ÜNİVERSİTE GENÇLİĞİNİN DİJİTAL OKURYAZARLIK DÜZEYLERİ: ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ ÖĞRENCİLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

1. yüzyıl, sosyal, ekonomik, teknolojik vb. alanda pek çok gelişmenin ve değişimlerin hızlı yaşandığı bir dönemdir. Bu zaman dilimi, bireylerin yaşam boyu öğrenme, analitik düşünme becerisine sahip olmayı amaçlayan, sorgulayan, araştıran, teknolojiyi kullanabilen, tartışan, yaratıcı, üretken, girişimci, ürettiğini paylaşan ve daha birçok becerilerin kazanıldığı ''Enformasyon Çağı'' olarak da adlandırılmaktadır. Hızlı teknolojik gelişmelerin ve yeniliklerin dayattığı dijital medya okuryazarlığı bu çağın gereksinimlerindendir. Bu çalışma dijital araçları kullanan bireylerin toplumsal kazanım ve dijital okuryazarlık ilişkilerini ortaya çıkarma girişimidir. Sosyal ağları ve buna yönelik uygulamaları kullanan gençlerin, bu sayede sosyal ilişkilerine sağladığı olumlu ve olumsuz katkılar bu araştırmada sorun edilmektedir. Bu araştırmada üniversite temel bilgi teknolojisi eğitimi almış öğrencilerden oluşan örneklemle çalışılmaktadır. Online etkinlikler, etkileşim ağlarının boyutları, sosyal ağ çeşitliliği, güvenirlik, bilgi kaynağı, gizlilik, içerik üretme ve yönetme vb. gibi aktiviteler zaman ve sıklık boyutunda dijital okuryazarlık ilişkisi değerlendirilmektedir. Veri toplama tekniği olarak yüz yüze anket kullanılmaktadır. Demografik özellikler de bu bağlamda değerlendirilmektedir. Dijital cihazların ustaca kullanılması, dijital dünyada daha çok zaman geçirilmesi, kullanıcıların teknolojiyi bilgece kullandığı anlamına gelmemektedir. Dijital becerilerin boyutları ile eleştirel bakış paralellik taşımamaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Dijital Okuryazarlık, Dijital Yerli, Sosyal Ağlar, Dijital Teknoloji

DIGITAL LITERACY LEVELS OF UNIVERSITY YOUTH: A RESEARCH ON THE STUDENTS OF ANADOLU UNIVERSITY

ThThe 21st century is a period when many developments and changes have accelerated in the field of social, economic, technological, etc. This period of time is also called as the "Information Age" in which individuals are aimed at having lifelong learning, analytical thinking skills, questioning, researching, using technology, using controversial, creative, productive, entrepreneurial. Rapid technological developments and innovation-driven digital media literacy are the requirements of this age. This study is an attempt to reveal the relationship between social gain and digital media literacy for network-based individuals. The problem of this research is the positive and negative contributions in social relations of young people who are connected to more than one network through digital media literacy. In this research, the sample is selected from the students who have received basic information technology education in their university. Online activities, dimensions of interaction networks, social networking diversity, strong and weak links, reliability, information source, privacy, generating and managing content, and so on. are related to digital literacy in terms of time and frequency. Demographic characteristics are evaluated in this context. The ingenious use of digital devices, more time spent in the digital world does not mean that users use technology wisely. Critical views do not parallel the dimensions of digital skills.

Keywords:

Digital Literacy, Digital Native, Social Network, Digital Technology,

PDF

___

Arıkan R (2004) Araştırma Teknikleri Ve Rapor Hazırlama. Asil Yayın, Ankara.
Baker E (2000) Integrating Literacy and Tool-Based Technologies, Computers in the Schools, 16:2, 73-89.
Buckingham D (2006) Defining Digital Literacy - What Do Young People Need To Know About Digital Learning? In: Digital Kompetanse-Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy. n. 4. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2006. Retrieved from http://www.idunn.no/ts/dk/2006/04/defining_digital_literacy_-_what_do_young_people_need_to_know_about_digital.
Curzon, S. C. (ed.). (1995). Information competencies final report: A report submitted to Commission on Learning Resources and Instructional Technology Work Group on Information Competence CLRIT Task 6.1. 29 Ekim 2010 tarihinde http://www.calstate.edu/AcadSen/Records/Reports/ic.shtml adresinden erişildi.
Duggan F (2013) Why Universities Should Acquire - And Teach - Digital Literacy. The Guardian. Available from http://www.theguardian.com/education/2013/apr/23/universities-should-teach-digitalliteracy
Eshet-Alkalai Y (2004) Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework For Survival Skills in the Digital Era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106.
Evering LC ve Moorman G (2012) Rethinking Plagiarism in the Digital Age, Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy International Reading Association. 56(1) September (pp. 35-44)
Ferrari A (2013) DIGCOMP: A Framework For Developing And Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. Edited by Yves Punie and Barbara N. Breč ko Seville: JRC-IPTS. Available fromhttp://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC83167.pdf
Gilster P (1997). Digital Literacy, John Wiley. New York.
Ito M, Horst H, Bittanti M, Boyd D, Herr-Stephenson B, Lange PG et al. Living and Learning With New Media: Summary Of Findings From The Digital Youth Project (2008) Retrieved 20.07.11 fromhttp://digitalyouth.ischool.berkeley.edu/files/report/digitalyouth-WhitePaper.pdf
Jenkins, H (2006) Convergence Culture. Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press, New York.
Jenkins H, Clinton K, Purushotma R, Robison A J, & Weigel M (2009) Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for The 21st Century, MacArthur Foundation, Chicago, IL.
Kirschner P A & De Bruyckere P (2017) The Myths Of The Digital Native And The Multitasker, Teaching and Teacher Education 67, Elsevier Ltd, 135-142. Retreived fromhttps://ac.els-cdn.com/S0742051X16306692/1-s2.0-S0742051X16306692-main.pdf?_tid=316e2c9b-87a9-4d20-a606-c35965ebdca9&acdnat=1523255745_f212282e8ab7e3e83a3ab24008c646cb
Livingstone S, Van Couvering E & Thumim N (2005) Adult Media Literacy: A Review of the Research Literature, Ofcom, London.
Media Awareness Network (2010) Digital literacy in Canada: From inclusion to transformation. A submission to the Digital Economy Strategy Consultation. Available from http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/028.nsf/eng/00454.html
Murray M C, & Pérez J (2014) Unraveling the Digital Literacy Paradox: How Higher Education Fails At The Fourth Literacy. Issues İn Informing Science And Information Technology, 11, 85-100. Retreived from http://iisit.org/Vol11/IISITv11p085-100Murray0507.pdf
Ng W (2012) Can we teach digital natives digital literacy?, Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078. Retreived from https://ac.els-cdn.com/S0360131512001005/1-s2.0-S0360131512001005-main.pdf?_tid=ed849775-eb55-4c8a-9957-3bff2b194b72&acdnat=1522826182_c4180482b70c763835e8fabeea6d8d0c
Özbay M ve Özdemir O (2014) Türkçe Öğretim Programı İçin Bir Öneri: Dijital Okuryazarlığa Yönelik Amaç ve Kazanımlar, Okuma Yazma Eğitimi Araştırmaları, 2(2), 31-40 / Research in Reading & Writing Instruction, 2(2), 31-40 Retreived from http://www.rrwi.org/article/view/1059000026
Prensky M (2001) Digital Natives Digital Immigrants, From On the Horizon (MCB University Press, Vol. 9 No. 5, October 2001), Retreived from https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/10748120110424816
Scanlon P M and Neumann D R (2002) Internet Plagiarism Among College Students, Journal of College Student Development, Vol 43 No:3 May/June 374-385
Williams J, Clemens S, Oleinikova K & Tarvin K (2003) The Skills for Life Survey:A National Needs and Impact Survey of Literacy, Numeracy and ICT Skills London: Department for Education and Skills.
Beacons of the Information Society: The Alexandria Proclamation on Information Literacy and Lifelong Learning, https://www.ifla.org/publications/beacons-of-the-information-society-the-alexandria-proclamation-on-information-literacy Erişim tarihi: 10 Mayıs 2018.
https://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2017_01/13152934_basYn_aYklamasY_13012017.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 10 Nisan 2018.
http://hbogm.meb.gov.tr/modulerprogramlar/kurslar/Ki%C5%9Fisel%20Geli%C5%9Fim%20ve%20E%C4%9Fitim_Dijital%20Yetkinlikler.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 10 Nisan 2018.