingdom: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2021. [Internet]. 2021 [updated 2022 June 25; cited 2022 June 25]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng201
  • 9. Turkey population and health survey [Internet]. 2018 [updated 2022 Apr 25; cited 2022 Apr 25]. Available from:http://www.sck.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/TNSA2018_ana_Rapor.pdf.
  • 10. Yilmaz L, Koruk F, Koruk I. The status of women who gave birth in a state hospital in Sanliurfa to receive prenatal care services, the quality of these services and the factors affecting them. Mersin Univ J Health Sci. 2018;11:209-218.
  • 11. World Health Organization. The Partnership for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health. Strategic Framework. 2012-2015. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2011.
  • 12. Aksu S. Prenatal care receiving status of pregnant women in Balikesir city center and affecting factors. Balıkesir J Health Sci. 2020;9(3):179-188.
  • 13. Sutlu S, Çatak B, Kilic S. Where are we in prenatal care? community-based research. STED. Contin Med Educ. 2012;21(5):264-270.
  • 14. Çatak B. Prenatal care services in bursa. Turkish Journal of Family Practice;2014,18(2):63-69.
  • 15. Erdoğan A, Çetinkaya F. Antenatal Care Receiving Status of Women Giving Birth in Kayseri City Center and Affecting Factors. Journal of Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine. 2019;14:135-41.
  • 16. Çatak B, Davas AA, Chain M. Quantity and quality of prenatal care services in Karabuk community health center region. TSK Preventive Medicine Bulletin. 2012;11:153-62.
Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1980
  • Yayıncı: Ondokuz mayıs Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Oktay OKUŞ, Onur HAKOĞLU, Savaş SEZİK, Şeyda KAYHAN OMEROGLU

Ali ÖZDEMİR, Ahmet KARAKAYA, Ahmet PERGEL

Kübra BAKİ ERİN, Deniz KULAKSIZ

Katibe Tuğçe TEMUR, Aslı SOĞUKPINAR ÖNSÜREN

Nörolojik bozukluğu olan çocuklarda ağır gastroözofageal reflü hastalığı nedeniyle yapılan Robotik Yardımlı Laparoskopik Nissen fundoplikasyonunun etkinliği

Gökhan Berktuğ BAHADIR, Melike ARSLAN, Mehmet Bahadır ÇALIŞKAN, Kadri Cemil ULUBULUT, Necati BALAM, İlhami SÜRER, Suzi DEMİRBAĞ

Yücel ÖZGÜR, Cemal AKER

Ali ÖZDEMİR, Mikail UYAN, Süleyman KALCAN, Muhammet Kadri ÇOLAKOĞLU, Ahmet PERGEL

Arda ÇOLAKOĞLU, Ahmet Veysel POLAT, Yurdanur  SÜLLÜ, Hüseyin AKAN

Aysu Başak ÖZBALCI, Miğraci TOSUN

Serdar ÖZDEMİR