Dinamik Yeteneklerin Mikro Temelleri Olarak Etkileşimsel Yaratıcılık Yaklaşımı

Bu çalışma dinamik yeteneklerin rasyonel aktör (yöneticiler) varsayımına yönelik eleştiriler üzerine oluşturulmuştur. Bu eleştiriler temelinde çalışma dinamik yeteneklerin oluşum ve yenilenmesinde bireylerin yaratıcı davranışlarını etkileyen değişkenler nelerdir? sorusuna cevap aramaktadır. Bu amaçla dinamik yeteneklerin mikro temellerindeki yaratıcı davranışları etkileyen değişkenleri anlamak için psikoloji disiplinindeki etkileşimsel yaratıcılık yaklaşımına ait kavramlar kullanılmıştır. Sonuçta da kolektif düzey dinamik yetenekler üzerinde etkili olan bireylerin yaratıcı davranışları ve bu davranışlara etki eden bağlamsal, kişisel ve sosyal değişkenleri incelenme imkânı sağlayan kavramsal bir model geliştirilmiştir.

Interactive Creativity Approach As Microfoundations of Dynamic Capabilities

This study is based on criticisms of the assumption of rational actors (managers) of dynamic capabilities. What are the variables that influence the creative behaviors of individuals in the formation and renewal of dynamic capabilities working on the basis of these criticisms? is looking for answers. For this purpose, the concepts related to the interactional creative approach in the discipline of psychology were used to understand the variables affecting the creative behaviors of the micro bases of dynamic capabilities. As a result, a conceptual model has been developed that enables the creative behaviors of individuals acting on collective level dynamic capabilities and the contextual, personal and social variables that affect these behaviors.

___

  • Abbey, A., Dickson, J. W., (1983). “RD work climate and innovation in semiconductors”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, 362-368.
  • Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J. A., (2013). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty, Broadway Business.
  • Adner, R., Helfat, C. E., (2003). “Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capabilities”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 10, 1011-1025.
  • Amabile, T. M., (1979). “Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 37, No. 2, 221-233.
  • Amabile, T. M., (1988). “A model of creativity and innovation in organizations”, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 10, No. 1, 123-167.
  • Amabile, T. M., (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity, Hachette, UK. Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., Herron, M., (1996). “Assessing the work environment for creativity”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 5, 1154-1184.
  • Amabile, T. M., Goldfarb, P., Brackfleld, S. C., (1990). “Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction and surveillance”, Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, 6-21.
  • Amabile, T. M., Gryskiewicz, N. D., (1989). “The creative environment scales: Work environment inventory”, Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 2, No. 4, 231-253.
  • Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., Collier, N., (2009). “Dynamic capabilities: an exploration of how firms renew their resource base”, British Journal of Management, Vol. 20, 9-24.
  • Amit, R., Schoemaker, P. J. H., (1993). “Strategic assets and organizational rent”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, No. 1, 33-46.
  • Arndt, F., Pierce, L., (2017). “The behavioral and evolutionary roots of dynamic capabilities”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 27, No. 2, 413-424.
  • Augier, M., Teece, D. J. (2007). “Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions”. Management International Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, 175-192.
  • Bağış, M., Hızıroğlu, M., (2018), Stratejik Yönetim'in Kaynaklara Dayalı Yaklaşımı: Ekonomik, Sosyolojik, Psikolojik Temeller, Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık, Ankara.
  • Balogun, J., Johnson, G., (2004). “Organizational restructuring and middle manager sensemaking”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 47, No. 4, 523-549.
  • Bandura, A., (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Prentice-Hall, Inc. Barca, M., (2003). Economic foundations of strategic management, Gower Publishing.
  • Barreto, I., (2010). “Dynamic capabilities: A review of past research and an agenda for the future”, Journal of Management, Vol. 36, No. 1, 256-280.
  • Barron, F., Harrington, D. M., (1981). “Creativity, intelligence, and personality” Annual Review of Psychology”, Vol. 32, No. 1, 439-476.
  • Baum, J. R., Locke, E. A., Kirkpatrick, S. A., (1998). “A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 83, No. 1, 43-54.
  • Bloom, B. S., Sosniak, L. A. (1981). “Talent development”, Educational Leadership, Vol. 39, No. 2, 86-94.
  • Breslin, D., (2012). The Evolving Organizational Routine. In F. Belussi U. H. Staber (Eds.), Managing networks of creativity, Routledge, Taylor Francis Group, New York, London.
  • Brockner, J., Higgins, E. T., Low, M. B., (2004). “Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 19, No. 2, 203-220.
  • Bromiley, P., (2009). The behavioral foundations of strategic management, John Wiley Sons. Buğra, A., (2017). Devlet ve İşadamları, İletişim Yayınları.
  • Carlsson, S. A., (2008). An Attention-based view on DSS, Encyclopaedia of Decision Making and Decision Support Technologies, F. Adam and P. Humphreys Eds., Idea Publishing Group, Hershey, 38-45.
  • Collis, D. J., (1994). “Research note: How valuable are organizational capabilities”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, No. 8, 143-152.
  • Cyert, R. M., March, J. G., (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs.
  • D'aveni, R. A., (2010). Hypercompetition, Simon and Schuster.
  • Danneels, E., (2002). “The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 23, No. 12, 1095-1121.
  • Dyer, J. H., Singh, H., (1998). “The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of inter organizational competitive advantage”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 4, 660-679.
  • Egan, T. M., (2005). “Factors influencing individual creativity in the workplace: An examination of quantitative empirical research”, Advances in Developing Human Resources, Vol. 7, No. 2, 160-181.
  • Eisenberger, R., Rhoades, L., (2001). “Incremental effects of reward on creativity”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 81, No. 4, 728-741.
  • Eisenhardt, K. M., Martin, J. A., (2000). “Dynamic capabilities: what are they?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 10-11, 1105-1121.
  • Feldman, M. S., (2000). “Organizational routines as a source of continuous change”, Organization Science, Vol. 11, No. 6, 611-629.
  • Feldman, M. S., Pentland, B. T., (2003). “Reconceptualizing organizational routines as a source of flexibility and change”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 48, No. 1, 94-118.
  • Felin, T., Foss, N., (2006). Individuals and organizations: thoughts on a micro-foundations project for strategic management and organizational analysis, Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 253-288.
  • Felin, T., Foss, N. J., Heimeriks, K. H., Madsen, T. L., (2012). “Microfoundations of routines and capabilities: Individuals, processes, and structure”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 49, No. 8, 1351-1374.
  • Felin, T., Hesterly, W. S., (2007). “The knowledge-based view, nested heterogeneity, and new value creation: Philosophical considerations on the locus of knowledge”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, 195-218.
  • Ford, C. M., Gioia, D. A. (2000). “Factors influencing creativity in the domain of managerial decision making”, Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 4, 705-732.
  • Foss, N. J., Husted, K., Michailova, S., (2010). “Governing knowledge sharing in organizations: Levels of analysis, governance mechanisms, ve research directions”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 47, No. 3, 455-482.
  • Foss, N. J., (2011). “Invited editorial: Why micro-foundations for resource-based theory are needed and what they may look like”, Journal of Management, Vol. 37, No. 5, 1413-1428.
  • Gazzaniga, M. S., Heatherton, T. F., Halpern, D. F., (2010). Psychological Science, New York, Norton.
  • Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., Reynolds, C., (2013). Handbook of Creativity, Springer Science Business Media.
  • Gordon, G. G., (1991). “Industry determinants of organizational culture”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, No. 2, 396-415.
  • Granovetter, M. S., (1973). “The strength of weak ties”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, No. 6, 1360-1380.
  • Hambrick, D. C., Mason, P. A., (1984). “Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 9, No. 2, 193-206.
  • Harackiewicz, J. M., Manderlink, G., Sansone, C., (1984). “Rewarding pinball wizardry: Effects of evaluation and cue value on intrinsic interest”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 47, No. 2, 287-300.
  • Helfat, C. E., Finkelstein, S., Mitchell, W., Peteraf, M., Singh, H., Teece, D., Winter, S. G., (2009). Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations, John Wiley Sons.
  • Helfat, C. E., Peteraf, M. A., (2015). “Managerial cognitive capabilities and the microfoundations of dynamic capabilities”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 36, No. 6, 831-850.
  • Hodgkinson, G. P., Healey, M. P., (2011). “Psychological foundations of dynamic capabilities: Reflexion and reflection in strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 32, No. 13, 1500-1516.
  • Jacobides, M. G., Winter, S. G., (2012). “Capabilities: Structure, agency, and evolution”, Organization Science, Vol. 23, No. 5, 1365-1381.
  • Jaussi, K. S., Dionne, S. D., (2003). “Leading for creativity: The role of unconventional leader behavior”, The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 14, No. 4-5, 475-498.
  • Johnston, J., DiNardo, J., (1972). Econometric methods (Fourth Edition), McGraw-Hill, New York.
  • Johnson, G., Langley, A., Melin, L.,Whittington, R., (2007). Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources, Cambridge University Press.
  • Kim, S. W., (2006). “The effect of supply chain integration on the alignment between corporate competitive capability and supply chain operational capability”, International Journal of Operations Production Management, Vol. 26, No. 10, 1084-1107.
  • Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., Hornsby, J. S., (2005). “A Model of Middle Level Managers’ Entrepreneurial Behavior”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 29, No. 6, 699-716.
  • Lavie, D., (2006). “The competitive advantage of interconnected firms: An extension of the resource-based view”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 31, No. 3, 638-658.
  • Leonard, D., (1992). “Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, No. 2, 111-125.
  • Lindenberg, S., Foss, N. J., (2011). “Managing joint production motivation: The role of goal framing and governance mechanisms”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 3, 500-525.
  • Ludwig, A. M., (1992). Culture and creativity, American Journal of Psychotherapy, Vol. 46, No. 3, 454-469.
  • Mahringer, C. A., Renzl, B., (2018). Entrepreneurial initiatives as a microfoundation of dynamic capabilities, Journal of Accounting Organizational Change, Vol. 14, No. 1, 61-79.
  • Makadok, R., Burton, R., Barney, Jay B., (2018). “A practical guide for making theory contributions in strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 39, No. 6, 1530-1545.
  • Mantere, S., (2005). “Strategic practices as enablers and disablers of championing activity”, Strategic Organization, Vol. 3, No. 2, 157-184.
  • March, J. G., (1991). “Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning”, Organization Science, Vol, 2, No. 1, 71-87.
  • Matsumoto, D. R., (2009). The Cambridge Dictionary of Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • McCloskey, D. N., Ziliak, S. T., (1996). “The standard error of regressions”, Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 34, No. 1, 97-114.
  • McCoy, J. M., Evans, G. W., (2002). “The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity”, Creativity Research Journal, Vol. 14, No. 3-4, 409-426.
  • Maclean, D., Macintosh, R., Seidl, D., (2015). “Rethinking dynamic capabilities from a creative action perspective”, Strategic Organization, 13, 1-13.
  • Mumford, M. D., Gustafson, S. B., (1988). “Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103, No. 1, 27-43.
  • Nelson, Richard R., Winter, Sidney G., (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University, The Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England.
  • Newbert, S. L., (2007). “Empirical research on the resource‐based view of the firm: an assessment and suggestions for future research”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2, 121-146.
  • North, D. C., (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge University Press.
  • Ocasio, W., (1997). Towards an attention based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. Summer Special Issue, 187-206.
  • Osborn, A. F., (1963). Applied İmagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem-Solving, Revised Third Edition, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York.
  • Oswick, C., Fleming, P., Hanlon, G., (2011). “From borrowing to blending: Rethinking the processes of organizational theory building”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 36, No. 2, 318-337.
  • Peng, M. W., Sun, S. L., Pinkham, B., Chen, H., (2009). “The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod”, The Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol, 23, No. 3, 63-81.
  • Pentland, B. T., Rueter, H. H., (1994). “Organizational routines as grammars of action”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 3, 484-510.
  • Perry-Smith, J. E., Shalley, C. E., (2003). “The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 8, No. 1, 89-106.
  • Regnér, P. (2008). “Strategy-as-practice and dynamic capabilities: Steps towards a dynamic view of strategy”, Human Relations, Vol. 61, No. 4, 565-588.
  • Salvato, C., Rerup, C., (2011). “Beyond collective entities: Multilevel research on organizational routines and capabilities”, Journal of Management, Vol. 37, No, 2, 468-490.
  • Schein, E. H., (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership, John Wiley Sons.
  • Schumpeter, J. A., (1942). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, Harper and Brothers.
  • Sternberg, R. J., Lubart, T. I., (1999). The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. Handbook of Creativity, Vol. 1, 3-15.
  • Teece, D., Pisano, G. (1994). “The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction”, Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 3, No. 3, 537-556.
  • Teece, D. J., (2007). “Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 28, No. 13, 1319-1350.
  • Teece, D. J., (2009). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and Growth, Oxford University Press.
  • Teece, D. J., (2012). “Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 49, No. 8, 1395-1401.
  • Teece, D. J., (2014). “The foundations of enterprise performance: Dynamic and ordinary capabilities in an (economic) theory of firms”, The Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 28, No. 4, 328-352.
  • Teece, D. J., (2017). “A capability theory of the firm: an economics and (strategic) management perspective”, New Zealand Economic Papers, 1-43.
  • Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., (1997). “Dynamic capabilities and strategic management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18, No. 7, 509-533.
  • Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J. L., Klein, S. R., (1997). Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity, The Journal of Creative Behavior, Vol. 31, No. 1, 27-41.
  • Wacker, J. G., (2008). “A conceptual understanding of requirements for theory‐building research: Guidelines for scientific theory building”, Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 44, No. 3, 5-15.
  • Wang, C. L., Ahmed, P. K., (2007). “Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda” International Journal of Management Reviews, Vol. 9, No. 1, 31-51.
  • Winter, S. G., (2003). “Understanding dynamic capabilities”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 24, No. 10, 991-995.
  • Whetten, D. A., Felin, T., King, B. G., (2009). “The practice of theory borrowing in organizational studies: Current issues and future directions”. Journal of Management. Vol. 35, No. 3, 537-563.
  • Wood, R., Bandura, A., (1989). “Social cognitive theory of organizational management”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 14, No. 3, 361-384.
  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., Griffin, R. W., (1993). “Toward a theory of organizational creativity”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, 293-321.
  • Woodman, R. W., Schoenfeldt, L. F., (1989). Individual Differences in Creativity, Handbook of Creativity, Springer, 77-91.
  • Woodman, R. W., Schoenfeldt, L. F., (1990). “An interactionist model of creative behavior”, The journal of Creative Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 4, 279-290.
  • Wooldridge, B., Schmid, T., Floyd, S. W., (2008). “The middle management perspective on strategy process: Contributions, synthesis, and future research”, Journal of Management, Vol. 34, No. 6, 1190-1221.
  • Zahra, S. A., Newey, L. R., (2009). “Maximizing the impact of organization science: Theory building at the intersection of disciplines and/or fields”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46, No. 6, 1059-1075.
  • Zollo, M., Winter, S. G., (2002). “Deliberate learning and the evolution of dynamic capabilities”, Organization Science, Vol. 13, No. 3, 339-351.
  • Zuckerman, H., (1977). Scientific Elite: Nobel laureates in the United States, Transaction Publishers.