Dönüşümsel Liderliğin Sosyal Sermayeye Etkisinde Lider-Üye Etkileşiminin Aracılık Rolü

Amaç – Dönüşümsel liderliğin, örgütsel bir kaynak olarak sosyal sermayenin biçimlendirilmesindeki etkisi ve bu etkide lider-üye etkileşiminin aracılık rolü, sosyal değişim teorisine dayanarak ortaya konulması amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem – Anket yöntemi ile saha çalışması sonucu elde edilen veriler hipotez testleri için kullanılmıştır. Toplamda 504 katılımcıdan elde edilen verilerin analizinde, doğrusal regresyon ve bootstrap ile aracılık testleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular – Elde edilen bulgularla, kurgulanan hipotezler desteklenerek, dönüşümsel liderliğin sosyal sermayeyi etkilediği ve dönüşümsel liderliğin sosyal sermayeyi etkilemesinde, lider-üye etkileşiminin kısmi aracı rolü oynadığı tespit edilmiştir. Tartışma – Bu çalışma, dönüşümsel liderliğin ilişkisel yönünü vurgulayarak, sosyal sermaye ve lider-üye etkileşimi gibi önemli kavramları etkileyen alternatif bir güç olduğunu savunmaktadır. Takipçiler, dönüşümsel liderleri, güvenilir ve destekleyici olarak algılar. Bu algı, takipçilerin örgüte daha iyi uyum sağlamalarını sağlayan, psikolojik rahatlık ve güvenlik duygusunu yaratır. Böylece takipçiler, paylaşılan vizyon çerçevesinde, diğer takipçiler ile uyumlu bir sosyal varlık haline gelerek, lider tarafından belirlenen ortak amaçlara ulaşmak için işbirliği içinde çalışır. Bu uyum ve paylaşılan liderlik etrafında işbirliği içinde çalışma, bilgi gibi olumlu sosyal değişimlere sebep olarak, güçlü bir sosyal sermaye yapısına yol açar.

The Mediating Role of Leader-Member Exchange in the Effect of Transformational Leadership on Social Capital

Purpose – The effect of transformational leadership on the shaping of social capital as an organizational resource and the mediating role of the leader-member exchange in this effect is presented based on the theory of social change. Design/methodology/approach – The field study data obtained by survey method were used for hypothesis testing. Linear regression and mediation with bootstrap tests are used to analyse the data obtained from 504 participants. Findings – The results show that transformational leadership affects social capital, and leadermember exchange plays a partial mediator role between transformational leadership and social capital. These results support the hypothesis. Discussion – By emphasizing the relational aspect of transformational leadership, this study argues that it is an alternative force that influences important concepts such as social capital and leader-member exchange. Followers perceive transformational leaders as reliable and supportive. This perception creates a sense of psychological comfort and security that enables the followers to better adapt to the organization. Thus, in the framework of shared vision, followers work in cooperation with other followers in order to reach the common goals determined by the leader. This harmony, and working in collaboration around shared leadership lead to a strong social capital structure by causing positive social changes such as knowledge.

___

  • Adler, P. S., ve Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of management review, 27(1), 17-40.
  • Akram, T., Lei, S., Hussain, S. T., Haider, M. J., ve Akram, M. W. (2016). Does relational leadership generate organizational social capital? A case of exploring the effect of relational leadership on organizational social capital in China. Future Business Journal, 2(2), 116-126.
  • Anand, S., Hu, J., Liden, R. C., ve Vidyarthi, P. R. (2011). Leader-member exchange: Recent research findings and prospects for the future. In D. C. A. Bryman, B. J. K. Grint, ve M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), The Sage handbook of leadership (pp. 311-325). Thousand Oaks: Sage Books.
  • Hayes, Andrew F. (2013). Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression‐Based Approach. New York, NY: The Guilford Press
  • Andrews, R. (2010). Organizational social capital, structure and performance. Human relations, 63(5), 583-608.
  • Avolio, B. J., ve Bass, B. (1993). Transformational leadership: a response to critiques. In M. Chemers ve R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership Theory Research. : San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  • Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., ve Jung, D. I. (1999). Re‐examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership. Journal of occupational organizational psychology, 72(4), 441-462.
  • Avolio, B. J., Zhu, W., Koh, W., ve Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational Organizational Psychology Behavior, 25(8), 951-968.
  • Balkundi, P., ve Kilduff, M. (2006). The ties that lead: A social network approach to leadership. The leadership quarterly, 17(4), 419-439.
  • Banks, G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W. L., ve Guler, C. E. (2016). A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy. The leadership quarterly, 27(4), 634-652.
  • Baron, R. A., ve Markman, G. D. (2003). Beyond social capital: The role of entrepreneurs' social competence in their financial success. Journal of business venturing, 18(1), 41-60.
  • Baron, R. M., ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality social psychology, 51(6), 1173.
  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations: Collier Macmillan.
  • Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18(3), 19-31.
  • Bass, B. M., ve Avolio, B. J. (1991). The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire: Form 5x. Center for Leadership Studies, State University of New York, Binhampton, NY.
  • Bass, B. M., ve Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Bhandari, H., ve Yasunobu, K. (2009). What is social capital? A comprehensive review of the concept. Asian Journal of Social Science, 37(3), 480-510.
  • Biddle, B. J. (1986). Recent developments in role theory. Annual review of sociology, 12(1), 67-92.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life: Transaction Publishers.
  • Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., ve Bloodgood, J. M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of management review, 27(4), 505-522.
  • Bono, J. E., ve Anderson, M. H. (2005). The advice and influence networks of transformational leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1306.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York. : Greenwood Press.
  • Boxall, P. (1996). The strategic HRM debate and the resource‐based view of the firm. Human Resource Management Journal, 6(3), 59-75.
  • Bresnen, M., Edelman, L., Newell, S., Scarbrough, H., ve Swan, J. (2003). Social practices and the management of knowledge in project environments. International journal of project management, 21(3), 157-166.
  • Brown, M. E., ve Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The leadership quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.
  • Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative science quarterly, 339-365.
  • Cabrera, E. F., ve Cabrera, A. (2005). Fostering knowledge sharing through people management practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5), 720-735.
  • Carmeli, A., Gelbard, R., ve Reiter-Palmon, R. (2013). Leadership, creative problem?solving capacity, and creative performance: The importance of knowledge sharing. Human Resource Management Journal, 52(1), 95-121.
  • Chiu, C.-M., Hsu, M.-H., ve Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1872-1888.
  • Choi, S. L., Goh, C. F., Adam, M. B. H., ve Tan, O. K. (2016). Transformational leadership, empowerment, and job satisfaction: the mediating role of employee empowerment. Human resources for health, 14(1), 73.
  • Chun, J. U., Cho, K., ve Sosik, J. J. (2016). A multilevel study of group‐focused and individual‐focused transformational leadership, social exchange relationships, and performance in teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(3), 374-396.
  • Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American journal of sociology, 94, 95-S120.
  • Craney, T. A., ve Surles, J. G. (2002). Model-dependent variance inflation factor cutoff values. Quality Engineering, 14(3), 391-403.
  • Cropanzano, R., ve Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management Studies, 31(6), 874-900.
  • Davenport, S., ve Daellenbach, U. (2011). ‘Belonging’to a virtual research centre: exploring the influence of social capital formation processes on member identification in a virtual organization. British Journal of Management, 22(1), 54-76.
  • Day, D. V. (2000). Leadership development:: A review in context. The leadership quarterly, 11(4), 581-613.
  • Erdogan, B., Kraimer, M. L., ve Liden, R. C. (2004). Work value congruence and intrinsic career success: The compensatory roles of leader‐member exchange and perceived organizational support. Personnel psychology, 57(2), 305-332.
  • Field, A.(2013).Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics, Sage, Londra
  • Flap, H. (1995). No Man is an Island. The Research Program of a Social Capital Theory. Paper pres. Paper presented at the Workshop on Rational Choice and Social Networks.
  • Gerstner, C. R., ve Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of applied psychology, 82(6), 827.
  • Gianvito, M. A. (2007). Delineating the effects of adjustment and social capital on workplace outcomes. University of Akron,
  • Goodwin, V. L., Bowler, W. M., ve Whittington, J. L. (2009). A social network perspective on LMX relationships: Accounting for the instrumental value of leader and follower networks. Journal of management, 35(4), 954- 980.
  • Gopalakrishnan, S., Scillitoe, J. L., ve Santoro, M. D. (2008). Tapping deep pockets: the role of resources and social capital on financial capital acquisition by biotechnology firms in biotech–pharma alliances. Journal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1354-1376.
  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
  • Graen, G., Novak, M. A., ve Sommerkamp, P. (1982). The effects of leader—member exchange and job design on productivity and satisfaction: Testing a dual attachment model. Organizational Behavior Human Performance, 30(1), 109-131.
  • Graen, G. B., ve Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in organizational behavior.
  • Graen, G. B., ve Uhl-Bien, M. (1991). The Transformation of Professionals into Self-Managing and Partially Self- Designing Contributors: Toward a Theory of Leadership-Making. Journal of Management Systems, 3(3), 49-54.
  • Graen, G. B., ve Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. The leadership quarterly, 6(2), 219-247.
  • Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California management review, 33(3), 114-135.
  • Greenleaf, R. K. (1997). The servant as leader: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Groeneveld, R. A. and Meeden, G. (1984), “Measuring Skewness and Kurtosis,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician), 33, 391-399
  • Gupta, V. K., Huang, R., ve Yayla, A. A. (2011). Social capital, collective transformational leadership, and performance: A resource-based view of self-managed teams. Journal of managerial issues, 31-45.
  • Hackett, R. D., Wang, A. C., Chen, Z., Cheng, B. S., ve Farh, J. L. (2018). Transformational Leadership and Organisational Citizenship Behaviour: A Moderated Mediation Model of Leader‐Member‐Exchange and Subordinates' Gender. Applied Psychology, 67(4), 617-644.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., ve Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (Vol. 6): Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Harris, T. B., Li, N., ve Kirkman, B. L. (2014). Leader–member exchange (LMX) in context: How LMX differentiation and LMX relational separation attenuate LMX's influence on OCB and turnover intention. The leadership quarterly, 25(2), 314-328.
  • Hau, Y. S., Kim, B., Lee, H., ve Kim, Y.-G. J. I. J. o. I. M. (2013). The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions. 33(2), 356-366.
  • Hempel, P. S., Zhang, Z. X., ve Tjosvold, D. B. (2009). Conflict management between and within teams for trusting relationships and performance in China. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational Organizational Psychology, 30(1), 41-65.
  • Henderson, D. J., Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., ve Tetrick, L. E. (2008). Leader--member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfillment: A multilevel examination. Journal of applied psychology, 93(6), 1208.
  • Herman, H., ve Chiu, W. C. (2014). Transformational leadership and job performance: A social identity perspective. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2827-2835.
  • Hitt, M. A., Lee, H.-U., ve Yucel, E. (2002). The importance of social capital to the management of multinational enterprises: Relational networks among Asian and Western firms. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(2-3), 353-372.
  • Hodson, R. (2005). Management behaviour as social capital: A systematic analysis of organizational ethnographies. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(1), 41-65.
  • Huber, F. (2009). Social capital of economic clusters: Towards a network‐based conception of social resources. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, 100(2), 160-170.
  • Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635-672.
  • Hyatt, D. E., ve Ruddy, T. M. (1997). An examination of the relationship between work group characteristics and performance: Once more into the breech. Personnel psychology, 50(3), 553-585.
  • Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., ve Tsai, W. (2005). Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organization science, 16(4), 359-371.
  • Inkpen, A. C., ve Tsang, E. W. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of management review, 30(1), 146-165.
  • Jansen, J. J., George, G., Van den Bosch, F. A., ve Volberda, H. W. (2008). Senior team attributes and organizational ambidexterity: The moderating role of transformational leadership. Journal of Management Studies, 45(5), 982-1007.
  • Johnson, S. G., Schnatterly, K., ve Hill, A. D. (2013). Board composition beyond independence: Social capital, human capital, and demographics. Journal of management, 39(1), 232-262.
  • Judge, T. A., ve Bono, J. E. (2000). Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. Journal of applied psychology, 85(5), 751.
  • Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., Ilies, R., ve Gerhardt, M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. Journal of applied psychology, 87(4), 765.
  • Judge, T. A., ve Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: a meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of applied psychology, 89(5), 755.
  • Katz, D., ve Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2): Wiley New York. Kaufman, B. E. (2015). The RBV theory foundation of strategic HRM: critical flaws, problems for research and practice, and an alternative economics paradigm. Human Resource Management Journal, 25(4), 516-540.
