KADIN ÇALIŞANLARIN TOPLUMSAL CİNSİYET ALGILARI VE İŞE ADANMIŞLIKLARI ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Toplumsal cinsiyet algısı bireylerin toplumdaki görev, sorumluluk ve kendilerinden olan beklentileri belirleyen cinsiyet normlarına dayanır. Toplumsal cinsiyet algısı kadınların yaşamın farklı alanlarındaki sorumluluklarını yerine getirmede kullandıkları referans olarak tanımlanmaktadır. İş yaşamı toplumsal cinsiyet algısının etkin olarak hissedildiği bir alan olarak kadınların yaşamında bir yer kapsamaktadır. Çalışanların adanmışlıklarının işletmenin performansını etkilediği gözönüne alındığında işgücünün büyük bir kısmını oluşturan kadın çalışanların adanmışlarının toplumsal cinsiyet algısı tarafından etkilenebileceği düşünülmüştür. Yayılım kuramı (Spillover Theory) çerçevesinde kurulan modelin araştırılması için Sinop il ve ilçelerinde kamu ve özel sektörde ücretli çalışan kadınlardan oluşan örneklem kullanılmıştır. Örneklemden toplanan veriler bir istatistik programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Regresyon sonuçlarına göre toplumsal cinsiyet algısının adanmışlığı etkilediği görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Kadın Çalışanlar, İşe Adanmışlık, Toplumsal Cinsiyet Algısı

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOCIAL GENDER PERCEPTIONS AND FEMALE EMPLOYEE COMMITMENT

Social gender perception based on the gender perceptions which determine duty, responsibility and expectations of individuals in a society. Social gender perceptions is defined as a reference which is used by women while fullfilling their resposibilities in their different areas of life. Work is accepted as major part of female’s life in which effect of social gender perception is sensed. When considered that emplyee’s commitment affects the performance of organizations female employee’s commitment might associate with social gender perceptions. Female employees working in government and private sectors of Sinop and its districts are consisting the sample group of the research. The researcy frame is based on spillover theory. Data gathered from sample was analyzed with an statistical programme. According to the regression test results effect of social gender perception on employee commitment was observed.

Keywords:

Woman Employees, Work Engagement, Social Gender Perceiveness,

PDF

___

Bailey, C., Madden, A., Alfes, K., & Fletcher, L. (2017). The meaning, antecedents and outcomes of employee engagement: A narrative synthesis. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 31-53.Barnes, D., & E. Collier, J. (2013). Investigating work engagement in the service environment. Journal of Services Marketing, 27(6), 485-499.Bicchieri, C. (2014). Norms, conventions, and the power of expectations. Philosophy of Social Science: A New Introduction, 208-229.Bicchieri, C., & Chavez, A. (2010). Behaving as expected: Public information and fairness norms. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(2), 161-178. Chen, J. V., Yen, D. C., Rajkumar, T. M., & Tomochko, N. A. (2011). The antecedent factors on trust and commitment in supply chain relationships. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 33(3), 262-270.Cogin, J. A., & Fish, A. (2009). An empirical investigation of sexual harassment and work engagement: Surprising differences between men and women. Journal of Management & Organization, 15(1), 47-61.Del Líbano, M., Llorens, S., Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2012). About the dark and bright sides of self-efficacy: Workaholism and work engagement. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 688-701.Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., and Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 2, pp. 357-411). New York: McGraw-Hill.Gallup (2012). Gallup Engagement Index. (http://eu.gallup.com/berlin /118645/gallup-engagement-index.aspx, 13.04.2017 tarihinde erişildi).Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. & Lindzey, G. (Eds.) (1998) Handbook of social psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling, by Arlie Russell Hochschild. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 692-724.Karatepe, O.M. (2012). Job resources,work engagement, and hotel employee outcomes: a time-lagged analysis, Economic Research, 25, 1127-1140.Mendes, F. & Stander, M.W. (2011). Positive organisation: The role of leader behaviour in work engagement and retention, South African Journal of Industrial Psychology, 37 (1), 1-13.Rees, C., Alfes, K. & Gatenby, M. (2013). Employee voice and engagement: connections and consequences, International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24, 2780-2798.Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of Categorization. In Rosch, E. and Lloyd, B. (Eds), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Rothbard, N.P. (2001). Enriching or Depleting? The Dynamics of Engagement in Work and Family Roles, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 655-84.Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E. & Schaufeli, W.B. (2009). Reciprocal relationships between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74, 235–244.Wong,C.A.,Laschinger, S. & Cummings, G. G. (2010). Authentic Leadership and Nurses' Voice Behaviour and Perceptions of Care Quality, Journal of Nursing Management, 18, 889-900.