Türkiye'deki bazı hava alanlarında iç hat uçuşları için uçak seçiminde çevresel etkilerin göz önünde bulundurulmasının incelenmesi

Havayolu işletmelerinin hava aracı satın alım süreçlerini etkileyen en önemli iki parametre işletme stratejisi ve karar vericinin yatırım politikasıdır. İşletmeler, sahip oldukları filo tipi ve uçuş rotalarının özelliklerine göre bu iki parametrenin önem sırasını değiştirebilir. Küresel ısınmanın önem kazandığı ve çevresel bilincin arttığı günümüzde uçak alımlarında çevresel parametreler de göz önünde bulundurulmalıdır. Bu çalışmada, Eskişehir, Uşak, Adıyaman, Çanakkale ve Ağrı’da gerçekleştirilen 2006 ile 2009 yılları arasındaki iç hat uçuşlarının çevresel etkileri incelenmiştir. Türkiye’deki bu iç hatlarda halen kullanılan dar gövdeli ve büyük uçakların yerine, bölgesel jet uçaklarının tercih edilmesiyle, iniş ve kalkış safhasında oluşan uçak emisyonlarının insan sağlığı üzerindeki etkileri % 62,72 ve ekosistem kalitesi üzerindeki etkisi ise % 68,10 oranında azalacağı bu çalışmada yapılan analizlerde öngörülmektedir. Havayolu işletmelerinin, uçak doluluk oranlarını dikkate alarak belirli uçuş hatlarında bölgesel jet uçaklarını kullanarak havayolu taşımacılığının çevre üzerinde etkilerini en küçüklemesinin, yolcular tarafından önemli bir tercih nedeni olacağı düşünülebilir.

Investigation of the environmental concern in aircraft selection for domestic flights in some Turkish airports

The two most important parameters that affect airlines’ aircraft purchase process are the management strategy and investment policy of the decision maker. Airlines may change the priority of these parameters, due to the characteristics of a fleet and flight path. Nowadays, as the global warming is going to be more critical than ever before and the environmental awareness is increasing every day, environmental parameter should be taken into consideration in aircraft purchases. In this study, environmental impacts of domestic flights at Eskişehir, Uşak, Adıyaman, Ağrı and Çanakkale airports between 2006 and 2009 was investigated. As a result, it is envisioned that impact of aircraft emissions at take-off and landing (LTO) phases will drop 62.72% and 68.10% on human health and on the ecosystem quality, respectively, if the regional jet aircrafts will be preferred instead of currently used narrow-body and large aircrafts in these domestic routes. It is anticipated that if airlines minimize environmental impacts of their aircrafts this will be a preference criterion for passengers.

PDF

___

[1] Air Transport Action Group (ATAG), “The economic and social benefits of air transport 2008” http://www.atag.org/files/ATAG%20brochure- 124015A.pdf Siteye giriş: 01.04.2010.
[2] Bernstein et al. (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report (adopted section by section at IPCC Plenary XXVII in Valencia, Spain, 12 – 17 November 2007).
[3] Hancox R, Lowe S, Pulles H, Velzen A, Baarse G, (2001) “Evaluating the economic and environmental effects of measures to reduce aircraft emissions. [Review about aviation emissions that prepared for Association for European Transport]”.
[4] International Business Aviation Council (2009) “[Review of emission trading scheme (ETS) implementation within EU]. European Union emission trading scheme (ETS) requirements for non-EU registered aircraft” IBAC Bulletin 09-01, 27.05.2009.
[5] ICAO Secretariat (2007) “Airport air quality guidance manual” Report No. Doc 9889.
[6] Jenichen EA (2009) “Embraer market outlook 2009 – 2028 6th ed.” Embraer – Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica SA.
[7] ICAO Secretariat (2004) “Operational opportunities to minimize fuel use and reduce emissions” Report No. CIR 303 AN/176.
[8] Gonzalez RK (2009) “Annual report of the Council 2008” Report No. Doc – 9916.
[9] Clark P (2007) “Buying the Big Jets; Fleet Planning for Airlines” Ashgate publish, İngiltere. ISBN:978-0-7546-7091-9.
[10] Airbus Press Release (2009) “Saudi Arabia airlines first A320” http://www.airbus.com/en/presscentre/pressreleases/pr essreleases_items/09_10_01_saudi_arabia_airlines_fir st_a320.html Siteye giriş: 03.03.2010.
[11] Boeing Press Release (2003) “A World of Service for the Boeing 737” http://www.boeing.com/commercial/news/feature/737. html Siteye giriş: 03.03.2010.
[12] Bae Systems Product Information Service (2010) “Bae systems product information” http://www.baesystems.com/ProductsServices/ra_ba1 46.html Siteye giriş: 03.03.2010.
[13] Bae Systems Product Information Service (2010) “Bae systems product information” http://www.baesystems.com/ProductsServices/ra_avro _rj.html Siteye giriş: 03.03.2010.
[14] Bombardier Product Information Service (2010) “Bombardier product information” http://www.crj.bombardier.com/CRJ/en/crjstory.jsp?la ngId=en&crjId=revolution&lastId=range.jsp?crjId=70 5 Siteye giriş: 03.03.2010.
[15] Embraer Product Information Service (2010) “Embraer product information” http://www.embraercommercialjets.com/english/conte nt/erj/default.asp?tela=success Siteye giriş: 03.03.2010.
[16] ATR Aircraft Product Information Service (2010) “ATR aircraft systems product information” http://www.atraircraft.com/public/atr/html/products/pr oducts.php?aid=508&pid=30442 Siteye giriş: 03.03.2010.
[17] Embraer Product Information Service (2010) “Embraer product information” http://www.embraer.com/english/content/aeronaves/e mb120.asp?tela=firm_orders Siteye giriş: 03.03.2010.
[18] ICAO Secretariat (2008) “Annex 16 — environmental protection volume II — aircraft engine emissions” ISBN 978-92-9231-123-0.
[19] Gonzalez R.K. (2009) “Annual report of the Council 2008” Report No. Doc – 9916.
[20] ICAO Secretariat (2007) “Outlook for air transport to the year 2025” Report No. Cir 313.
[21] ICAO Secretariat (2001) “Background information paper – aircraft engine emissions ICAO’s existing policies (EnvColl-BIP/5, 3/4/01)” Presented in Colloquium on Environmental Aspects of Aviation in Montreal, 9 – 11 April 2001.
[22] Skeie RB, Fuglestvedt J, Berntsen T, Lund MT, Myhre G, Rypdal K (2009) “Global temperature change from the transport sectors: Historical development and future scenarios” Atmospheric Environment 43(39): 6260-6270 (doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.05.025).
[23] Kesgin U. “Aircraft emissions at Turkish airports” Energy 31;372–384 (2006).
[24] Tınmaz E, Özkan A, Akpınar A. “Aircraft originated air pollution in the example of Çorlu airport” Journal of Environmental Protection and Ecology, 3(3);586-592;(2002).
[25] Kaygusuz K. “Energy policy and climate change in Turkey” Energy Conver Manage 44;1671– 1688 (2003).
[26] Cleveland CJ (2004) “Encyclopedia of energy” Elsevier Academic Press.
[27] Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2000) “The eco- indicator 99: A damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment” Pré Consultants www.pre.nl/eco- indicator99/ Siteye giriş: 01.03.2010.
[28] DHMI, Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi, http://www.dhmi.gov.tr/istatistik.aspx Siteye giriş: 01.04.2010.
[29] Dopelheur A (2000) “Aircraft emission parameter modelling” Air and Space Europe 2: 34-37
[30] ICAO Secretariat (2009) “ICAO engine exhaust emissions data bank” Report No. Doc 9646 http://www.icao.int/icao/en/download.htm#Aircraft Siteye giriş: 03.03.2010.
[31] Tunca F, Altuntas O, Karakoc TH. “Effects of emissions to the human health and ecological quality for selection of commercial aircraft in airways” 5th International Ege Energy Symposium and Exhibition, paper no: IEESE196, Denizli, Türkiye.