  • Konovsky, M. A. (2000). Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations. Journal of management, 26(3), 489-511.
  • Kristof, A. L. (1996). Person‐organization fit: An integrative review of its conceptualizations, measurement, and implications. Personnel psychology, 49(1), 1-49.
  • Lefebvre, V. M., Sorenson, D., Henchion, M., ve Gellynck, X. (2016). Social capital and knowledge sharing performance of learning networks. International Journal of Information Management, 36(4), 570-579.
  • Lester, R. H., Hillman, A., Zardkoohi, A., ve Cannella Jr, A. A. (2008). Former government officials as outside directors: The role of human and social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 999-1013.
  • Li, Y., Chen, H., Liu, Y., ve Peng, M. W. (2014). Managerial ties, organizational learning, and opportunity capture: A social capital perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1), 271-291.
  • Liao, H., Liu, D., ve Loi, R. (2010). Looking at both sides of the social exchange coin: A social cognitive perspective on the joint effects of relationship quality and differentiation on creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1090-1109.
  • Liden, R. C., Sparrowe, R. T., ve Wayne, S. J. (1997). Leader-member exchange theory: The past and potential for the future. Research in personnel human resources management, 15, 47-120.
  • Lin. (1982). Social resources and instrumental action. In P. V. Marsden ve N. Lin (Eds.), Social Structure and Network Analysis (pp. 131-145): State University of New York, Department of Sociology.
  • Lin, N. (2002). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action (Vol. 19): Cambridge university press.
  • Liu, J., Siu, O. L., ve Shi, K. (2010). Transformational leadership and employee well‐being: The mediating role of trust in the leader and self‐efficacy. Applied Psychology, 59(3), 454-479.
  • Maslyn, J. M., ve Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leader–member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-effort and other's effort on relationship quality. Journal of applied psychology, 86(4), 697.
  • Mason, C., Griffin, M., ve Parker, S. (2014). Transformational leadership development: Connecting psychological and behavioral change. Leadership Organization Development Journal, 35(3), 174-194.
  • McCallum, S., ve O'Connell, D. (2009). Social capital and leadership development: Building stronger leadership through enhanced relational skills. Leadership Organization Development Journal, 30(2), 152-166.
  • McFadyen, M. A., ve Cannella Jr, A. A. (2004). Social capital and knowledge creation: Diminishing returns of the number and strength of exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 735-746.
  • Molm, L. D. (1994). Dependence and risk: Transforming the structure of social exchange. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 163-176.
  • Moran, P. (2005). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic management journal, 26(12), 1129-1151.
  • Muchiri, M. K., Cooksey, R. W., ve Walumbwa, F. O. (2012). Transformational and social processes of leadership as predictors of organisational outcomes. Leadership Organization Development Journal, 33(7), 662-683.
  • Mura, M., Lettieri, E., Radaelli, G., ve Spiller, N. (2013). Promoting professionals' innovative behaviour through knowledge sharing: the moderating role of social capital. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(4), 527- 544.
  • Nahapiet, J., ve Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review, 23(2), 242-266.
  • Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice: Sage publications. Oh, H., Chung, M.-H., ve Labianca, G. (2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 860-875.
  • Oliver, P. H., Gottfried, A. W., Guerin, D. W., Gottfried, A. E., Reichard, R. J., ve Riggio, R. E. (2011). Adolescent family environmental antecedents to transformational leadership potential: A longitudinal mediational analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(3), 535-544.
  • Paldam, M. (2000). Social capital: one or many? Definition and measurement. Journal of economic surveys, 14(5), 629-653.
  • Perry-Smith, J. E., ve Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of management review, 28(1), 89-106.
  • Phelps, C., Heidl, R., ve Wadhwa, A. (2012). Knowledge, networks, and knowledge networks: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 38(4), 1115-1166.
  • Piccolo, R. F., ve Colquitt, J. A. (2006). Transformational leadership and job behaviors: The mediating role of core job characteristics. Academy of Management journal, 49(2), 327-340.
  • Ployhart, R. E. (2006). Staffing in the 21st century: New challenges and strategic opportunities. Journal of management, 32(6), 868-897.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Moorman, R. H., ve Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors. The leadership quarterly, 1(2), 107-142.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1998). The ‘problem’of the psychological contract considered. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational Organizational Psychology Behavior, 19(S1), 665-671.
  • Sauer, N. C., ve Kauffeld, S. (2015). The ties of meeting leaders: A social network analysis. Psychology, 6(04), 415.
  • Scandura, T. A., ve Graen, G. B. (1984). Moderating effects of initial leader–member exchange status on the effects of a leadership intervention. Journal of applied psychology, 69(3), 428.
  • Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., ve Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of applied psychology, 96(4), 863.
  • Scott, B. A. (2013). A conceptual framework for the study of popularity in the workplace. Organizational Psychology Review, 3(2), 161-186.
  • Scott, B. A., ve Judge, T. A. (2009). The popularity contest at work: Who wins, why, and what do they receive? Journal of applied psychology, 94(1), 20.
  • Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., ve Liden, R. C. (2001). A social capital theory of career success. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 219-237.
  • Shamir, B., House, R. J., ve Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organization science, 4(4), 577-594.
  • Shane, S., ve Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management science, 48(1), 154-170.
  • Simons, T. L., ve Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of applied psychology, 85(1), 102.
  • Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., ve Ireland, R. D. (2007). Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of management review, 32(1), 273-292.
  • Sosik, J. J., Godshalk, V. M., ve Yammarino, F. J. (2004). Transformational leadership, learning goal orientation, and expectations for career success in mentor–protégé relationships: A multiple levels of analysis perspective. The leadership quarterly, 15(2), 241-261.
  • Sparrowe, R. T., ve Liden, R. C. (1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Academy of management review, 22(2), 522-552.
  • Stam, W., ve Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra-and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97-111.
  • To, M. L., Herman, H., ve Ashkanasy, N. M. (2015). A multilevel model of transformational leadership, affect, and creative process behavior in work teams. The leadership quarterly, 26(4), 543-556.
  • Tsai, W., ve Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
  • Tsui, A. S. (1984). A role set analysis of managerial reputation. Organizational Behavior Human Performance, 34(1), 64-96.
  • Uhl-Bien, M., Graen, G. B., ve Scandura, T. A. (2000). Implications of leader-member exchange (LMX) for strategic human resource management systems: Relationships as social capital for competitive advantage. Research in personnel human resources management, 18, 137-186.
  • Van Knippenberg, D., ve Sitkin, S. B. (2013). A critical assessment of charismatic—transformational leadership research: Back to the drawing board? The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 1-60.
  • Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., ve Colbert, A. E. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group organization management, 36(2), 223-270.
  • Westphal, J. D., ve Clement, M. B. (2008). Sociopolitical Dynamics In Relations Between Top Managers and Security Analysts: Favor Rendering, Reciprocity, and Analyst Stock Recommendations. Academy of Management Journal, 51(5), 873-897. doi:10.5465/amj.2008.34789647
  • Westphal, J. D., ve Stern, I. (2007). Flattery Will Get You Everywhere (Especially If You Are A Male Caucasian): How Ingratiation, Boardroom Behavior, And Demographic Minority Status Affect Additional Board Appointments at U.S. Companies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 267-288. doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24634434
  • Whipple, J. M., Wiedmer, R., ve K. Boyer, K. (2015). A dyadic investigation of collaborative competence, social capital, and performance in buyer–supplier relationships. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 51(2), 3- 21. Wright, P. M., ve McMahan, G. C. (2011). Exploring human capital: putting ‘human’back into strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(2), 93-104.
  • Wu, W. p. (2008). Dimensions of social capital and firm competitiveness improvement: The mediating role of information sharing. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 122-146.
  • Youndt, M. A., Snell, S. A., Dean Jr, J. W., ve Lepak, D. P. (1996). Human resource management, manufacturing strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4), 836-866.
  • Zacher, H., Pearce, L. K., Rooney, D., ve McKenna, B. (2014). Leaders' personal wisdom and leader-member exchange quality: The role of individualized consideration. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(2), 171-187.
  • Zahra, S. A. (2010). Harvesting family firms' organizational social capital: A relational perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 345-366.
  • Zhu, W., Chew, I. K., ve Spangler, W. D. (2005). CEO transformational leadership and organizational outcomes: The mediating role of human–capital-enhancing human resource management. The leadership quarterly, 16(1), 39-52.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu