Veri Zarflama Analiziyle Türkiye’deki Bölgesel Kalkınma Ajanslarının Etkinliğinin Ölçülmesi

Bu çalışmada Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA) kullanılarak Türkiye’deki Bölgesel Kalkınma Ajanslarının (BKA) göreli performansları karşılaştırılmıştır VZA’nın amacı, benzer girdilerle benzer çıktılar üreten karşılaştırılabilir karar birimlerinin göreli etkinliklerini ölçmektir. Analiz sonucunda etkin olmayan karar birimleri için referans olacak karar birimleri belirlenmektedir.. Etkinlik skorları BKA tarafından yayınlanan faaliyet raporları baz alınarak hesaplanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucunda, elde edilen bulgulardan yola çıkarak BKA’nın performansının nasıl artırılabileceğine yönelik öneriler sunulmuştur.

Efficiency Measurement of Regional Development Agencies in Turkey by Using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)

In this study, relative efficiencies of Regional Development Agencies (RDA) work in Turkey were determined using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). The goal of DEA is to measure relative efficiencies of comparable Decision Making Units which produce similar input and output. At the end of the analysis, reference decision making units will be determined for inefficient decision making units. To do this data are gathered from efficiency reports of Regional Development Agencies and based on these data, efficiency scores are calculated. At the end of the study, recommendations are given with the help of findings to improve RDAs performances.

___

  • ADLER, N., FRIEDMAN, L., SINUANY-STERN, Z. (2002), “Review of Ranking Methods in the Data Envelopment Analysis Context”, European Journal of Operational Research, 140, 249–265.
  • ANSELL, C. (2000), “The Networked Polity: Regional Development in Western Europe”, Governance, 13(3), 303-333.
  • BACHTLER, J. and YUILL, D. (2001), “Policies and Strategies for Regional Development: A Shift in Paradigm?”, Regional and Industrial Policy Research Paper, Number: 46, European Policies Research Centre, UK.
  • BANKER, R. D., CHARNES, A., and COOPER, W. W. (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis,” Management Science, 30(9), 1078-1092.
  • CHARNES, A., COOPER, W.W., RHODES, E. (1978), “Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units,” European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
  • COOPER, W. W., SEIFORD, L. M., and TONE, K. (2007), Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With DEA-Solver Software and References, Springer, New York.
  • DDK (2014), Türkiye’nin Kalkınma Ajansları Uygulamasının Değerlendirilmesi, T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Devlet Denetleme Kurulu Araştırma ve İnceleme Raporu, 2014/3.
  • FARRELL, M. J. (1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 120(3), 253–281.
  • HALKIER, H., DANSON, M., DAMBORG, C. (1998), Regional Development Agencies in Europe, Jessica Kingsley. London.
  • KEATING, M.l (2004), “The Political Economy of Regionalism”, (Eds. Michael Keating, John Loughin), The Political Economy of Regionalism , 17-40, Routledge, UK.
  • MAILLAT, D. (1998), Interactions Between Urban Systems and Localized Productive Systems: An Approach to Endogenous Regional Development in Terms of Innovative Milieu, European Planning Studies, 6(2), 117-129.
  • MOUNTFORD, D. (2009), Organising for Local Development: The Role of Local Development Agencies, Summary Report, CFE/LEED(2009)18.
  • RAO, H. and BABU, M. D. (1996), “Intra-Regional Disparities In Hyderabad-Karnataka Region: An Analysis”, Regional Development: Problems and Policy Measures, (Ed. A. Aziz and S. Krishna), Concept Publishing Company, New Delhi.
  • SADIQ, S. (2011), “The Final Frontier: A SAS Approach to Data Envelopment Analysis”, in SAS Global Forum 2011 Operations Research, Paper, 198-2011.
  • STIMSON, R. J., STOUGH R. R., and ROBERTS B. H. (2006), Regional Economic Development: Analysis and Planning Strategy, Berlin: Springer.
  • TONE, K. (1996), “A Simple Characterization of Returns to Scale in DEA”, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 39(4), 604-613.