Örgütsel Dedikodu Kavramına Genel Bir Bakış: Bibliyometrik Analizi İle Kavramsal Çerçeveden Gelecek Araştırma Yönelimlerine

Amaç – Bu çalışmanın amacı örgütsel dedikodu kavramının örgütsel davranış yazını başta olmak üzere sosyal antropoloji, sosyal psikoloji, sosyoloji gibi yönetim yazını ile ilişkilendirilen çalışmaların bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile değerlendirilerek, Türk yazınında örgütsel dedikodu olgusuna yönelik yapılacak olan çalışmalara yön göstermektir. Yöntem – Web of Science Core Collection veri tabanında yer alan dedikodu ve örgütsel dedikodu kavramlarına yönelik 1990-2020 yılları arasında yayınlanan 681 makale bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle atıf analizi, bibliyografik eşleştirme, ortak atıf analizi, ortak-varlık analizi, ortak yazar ve bibliyometrik haritalama analizleri aracılığıyla değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular – Araştırma sonuçlarına göre dedikodu alanında en çok çalışılan konuların sosyal medya, sosyal ağ, kurumsal itibar, güç, iletişim, güven, şiddet olduğu örgütsel dedikodu kavramına yönelik olarak ise en çok çalışılan konuların proaktif davranışları, örgütsel dışlanma, kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk, sosyal sermaye, duygusal düzenleme, negatif duygular, sinizm, güç, itibar yönetimi, örgütsel sapma davranışı, örgütsel güven, mobbing, tükenmişlik, bilgi arama davranışı olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Tartışma – Dedikodu yazınına yönelik literatüre önemli katkılar sağlayan çalışmalar bulunsa da, konunun örgütsel davranış yazını kapsamında bütüncül bir incelemesine yönelik çalışmalar yetersiz kalmaktadır. Bu nedenle gelecek araştırma yönelimlerinin mevcut yazında yer alan perspektiflerden hareketle, örgütsel dedikodunun örgütler arası ve örgüt düzeyinde incelenmesi önerilmektedir.

A Review of Organizational Gossip: From Bibliometric Analysis to a Conceptual Framework and Future Research Directions

Purpose – The aim of this study is to evaluate the studies related to the management literature such as social anthropology, social psychology, sociology and especially organizational behavior, with the bibliometric analysis method and to guide the studies that will be directed towards the organizational gossip phenomenon in Turkish literature. Design/methodology/approach – The VOSwiever software was used to perform citation analysis, biblographic coupling, co-citation, co-occurrence analysis, co-autorship and bibliometric mapping method using bibliometric citation analysis on a sample of 681 articles, obtained from the Web of Science database. Influential journals, institutions, and trending articles in the gossip research are revealed published between 1990 and 2020. Findings – According to the results of the research, the most studied topics are social media, social network, corporate reputation, power, communication, trust, violence in the field of gossip and proactive behavior, organizational exclusion, corporate social responsibility, social capital, emotional regulation, negative emotions, cynicism, power, reputation, organizational deviation, organizational trust, mobbing, burnout, information seeking behavior in the field of organizational gossip. Discussion – Although there are studies that albeit significant progress to the literature on gossip, the studies for a holistic review of the subject within the scope of the organizational behavior literature remain insufficient. In this vein, future research directions claimed by the trending articles in the field, were examined of organizational gossip at the inter- organizational and organizational level is suggested.

___

  • Altuntaș, S., Șahin Altun, Ö., & Çevik Akyil, R. (2014). The nurses’ form of organizational communication: What is the role of gossip?. Contemporary Nurse, 48(1), 109-116.
  • Andersen, B. L., Cacioppo, J. T., & Roberts, D. C. (1995). Delay in seeking a cancer diagnosis: delay stages and psychophysiological comparison processes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 34(1), 33-52.
  • Ashkanasy, N. M., & Daus, C. S. (2005). Rumors of the death of emotional intelligence in organizational behavior are vastly exaggerated. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 441-452.
  • Babalola, M. T., Ren, S., Kobinah, T., Qu, Y. E., Garba, O. A., & Guo, L. (2019). Negative workplace gossip: Its impact on customer service performance and moderating roles of trait mindfulness and forgiveness. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 80, 136-143.
  • Baker, J. S., & Jones, M. A. (1996). The poison grapevine: How destructive are gossip and rumor in the workplace?. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7(1), 75-86.
  • Baumeister, R. F., Zhang, L., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 111–121.
  • Baumeister, R. F., Zhang, L., & Vohs, K. D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 111-121.
  • Bellek, M., Koparan, E., & Aykan, E. (2019). Stratejik yönetim alanında Türkiye’nin genel durumu: 1975-2019 yılları arası bibliyografik bir değerlendirme. Kayseri Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 58-90.
  • Ben-Hador, B. (2019). Social capital levels, gossip and employee performance in aviation and shipping companies in Israel. International Journal of Manpower, 40 (6), 1036-1055.
  • Boehm, C. (2012). Gossip and reputation in small-scale societies. The oxford handbook of gossip and reputation, 253-274.
  • Boğan, E., Çalışkan, C., & Dedeoğlu, B. B. (2018). Turizm yazınında kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk: Türkiye’de yapılan çalışmaların bibliyometrik analizi. Turizm Akademik Dergisi, 5(2), 47-62.
  • Brady, D. L., Brown, D. J., & Liang, L. H. (2017). Moving beyond assumptions of deviance: The reconceptualization and measurement of workplace gossip. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(1), 1.
  • Burt, R. S., & Knez, M. (1996). Trust and third-party gossip. Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research, Editör: Roderick M. Kramer, Tom R. Tyler, 68-89.
  • Cengiz, A. K. (2017). Bir Yerli Olma Bağlamında Dedikodu, Söylentiler ve Antakyalılık, Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, Yıl: 5, Sayı: 51, 311-327.
  • Cole, J. M., & Scrivener, H. (2013). Short term effects of gossip behavior on self-esteem. Current Psychology, 32(3), 252-260.
  • Crampton, S.M., Hodge, J.W. & Mishra, J.M. (1998). The informal communication network: factors influencing grapevine activity, Public Personnel Management, Vol. 27, No. 4, 569‐84.
  • Çetin, Ç. K., & Çaylan, D. Ö. (2015). Stratejik yönetim yazınının entelektüel yapısında değişim: 2001-2013 yılları arası bibliyometrik bir değerlendirme. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 29(1), 101-120.
  • Decoster, S., Camps, J., Stouten, J., Vandevyvere, L., & Tripp, T. M. (2013). Standing by your organization: The impact of organizational identification and abusive supervision on followers’ perceived cohesion and tendency to gossip. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(3), 623-634.
  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8, 100–110.
  • Durmuş, A., Kırılmaz, h., & Şahin, Ö. (2020). Is gossip associated with nurses’ job performance perceptions?. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 17-30.
  • Eder, D., & Enke, J. L. (1991). The structure of gossip: Opportunities and constraints on collective expression among adolescents. American Sociological Review, 494-508.
  • Ekşili, N., & Alparslan, A. M. (2016). Gündemdeki liderlik konuları: Journal Of Organizational Behavior Dergisinde bibliyometrik bir analiz (2010-2015). Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(16), 274-291.
  • Ellwardt, L., Labianca, G. J., & Wittek, R. (2012). Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work?: A social network perspective on workplace gossip. Social Networks, 34(2), 193-205.
  • Eroğlu, E. (2005). Yöneticilerin dedikodu ve söylentiye yönelik davranış biçimlerinin belirlenmesi Arfor Taşıma Hizmetleri AŞ’de bir uygulama. Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(13), 203-218.
  • Farley, S. D. (2011). Is gossip power? The inverse relationships between gossip, power, and likability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 574-579.
  • Fine, G. A., & Rosnow, R. L. (1978). Gossip, gossipers, gossiping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(1), 161–168.
  • Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78-99.
  • Fuchs, S. (1995). The stratified order of gossip: informal communication in organizations and science. Soziale Systeme, 1(1), 47-72.
  • Gabriel, Y. (1995). The unmanaged organization: Stories, fantasies and subjectivity. Organization Studies, 16(3), 477-501.
  • Gambetta, D. (1994). Godfather’s gossip. European Journal of Sociology, 35(02), 199-223.
  • Georganta, K., Panagopoulou, E., & Montgomery, A. (2014). Talking behind their backs: Negative gossip and burnout in Hospitals. Burnout Research, 1(2), 76-81.
  • Giardini, F., & Conte, R. (2012). Gossip for social control in natural and artificial societies. Simulation, 88(1), 18-32.
  • Giardini, F., & Wittek, R. P. (2019). Silence Is Golden. Six reasons ınhibiting the spread of third-party gossip. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-11.
  • Gluckman, M. (1968). Psychological, sociological and anthropological explanations of witchcraft and gossip: a clarification, Man, 3, 20–34.
  • Grosser, T., Kidwell, V., & Labianca, G. J. (2012). Hearing it through the grapevine: Positive and negative workplace gossip. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 52-61.
  • Hafen, S. (2004). Organizational gossip: A revolving door of regulation and resistance. Southern Journal of Communication, 69(3), 223-240.
  • Heath, C., Bell, C., & Sternberg, E. (2001). Emotional selection in memes: the case of urban legends. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1028.
  • Hofman, E. (2014). An obligation of conscience: gossip as social control in an eighteenth-century Flemish town. European Review of History: Revue Européenne d’histoire, 21(5), 653-670.
  • Houmanfar, R., & Johnson, R. (2004). Organizational implications of gossip and rumor. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 23(2-3), 117-138.
  • House, R. J., Shane, S. A., & Herold, D. M. (1996). Rumors of the death of dispositional research are vastly exaggerated. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 203-224.
  • Hozouri, M., Yaghmaei, M., & Bordbar, H. (2018). Clarifying the impacts of organizational silence on organizational commitment with controlling the effects of organizational rumors. Management Science Letters, 8(6), 533-542.
  • İpek, İ. (2019). Organizational learning in exporting: A bibliometric analysis and critical review of the empirical research. International Business Review, 28(3), 544-559.
  • Järvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (1993). The evolution of library and information science 1965–1985: A content analysis of journal articles. Information Processing & Management, 29(1), 129–144.
  • Jeuken, E., Beersma, B., ten Velden, F. S., & Dijkstra, M. T. (2015). Aggression as a motive for gossip during conflict: The role of power, social value orientation, and counterpart's behavior. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 8(3), 137-152.
  • Kim, A., Moon, J., & Shin, J. (2019). Justice perceptions, perceived insider status, and gossip at work: A social exchange perspective. Journal of Business Research, 97, 30-42.
  • Kniffin, K. M., & Sloan Wilson, D. (2010). Evolutionary perspectives on workplace gossip: Why and how gossip can serve groups. Group & Organization Management, 35(2), 150-176.
  • Kolb, D. M., & Putnam, L. L. (1992). The multiple faces of conflict in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 311-324.
  • Kuo, C. C., Chang, K., Quinton, S., Lu, C. Y., & Lee, I. (2015). Gossip in the workplace and the implications for HR management: A study of gossip and its relationship to employee cynicism. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(18), 2288-2307.
  • Kurland, N. B., & Pelled, L. H. (2000). Passing the word: Toward a model of gossip and power in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 25(2), 428-438.
  • Kurutkan, M. N., & Orhan, F. (2018). Sağlık politikası konusunun bilim haritalama teknikleri ile analizi. İksad Yayınevi, Türkiye.
  • Levent, F., & Türkmenoğlu, G. (2019). Okul yöneticilerinin dedikodu ve dedikodu yönetimine ilişkin görüşleri. OPUS Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(17), 787-814.
  • Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106–131.
  • Litman, J. A., & Pezzo, M. V. (2005). Individual differences in attitudes towards gossip. Personality and Individual Differences, 38(4), 963-980.
  • Liu, Y., & Lim, J. H. (2018). Positive gossip from leaders elicits employee voice. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2018, No. 1, p. 15336). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
  • Maditati, D. R., Munim, Z. H., Schramm, H. J., & Kummer, S. (2018). A review of green supply chain management: From bibliometric analysis to a conceptual framework and future research directions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 139, 150-162.
  • Michelson, G., Van Iterson, A., & Waddington, K. (2010). Gossip in organizations: Contexts, consequences, and controversies. Group & Organization Management, 35(4), 371-390.
  • Morrill, C. (1995). The Executive Way: Conflict Management in Corporations. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
  • Noon, M., & Delbridge, R. (1993). News from behind my hand: gossip in organizations. Organization Studies, 14(1), 23–36.
  • Özveren, C. G., & Büte, M. (2019). Dedikodu mekanizmasının psikososyal öncülleri ve sonuçları: araştırma görevlileri üzerine nitel bir araştırma. Journal of International Social Research, 12(66), 1138-1145.
  • Paquette, J. A., & Underwood, M. K. (1999). Gender differences in young adolescents’ experiences of peer victimization: Social and physical aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45, 242–266.
  • Pheko, M. M. (2018). Rumors and gossip as tools of social undermining and social dominance in workplace bullying and mobbing practices: A closer look at perceived perpetrator motives. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 28(4), 449-465.
  • Robinson, K. L., & Thelen, P. D. (2018). What makes the grapevine so effective? An employee perspective on employee-organization communication and peer-to-peer Communication. Public Relations Journal, 12(2).
  • Rooks, G., Tazelaar, F., & Snijders, C. (2011). Gossip and reputation in business networks. European Sociological Review, 27(1), 90-106.
  • Seglen, Per O. (1994). Causal relationship between article citedness and journal impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45 (1), 1-11.
  • Soeters, J., & van Iterson, A. (2002). Blame and praise gossip in organizations: Established, outsiders and the civilising process. Advances in Organization Studies, 10, 25-40.
  • Şantaş, G., Akbolat, M., & Sağlam, H. (2019). Sağlık çalışanlarında örgütsel affetme, örgütsel dedikodu ve intikam niyeti arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (36), 131-148.
  • Taşkın, Z., & Çakmak, T. (2010). Başlangıcından bugüne Bilgi Dünyası Dergisi'nin bibliyometrik profili. Bilgi Dünyası, 11(2), 332-348.
  • Tian, Q. T., Song, Y., Kwan, H. K., & Li, X. (2019). Workplace gossip and frontline employees’ proactive service performance. The Service Industries Journal, 39(1), 25-42.
  • Vaidyanathan, B., Khalsa, S., & Ecklund, E. H. (2016). Gossip as social control: Informal sanctions on ethical violations in scientific workplaces. Social Problems, 63(4), 554-572.
  • Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538.
  • Van Iterson, A., & Clegg, S. R. (2008). The politics of gossip and denial in interorganizational relations. Human Relations, 61(8), 1117-1137.
  • Van Raan, A. F. J. (2012). Properties of journal impact in relation to bibliometric research group performance indicators. Scientometrics, 92(2), 457–469.
  • Waddington, K. (2012). Gossip and organizations. Routledge, London.
  • Wittek, R., & Wielers, R. (1998). Gossip in organizations. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 4(2), 189-204.
  • Wu, J., Balliet, D., & Van Lange, P. A. (2016). Gossip versus punishment: The efficiency of reputation to promote and maintain cooperation. Scientific Reports, 6, 23919.
  • Wu, X., Kwan, H. K., Wu, L. Z., & Ma, J. (2018). The effect of workplace negative gossip on employee proactive behavior in China: The moderating role of traditionality. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(4), 801-815.
  • Xie, J., Huang, Q., Wang, H., & Shen, M. (2018). Coping with negative workplace gossip: the roles of self-monitoring and impression management. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2018, No. 1, p. 10649). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
  • Zinko, R., Furner, C. P., Herdman, A., & Wikhamn, W. (2011). Gossip: A vehicle for the development of personal reputation in organizations. Journal of Organizational Moral Psychology, 2(1), 39-47.
İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1309-0712
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2009
  • Yayıncı: Melih Topaloğlu