Serbest Nakit Akışlarının Şirket Değerine Etkisi: Serbest Nakit Akış Teorisi Bağlamında BIST 100 Endeksi Üzerine Dinamik Panel Veri Analizi

Her geçen gün daha fazla sayıda şirket; yeni finansman kaynaklarına ulaşmak, kredibilitesini artırmak, kurumsallaşmak ve tanınmak gibi amaçlarla halka açılmakta ve çok ortaklı hale gelmektedir. Şirket hisselerinin çok sayıda yatırımcının eline geçmesiyle birlikte sahiplik ve yönetim ayrımı ortaya çıkmakta ve bu ayrım beraberinde birtakım sorunlar getirmektedir. Serbest Nakit Akış Teorisine göre vekâlet maliyetlerinin başlıca kaynağı serbest nakit akışlarıdır ve özellikle düşük büyüme fırsatlarına sahip şirketlerde serbest nakit akışları şirket değerini azaltmaktadır. Çalışmada BIST 100 endeksinde yer alan 49 şirketin 2002-2016 verileri kullanılarak dinamik panel veri analizi yapılmıştır. Şirket değerini temsilen Tobin's q'nun bağımlı değişken olarak seçildiği ve Arellano-Bond fark ve Arellano-Bover sistem genelleştirilmiş momentler tahmincilerinin (GMM) kullanıldığı analiz sonuçları, düşük büyüme fırsatlarına sahip şirketlerde serbest nakit akışları ve şirket değeri arasında negatif bir ilişkinin olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuçlar, Türkiye özelinde Serbest Nakit Akış Teorisini desteklemektedir

The Effect of Free Cash Flows on Company Value: Dynamic Panel Data Analysis on BIST 100 Index in The Context of Free Cash Flow Theory

Each passing day more companies go public to reach new financial sources, to increase credibility, to institutionalize, to gain recognition and thus transform into a structure with many shareholders. Along with increasing number of shareholders, separation between ownership and management arise, which comes with several problems. According to Free Cash Flow Theory the main source of agency costs is free cash flow and free cash flows decrease the value especially in companies having low growth opportunities. In this article dynamic panel data analysis has been performed by using 2002-2016 data of 49 companies in BIST 100 Index. Results of analysis in which Tobin’s q as proxy for company value has been selected as dependent variable and Arellano-Bond difference and Arellano-Bover system generalized method of moments (GMM) estimators have been used show that there is a negative relationship between free cash flows and company value. The results support Free Cash Flow Theory in Turkey

___

  • Akdoğan, N., Tenker, N., (2007). Finansal Tablolar ve Mali Analiz Teknikleri, Gazi Kitabevi, Ankara.
  • Anderson, T.W., Hsiao, C., (1982). ‘‘Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data’’, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 18, No. 1, 47-82.
  • Ang, J.S., Beck, K.L., (2000). ‘‘A Comparison of Marginal and Average Tobin's Q Ratios’’, International Journal of Business, Vol. 5, No. 1, 27-55.
  • Arellano, M., Bond, S., (1991). ‘‘Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations’’, The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 58, No. 2, 277-297.
  • Arellano, M., Bover, O., (1995). ‘‘Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-components Models’’, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 68, No. 1, 29-51.
  • Berle, A.A., Means, G.C., (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property, Transaction Publishers (1991), New Brunswick.
  • Blundell, R., Bond, S., (1998). ‘‘Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Model’’, Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 87, No. 1, 115-143.
  • Bond, S., (2002). Dynamic Panel Data Models: A Guide to Micro Data Methods and Practice (CEMMAP Working Paper 09/02), http://www.cemmap.ac.uk/wps/cwp0209.pdf (25.3.2017).
  • Brainard, W.C., Tobin, J., (1968). ‘‘Pitfalls in Financial Model Building’’, American Economic Review, Vol. LVIII, No. 2, 99-122.
  • Chung, K.H., Pruitt, S.W., (1994). ‘‘A Simple Approximation of Tobin’s q’’. Financial Management, Vol. 23, No. 3, 70-74.
  • Chung, R., Firth, M., Kim, J., (2005). ‘‘Earnings Management, Surplus Free Cash Flow, and External Monitoring’’, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 58, No. 6, 766- 776.
  • Demsetz, H., Lehn, K., (1985). ‘‘The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences’’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 93, No. 6, 1155-1177.
  • Dobbin, F., Jung, J., (2010). “The Misapplication of Mr. Michael Jensen: How Agency Theory Brought Down the Economy and Why it Might Again”, Markets on Trial: The Economic Sociology of the U.S. Financial Crisis (Research in the Sociology of Organizations), Vol. 30, Part. B, 29-64.
  • Donaldson, G., (1961). Corporate Debt Capacity; A Study of Corporate Debt Policy and the Determination of Corporate Debt Capacity, Harvard University, Boston. Eisenhardt, K.M., (1989). ‘‘Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review’’, The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 1, 57-74.
  • Falvey, R., Foster, N., Greenaway, D., (2002). ‘‘North-South Trade, Knowledge Spillovers and Growth’’, Journal of Economic Integration, Vol. 17, No. 4, 650- 670.
  • Fama, E.F., (1980). ‘‘Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm’’, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 88, No. 2, 288-307.
  • Fama, E.F., Jensen, M.C., (1983). ‘‘Separation of Ownership and Control’’, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26, No. 2, 301-325.
  • Garin-Munoz, T., (2006). ‘‘Inbound International Tourism to Canary Islands: A Dynamic Panel Data Model’’, Tourism Management, Vol. 27, No. 2, 281–291.
  • Greene, W.H., (2003). Econometric Analysis, Pearson Education, New Jersey. Gul, F.A., Tsui, J.S.L., (1998). ‘‘A Test of the Free Cash Flow and Debt Monitoring Hypotheses: Evidence from Audit Pricing’’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 24, No. 2, 219-237.
  • Gürbüz, A.O., Aybars, A., Yeşilyurt, S., (2016). ‘‘The Role of Agency Costs in Explaining Financial Performance Differences: An Empirical Analysis on Selected Public Firms in BRIC Countries’’, Marmara Üniversitesi Öneri Dergisi, Cilt. 12, Sayı. 45, 187-210.
  • Han, C., Phillips, P.C.B., Sul, D., (2014). ‘‘X-Differencing and Dynamic Panel Model Estimation’’, Econometric Theory, Vol. 30, No. 1, 201-251.
  • Hansen, L.P., (1982). ‘‘Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators’’, Econometrica, Vol. 50, No. 4, 1029-1054.
  • Healy, P.M., Palepu, K.G., (2001). ‘‘Information Asymmetry, Corporate Disclosure, and the Capital Markets: A Review of the Empirical Disclosure Literature’’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol. 31, No. 1-3, 405–440.
  • Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., Rosen, H.S., (1988). ‘‘Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data’’, Econometrica, Vol. 56, No. 6, 1371-1395.
  • Jensen, M.C., (1983). ‘‘Organization Theory and Methodology’’, The Accounting Review Vol. 58, No. 2, 319-339.
  • Jensen, M.C., (1986). ‘‘Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers’’, The American Economic Review, Vol. 76, No. 2, 323-329.
  • Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W.H., (1976). ‘‘Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 3, No. 4, 305-360.
  • Kadıoğlu, E., Yılmaz, E.A., (2017). ‘‘Is the Free Cash Flow Hypothesis Valid in Turkey?’’, Borsa İstanbul Review (2017), 1-6.
  • Khidmat, W., Rehman, M., (2014). ‘‘The Impact of Free Cash Flows and Agency Costs on Firm Performance-An Empirical Analysis of KSE Listed Companies of Pakistan’’, Journal of Financial Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 3, 1-25.
  • King, R.D., Levine, R., (1994). Capital Fundamentalism, Economic Development and Economic Growth, The World Bank, Washington.
  • Kraus, A., Litzenberger, R.H., (1973). ‘‘A State-preference Model of Optimal Financial Leverage’’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 28, No. 4, 911-922.
  • Lang, L.H.P., Stulz, R.M., Walkling, R.A., (1991). ‘‘A Test of the Free Cash Flow Hypothesis’’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 29, No. 2, 315-335.
  • Lehn, K., Poulsen, A., (1989). ‘‘Free Cash Flow and Stockholder Gains in Going Private Transactions’’, Journal of Finance, Vol. 44, No. 3, 771-787.
  • Modigliani, F., Miller, M.H., (1958). ‘‘The Cost of Capital, Corporation Finance and the Theory of Investment’’, The American Economic Review, Vol. XLVIII, No. 3, 261-297.
  • Modigliani, F., Miller, M.H., (1963). ‘‘Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction’’, The American Economic Review, Vol. 53, No. 3, 433-443.
  • Myers, S.C., (1984). ‘‘The Capital Structure Puzzle’’, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 39, No. 3, 574-592.
  • Myers, S.C., Majluf, N.S., (1984). ‘‘Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions: When Firms Have Information that Investors Do Not Have’’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 13, No. 2, 187-221.
  • Park, K., Jang, S., (2013). ‘‘Capital Structure, Free Cash Flow, Diversification and Firm Performance: A Holistic Analysis’’, International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 33, No. 1, 51–63.
  • Rahman, A.F., Mohd-Saleh, N., (2008). "The Effect of Free Cash Flow Agency Problem on the Value Relevance of Earnings and Book Value", Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, Vol. 6, No. 1, 75-90.
  • Roodman, D., (2006). How to Do xtabond2: An Introduction to Difference and System GMM in Stata (CGDEV Working Paper No. 103), https://www.cgdev.org/files/11619_file_HowtoDoxtabond6_12_1_06.pdf (22.4.2017).
  • Ross, S., (1973). ‘‘The Economic Theory of Agency: The Principal's Problem’’, American Economic Review, Vol. 63, No. 2, 134-39.
  • Sargan, J.D., (1958). ‘‘The Estimation of Economic Relationships Using Instrumental Variables’’, Econometrica, Vol. 26, No. 3, 393-415.
  • Smith, A., (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Methuen & Co., Ltd. (1904), London.
  • Smith, C., Watts, R., (1992). ‘‘The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing, Dividend, and Compensation Policies’’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 32, No. 3, 263-292.
  • Stock, J. H., Watson, M.W., (2011). Introduction to Econometrics, Pearson, Boston. Stulz, R.M., (1990). ‘‘Managerial Discretion and Optimal Financing Policies’’, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 26, No. 1, 3-27.
  • Tobin, J., (1969). ‘‘A General Equilibrium Approach To Monetary Theory’’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 1, No. 1, 15-29.
  • Wang, G.Y., (2010). ‘‘The Impacts of Free Cash Flows and Agency Costs on Firm Performance’’, Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol. 3, No. 4, 408- 418.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu