___

• Ablard, K. E., & Lipschultz, R. E. (1998). Self-regulated learning in high achieving students: relation to advanced reasoning, achievement goals, and gender. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 94–101.
• Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P.D., & Paris, S.G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373
• Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context. Boulder, CO: Westview.
• Arbuckle, J. L. (2012). IBM SPSS Amos 19 User’s Guide. http://www.amosdevelopment.com/download/amos.pdf
• Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V.S. Ramachaudran (eds.) Encyclopedia of human behavior (pp. 71–81), New York: Academic Press.
• Barrett, P., (2007). Structural equation modelling: adjudging model fit. Personal and Individual Differences, 42, 815-824
• Bas, T. (2007). The comparison of self regulation skills across grade levels in web-based education. Master Thesis, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
• Betts, G. T. (1986). The autonomous learner model: For the gifted and talented. Greeley, CO: ALPS Publishing.
• Betts, G. T., & Kercher, J. K. (1999).The autonomous learner model: optimizing ability. Greeley, CO: ALPS Publishing.
• Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning and organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740-756.
• Boekaerts, M. (1998). Do culturally rooted self-construal affect students’ conceptualization of control over learning?, Educational Psychologist, 33, 87–108
• Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (2000). Handbook of Self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Pres.
• Buyukozturk, S. (2007). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı [Handbook of data analysis for social sciences], Ankara: PegemA Yayıncılık.
• Buyukozturk, S., Cakmak, E.,K., Akgun, O.,E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (8th Ed) [Scientific research methods], Ankara: PegemA yayıncılık.
• Byrne, B. M. (2011) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Second Edi., Mahwah, NJ: LEA, London, 2011.
• Cheng, E. C. K. (2011). The role of self-regulated learning in enhancing learning performance. The International Journal of Research and Review, 6(1), 1–16.
• Clark, B. (1992). Growing up gifted: Developing the potential of children at home and at school. (4th Ed.), New York: Merrill.
• Cleary, T. J., Callan, G. L., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2012). Assessing self-regulation as a cyclical, context-specific phenomenon: Overview and analysis of SRL microanalytic protocols. Education Research International, 2012, 1-19.
• Colakoglu, O., & Eksi, C., (2014). Açımlayıcı faktör analiz sürecini etkileyen unsurların değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of factors effecting exploratory factor analysis process]. Karaelmas Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(1), 58-64.
• Coleman, L. J., & Cross, T. L. (2000). Social and emotional development and the personal experience of giftedness. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, R. Subotnik, & R. Sternberg (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 203–212). New York: Elsevier.
• Covington, M. V., & Dray, E. (2002). The developmental course of achievement motivation: A need-based approach. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 33–56). San Francisco, CA: Elsevier Science.
• Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 283–291.
• Cross, T. L. (2011). On the social and emotional lives of gifted children (4th Ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
• Cross, T. L., & Coleman, L. J. (2005). School-based conception of giftedness. In R.J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 52–63). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Curby, T. W., Rudasill, K. M., Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Konold, T. R. (2008). The role of social competence in predicting gifted enrollment. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 729–744.
• Davis, G.A., & Rimm, S.B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented. (4th Ed). USA: Allyn & Bacon. Chapter 15 (p342-362).
• Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100, 363–406.
• Feldhusen, J. F., & Kolloff, P. B. (1986). The Purdue three-stage enrichment model for gifted education at the elementary level. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
• Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
• Gagne, F. (2004). Transforming gifts to talent: The DGMT as a developmental model. High Ability Studies, 15, 199-147.
• Gagne, F. (2005). From noncompetence to exceptional talent: Exploring the range of academic achievement within and between grade levels. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49, 139–153.
• Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic books.
• Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic books.
• Harris, T., & Hodges, R. (1995). The literacy dictionary: The vocabulary of reading and writing. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Heller, K. A. (1999). Individual (learning and motivational) needs versus instructional conditions of gifted education. High Ability Studies, 10(1), 9–21.
• Hoe, S.L., (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling Technique. Journal of Application Quantity Method, 3(1), 76-83.
• Horowitz, F. D., Subotnik, R. F., & Matthews, D. J. (Eds.). (2009). The development of giftedness and talent across the life span. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• Housand, A., & Reis, S. M. (2008). Self-regulated learning in reading: Gifted pedagogy and instructional settings. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 108–136.
• Howard, R. W. (2008). Linking extreme precocity and adult eminence: A study of eight prodigies at international chess. High Ability Studies, 19, 117–130.
• Karnes, M. B., & Johnson, L. J. (1991). Gifted handicapped. In Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. (Eds). Handbook of gifted education. Massachusetts: Allyn & Bacon.
• Klien, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis, London: Routledge.
• Kline, R. B. (1998). Principal and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Kover, D. J., & Worrell, F. C. (2010). The influence of instrumentality beliefs on achievement motivation: A study of high achieving adolescents. Journal of Advanced Academics, 21, 470–498.
• Maker, C.J., & Nielson, A.B. (1995) Teaching models in education of the gifted (2nd Ed.). Texas: Pro-Ed.
• Mayer, R. E. (2005). The scientific study of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd Ed., pp. 437–447). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage Publication.
• Moltzen, R., Riley, T. & McAlpine, D. (2000). Gifted and talented students: Meeting their needs in New Zealand schools. Wellington: Learning Media Limited.
• Neber H., & Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). Self-regulated science learning with highly gifted students: the role of cognitive, motivational, epistemological, and environmental variables. High Ability Studies, 13(1), 59-74, DOI: 10.1080/13598130220132316.
• Obergriesser, S., Steinbach, J., & Stoeger, H. (2013). Emotional experience during participation in a program of self-regulated learning. International Conference on Talent Development & Excellence Congress. September 25-28 2013, Antalya, Turkey.
• Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2007). Contrasting intellectual patterns predict creativity in the arts and sciences: Tracking intellectually precocious youth over 25 years. Psychological Science, 18, 948–952.
• Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16 (4), 385-407.
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33- 40.
• Pintrich, P.R. (2000). The roal of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich ve M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation: Theory, Research and Applications (pp. 452–502) içinde, San Diego, CA: Academic Pres.
• Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & Mc Keachie, W.J., (1993). Reliability and Predictive of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
• Plucker, A. J. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12(2), 103-114.
• Ramdass, D., & Zimmerman, B. J., (2011). Developing self-regulation skills: the important role of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(2), 194-218. DOI: 10.1177/1932202X1102200202. Reis, S. (1998). Underachieving for some. Dropping out with dignity for others. Communicator, 29(1), 19-24.
• Renzulli, J. S. (1977). The Enrichment Triad Model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
• Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 53-92). New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The schoolwide enrichment model: A how-to guide for educational excellence (2nd ed.). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
• Renzulli, J.S., & Park, S. (2002). Giftedness and high school dropout: Personal, family, and school related factors. Storss, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
• Rimm, S.B. (2001). How Jane won. New York: Crown Publishers.
• Rimm, S.B. (2003). Underachievement: A national epidemic: In N. Colangelo and G.A. Davis (Eds), Handbook of Gifted Education. New York: Allyn and Bacon.
• Risemberg, R., & Zimmerman, B.J. (1992). Self-regulated learning in gifted students. Roeper Review, 15, 98–101.
• Ruban, L., & Reis, S. M. (2006). Patterns of self-regulatory strategy use among low-achieving and high-achieving university students. Roeper Review, 28(3).
• Runco, M. A. (1999). Divergent thinking. M. A. Runco, & S. B. Pritzker (Eds)., Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 577-582). San Diego, California: Academic Press.
• Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 749-761.
• Sak, U. (2010). Üstün zekalılar özellikleri tanılanmaları ve eğitimleri [Gifted students: Identifications, characterictics and their educations]. Maya Akademi, Ankara.
• Sak, U., (2011). An overview and social validity of Education Programs for Talented Students Models (EPTS). Education and Science, 36, 213-229.
• Schunk, D. H. (2009). Öğrenme teorileri, eğitimsel bir bakışla (çev. M. Şahin). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım
• Siegle, D., & McCoach, D. B. (2005). Motivating gifted students. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.
• Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55, 151–157.
• Simonton, D. K. (2001). Talent development as a multidimensional multiplicative and dynamic process. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 39–43.
• Smith-Donald, R., Raver, C. C., Hayes, T., & Richardson, B. (2007). Preliminary construct and concurrent validity of the Preschool Self-regulation Assessment (PSRA) for field-based research. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 173-187.
• Sosniak, L. A. (1990). The tortoise, the hare, and the development of talent. In M. J. A. Howe (Ed.), encouraging the development of exceptional abilities and talents (pp. 149–164). Leichester, England: The British Psychological Society.
• Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.). (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd Ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2005). Evaluation of elementary classroom self-regulated learning program for gifted mathematics underachievers. International Education Journal, 6(2), 261-271.
• Subotnik, R.F., Olszewski-Kubilius, F., & Worrell, F.C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: a proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12(1) 3–54.
• Syed, M. (2010). Bounce: Mozart, Federer, Picasso, Beckham, and the science of success. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
• Tannenbaum, A. J. (1986). Giftedness: A psychosocial approach. In R.J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 21–52). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Tannenbaum, A. J. (2003). Nature and nurture of giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 45–59). New York, NY: Allyn & Bacon.
• Tortop, H. S., & Eker, C., (2014). Üstün yetenekliler eğitim programlarında öz-düzenlemeli öğrenme neden yer almalıdır? [Why should self-regulated learning skills take place in gifted education programs?]. Üstün Yetenekliler Eğitimi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 23-41.
• Tortop, H. S., & Kunt, K., (2013). Investigation of primary school teachers’ attitudes towards gifted education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5 (2), 441-451
• Tortop, H. S., (2014). Gifted students’ views about first stage of the Education Program for the Gifted Students’ Bridge with University (EPGBU). Turkish Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 15(2), 62-74
• Tortop, H.S. (2013a). A new model program for academically gifted students in turkey: overview of the education program for the gifted students’ bridge with university (EPGBU). Journal for the Education of the Young Scientist and Giftedness, 1(2), 21-31.
• Tortop, H.S. (2013b). Üstün Yetenekliler Üniversite Köprüsü Eğitim Programı (ÜYÜKEP). International Conference on Talent Development & Excellence Kongresi. 25-28 Eylül 2013, Antalya, Türkiye.
• Treffinger, D.J. (1975) Teaching for self-directed learning: A priority for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19(1), 46-59.
• Uredi, I. (2005). The contributions of perceived parenting styles to 8th class primary school students' self-regulated learning strategies and motivational beliefs. Doctoral Thesis, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey. [in Turkish]
• Uredi, I., & Uredi, L. (2005). The predictive power of self-regulation strategies and motivational beliefs on mathematics achievement of primary school 8th grade students. Mersin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 1(2), 250-260. [in Turkish]
• Walberg, H., Williams, D. B., & Zeiser, S. (2003). Talent, accomplishment, and eminence. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (Eds.), The handbook of gifted education (pp. 350-357). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Webb, J., Meckstroth, B., Tolan, S. (1994). Guiding the gifted child. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press, Inc.
• Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York, NY: Basic Books.
• Winner, E. (2009). Toward broadening our understanding of giftedness: The spatial domain. In F. D. Horowitz, R. F. Subotnik, & DJ. Matthews (Eds.), The development of giftedness and talent across the lifespan (pp. 75–85). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11867-005.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H., (2003). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. Seçkin Yayıncılık. 3. Baskı. Ankara.
• Zimmerman, B. J. & Schunk, D. H. (2004). Self-regulating intellectual processes and outcomes: A social cognitive perspective. In D.Y. Dai & R.J. Sternberg (Eds), Motivation, emotion and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 323–350), Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation: An analysis of exemplary instructional models. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (eds.), Self-regulated learning: from teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 1–20), New York, NY: The Guilford press.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview and analysis. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (2nd Ed., pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002a). Developing self-regulated learners beyond achievement to self-efficacy, Washington: American Psychological Association.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002b) Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59.
• Zimmerman, B. J., Bonner S., & Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners, beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington: American Psychological Association.