Üretken Enerji Ölçeği’nin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Amaç – Yapılan çalışmanın amacı; Cole, Bruch ve Vogel (2012) tarafından geliştirilen ve halen günümüzde de kullanılabileceği düşünülen Üretken Enerji Ölçeği’ni (Productive Energy Scale) Türkçe’ye uyarlamak ve ulusal yazına kazandırmaktır. Yöntem – Çalışma dört aşamadan oluşan bir süreç içerisinde gerçekleştirilmiştir. İlk aşamada, Üretken Enerji Ölçeği’nin kavramsal ve kuramsal arka planı tartışılmıştır. İkinci aşamada, ölçeğin Türkçe’ye çevirisi yapılmıştır. Bu aşamada Brislin (1970) tarafından önerilen çeviri ve geri çeviri yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Üçüncü ve dördüncü aşamalarda ise ölçeğin geçerlik ve güvenirlik analizleri yapılmıştır. Ölçeğin kapsam ve mantık geçerliği için uzman görüşüne başvurulmuş, yapı geçerliği ve güvenirlik analizlerinde ise ölçeğin Ankara ilinde yerleşik olan ve döküm endüstrisinde faaliyet gösteren ticari bir işletmede görevli 176 yönetici ve çalışana uygulanması sonucunda elde edilen veriler kullanılmıştır. Analizler SmartPLS paket programı ve R programlama dili kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular – Çalışmanın neticesinde; ölçeğin orijinalinde olduğu gibi üç boyutlu yapısını koruduğu ve güvenirliğinin oldukça yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu kapsamda Üretken Enerji Ölçeği’nin Türkiye’de sosyal bilimlerde yapılacak araştırmalarda kullanılabileceği değerlendirilmiştir. Tartışma – Yapılan çalışmanın örgütsel davranış yazınına, araştırmacılara ve yöneticilere katkı sağlayacağı öngörülmektedir.

Validity and Reliability Study of Productive Energy Scale

Purpose – The aim of present study is to adapt the Productive Energy Scale developed by Cole, Bruch and Vogel (2012) to Turkish and to bring the scale into Turkish literature. Design/methodology/approach – The study was carried out in four stages. In the first stage of the study, theoretical information about Productive Energy Scale was given. In the second stage of the study, the Turkish translation of the scale was made. At this stage, the translation and back translation method proposed by Brislin (1970) was used. In the third and fourth stages, the validity and reliability study of the scale was performed. For the content and logic validity of the scale, expert opinion was consulted, and the data obtained as a result of the application of the scale to 176 managers and employees working in a private enterprise in the foundry industry in Ankara were used in the analysis of structure validity and reliability. Analyzes were performed using SmartPLS software and R programming language. Findings – As a result of the study; it was determined that the scale has a three-dimensional structure as in the original and its reliability is quite high. In this context, Productive Energy Scale can be used in research to be done before each work in the social sciences in Turkey. Discussion – It is evaluated that the study will contribute to the organizational behavior literature, researchers and managers.

___

  • Alexiou, A. Khanagha, S. ve Schippers, M.C. (2019). Productive organizational energy mediates the impact of organizational structure on absorptive capacity. Long Range Planning, 52(2), 155-172.
  • Alpar, R. (2012). Uygulamalı İstatistik ve Geçerlik-Güvenirlik. Detay, Ankara.
  • Atwater, L. ve Carmeli, A. (2009). Leader–member exchange, feelings of energy, and involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 264-275.
  • Baker, W.E. (2019). Emotional energy, relational energy, and organizational energy: Toward a multilevel model. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 373–95.
  • Bayram, N. (2016). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş AMOS Uygulamaları. 3.b., Ezgi, Bursa.
  • Brislin, R. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185-216.
  • Bruch, H. ve Kunz, J.J. (2013). Organisational energy as the engine of success: Managing energy effectively with strategic HR development. In: (Matthias T. Meifert Eds.) Strategic Human Resource Development, Berlin: Springer, 329-338.
  • Bruch, H. ve Vogel, B. (2011). Fully charged: How great leaders boost their organization’s energy and ignite high performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  • Bruch, H., Walter, F. ve Voelpel, S. (2006). Charismatic leadership and collective mental energy: The mediating role of emotional energy and job involvement climate. Critical Management Studies Research Workshop, Atlanta.
  • Bruch, H. ve Ghoshal, S. (2003). Unleashing organizational energy. MIT Swan Management Review, Fall, 45-52.
  • Burns, T. ve Stalker, G. M. (2011). Mechanistic and organic systems of management. In: (Mary Godwyn ve Jody Hoffer Gittell Eds.) Sociology of Organizations: Structures and Relationships, SAGE Publications, 14-18.
  • Cole, M.S., Bruch, H. ve Vogel, B. (2012). Energy at work: A measurement validation and linkage to unit effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 445–467.
  • Cole, M.S., Bruch, H. ve Vogel, B. (2005). Development and validation of a measure of organizational energy. Proceedings of the Sixty-fourth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, https://journals.aom.org/doi/pdf/10.5465/ambpp.2005.18781081c Erişim Tarihi: 16.06.2020 14:07.
  • Compeau, D. ve Higgins, C. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211
  • Cross, R., Baker, W. ve Parker, A. (2003). What creates energy in organizations? MIT Swan Management Review, Summer, 51-53.
  • Dhawan, S.K., Roy, S. ve Kumar, S. (2002). Organizational energy: An empirical study in Indian R&D laboratories. R&D Management, 32(5), 397-408.
  • Eisenhardt, K.M, Furr, N.R. ve Bingham, C.B. (2010). Micro foundations of performance: Balancing efficiency and flexibility in dynamic environments. Organization Science, 21(6), 1263-1273.
  • Eisenhardt, K.M. ve Martin, J.A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105-1121.
  • Evans, J. D. (1996), Straightforward Statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing, USA.
  • Fornell, C. ve Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
  • Grobler, S. ve Grobler, A. (2019). Ethical leadership, person-organizational fit, and productive energy: A South African sectoral comparative study. Ethics & Behavior, https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2019.1699412.
  • Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. ve Anderson, R.E. (2006). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
  • Henseler, Jörg, Christian M. Ringle ve Marko Sarstedt (2015). A new criterion for assessing discirimant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135.
  • Kunze, F. ve Bruch, H. (2010). Age-based faultlines and perceived productive energy: The moderation of transformational leadership. Small Group Research, 41(5), 593-620.
  • Miner, J.B. (1980). Limited domain theories of organizational energy. (Craig C. Pinder ve Larry F. Moor Eds.) Middle Range Theory and the Study of Organizations, Martinus Nijhoff, Boston: 273-286.
  • Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Schiuma, G., Mason, S. ve Kennerly, M. (2007). Assessing energies within organizations. Measuring Business Excellence, 11(3), 69-78.
  • Seibert, S.E., Silver, S.R. ve Randolph, W.A. (2016). Taking empowerment to the next level: A multiple-level model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Acad. Manag. J. 47(3), 332-349.
  • Shirom, A. (2003). Feeling vigorous at work? The construct of vigor and the study of positive affects in organizations. In: (D. Ganster & P. L. Perrewe Eds.) Research in organizational stress and well-being, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 135-165.
  • Singh, B. ve Rao, M.K. (2016). Effect of intellectual capital on dynamic capabilities. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 29(2): 129-149.
  • Tosey, P. ve Smith, P.A.C. (1999). Assessing the learning organization: Part 2 – Exploring practical assessment approaches. The Learning Organization, 6(3), 107–115.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu